The three-dimensional structure of human tubulin beta-4B chain was obtained by homology modeling, using as template the crystallographic structure of bovine tubulin beta-2B chain (sequence identity 96.9%) with Protein Data Bank (PDB) identifier 4I4T
31 (link) (resolution 1.8 Å), by selecting the beta-chain with the highest percentage of solved residues (chain D in the PDB file), and retaining the respective ligands (Mg
2+, Ca
2+, and GDP). Homology modeling, structure refinement procedures, and calculation of the differences in Gibbs free energy due to in silico mutagenesis were carried out using the BioLuminate interface provided by Maestro molecular modeling suite (Schroedinger, New York, USA).
Briefly, the structure of isolated TUBB4B was subjected to the protein preparation wizard provided by BioLuminate, which assigned bond orders based on the Chemical Components Dictionary database (
http://www.pdb.org, wwPDB foundation, Piscataway NJ, USA), added H-atoms, created zero-order bonds to metals, and generated protonation states for GDP and protein at pH 7.5 using Epik and PROPKA
32 (link) modules, respectively. After assigning and optimizing the geometry and distances for H-bonds, structures were minimized using Optimized Potentials for Liquid Simulations 4 (OPLS4) forcefield
33 (link), setting 0.3 Å as the heavy-atoms Root-Mean Square Deviation (RMSD) threshold for reaching convergence.
The αβαβ organization of tubulin chains was reconstituted using the structure with PDB identifier 4I4T
31 (link) as template, which contains the coordinates of the tubulin (αβαβ chains) - stathmin-4 - tubulin tyrosine ligase complex, upon superimposition of the model of the isolated TUBB4B on the two tubulin beta-2B subunits (chains B and D in the PDB entry), with a Cα-RMSD of 0.395 and 0.001, respectively.
The tubulin αβ and βα heterodimers were extrapolated from the complex to evaluate in detail the interactions of TUBB4B with the preceding or following α subunits.
All potential substitutions due to point mutations in the codons encoding for residues Arg390 (to Gln, Gly, Leu, Pro, and Trp) and Arg391 (to Cys, Gly, His, Leu, Pro, and Ser), as well as the Tyr310His mutation were introduced by the BioLuminate’s Residue scanning tool for in silico mutagenesis. The most naturally occurring rotamer was selected for each side chain substitution, then all structures underwent energy minimization with the same computational parameters as above.
The thermodynamic cycle for each TUBB4B variant was computed according to the Molecular Mechanics/Generalized Born and Surface Area Continuum solvation (MM/GBSA) method
34 (link). This method, which allows the evaluation of the differences in Gibbs free energy of folding (∆∆G
fapp = ∆G
fappmut − ∆G
fappWT) and binding to Tubulin α-1B chain (∆∆G
bapp = ∆G
bappmut − ∆G
bappWT) with respect to the wildtype does not consider the explicit energetic term associated with the conformational change. Therefore, the differences in free energy reported in this study cannot be considered precise thermodynamic values, but they represent variations in apparent stability (∆∆G
fapp) or affinity (∆∆G
bapp), which nevertheless have been proven to correlate with functional data also in other protein systems
35 (link).
Bodenbender J.P., Marino V., Philipp J., Tropitzsch A., Kernstock C., Stingl K., Kempf M., Haack T.B., Zuleger T., Mazzola P., Kohl S., Weisschuh N., Dell’Orco D, & Kühlewein L. (2024). Comprehensive analysis of two hotspot codons in the TUBB4B gene and associated phenotypes. Scientific Reports, 14, 10551.