The largest database of trusted experimental protocols
> Anatomy > Body Part > Posterior Parietal Cortex

Posterior Parietal Cortex

The posterior parietal cortex (PPC) is a key region of the parietal lobe, involved in integrating sensory information and coordinating movement.
This versatile area plays a crucial role in spatial awareness, visuomotor control, and higher-order cognitive functions.
PubCompare.ai's AI-driven platform empowers researchers to explore the PPC, locate optimal research protocols, and enhance reproducibility through powerful comparison tools.
Discover the best products for your studies and experiance the future of scientific research today.

Most cited protocols related to «Posterior Parietal Cortex»

Protocol full text hidden due to copyright restrictions

Open the protocol to access the free full text link

Publication 2018
Animals Animals, Laboratory Calcium Ferrets Finches Mice, Laboratory Microscopy Movement Posterior Parietal Cortex Zebras

Protocol full text hidden due to copyright restrictions

Open the protocol to access the free full text link

Publication 2009
Anesthesia Anesthesia, Cardiac Procedures Auditory Perception Body Regions Contrast Media fMRI Head Movements Heart Insula of Reil Microtubule-Associated Proteins physiology Population Group Posterior Parietal Cortex Radius Respiratory Rate Seahorses Somatosensory Cortex, Primary Thalamus White Matter
Functional properties of the networks ensuing from our co-activation-based parcellation and subsequent connectivity analysis were characterized using the “BD” and “paradigm class (PC)” meta-data categories in the BrainMap database. BDs include the main categories cognition, action, perception, emotion, interoception as well as their related subcategories, whereas the respective PCs classify the specific task employed (Fox et al. 2005 (link); Turner and Laird 2011 (link)). To characterize the functional differences between the studies activating the 2 clusters, we performed quantitative “forward inference” and “reverse inference” (cf. Poldrack 2006 (link); Poldrack 2011 (link)) on the 2 networks (right anterior DLPFC-[anterior cingulate cortex] ACC and right posterior DLPFC-posterior parietal cortex). Forward and reverse inferences has become an increasingly used tool to decode mental states from brain imaging activations (cf. Poldrack 2011 (link); Yarkoni et al. 2011 (link); Chang et al. 2012 ). Whereas “forward inference” is the probability of observing activity in a brain region given the knowledge of the psychological process, “reverse inference” reflects the probability of a psychological process being present given knowledge of activation in a particular brain region (cf. Poldrack 2006 (link)). In these analyses, we restricted ourselves to studies dealing with “action” or “cognition” activating either of the 2 ensuing networks. Hence, the performed functional inference is directly contrasting in the networks identified in the present study. In particular, forward inference denotes the probability of activating the anterior (vs posterior) cluster given the respective BD or PC. That is, what is the likelihood that any given experiment from that BD/PC would activate the “right anterior DLPFC-ACC” rather than the posterior “right posterior DLPFC-posterior parietal cortex” network? In contrast, reverse inference describes the probability for any particular BD (or PC) given activation in the anterior or posterior network. That is, given that we see activation of the “right anterior DLPFC-ACC” rather than the “right posterior DLPFC-posterior parietal cortex” network, how likely is a particular BD/PC present. Base rates for activations in the respective network as well as base rates for tasks were taken into account in the latter inference using the Bayesian formulation for deriving P(Task|Activation) based on P(Activation|Task) as well as P(Task) and P(Activation).
Publication 2012
6H,8H-3,4-dihydropyrimido(4,5-c)(1,2)oxazin-7-one Brain Cognition Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Emotions Gyrus, Anterior Cingulate Interoception Posterior Parietal Cortex Vaginal Diaphragm

Protocol full text hidden due to copyright restrictions

Open the protocol to access the free full text link

Publication 2015
Body Regions Cloning Vectors Posterior Parietal Cortex Primary Auditory Cortex Radionuclide Imaging Sound
We defined six bilaterally defined regions of interest to cover the main anatomical areas that showed encoding for sequences in general (Figure 6A). Using probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps (Fischl et al., 2008 (link)), only surface nodes that belonged to Brodman area (BA) 4 with maximal probability were included into the M1 ROI. To exclude mouth and leg representations, we further excluded all nodes that had a distance of more then 2.5 cm from the hand knob (Yousry et al., 1997 (link)). S1 was similarly defined as the hand-related aspect of BA 1,2, and 3. BA 6 was divided into a medial aspect (SMA/pre-SMA) and the lateral aspect superior to the crest of the middle frontal gyrus (PMd). The posterior parietal cortex was divided into an anterior region, including anterior, medial, and ventral IPS, and a posterior region, including the medial and lateral OPJ (Culham and Valyear, 2006 (link)).
For the analysis of the mean activity, we averaged all voxels within each ROI. For classification and decomposition analysis, we selected within each anatomical ROI and participant the 800 most activated surface nodes, causing each ROI to have a size of approximately 260 voxels. Because the MVPA measures are independent of the mean activity, this selection does not bias the results under the null-hypothesis. Classification analysis within each selected part of the ROI was performed using randomly drawn groups of 160 voxels, repeating this process 5000 times, and averaging the accuracy over all draws. This random-subspace approach increases the reliability of accuracy for ROI-based analyses (Diedrichsen et al., 2013 (link)).
Publication 2013
Brodmann Area 1 Brodmann Area 6 Crista Ampullaris Microtubule-Associated Proteins Motor Cortex, Primary Oral Cavity Posterior Parietal Cortex Superior Frontal Gyrus

Most recents protocols related to «Posterior Parietal Cortex»

Two weeks after injury, mice were deeply anesthetized with isoflurane and perfused transcardially with 30 ml phosphate buffered saline (PBS). After removal, the brain was post-fixed with 4% PFA overnight then transferred to a 30% sucrose solution in PBS. Coronal sections from the dorsal hippocampus and the posterior parietal cortex were cryosectioned at 25 μm thickness and stored in cryoprotectant solution for Giemsa staining and immunohistochemical analysis.
Publication 2023
Brain Cryoprotective Agents Injuries Isoflurane Mice, Laboratory Phosphates Posterior Parietal Cortex Saline Solution Seahorses Stain, Giemsa Sucrose
Experiment 1 – ST effects: patients with ST were asked to perform the arm movement that produced the ST, whereas patients without ST and HCs were asked to mimic the ST by touching their faces. For patients without ST and HCs, the arm used for mimicking the ST was chosen to have a similar right-to-left proportion to patients with ST. HCs were also asked to mimic CD by rotating the head approximately 30–45 degrees, and the side of the head rotation in HCs was chosen to have a similar right-to-left proportion to patients with ST. HCs were also asked to move their heads back to the neutral position after the touch to mimic the ST effect.
Experiment 2 – No-touch condition: patients were asked to perform the arm movement that produced/mimicked the ST, but an object held by a mechanical arm about 2 cm away from the head/face prevented the subject from touching the head/face.
Experiment 3 – Passive condition: the patient’s arm was passively moved by the examiner to simulate ST/mimicked ST.
Experiment 4 – Examiner touch condition: with the patient at rest, the examiner stood behind the patient and touched the patient’s face in the same place used for the ST/mimicked ST.
Both patients and HCs underwent experiment 1, whereas only patients participated in experiments 2, 3, and 4. Each experiment consisted of 30 trials separated by a 15-s intertrial interval. The examiner gave verbal cues to indicate the beginning of each trial, but after the cue participants spontaneously decided when to initiate the task. Another examiner was involved in “passive” and “examiner touch” conditions. Participants and the examiner performed a self-paced ST/mimicked ST, maintained the touch for 15 s post-touch, and then released the touch to return to the rest position. Continuous EMG-EEG co-registration was performed during the experimental procedures. An electrode was placed over the head/face spot being touched to record the touch event on the EMG and EEG recordings. The order of experimental conditions was pseudo-randomized across participants (Fig. 1).

A: trial from one representative patient with a sensory trick (ST) in experiment 1. EMG from right dystonic (SCM dys) and left non-dystonic sternocleidomastoid (SCM non-dys), from bicep brachii (Bicep), and EEG from left sensorimotor (C3) and posterior parietal cortex (P7). Arrows: time windows of interest. B: experimental conditions.

Publication 2023
ARID1A protein, human Face Head Movement Patient Representatives Patients Posterior Parietal Cortex RCE1 protein, human Touch
EMG and EEG analyses were performed using MATLAB toolboxes (EEGLAB, Fieldtrip) (Oostenveld et al., 2011 ). EMG signal was down-sampled to 500 Hz, band-pass filtered between 20 and 220 Hz, and notch-filtered (zero-phase, 4th-order Butterworth). High pass filtering above 20 Hz limits contamination by movement artifact and volume conduction without losing information on dystonic activity below 20 Hz frequency (Grosse et al., 2004 (link), Foncke et al., 2007 (link)).
EEG signal was down-sampled to 500 Hz, band-pass filtered between 1 and 100 Hz, and notch-filtered (zero-phase, 4th-order Butterworth). Continuous EMG and EEG recordings were epoched and time-locked from −15 s before to 55 s after the touch events. Epochs containing large EMG or EEG artifacts were rejected by visual inspection. FastICA was used to clean EEG epochs from muscle and eye movements and residual line noise artifacts. We computed the current source density of cleaned EEG epochs to obtain non-referential high spatial resolution distribution of surface voltage of the scalp (Kayser and Tenke 2015 (link)).
Further analyses were carried out on the EMG signal from the SCM muscle responsible for head-turning (i.e., the dystonic SCM in CD patients and the one activated to mimic CD in HCs) and from contralateral EEG channels. Also, EMG and EEG analysis was carried out on the following three intervals of interest: from −10 to −5 s before the touch (pre-touch), from 0.5 to 5.5 s after the touch (post-touch interval), and from 5 to 10 s after release (release) (Fig. 1A).
Fast Fourier transform (FFT) with Hanning tapering was used to obtain EMG and EEG power spectral density values from 1 to 100 Hz over the pre-touch interval. Complex Morlet wavelet convolution (Cohen 2019 (link)) was used to compute time–frequency power spectra from 1 to 100 Hz in the EMG signal, and from 1 to 50 Hz in the EEG, as described in a previous study (Leodori et al., 2021 (link)). Time-frequency power spectra were decibel normalized to the average value of the pre-touch interval to obtain touch-related power modulation values. We computed mean EMG power and modulation values by averaging EMG spectra from 1 to 100 Hz. Similarly, we computed mean EEG power values and event-related spectral perturbation (ERSP) relative to the touch by averaging across the theta (4–7 Hz), alpha (8–12 Hz), beta (13–30 Hz), and gamma (31–45 Hz) frequency bands, and across electrodes over the sensorimotor cortex (C3/4, CP1/2) and posterior parietal cortex (PPC) (P3/4, P7/8).
Publication 2023
Electric Conductivity EPOCH protocol Eye Movements Gamma Rays Head Movement Muscle Tissue Patients Posterior Parietal Cortex Scalp Sensorimotor Cortex Touch
The Kruskal-Wallis test was conducted to investigate differences in age between patients with ST, patients without ST, and HCs groups. Chi-square tests of homogeneity were used to investigate differences between the three groups in the distribution of gender, side of the arm used in the task, and to check the proportion of patients with dystonic tremor between patients with and without ST. An unpaired t-test was run to investigate differences in TWSTRS scores between patients with and without ST.
Data normality was tested for EMG and EEG variables by skewness and kurtosis values. The assumption of normality was satisfied for baseline EMG and for EMG power modulation values after the removal of one outlier (2.5 standard deviations (SDs); results were not affected by removing the outlier), but not for baseline EEG and ERSP values.
Experiment 1: For baseline EMG power, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to investigate the effect of the factor group (patients with ST, patients without ST, and HCs) on EMG power pre-touch. To evaluate the effect of ST, mixed-design ANOVAs were used to test the effect of the factors time (post-touch, release) and group (patients with ST, patients without ST, and HC) on EMG power modulation.
For baseline EEG power, false discovery rate (FDR)-corrected Kruskal-Wallis tests with Dunn's post hoc comparisons were conducted to investigate differences in EEG power pre-touch between groups (patients with ST, patients without ST, HCs) across the different frequency bands and area on EEG power pre-touch. To evaluate the effect of ST, we performed a MANOVA with ERSP at different frequency bands as dependent variables (theta, alpha, beta, gamma), and group (patients with ST, patients without ST, and HCs), time (post-touch, release) and cortical area (sensorimotor vs posterior parietal cortex) as independent variables. Since MANOVA is robust to deviations from normality (Weinfurt 1995 ), we performed a parametric test regardless of the non-normal distribution of ERSP values. FDR correction was applied to MANOVA post hoc multiple univariate interaction effects.
Spearman's correlation assessed the relationship between ERSP associated with ST and EMG power modulation considering an FDR correction for multiple correlations. Outliers in correlation analysis were defined as data points with standardized residuals greater than ± 3 standard deviations.
Experiments 2, 3, and 4: Mixed-design ANOVAs used for experiment 1 analysis were repeated to compare EMG power modulation and ERSP between patients with ST and patients without ST in the no touch, passive, and examiner touch conditions.
Publication 2023
Cortex, Cerebral Gamma Rays Gender neuro-oncological ventral antigen 2, human Patients Posterior Parietal Cortex Touch Tremor
Functional data was preprocessed using fMRIPrep30 (link); RRID:SCR_016216). Specifically, a reference volume and its skull-stripped version were generated using a custom methodology of fMRIPrep. Head-motion parameters with respect to the BOLD reference (transformation matrices, and six corresponding rotation and translation parameters) were estimated before any spatiotemporal filtering using mcflirt (FSL 5.0.9)36 (link). BOLD runs were slice-time corrected using 3dTshift from AFNI 201 602 0737 (link) (RRID:SCR_005927). The BOLD reference was then co-registered to the T1w reference using bbregister (FreeSurfer) which implements boundary-based registration38 . Co-registration was configured with six degrees of freedom. The BOLD time-series were resampled into standard MNI152NLin2009cAsym space. Several confounding time-series were calculated based on the preprocessed BOLD: Frame-wise displacement (FWD) was calculated from the six motion parameters and root-mean-square difference (RMSD) of the BOLD percentage signal in the consecutive volumes. Contaminated volumes were then detected and classified as outliers by the criteria FWD > 0.5 mm or RMSD > 0.3% and replaced with new volumes generated by linear interpolation of adjacent volumes. The three global signals are extracted within the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), the white matter masks. A bandpass filter with cut-off frequencies of 0.01 and 0.09 Hz was used. Finally, the covariates corresponding to head motion (6 realignment parameters), outliers, and the BOLD time series from the subject-specific white matter and CSF masks were used in the connectivity analysis as predictors of no interest, and were removed from the BOLD functional time series using linear regression.
ROI-to-ROI connectivity analysis was performed in CONN toolbox using 11 CONN resting state network nodes composing 3 networks (Default Mode Network (DMN): medial pre-frontal cortex (MPFC), precuneus cortex (PCC), bilateral lateral parietal (LP); Salience Network (SN): anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), bilateral anterior insula (AI), rostral pre-frontal cortex (RPFC), and supramarginal gyrus (SMG); Fronto-parietal Network (FP): bilateral lateral pre-frontal cortex (LPFC) and posterior parietal cortex (PPC)39 (link). The mean BOLD time series was computed across all voxels within each ROI. Bivariate regression analyses were used to determine the linear association of the BOLD time series between each pair of regions for each subject. Both positive and negative correlations were examined. The resultant correlation coefficients were transformed into z-scores using Fisher’s transformation to satisfy normality assumptions. The within network-level FC was calculated as the average of the FCs within the networks of SN, DMN and FPN.
Publication Preprint 2023
Cerebrospinal Fluid Cranium Default Mode Network Gyrus, Anterior Cingulate Head Insula of Reil Lobe, Frontal Plant Roots Posterior Parietal Cortex Precuneus Reading Frames Supramarginal Gyrus White Matter

Top products related to «Posterior Parietal Cortex»

Sourced in United States, Ireland, Germany, Israel
A stereotaxic apparatus is a specialized laboratory instrument used to precisely position and orient surgical instruments or experimental tools within a subject's brain or other three-dimensional anatomical structure. It provides a standardized frame of reference to accurately target specific regions of the brain or body for various research and clinical applications.
The CS-3R is a laboratory instrument manufactured by Warner Instruments. It serves as a chamber slide system for microscopic cell and tissue analysis. The device provides a controlled environment for specimens during observation and experimentation.
Sourced in United States
The Picospritzer III is a versatile microinjection system designed for precise delivery of small volumes of liquid samples. It provides programmable control over pressure and duration of liquid ejection, enabling accurate and reproducible microinjections. The Picospritzer III is a compact, stand-alone instrument suitable for a variety of laboratory applications.
Stainless steel is a durable, corrosion-resistant metal alloy commonly used in the manufacturing of lab equipment. It is composed primarily of iron, chromium, and other elements that enhance its strength and resistance to chemicals, heat, and oxidation.
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom, Germany, Canada, Japan, Sweden, Austria, Morocco, Switzerland, Australia, Belgium, Italy, Netherlands, China, France, Denmark, Norway, Hungary, Malaysia, Israel, Finland, Spain
MATLAB is a high-performance programming language and numerical computing environment used for scientific and engineering calculations, data analysis, and visualization. It provides a comprehensive set of tools for solving complex mathematical and computational problems.
Sourced in United States
Silicon probes are a type of electrode array used for neural recordings. They are designed to precisely measure electrical activity in the brain. The probes are made of silicon and feature multiple recording sites along their length, allowing for simultaneous recording from multiple locations.
Sourced in Israel
Glass-coated tungsten electrodes are a type of laboratory equipment used for various applications. They consist of a tungsten core coated with a layer of glass. The core function of these electrodes is to provide a conductive pathway for electrical signals or currents in experimental setups.
The SC72 body gradients is a lab equipment product manufactured by Siemens. It is designed to generate uniform magnetic field gradients within a specified region of space. The device provides a controlled and stable magnetic field environment for various scientific and research applications.
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom, Germany, Japan, Italy
LabVIEW is a graphical programming environment developed by National Instruments for creating and deploying measurement and control systems. Its core function is to provide users with a visual interface for designing, simulating, and executing programs.
Biotinylated goat-anti rabbit antibody is a secondary antibody conjugated with biotin. It is designed to bind to rabbit primary antibodies, allowing for their detection and visualization in various immunoassays and immunochemical techniques.

More about "Posterior Parietal Cortex"

The Posterior Parietal Cortex (PPC) is a crucial region of the parietal lobe, known for its pivotal role in integrating sensory information and coordinating movement.
This versatile area, also referred to as the dorsoparietal cortex or parietotemporal junction, is essential for spatial awareness, visuomotor control, and higher-order cognitive functions.
Researchers utilzing PubCompare.ai's AI-driven platform can explore the PPC in depth, locating optimal research protocols from literature, preprints, and patents.
Powerful comparison tools empower scientists to enhance the reproducibility of their studies and discover the best products for their research, such as Stereotaxic apparatuses, CS-3R microinjectors, Picospritzer III pressure ejection systems, Stainless steel recording electrodes, MATLAB software, Silicon probes, Glass-coated tungsten electrodes, SC72 body gradient systems, and LabVIEW software.
The PPC's involvement in spatial cognition, attention, and sensorimotor integration make it a key area of interest for neuroscientists studying topics like visuospatial processing, decision-making, and motor planning.
By leveraging the latest tools and technologis, researchers can delve deeper into the functional organization and information processing capabilities of this remarkable region of the parietal lobe.