Cell Lines
They are widely used in biomedical research to study cellular processes, test drug candidates, and develop new therapies.
These immortalized cell lines provide a renewable and homogeneous resource for experimentation, offering advantages over primary cells.
Researchers can leverage the power of PubCompare.ai to streamline their cell line studies, using AI-driven comparisons to identify the optimal protocols and products for their experiments.
Discover how this innovative platform can enhance your research accuracy by helping you locate the best cell line protocols from literature, pre-prints, and patents.
Take your studies to new heights with PubCompare.ai.
Most cited protocols related to «Cell Lines»
Most recents protocols related to «Cell Lines»
Example 49
The functional activity of compounds was determined in a cell line where p70S6K is constitutively activated. Test article was dissolved in DMSO to make a 10 μM stock. PathScan® Phospho-S6 Ribosomal Protein (Ser235/236) Sandwich ELISA Kit was purchased from Cell Signaling Technology. A549 lung cancer cell line, was purchased from American Type Culture Collection. A549 cells were grown in F-12K Medium supplemented with 10% FBS. 100 μg/mL penicillin and 100 μg/mL streptomycin were added to the culture media. Cultures were maintained at 37° C. in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 and 95% air. 2.0×105 cells were seeded in each well of 12-well tissue culture plates for overnight. Cells were treated with DMSO or test article (starting at 100 μM, 10-dose with 3 fold dilution) for 3 hours. The cells were washed once with ice cold PBS and lysed with 1× cell lysis buffer. Cell lysates were collected and samples were added to the appropriate wells of the ELISA plate. Plate was incubated for overnight at 4° C. 100 μL of reconstituted Phospho-S6 Ribosomal Protein (Ser235/236) Detection Antibody was added to each well and the plate was incubated at 37° C. for 1 hour. Wells were washed and 100 μl of reconstituted HRP-Linked secondary antibody was added to each well. The plate was incubated for 30 minutes at 37° C. Wash procedure was repeated and 100 μL of TMB Substrate was added to each well. The plate was incubated for 10 minutes at 37° C. 100 μL of STOP Solution was added to each well and the absorbance was read at 460 nm using Envision 2104 Multilabel Reader (PerkinElmer, Santa Clara, CA). IC50 curves were plotted and IC50 values were calculated using the GraphPad Prism 4 program based on a sigmoidal dose-response equation.
Unless otherwise noted, compounds that were tested had an IC50 of less than 50 μM in the S6K Binding assay. A=less than 0.05 μM; B=greater than 0.05 μM and less than 0.5 μM; C=greater than 0.5 μM and less than 10 μM;
Example 17
To further validate the activity of the DMPK siRNAs, many of the sequences that showed the best activity in the initial screen were selected for a follow-up evaluation in dose response format. Once again, two human cell lines were used to assess the in vitro activity of the DMPK siRNAs: first, SJCRH30 human rhabdomyosarcoma cell line; and second, Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1 (DM1) patient-derived immortalized human skeletal myoblasts. The selected siRNAs were transfected in a 10-fold dose response at 100, 10, 1, 0.1, 0.01, 0,001, and 0.0001 nM final concentrations or in a 9-fold dose response at 50, 5.55556, 0.617284, 0.068587, 0.007621, 0.000847, and 0.000094 nM final concentrations. The siRNAs were formulated with transfection reagent Lipofectamine RNAiMAX (Life Technologies) according to the manufacturer's “forward transfection” instructions. Cells were plated 24 h prior to transfection in triplicate on 96-well tissue culture plates, with 8500 cells per well for SJCRH30 and 4000 cells per well for DM1 myoblasts. At 48 h (SJCRH30) or 72 h (DM1 myoblasts) post-transfection cells were washed with PBS and harvested with TRIzol® reagent (Life Technologies). RNA was isolated using the Direct-zol-96 RNA Kit (Zymo Research) according to the manufacturer's instructions. 10 μl of RNA was reverse transcribed to cDNA using the High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturer's instructions. cDNA samples were evaluated by qPCR with DMPK-specific and PPIB-specific TaqMan human gene expression probes (Thermo Fisher) using TaqMan® Fast Advanced Master Mix (Applied Biosystems). DMPK values were normalized within each sample to PPIB gene expression. The quantification of DMPK downregulation was performed using the standard 2−ΔΔCt a method. All experiments were performed in triplicate, with Tables 16A-B, 17A-B, and 18A-B presenting the mean values of the triplicates as well as the calculated IC50 values determined from fitting curves to the dose-response data by non-linear regression.
Example 7
The MTT Cell Proliferation assay determines cell survival following apple stem cell extract treatment. The purpose was to evaluate the potential anti-tumor activity of apple stem cell extracts as well as to evaluate the dose-dependent cell cytotoxicity.
Principle: Treated cells are exposed to 3-(4,5-dimethythiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT). MTT enters living cells and passes into the mitochondria where it is reduced by mitochondrial succinate dehydrogenase to an insoluble, colored (dark purple) formazan product. The cells are then solubilized with DMSO and the released, solubilized formazan is measured spectrophotometrically. The MTT assay measures cell viability based on the generation of reducing equivalents. Reduction of MTT only occurs in metabolically active cells, so the level of activity is a measure of the viability of the cells. The percentage cell viability is calculated against untreated cells.
Method: A549 and NCI-H520 lung cancer cell lines and L132 lung epithelial cell line were used to determine the plant stem cell treatment tumor-specific cytotoxicity. The cell lines were maintained in Minimal Essential Media supplemented with 10% FBS, penicillin (100 U/ml) and streptomycin (100 μg/ml) in a 5% CO2 at 37 Celsius. Cells were seeded at 5×103 cells/well in 96-well plates and incubated for 48 hours. Triplicates of eight concentrations of the apple stem cell extract were added to the media and cells were incubated for 24 hours. This was followed by removal of media and subsequent washing with the phosphate saline solution. Cell proliferation was measured using the MTT Cell Proliferation Kit I (Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN) New medium containing 50 μl of MTT solution (5 mg/ml) was added to each well and cultures were incubated a further 4 hours. Following this incubation, DMSO was added and the cell viability was determined by the absorbance at 570 nm by a microplate reader.
In order to determine the effectiveness of apple stem cell extracts as an anti-tumor biological agent, an MTT assay was carried out and IC50 values were calculated. IC50 is the half maximal inhibitory function concentration of a drug or compound required to inhibit a biological process. The measured process is cell death.
Results: ASC-Treated Human Lung Adenocarcinoma Cell Line A549.
Results: ASC-Treated Human Squamous Carcinoma Cell Line NCI-H520.
Results: ASC-treated Lung Epithelial Cell Line L132.
Summary Results: Cytotoxicity of Apple Stem Cell Extracts.
Apple stem cell extracts killed lung cancer cells lines A549 and NCI-H520 at relatively low doses: IC50s were 12.58 and 10.21 μg/ml respectively as compared to 127.46 μg/ml for the lung epithelial cell line L132. Near complete anti-tumor activity was seen at a dose of 250 μg/ml in both the lung cancer cell lines. This same dose spared more than one half of the L132 cells. See Tables 7-10. The data revealed that apple stem cell extract is cytotoxic to lung cancer cells while sparing lung epithelial cells.
Example 9
The experiment of Example 7 was repeated substituting other plant materials for ASC. Plant stem cell materials included Dandelion Root Extract (DRE), Aloe Vera Juice (AVJ), Apple Fiber Powder (AFP), Ginkgo Leaf Extract (GLE), Lingonberry Stem Cells (LSC), Orchid Stem Cells (OSC) as described in Examples 1 and 2. The concentrations of plant materials used were nominally 250, 100, 50, 25, 6.25, 3.125, 1.562, and 0.781 μg/mL. These materials were tested only for cells the human lung epithelial cell line L132 (as a proxy for normal epithelial cells) and for cells of the human lung adenocarcinoma cell line A549 (as a proxy for lung cancer cells).
A549 cells lung cancer cell line cytotoxicity results for each of the treatment materials.
DRE-Treated Lung Cancer Cell Line A549 Cells.
AVJ-Treated Lung Cancer Cell line A549 Cells.
AFP-Treated Lung Cancer Cell line A549 Cells.
GLE-treated Lung Cancer Cell line A549 Cells.
LSC-treated lung cancer cell lines A549 cells.
OSC-treated Lung Cancer Cell line A549 Cells.
L132 cells (“normal” lung epithelial cell line) cytotoxicity results for each of the treatment materials.
DRE-Treated Lung Epithelial Cell Line L132 cells.
AVJ-Treated Lung Epithelial Cell Line L132 cells.
AFP-Treated Lung Epithelial Cell Line L132 cells.
GLE-Treated Lung Epithelial Cell Line L132 cells.
LSC-Treated Lung Epithelial Cell Line L132 cells.
OSC-Treated Lung Epithelial Cell Line L132 cells.
Calculated values.
Example 9
An analysis of gene ontology (GO) categories associated with ADAR1 dependent cells revealed that NCI-H1650 and HCC366 (“HCC-366”), two ADAR1 dependent cell lines, both have elevated basal expression of interferon inducible genes (
In light of the correlation between ADAR1 dependency and the expression of interferon-inducible genes, additional cancer cell lines from the Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB) (Liberzon et al. (2015) Cell Systems 1:417-425) was examined. Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) clustering was performed based on the Type I/Interferon-a gene set, which contained 97 genes including PKR. The resulting cluster included HCC366, NCI-H1650 and 9 additional lung cell lines. Among these cell lines, HCC1438 and NCI-H596 were sensitive to knockout of ADAR1 by lentiviral CRISPR-Cas9 (
All the above-identified ADAR1 dependent cancer cell lines showed elevated interferon signaling markers, e.g., phosphorylation of STAT1 and expression of interferon-stimulated gene (ISGs) (
Example 1
1) Tucaresol
Tucaresol (0-1200 μM) is exposed for 72 hours to a panel of human liquid, hematological, and solid tumors such as multiple myeloma, leukemia, colorectal, non-small cell lung cancer (squamous and adenocarcinoma), hepatocellular, renal, pancreatic and breast cancer cell lines, and human non-tumor such as HUVEC, PBMC, skin fibroblast cells lines. Tucaresol is studied either alone or in combination with standard-of-care agents (1-100 μM). All cell lines are grown in standard serum-containing media with an exposure time of 24-144 hours. Cell viability is measured using, for example, the Cell TiterGlo® Viability Assay. The potency (IC50) and efficacy (% cell kill) are determined from the percent cell growth of the vehicle control.
2) Tucaresol Plus PD-1 Antibody
Tucaresol (0-1200 μM) in the presence of a PD-1 antibody is exposed for 72 hours to a panel of human liquid, hematological, and solid tumor such as multiple myeloma, leukemia, colorectal, non-small cell lung cancer (squamous and adenocarcinoma), hepatocellular, renal, pancreatic and breast cancer cell lines, and human non-tumor such as HUVEC, PBMC, skin fibroblast cells lines, and the viability of the cell lines are measured as described above. The viability of the cell lines in the presence of tucaresol plus PD-1 antibody is compared to the viability of the cell lines in the presence of a CTLA-4 antibody plus the PD-1 antibody or PD-1 antibody alone.
3) CTLA-4 Antibody Plus PD-1 Antibody
CTLA-4 antibody in the presence of a PD-1 antibody is exposed for 72 hours to a panel of human liquid, hematological, and solid tumor such as multiple myeloma, leukemia, colorectal, non-small cell lung cancer (squamous and adenocarcinoma), hepatocellular, renal, pancreatic and breast cancer cell lines, and human non-tumor such as HUVEC, PBMC, skin fibroblast cells lines, and the viability of the cell lines are measured as described above.
4) Tucaresol Plus Plinabulin
Tucaresol (0-1200 μM) in the presence of Plinabulin is exposed for 72 hours to a panel of human liquid, hematological, and solid tumor such as multiple myeloma, leukemia, colorectal, non-small cell lung cancer (squamous and adenocarcinoma), hepatocellular, renal, pancreatic and breast cancer cell lines, and human non-tumor such as HUVEC, PBMC, skin fibroblast cells lines, and the viability of the cell lines are measured as described above.
The viability of the cell lines in the presence of tucaresol, tucaresol plus PD-1 antibody, CTLA-4 antibody plus the PD-1 antibody, and tucaresol plus plinabulin are compared.
Top products related to «Cell Lines»
More about "Cell Lines"
These renewable and homogeneous resources offer advantages over primary cells, allowing researchers to conduct consistent and controlled experiments.
Cell lines are derived from animal or human tissues and can be maintained and propagated in vitro.
Popular cell culture media like DMEM, RPMI 1640, and supplements such as FBS, L-glutamine, penicillin, and streptomycin, provide the necessary nutrients and growth factors to support cell growth and proliferation.
Leveraging the power of AI-driven platforms like PubCompare.ai, researchers can streamline their cell line studies by identifying the optimal protocols and products from scientific literature, preprints, and patents.
This innovative tool enables accurate comparisons, helping researchers locate the best cell line models and experimental conditions to enhance their research accuracy and productivity.
Whether you're investigating cellular signaling pathways, testing drug efficacy, or developing new therapies, the use of well-characterized cell lines, coupled with cutting-edge analysis tools, can take your studies to new heights.
Explore the capabilities of PubCompare.ai and discover how it can optimize your cell line research and accelerate your scientific discoveries.