We added scorings for
Yonghesuchus sangbiensis, based upon our original observations of the holotype of this taxon (IVPP V 12378), to the morphological cladistic data set of Nesbitt [2 ]. We also added a new character to the data set, resulting in a modified data matrix composed of 413 characters and 78 taxa (following the a priori pruning of the following operational taxonomic units [OTUs] that were also excluded by Nesbitt [2 ]:
Archosaurus rossicus,
Prestosuchus chiniquensis, UFRGS 0156 T, UFRGS 0152 T,
Lewisuchus admixtus and
Pseudolagosuchus major). In addition, several scorings for
Gracilisuchus stipanicicorum and
Turfanosuchus dabanensis were modified based upon new direct observations and interpretations of the relevant specimens. Additional file
1 provides details of and justifications for all rescorings and Additional file
2 is the data matrix. This data matrix is also available at TreeBASE (
http://purl.org/phylo/treebase/phylows/study/TB2:S15917).
The data matrix was analysed under equally weighted parsimony using TNT 1.1 [21 (
link)]. A heuristic search with 100 replicates of Wagner trees (with random addition sequence) followed by TBR branch-swapping (holding 10 trees per replicate) was performed. The best trees obtained from the replicates were subjected to a final round of TBR branch swapping. Zero length branches in any of the recovered MPTs were collapsed (rule 1 of Coddington & Scharff [22 (
link)]). Characters 32, 52, 75, 121, 137, 139, 156, 168, 188, 223, 247, 258, 269, 271, 291, 297, 328, 356 and 399 were treated as additive (ordered) following Nesbitt [2 ], as was the new character 413. Decay indices (=Bremer support values) were calculated and a bootstrap resampling analysis, using 10,000 pseudoreplicates, was performed reporting both absolute and GC (i.e. difference between the frequencies of recovery in pseudoreplicates of the original group and the most frequently recovered contradictory group) frequencies. Templeton tests (T-t) were conducted using PAUP* 4.0 [23 ] to determine the significance of alternative phylogenetic topologies, with a 5% threshold for significance (p-value ≤ 0.05 = significantly less parsimonious [S]; p-value > 0.05 = non-significant [NS]).
Nesbitt & Butler [20 (
link)] included the enigmatic archosaurs
Erpetosuchus granti and
Parringtonia gracilis within the data matrix of Nesbitt [2 ]. They recovered
E. granti and
P. gracilis within a monophyletic Erpetosuchidae; however, this clade acted as a wildcard taxon that substantially reduced phylogenetic consensus within Archosauria. Erpetosuchidae was recovered by Nesbitt & Butler [20 (
link)] within a major polytomy that also included Avemetatarsalia, Ornithosuchidae, Aetosauria +
Revueltosaurus,
Ticinosuchus + Paracrocodylomorpha,
G. stipanicicorum and
T. dabanensis. It is noteworthy that Erpetosuchidae was found as the sister taxon of
T. dabanensis in some of the most parsimonious trees recovered by Nesbitt & Butler [20 (
link)]. As a result, we conducted a second analysis where we added
E. granti and
P. gracilis to the data matrix. Character scorings for the two erpetosuchids follow Nesbitt & Butler [20 (
link)], with the exception of the scorings for the new character added here. This data matrix was therefore composed of 413 characters and 80 taxa, and was analysed under the same search criteria described above. This modified data matrix is supplied as Additional file
3, and is also available at TreeBASE as submission S15917 (
http://iczn.org/code).
There is some disagreement over the identification and interpretation of the element described as the astragalus of
T. dabanensis by Wu & Russell [12 (
link)], with Nesbitt [2 ] scoring all astragalus characters as uncertain for
T. dabanensis. To reflect this uncertainty, we reran both of the analyses described above, but rescored all astragalus characters (characters 354–370) as uncertain for
T. dabanensis.
Butler R.J., Sullivan C., Ezcurra M.D., Liu J., Lecuona A, & Sookias R.B. (2014). New clade of enigmatic early archosaurs yields insights into early pseudosuchian phylogeny and the biogeography of the archosaur radiation. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 14, 128.