Importins
They act as shuttles, binding to their cargo inside the cytoplasm and then transporting them into the nucleus.
Importins recognize specific nuclear localization signals (NLS) on their cargo and facilitate their passage through the nuclear pore complex.
This process is essential for many cellular processes, including gene regulation, signal transduction, and cellular homeostasis.
Importins are divided into several subtypes, each with distinct cargo preferences and functions.
Understaning the dynamics and mechanisms of importins is crucial for researchers studying cellular trafficking, nuclear transport, and related biological pathways.
With PubCompare.ai, you can easily identify the latest protocols, preprints, and patents related to importins, optimizing your research workflow and discovering the most effective methodologies.
Most cited protocols related to «Importins»
Each reaction contained extracted RNA, 1× TaqPath™ 1-Step RT-qPCR Master Mix, CG (ThermoFisher), the CDC N1 forward and reverse primers, and probe36 . Viral copy numbers were quantified using N1 quantitative PCR (qPCR) standards in 16-fold dilutions to generate a standard curve. The assay was run in triplicate for each sample and two non-template control wells were included as negative controls. Quantification of the Importin-8 housekeeping gene RNA level was performed to determine the quality of respiratory sample collection. An internal virion control (RCAS) was spiked into each sample and quantified to determine the efficiency of RNA extraction and qPCR amplification37 (link). Concurrent analysis of results by this CDC N1 viral load assay showed high correlation with that of the Roche cobas SARS-CoV-2 ORF-1ab and E genes (Supplementary Fig.
The NMA is performed in a pre-processing stage. In this stage, the normal modes of the proteins are calculated using the anisotropic network model (ANM) (18 (link)).
The FiberDock algorithm, which is applied on each rigid-body solution candidate, includes four main stages:
Side-chain optimization: The side-chain flexibility of interface residues of both proteins is modeled by a rotamer library. The optimal combination of rotamers is found by an integer linear programming (ILP) technique (23 ).
NMA-based backbone refinement: The refinement performs up to 20 iterations which consist of the following steps: (i) The van der Waals (vdW) forces that the proteins apply on each other are calculated. (ii) The 10 normal modes with the best correlation to these forces are identified, and the backbone conformation of the proteins are minimized along these normal modes. (iii) Monte Carlo (MC) rigid-body minimization is performed. (iv) A score is calculated for the current result and the result is saved if it is better than the previous results.
Rigid-body MC minimization: The rigid-body orientation of the ligand is optimized by a MC technique, and a BFGS quasi-Newton minimization is performed in each MC cycle (24 ,25 ).
Ranking according to binding energy: This stage attempts to identify near-native solutions among the entire set of refined complexes. The calculated binding energy includes a variety of energy terms, such as desolvation energy [atomic contact energy(ACE)], vdW interactions, partial electrostatics, hydrogen and disulfide bonds, π-stacking, aliphatic interactions, and more.
FiberDock results of refining two docking models of complexes: (
Most recents protocols related to «Importins»
The plasmid pEGFP-c1-GR(511–795)2-GFP2-MCS was generated by inserting two copies of the hormone-responsive fragment of rat glucocorticoid receptor via NotI and XhoI and XhoI and BcuI in front of GFP. A second GFP was inserted via BglII and Eco32I.
NOSIP fragments (aa 1–110, 1–160, 1–240, 111–240, 111–301, 75–102, 75–140, 75–180, 75–200) were amplified by PCR using pcDNA3.1(+)-NOSIP-HA as template and cloned via Gibson assembly into the pEGFP-GST vector. For tagged versions of NOSIP K78AK79A, site-directed mutagenesis was performed using oligonucleotides 5′-GTACATTCTGCACCAGGCGGCGGAGATTGCCCGGCAG and 5′-CTGCCGGGCAATCTCCGCCGCCTGGTGCAGAATGTAC using the corresponding wildtype plasmids as template. The coding sequence of NOSIP was amplified by PCR using NOSIP-HA as a template and cloned into pGEX-6P-1 via EcoRI and XhoI to generate GST-NOSIP, in pQLink-His via HindIII and NotI to obtain His-NOSIP and in pEGFP-C1-GR(511–795)2-GFP2-MCS using BglII and SalI and thereby replacing one GFP to obtain GR(511–795)2-GFP-NOSIP. pcDNA3-NES-mTagBFP2-M9 was generated by amplifying NES-mTagBFP2 by PCR using pcDNA3-NES-mTagBFP2-cNLS as template (51 (link)) and cloning it into pcDNA3 via EcoRI and EcoRV. The oligonucleotides 5′-AAAGATATCATGGGGAATTACAACAATCAGTCTTC and 5′-AAACTCGAGTCAATAGCCACCTTGGTTTCGTG were used to amplify the M9-sequence of hnRNPA1 and inserting it via EcoRV and XhoI into pcDNA3-NES-mTagBFP2 to obtain pcDNA3-NES-mTag-BFP2-M9. Plasmids coding for RFP-M9M and RFP-Bimax2 were obtained from Dr Dorothee Dormann (49 (link)).
Binding assays using GST proteins were performed as described above, using 100 pmol GST, GST-IBB, GST-M9, or GST-NOSIP, immobilized on 10 μl glutathione Sepharose beads (Cytiva) and 100 pmol of respective proteins, as indicated.
For competition assays, 100 pmol His-S-importin β was immobilized on 10 μl S-protein beads (Cytiva) and incubated with 100 pmol His-NOSIP and increasing amounts of His-importin α (0, 100, 300, 1000 pmol) or the other way around. For assays with NTRs competing for binding sites on NOSIP, 100 pmol His-NOSIP-MBP was immobilized on amylose beads and incubated with 100 pmol of one and increasing amounts of the other NTR.
For binding assays with HeLa-cytosol, 600 pmol His-NOSIP-MBP was immobilized on 62.5 μl MBP-selector beads (Nanotag Biotechnologies) in TPB containing 10 mg/ml bovine serum albumin (BSA, Sigma) and 1 μg/ml each of leupeptin, pepstatin, and aprotinin (Sigma). After washing the beads 3 times with buffer, immobilized His-NOSIP-MBP was incubated with 200 μl HeLa-cytosol (Ipracell; 14,3 mg/ml) in the presence or absence of 2000 pmol RanQ69L1−180-GTP for 6 h at 4 °C under gentle rotation, followed by four washing steps with TPB. Bound proteins were eluted in 4× SDS-sample buffer at 95 °C and analyzed by SDS-PAGE (4–12% NuPAGE, Invitrogen) followed by Western blotting using the Odyssey system (LI-COR).
GST-NOSIP was expressed in JM109 cells grown in LB medium and induced with 0.5 mM IPTG at an A600nm of 0.7 for 4 h at 30 °C. Bacteria were lysed in buffer B (50 mM Na2HPO4/NaH2PO4, pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 10% glycerol, 10 mM β-mercaptoethanol) containing 1% Triton-X 100; 1 μg/ml each of leupeptin, pepstatin, and aprotinin; and 0.1 mM PMSF and purified over glutathione Sepharose beads using buffer B containing protease inhibitors as above, followed by size exclusion chromatography with a HiLoad 26/600 Superdex 200 prepgrade column (Cytiva) equilibrated in 20 mM Tris pH 7.4, 100 mM NaCl, and 2 mM DTT.
MBP-TNPO1 FL/ΔC/ΔN was expressed in BL21DE3 cells grown in LB medium for 3 h at 37 °C and induced at an A600 of 0.7 with 0.5 mM IPTG. MBP proteins were purified using amylose resin (New England Biolabs) in MBP buffer (20 mM Tris pH 7.5; 200 mM NaCl; 5% glycerol; 2 mM DTT; 1 μg/ml each of leupeptin, pepstatin, and aprotinin; and 0.1 mM PMSF) and separated by a HiLoad 26/600 Superdex 200 prepgrade column using an Äkta system (Cytiva) in transport buffer TPB; (20 mM Hepes, pH 7.3, 110 mM KOAc, 2 mM Mg(OAc)2, 1 mM EGTA, 2 mM DTT).
His-TNPO1 (45 (link)), His-CRM1 (46 (link), 52 (link)), His-Importin α (47 (link)), S-His-importin β (48 (link)), GST-M9 (32 (link)), RanQ69L1-180 (52 (link)), Ubc9 (53 (link)), and RanWT (42 (link)) were purified as described. RanQ69L (aa 1–180) was loaded with GTP as described (54 (link)). His-importin 5 was a gift from Achim Dickmanns.
Top products related to «Importins»
More about "Importins"
They recognize nuclear localization signals (NLS) on their cargo and facilitate their passage through the nuclear pore complex, enabling essential cellular processes such as gene regulation, signal transduction, and homeostasis.
Importins are divided into subtypes with distinct cargo preferences and functions.
Researchers studying cellular trafficking, nuclear transport, and related biological pathways can leverage tools like PubCompare.ai to easily identify the latest protocols, preprints, and patents related to importins.
This can help optimize research workflows and discover the most effective importin-related methodologies.
For example, techniques involving Lipofectamine 2000, Glutathione Sepharose 4B beads, Lipofectamine 3000, and the Cary Varian spectrofluorometer may be useful for studying importin dynamics and mechanisms.
Additionally, the 7900HT Fast Real-Time PCR System could aid in quantifying importin-mediated gene expression.
Importin-binding proteins like α-tubulin and the Ab2811 antibody may also be leveraged in importin research, while size-exclusion chromatography using a Superdex 200 16/60 column can help purify and characterize importin complexes.
By incorporating these related terms and techniques, researchers can gain a more comprehensive understanding of the importin system and accelerate their studies in this crucial area of cell biology.
One typo to note is 'experince' instead of 'experience' in the metadescription.