The largest database of trusted experimental protocols
> Chemicals & Drugs > Antibiotic > Clavulanic Acid

Clavulanic Acid

Clavulanic Acid is a beta-lactamase inhibitor that is commonly used in combination with other antibiotics, such as amoxicillin, to enhance their effectivness against bacterial infections.
It works by inactivating certain enzymes produced by bacteria that would otherwise render the antibiotic ineffective.
Clavulanic Acid is an important tool in the fight against antibiotic resistance, helping to preserve the potency of critical antimicrobial medications.
Researchers can use PubCompare.ai to quickly locate the best procedures and protocols for working with Clavulanic Acid, improving the reproducibility and accuracy of their studies.
The platform's AI-driven comparisons can also help identify the most effective Clavulanic Acid products, streamlining the research process.

Most cited protocols related to «Clavulanic Acid»

For each combination of microorganism, antimicrobial and food category/animal population were tested, MIC distributions were tabulated in frequency tables, giving the number of isolates tested that have a given MIC at each test dilution (mg/L) of the antimicrobial. Isolate‐based dilution results allowed MIC distributions reported:

for Salmonella for ampicillin, azithromycin, cefepime, cefotaxime, cefotaxime and clavulanic acid, ceftazidime, ceftazidime and clavulanic acid, cefoxitin, chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, colistin, ertapenem, gentamicin, imipenem, meropenem, nalidixic acid, sulfamethoxazole, temocillin, tetracycline, tigecycline and trimethoprim;

for Campylobacter for ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, gentamicin, nalidixic acid, streptomycin and tetracycline;

for indicator E. coli for ampicillin, azithromycin, cefepime, cefotaxime, cefotaxime and clavulanic acid, ceftazidime, ceftazidime and clavulanic acid, cefoxitin, chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, colistin, ertapenem, gentamicin, imipenem, meropenem, nalidixic acid, sulfamethoxazole, temocillin, tetracycline, tigecycline and trimethoprim;

for MRSA for cefoxitin, chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, erythromycin, fusidic acid, gentamicin, kanamycin, linezolid, mupirocin, penicillin, quinupristin/dalfopristin, rifampicin, streptomycin, sulfamethoxazole, tetracycline, tiamulin, trimethoprim and vancomycin.

Full text: Click here
Publication 2019
Ampicillin Animal Population Groups Azithromycin Campylobacter Cefepime Cefotaxime Cefoxitin Ceftazidime Chloramphenicol Ciprofloxacin Clavulanic Acid Clindamycin Colistin Ertapenem Erythromycin Escherichia coli Feeds, Animal Food Fusidic Acid Gentamicin Imipenem Kanamycin Linezolid Meropenem Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus MICA protein, human Microbicides Mupirocin Nalidixic Acid Penicillins quinupristin-dalfopristin Rifampin Salmonella Streptomycin Sulfamethoxazole Technique, Dilution temocillin Tetracycline tiamulin Tigecycline Trimethoprim Vancomycin
Kinetic parameters for hydrolysis of β-lactams by the purified OXA-830 β-lactamase were examined using a UV-VIS spectrophotometer (U-3900, HITACHI, Japan) at 30°C in 10 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) in a final reaction volume of 300 μL. The steady-state kinetic parameters (kcat and KM) were determined by non-linear regression of the initial reaction rates with the Michaelis–Menten equation in Prism (version 7) software (GraphPad Software, San Jose, CA, United States).
β-lactamase inhibition was studied with benzylpenicillin (500 μM) as the substrate. The β-lactamase inhibitors sulbactam, tazobactam and clavulanic acid at various concentrations were preincubated with the purified OXA-830 β-lactamase for 3 min at 30°C before addition of substrate. The inhibitor concentration required to reduce the hydrolysis of 500 μM benzylpenicillin by 50% was determined by non-linear regression with the log(inhibitor) vs. response – Variable slope equation in Prism (version 7) software (GraphPad Software, San Jose, CA, United States).
Full text: Click here
Publication 2019
beta-Lactamase beta-Lactamase Inhibitors Buffers Clavulanic Acid Hydrolysis Kinetics Lactams Penicillin G Phosphates prisma Psychological Inhibition Sulbactam Tazobactam
The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) as determined by the MHB microdilution method was used to evaluate the antimicrobial susceptibility of 500 UPEC clinical strains according to the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI, 2016 ). MDR strains were defined as having acquired no susceptibility to at least one antibiotic in three or more classes. XDR strains were defined as having non-susceptibility to at least one agent in all but two or fewer antibiotic classes (Magiorakos et al., 2012 (link)). The MIC for each antibiotic was compared to the standard values of the CLSI. The antibiotic panel that was used included ampicillin (AM; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), amoxicillin-clavulanate (AMC; Great West Road, Brentford Middlesex, UK), ticarcillin-clavulanate (TIM; Gold Biotechnology, Inc., Ashby Road, St. Louis, MO), piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP; Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., Valley Stream Parkway, Malvern, PA, USA), cephalothin (CF; Eli Lilly and Company, S Harding St, Indianapolis, IN, USA), cefaclor (CEC; Phadia Laboratory Systems, Thermo Scientific, Wyman Street, Waltham, MA, USA), ceftazidime (CAZ; Roselle Rd, Schaumburg, IL, USA), aztreonam (ATM; Bristol-Myers Squibb Corporate, Park Avenue, NY, USA), norfloxacin (NOR), ofloxacin (OFX; MP Biomedicals, Solon, OH, USA), meropenem (MEM), imipenem (IPM; AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Wilmington, DE, USA), gentamycin (GM; Schering-Plough Pharmaceuticals, Kenilworth, NJ, USA), ceftriaxone (CRO), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT; Roche, Basel, Switzerland), tetracycline (TE; Heritage Pharmaceuticals Inc., Fieldcrest Avenue, Edison, NJ, USA), and nitrofurantoin (F/M; McKesson Pharmaceutical, One Post Street, San Francisco, CA, USA). E. coli ATCC 25922 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 were used as controls.
The extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) were phenotypically detected as previously recommended by CLSI using the double-disc synergy test based on the synergistic effect between clavulanic acid (inhibitor of ESBLs) and β-lactam antibiotics (cefotaxime, CRO, CAZ, cefepime, cefpirome, and ATM). Additionally, ESBLs were detected using an individual disk that was tested with/without clavulanic acid (10 μg/mL) and by the Hodge test using Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 700603 (ESBL+) and E. coli ATCC 25922 (ESBL-) as control strains (CLSI, 2016 ).
Full text: Click here
Publication 2016
Amox clav Ampicillin Antibiotics Aztreonam beta-Lactamase beta-Lactamase Inhibitors Cefaclor Cefepime Cefotaxime cefpirome Ceftriaxone Cephalothin Clavulanate Clavulanic Acid Clinical Laboratory Services Escherichia coli Gentamicin Gold Hibiscus sabdariffa Imipenem Klebsiella pneumoniae Meropenem Microbicides Minimum Inhibitory Concentration Monobactams Nitrofurantoin Norfloxacin Ofloxacin Pharmaceutical Preparations Piperacillin-Tazobactam Combination Product Pseudomonas aeruginosa Solon Strains Susceptibility, Disease Tetracycline Ticarcillin Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole Combination
The study was conducted at the Microbiology Department of The Children’s Hospital and Institute of Child Health Lahore, Pakistan, from May 2010 to February 2012. Eleven pathological samples including blood, cerebro-spinal fluid (CSF), urine, sputum, peritoneal dialysis catheters, tracheal secretions and pus were collected from paediatric patients were analysed during the study period. The patient’s history regarding the use of various interventions like intravenous line, urinary catheters, endotracheal tube, lumber puncture, peritoneal dialysis catheters, exchange transfusion, nasogastric tube, surgery, central venous pressure line and tracheostomy was also noted. The Brain Heart Infusion Broth (BHI) was used to inoculate the blood samples and after a period of incubation they were sub-cultured on solid media. All of the clinical samples were cultured on different solid media of Blood, Chocolate and MacConkey agar plates (90mm) while the urine samples were cultured only on Cystine Lysine Electrolyte Deficient Medium (CLED). An overnight incubation of these culture plates was done at 37±1ºC in an incubator. The bacterial strains were identified using API 20E system (bioMerieux). Only the K. pneumoniae strains were included and processed further for ESBL detection. The culture media and antibiotic discs were purchased from Oxoid.
The K. pneumoniae strains were screened as ESBL screening-positive on the basis of resistance to ceftazidime. The screen positive K. pneumoniae strains were further processed for double disc synergy test (DDST) and Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) confirmatory test. In DDST, a disc of amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (AMC) was placed in the center of Mueller-Hinton agar plate (90mm) at 20mm distance to ceftazidime (CAZ 30μg) and cefotaxime (CTX 30μg). ESBL production was detected by the appearance of key hole effect due to the enhanced activity of ceftazidime and cefotaxime with clavulanic acid.
Both DDST positive and negative K. pneumoniae strains were analysed by CLSI confirmatory test. The CLSI confirmatory test was performed with of ceftazidime (CAZ 30μg) and cefotaxime (CTX 30μg) alone and using a combined disc of ceftazidime-clavulanic acid and cefotaxime-clavulanic acid (CAZ/CLA and CTX/CLA 30/10 μg). The CLSI confirmatory test was considered positive when the inhibition zone produced by the combined effect of ceftazidime or cefotaxime and clavulanic acid increased ≥5 mm than ceftazidime or cefotaxime without the clavulanic acid.10
Full text: Click here
Publication 2013
Agar Amox clav Antibiotics Bacteria Blood Blood Culture Brain Cacao Catheters Cefotaxime Ceftazidime Cerebrospinal Fluid Child Children's Health Clavulanic Acid Clinical Laboratory Tests Culture Media Cystine Electrolytes Exchange Transfusion, Whole Blood Heart Klebsiella pneumoniae Lysine Operative Surgical Procedures Patients Peritoneal Dialysis Psychological Inhibition Punctures Secretions, Bodily Sputum Strains Trachea Tracheostomy Urinary Catheter Urine Venous Blood Pressure Venous Catheter, Central
ESBL-producing isolates were selected from an existing collection of isolates obtained from wastewater and surface water sampled between 2010 and 20125 (link)13 (link). Surface water samples (n = 20) were taken at ten different sites situated in four different regions in the Netherlands (including rivers, canals, lakes, North Sea), wastewater samples (n = 20) included influents and effluents from wastewater treatment plants (WWTP), an international airport WWTP, and from wastewater of health care institutions. Isolates were obtained by filtration of multiple volumes of water samples through 0.45 μm filters, followed by incubation of these filters on selective culture media for the isolation of ESB-producing E. coli: Tryptone Bile X-glucuronide medium supplemented with 1 μg/ml cefotaxime (TBX/CTX) or on ChromIDTM ESBL agar (Biomerieux). Incubation conditions were 18–24 hours at 36 ± 2 °C or 4 to 5 hours at 36 ± 2 °C followed by 18 to 19 hours at 44 ± 0.5 °C. Isolation procedures were based on standard isolation procedures for the selective isolation of E. coli from water and food using chromogenic media (NEN-EN-ISO 9308-1 and ISO 16649-2), adapted to enable selective growth of ESBL-producing variants. Variations in isolation procedures was related to isolates being obtained as part of different projects. Suspected ESBL-E. coli isolates (i.e. the ß-glucuronidase-positive colonies on TBX-CTX as well as on ChromIDTM ESBL agar) were further confirmed as E. coli by testing for indole-production using BBL Dry SlideTM (BD), and subsequently tested for ESBL-production by disk diffusion following CLSI guidelines14 , using Sensi-DiscsTM (BD, Breda, the Netherlands). Zone diameters were determined for cefotaxime (30 μg) ± clavulanic acid (10 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg) ± clavulanic acid (10 μg). ESBL-producing isolates were defined as strains resistant to cefotaxime (zone diameter ≤22 mm) and/or ceftazidime (zone diameter ≤17 mm), and an increase in zone diameter of ≥5 mm with the disks containing clavulanic acid14 .
From this pre-existing collection of confirmed ESBL-producing E. coli isolates, 93 wastewater and 93 surface water isolates, from 20 samples each, were selected more or less randomly, but taking into account established ABR profiles (when available), to minimize the chance of including duplicate isolates from the same sample. After characterization of phylogenetic groups, ESBL-genes, virulence genes and antibiotic resistance profiles was completed, some isolates were retrospectively identified as duplicates and omitted, leaving 88 wastewater (63 from WWTP, 15 from the international airport and 10 from health care institutions) and 82 surface water isolates for analyses.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2015
Agar Antibiotic Resistance, Microbial azo rubin S beta-Glucuronidase Bile Cefotaxime Ceftazidime Clavulanic Acid Diffusion Escherichia coli Filtration Food Genes Glucuronides indole isolation Plants Pulp Canals Rivers Strains Virulence

Most recents protocols related to «Clavulanic Acid»

MSs followed Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1729 and recommendations from EFSA regarding the use of epidemiologic cut‐off values for AMR monitoring. MSs tested antimicrobials and interpreted the results using the ECOFFs and concentration ranges shown in Tables F.5 and F.6 to determine the susceptibility of the following microorganisms: Salmonella spp., C. coli, C. jejuni and indicator commensal E. coli. Under the new legislation (Commission Implementing (EU) 2020/1729), changes were made to the ECOFFs and clinical breakpoints for several antimicrobial substances included in the harmonised panel for testing of Salmonella spp., and E. coli. The substances with changes to ECOFFs and or clinical breakpoints included tigecycline, nalidixic acid and ciprofloxacin (Table F.5). For 2021 data from pigs, calves and meat from BCPS, the occurrence of resistance to tigecycline, nalidixic acid and ciprofloxacin is determined using the new ECOFFs and clinical breakpoints, and for 2020 data from poultry, tigecycline, nalidixic acid and ciprofloxacin resistance are analysed using the ECOFFs and clinical breakpoints from the previous legislation (Decision 2013/652/EU). Also, in 2021, a new substance, amikacin, was added to the harmonised panel for both Salmonella spp. and E. coli. While for Campylobacter spp., no changes were made to ECOFFs and clinical breakpoints for the substances included in the harmonised panel. However, two new substances were added (chloramphenicol and ertapenem) and two substances were removed (nalidixic acid and streptomycin).
Presumptive ESBL‐ AmpC‐ or carbapenemase‐producing E. coli isolates identified through selective plating, as well as randomly selected isolates of Salmonella spp. and E. coli that, after testing with the first panel of antimicrobials in accordance with Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1729 were found to be resistant to cefotaxime, ceftazidime or meropenem, should be further tested with a second panel of antimicrobial substances (Table F.7) or further investigated using WGS. The second panel includes cefoxitin, cefepime and clavulanic acid in combination with cefotaxime and ceftazidime for the detection of presumptive ESBL‐ and AmpC‐ producing isolates. Moreover, the second panel contains imipenem, meropenem and ertapenem to phenotypically verify presumptive carbapenemase‐ producers.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2023
Amikacin Campylobacter carbapenemase Cefepime Cefotaxime Cefoxitin Ceftazidime Chloramphenicol Ciprofloxacin Clavulanic Acid Ertapenem Escherichia coli Fowls, Domestic Imipenem Meat Meropenem Microbicides Nalidixic Acid Pigs Salmonella Scheuermann's Disease Streptomycin Susceptibility, Disease Tigecycline
For each combination of microorganism, antimicrobial and food category/animal population were tested, MIC distributions were tabulated in frequency tables, giving the number of isolates tested that have a given MIC at each test dilution (mg/L) of the antimicrobial. Isolate‐based dilution results allowed MIC distributions reported:

for Salmonella for amikacin, ampicillin, azithromycin, cefepime, cefotaxime, cefotaxime and clavulanic acid, ceftazidime, ceftazidime and clavulanic acid, cefoxitin, chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, colistin, ertapenem, gentamicin, imipenem, meropenem, nalidixic acid, sulfamethoxazole, temocillin, tetracycline, tigecycline and trimethoprim;

for Campylobacter for chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, ertapenem, erythromycin, gentamicin, nalidixic acid and tetracycline;

for indicator E. coli for amikacin, ampicillin, azithromycin, cefepime, cefotaxime, cefotaxime and clavulanic acid, ceftazidime, ceftazidime and clavulanic acid, cefoxitin, chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, colistin, ertapenem, gentamicin, imipenem, meropenem, nalidixic acid, sulfamethoxazole, temocillin, tetracycline, tigecycline and trimethoprim;

for MRSA for cefoxitin, chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, erythromycin, fusidic acid, gentamicin, kanamycin, linezolid, mupirocin, penicillin, quinupristin/dalfopristin, rifampicin, streptomycin, sulfamethoxazole, tetracycline, tiamulin, trimethoprim and vancomycin.

Full text: Click here
Publication 2023
Amikacin Ampicillin Animal Population Groups Azithromycin Campylobacter Cefepime Cefotaxime Cefoxitin Ceftazidime Chloramphenicol Ciprofloxacin Clavulanic Acid Clindamycin Colistin Ertapenem Erythromycin Escherichia coli Feeds, Animal Food Fusidic Acid Gentamicin Imipenem Kanamycin Linezolid Meropenem Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus MICA protein, human Microbicides Mupirocin Nalidixic Acid Penicillins quinupristin-dalfopristin Rifampin Salmonella Streptomycin Sulfamethoxazole Technique, Dilution temocillin Tetracycline tiamulin Tigecycline Trimethoprim Vancomycin
The antimicrobials included in the 2021 report followed the panel of antimicrobials from the EU protocol for harmonised monitoring of AMR in human Salmonella and Campylobacter isolates (ECDC, 2016 , 2021 ). The priority panel for Campylobacter includes ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, tetracyclines and, since June 2016, gentamicin. Gentamicin is recommended for screening of invasive isolates and was added to the priority panel after a EUCAST ECOFF became available for disk diffusion for C. jejuni. Co‐amoxiclav (combination drug with amoxicillin and clavulanic acid) was included from the list of optional antimicrobials. In 2021, all reporting countries except Iceland tested the isolates against the three main antimicrobials ciprofloxacin, erythromycin and tetracycline (although some countries tested less than 10 isolates). In relation to C. jejuni isolates, sixteen reporting countries also tested for gentamicin and thirteen tested for co‐amoxiclav. With regards to C. coli isolates, thirteen reporting countries also tested these isolates for gentamicin and six tested for co‐amoxiclav (Annex B, Tables 1 and 2)
Full text: Click here
Publication 2023
Amox clav Amoxicillin Campylobacter Ciprofloxacin Clavulanic Acid Diffusion Drug Combinations Erythromycin Gentamicin Homo sapiens Microbicides Salmonella Tetracycline Tetracyclines
Species identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing were performed using NMIC/ID4 card with BD PhoenixTM100 Automated Microbiology System (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Sparks, Maryland, USA). The following antimicrobial agents were tested: amikacin (8 ~ 32 μg/mL), amoxicillin/clavulanate (4/2 ~ 16/8 μg/mL), ampicillin (4 ~ 16 μg/mL), ampicillin/sulbactam (4/2 ~ 16/8 μg/mL), aztreonam (2 ~ 16 μg/mL), cefepime (2 ~ 16 μg/mL), cefotaxime (1 ~ 32 μg/mL), ceftazidime (1 ~ 16 μg/mL), ciprofloxacin (0.5 ~ 2 μg/mL), gentamicin (2 ~ 8 μg/mL), imipenem (1 ~ 8 μg/mL), levofloxacin (1 ~ 8 μg/mL), meropenem (1 ~ 8 μg/mL), piperacillin/tazobactam (4/4 ~ 64/4 μg/mL), tetracycline (2 ~ 8 μg/mL), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (0.5/9.5 ~ 2/38 μg/mL), cefotaxime/clavulanate (for ESBL, < 9 μg/mL), ceftazidime/ clavulanate (for ESBL, < 9 μg/mL), cefpodoxime-proxetil (for ESBL, < 9 μg/mL), ceftazidime (for ESBL, < 9 μg/mL) and ceftriaxone/clavulanate (for ESBL, < 9 μg/mL) [15 (link)]. If the MIC of ciprofloxacin was less than or equal to 0.5 μg/mL, or the MIC of levofloxacin was less than or equal to 1 μg/mL, sensitivity or intermediation was confirmed by disk diffusion test (ciprofloxacin (5 μg) and levofloxacin (5 μg), respectively). Phenotypic ESBL confirmation was performed with a double-disk synergy test (cefotaxime (30 μg), cefotaxime/clavulanic acid (30 μg/10 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg) and ceftazidime/clavulanic acid (30 μg/10 μg) disk) following clinical and laboratory standards institute (CLSI) criteria [16 ]. The recently revised CLSI species-specific clinical breakpoints (CBPs) were used to interpret the MIC results. The quality control strains were Escherichia coli ATCC25922, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC27853 and Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC700603.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2023
Amikacin Amox clav Ampicillin ampicillin-sulbactam Aztreonam Cefepime Cefotaxime cefpodoxime proxetil Ceftazidime Ceftriaxone Ciprofloxacin Clavulanate Clavulanic Acid Clinical Laboratory Services Diffusion Escherichia coli Gentamicin Hypersensitivity Imipenem Klebsiella pneumoniae Levofloxacin Meropenem Microbicides Phenotype Piperacillin-Tazobactam Combination Product Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strains Susceptibility, Disease Tetracycline Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole Combination
Patients over 18 years of age, presenting with lymph nodes suspected of malignancy in the neck and axilla on US, were evaluated prospectively. In B-mode US, long axis/short axis ratio >2 in the lymph node, >1 cm in the short axis, increased cortex thickness (>2.5 mm), absence of fatty hilus were regarded as a suspicion of malignancy(4 (link), 5 (link), 6 (link)). The lymph nodes which were suspicious for malignancy were followed-up for 12 weeks with an appropriate antibiotic therapy. During antibiotic treatment, 875 mg of amoxicillin and 125 mg of clavulanic acid were administered to the patients for 10 days. Subsequently, the reduction in size was monitored, and the lymph nodes suspected of malignancy were re-evaluated 12 weeks later.
The study was conducted prospectively between 2019 and 2020. Patients who did not agree to participate in the study, patients under the age of 18, patients with biopsy contraindications/refusal to biopsy, patients in whom US/biopsy could not be performed, and pregnant or lactating patients were excluded from the study. A total of 10 patients whose biopsy results were unsatisfactory and who met the exclusion criteria were excluded from the study.
Oral and written consents were obtained from the parents of all patients who participated in our study, as necessary. Ethical approval was obtained from the local scientific research ethics committee (decision No. 05, dated 17.01.2019). The study was conducted on the basis of ethical standards outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki of the World Medical Association. All sonographic evaluations were performed by two radiologists who are specialized in this field of radiology.
Publication 2023
Amoxicillin Antibiotics Axilla Biopsy Clavulanic Acid Cortex, Cerebral Epistropheus Ethics Committees, Research Malignant Neoplasms Neck Nodes, Lymph Parent Patients Radiologist Ultrasonography X-Rays, Diagnostic

Top products related to «Clavulanic Acid»

Sourced in United Kingdom, United States, Italy
Ceftazidime is a broad-spectrum cephalosporin antibiotic used in the laboratory setting. It is a bactericidal agent that inhibits bacterial cell wall synthesis.
Sourced in United Kingdom, United States, Germany, Italy, Denmark
Cefotaxime is a third-generation cephalosporin antibiotic used to treat a variety of bacterial infections. It functions as a bactericidal agent by inhibiting cell wall synthesis in susceptible bacteria.
Sourced in United States, Germany
Clavulanic acid is a naturally occurring compound produced by the bacterium Streptomyces clavuligerus. It functions as a beta-lactamase inhibitor, which means it can inhibit the activity of certain enzymes that can break down beta-lactam antibiotics. This property can be utilized in the development of antibiotic formulations to enhance the effectiveness of beta-lactam antibiotics.
Sourced in France, Sweden, United States, Germany, United Kingdom, Denmark, Italy, Australia, Spain, Switzerland, Japan
Etest is a quantitative antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) method developed by bioMérieux. It provides minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values for specific antimicrobial agents. Etest utilizes a predefined antimicrobial gradient on a plastic strip to determine the MIC of a tested microorganism.
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom, Germany, Canada, France, Belgium, Switzerland, Italy, Spain, China, Ireland, Israel, Sweden, Austria, Australia, Japan, India, Argentina, Denmark, Netherlands, Macao, Brazil, Portugal, Panama
Gentamicin is a laboratory reagent used for the detection and quantification of the antibiotic gentamicin in biological samples. It is a commonly used tool in research and clinical settings.
Sourced in France, United States, Germany, Italy, Macao, United Kingdom, Sweden, Belgium, India, Japan, Brazil
The Vitek 2 system is an automated microbiology platform designed for the rapid identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of microorganisms. The system utilizes miniaturized biochemical testing to provide accurate results for a wide range of bacterial and yeast species.
Sourced in France, United States, Germany, Italy, United Kingdom, Canada, Poland, Macao
The Vitek 2 is a compact automated microbiology system designed for the identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of clinically significant bacteria and yeasts. The system utilizes advanced colorimetric technology to enable rapid and accurate results for clinical decision-making.
Sourced in United States
Clavulanic acid is a β-lactamase inhibitor. It is a chemical compound used in combination with certain antibiotics, such as amoxicillin, to enhance their effectiveness against bacterial infections.
Sourced in United Kingdom, United States, Germany, Italy, Belgium, Ireland, India
Ciprofloxacin is a synthetic antibiotic that belongs to the fluoroquinolone class. It is a broad-spectrum antimicrobial agent effective against a variety of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.
Sourced in United Kingdom, United States, Italy, Germany, France, India, Spain, China
Mueller-Hinton agar is a microbiological growth medium used for the antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bacteria. It is a standardized agar formulation that supports the growth of a wide range of bacteria and allows for the consistent evaluation of their susceptibility to various antimicrobial agents.

More about "Clavulanic Acid"

Clavulanic acid is a beta-lactamase inhibitor that is widely used in combination with other antibiotics like amoxicillin to enhance their effectiveness against bacterial infections.
It works by inactivating certain enzymes produced by bacteria that would otherwise render the antibiotic ineffective.
This makes clavulanic acid an important tool in the fight against antibiotic resistance, helping to preserve the potency of critical antimicrobial medications.
Researchers can use PubCompare.ai to quickly locate the best procedures and protocols for working with clavulanic acid, improving the reproducibility and accuracy of their studies.
The platform's AI-driven comparisons can also help identify the most effective clavulanic acid products, streamlining the research process.
Clavulanic acid is often used in conjunction with other antibiotics such as ceftazidime, cefotaxime, and ciprofloxacin.
The Etest and Vitek 2 system are commonly used to evaluate the effectiveness of these antibiotic combinations, including clavulanic acid, against bacterial infections.
Researchers can leverage PubCompare.ai to access optimized protocols and compare the performance of different clavulanic acid products, enhancing the efficiency and reliability of their studies.
By incorporating clavulanic acid into their research, scientists can work towards preserving the potency of critical antimicrobial medications and combating the growing threat of antibiotic resistance.
PubCompare.ai provides a valuable tool to support this important work, streamlining the research process and improving the quality of the findings.