Hepatic Artery
It originates from the celiac trunk and divides into the left and right hepatic arteries, which further branch to provide blood flow to the various lobes of the liver.
The hepatic artery plays a crucial role in liver function and is an important consideration in hepatic research, surgical procedures, and disease processes affecting the liver.
Optimizing research protocols related to the hepatic artery can lead to advancements in our understanding and treatment of liver-related conditions.
Most cited protocols related to «Hepatic Artery»
LEOPARD-2 trial flow diagram according to SPIRIT [36 (link)]. EQ-5D-5 L, Euro-QoL five health dimensions questionnaire; HA, hepatic artery; IC, informed consent; PV, portal vein; QLQ-C30, Quality of life questionnaire including 30 questions; SMA, superior mesenteric artery; SMV, superior mesenteric vein
In the HAIC group, patients were treated using a 3-week cycle regimen. A catheter was advanced into the hepatic artery according to our previously reported protocol [16 (link)]. A microcatheter was selectively placed into the feeding arteries of the tumor. The gastroduodenal artery was occluded by a coil when necessary. Then, the microcatheter was connected to the artery infusion pump to administer the following treatment: OXA, 85 mg/m2 intra-arterial infusion on day 1; LV, 400 mg/m2 intra-arterial infusion on day 1; and 5-FU, 400 mg/m2 bolus infusion on day 1 and 2400 mg/m2 continuous infusion over 46 h. After HAIC was completed, the indwelling catheter and the sheath were removed, and manual compression was performed to achieve hemostasis.
HAIC and TACE were discontinued when disease progression (including vascular invasion or the development of extrahepatic spread) or intolerable AEs occurred or when the patient was eligible for another treatment (surgical resection) or withdrew consent. Additionally, the study treatment was suspended when the following conditions occurred: technical difficulty in repeating the treatment (stenosis or occlusion of the tumor-feeding artery or an artery only supplied by the extrahepatic collateral arteries) or unsuitable characteristics (neutrophil count < 1200/μL, platelet count < 60,000/μL, total bilirubin > 30 mmol/L, or albumin < 3.0 mg/dL). The study treatment was stopped if no recovery occurred after a 30-day delay.
If the study treatment was discontinued, the following treatment was defined as subsequent treatment. The subsequent treatment decisions of both groups would be made according to the same protocol by the same multidisciplinary team, based on the tumor burden, liver function, and the patient’s request. Basically, hepatic resections were performed on patients whose tumor shrank to be resectable. For patients with tumor progression without contraindications to TACE, repeating TACE was recommended. For patients whose residual tumors could not be embolized due to technical problems, radiofrequency ablations were used to destroy residual tumors when it was feasible. Conservative treatments were given to patients with terminal HCC, Child–Pugh C liver function, or Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score > 2 [32 (link)].
All patients underwent pretreatment examination using a 64-slice MDCT. Computed tomography (CT) was performed according to a defined pancreas protocol as 4-phasic contrast-enhanced MDCT with thin slices at intervals of 1 mm. In the present study, all of these 100 patients were reclassified into the 3 groups (R, BR, and UR) according to NCCN guidelines (2010)7 based on MDCT findings at the initial visit to our hospital. The CT criteria of the NCCN guidelines are as follows: R criteria, (1) no evidence of SMV and PV abutment, distortion, tumor thrombus, or venous encasement and (2) clear fat planes around the CA, hepatic artery, and SMA; BR criteria, (1) venous involvement of the PV/SMV demonstrating tumor abutment without impingement and narrowing of the lumen, encasement of the PV/SMV without encasement of the nearby arteries, or short-segment venous occlusion resulting from either tumor thrombus or encasement but with suitable vessel proximal and distal to the area of vessel involvement, allowing for safe resection and reconstruction, (2) gastroduodenal artery encasement up to the hepatic artery with either short-segment encasement or direct abutment of the hepatic artery without extension to the CA, and (3) tumor abutment of the SMA not exceeding greater than 180° of the circumference of the vessel wall; and UR criteria, (1) greater than 180° of SMA encasement, celiac involvement (any abutment of the head with a greater than 180° encasement of the body or tail), (2) unreconstructive PV/SMV occlusion, and (3) aortic invasion. On the basis of the objective CT criteria, the patients enrolled in our study were classified as follows: 14 patients with R, 44 with BR, and 42 with UR tumors.
Most recents protocols related to «Hepatic Artery»
Example 10
A patient with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma is under treatment with sorafenib. The patient is receiving 400 mg per day of oral sorafenib (2×200 mg). In a single setting the patient is also treated with TheraSphere which consists of insoluble glass microspheres where yttrium-90 is bound within the spheres. The hepatic artery is catheterized and the tumor vascular bed is embolized with TheraSpehere delivering a target dose of TheraSphere of 100 Gy by injection through the hepatic artery. A dose of 0.1 cc per kg of DDFPe is mixed with oxygen and is also infused into the hepatic artery during the embolization procedure.
We evaluated baseline CT scans before TACE and 1-month post-TACE to evaluate TACE responses. The treatment response was assessed based on the imaging studies of the patients, which were either 4-phase contrast-enhanced CT scan or dynamic magnetic resonance imaging within 1 month after the initial TACE. The modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) was used to assess radiological changes of HCC after treatment16 (link). The criteria have four categories; complete response (CR); partial response (PR); stable disease (SD); and progressive disease (PD). Complete or partial response in the imaging study at 1-month post-TACE was classified as TACE response whereas stable or progressive disease was defined as no response. Assessment of tumor response was reviewed independently by two radiologists with expertise in liver imaging to minimize variability. In cases of disagreement, the final decision was obtained by consensus.
Top products related to «Hepatic Artery»
More about "Hepatic Artery"
This major blood vessel originates from the celiac trunk and divides into the left and right hepatic arteries, which further branch to provide essential blood flow to the various lobes of the liver.
The hepatic artery plays a crucial role in maintaining liver function and is a key consideration in hepatic research, surgical procedures, and disease processes affecting the liver.
Optimizing research protocols related to the hepatic artery can lead to advancements in our understanding and treatment of a wide range of liver-related conditions.
Researchers may utilize various imaging agents and tools, such as Lipiodol, Progreat, Lipiodol Ultra-Fluide, Magnevist, Pharmorubicin, Allura Xper FD20, Ultravist 370, Carboplatin, and Epirubicin, to study the hepatic artery and its role in liver health.
Additionally, specialized catheters like the 2.7-F microcatheter may be employed to navigate and interact with this critical blood vessel.
By exploring the latest research protocols and leveraging cutting-edge AI comparisons, researchers can identify the most effective approaches for their hepatic artery studies, ultimately contributing to breakthroughs in liver-related diagnostics, treatments, and patient outcomes.
PubCompare.ai is an AI-driven platform that empowers researchers to optimize their hepatic artery research, drawing from a vast database of protocols from literature, pre-prints, and patents.