The largest database of trusted experimental protocols
> Chemicals & Drugs > Antibiotic > Imipenem

Imipenem

Imipenem is a broad-spectrum carbapenem antibiotic used to treat severe bacterial infections.
It works by inhibiting cell wall synthesis, leading to bacterial cell death.
Imipenem is effective against a wide range of Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens, including P. aeruginosa and many drug-resistant strains.
Researchers can use PubCompare.ai to locate the most accurate and reproducible protocols for Imipenem research from literature, preprints, and patents.
The AI-driven platfrom allows side-by-side comparisons of multiple methods to identify the optimal approach for individual research needs, helping to optimise Imipenem studies.

Most cited protocols related to «Imipenem»

To eradicate the commensal gut flora, mice were transferred to sterile cages and treated by adding ampicillin (1 g/L; Ratiopharm), vancomycin (500 mg/L; Cell Pharm), ciprofloxacin (200 mg/L; Bayer Vital), imipenem (250 mg/L; MSD), and metronidazole (1 g/L; Fresenius) to the drinking water ad libitum for 6–8 weeks as described earlier [30] (link).
Full text: Click here
Publication 2011
Ampicillin Cells Ciprofloxacin Gastrointestinal Microbiome Imipenem Metronidazole Mus Sterility, Reproductive Vancomycin
The CLABSIs,7 CAUTIs,8 select VAEs,9 and SSIs10 that occurred between 2015–2017 and had been reported to the NHSN’s Patient Safety Component as of July 1, 2018, were included in this report. These HAIs were reported by acute-care hospitals, critical access hospitals, LTACHs, and IRFs from all US states and territories. Unless otherwise noted, CLABSI data included events classified as mucosal barrier injury laboratory-confirmed bloodstream infection (MBI-LCBI). VAE data were limited to events classified as possible ventilator-associated pneumonia (PVAP) because this is the only subtype of VAE for which a pathogen can be reported. Asymptomatic bacteremic urinary tract infections, CLABSIs reported from IRFs, and outpatient SSIs were excluded.
The NHSN protocols provide guidance for attributing device-associated (DA) HAIs (ie, CLABSIs, CAUTIs, and PVAPs) to a CDC-defined location type, and SSIs to a CDC operative procedure code. Due to known differences in pathogens and resistance patterns between adult and pediatric populations,11 ,12 (link) this report was limited to DA HAIs attributed to adult location types, and to SSIs that occurred in patients ≥18 years old at the time of surgery. Comparable data from pediatric locations and patients are described in a companion report.13 (link)Unless otherwise noted, DA HAIs were stratified into 5 mutually exclusive location categories: hospital wards (inclusive of step-down, mixed acuity, and specialty care areas), hospital intensive care units (ICUs), hospital oncology units (ie, oncology ICUs and wards), LTACHs (ie, LTACH ICUs and wards), and IRFs (ie, freestanding IRFs and CMS-certified IRF units located within a hospital). SSI data were stratified into mutually exclusive surgical categories based on the operative procedure code. Pathogen distributions were also analyzed separately for each operative procedure code and are available in the online supplement.14 Up to 3 pathogens and their antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) results can be reported to the NHSN for each HAI. The AST results for the drugs included in this analysis were reported using the interpretive categories of “susceptible” (S), “intermediate” (I), “resistant” (R), or “not tested.” Instead of “intermediate,” cefepime had the category interpretation of “intermediate/susceptible-dose dependent” (I/S-DD), which was treated as I for this analysis. Laboratories are expected to follow current guidelines from the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) for AST.15 Naming conventions for pathogens generally adhered to the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms (SNOMED CT) Preferred Term.16 In some cases, pathogens were grouped by genus or clinically recognized group (eg, viridans group streptococci) (Appendices A2A4 online). Results for Klebsiella spp were limited to K. pneumoniae and K. oxytoca; K. aerogenes was considered part of Enterobacter spp due to the timing of the NHSN’s adoption of its name change.17 (link)Staphylococcus aureus was defined as methicillin-resistant (MRSA) if the isolate was reported as R to oxacillin, cefoxitin, or methicillin. Enterococcus spp isolates were defined as vancomycin-resistant (VRE) if they tested R to vancomycin. VRE data were analyzed for all HAIs except PVAP because Enterococcus spp are excluded from the NHSN’s PVAP surveillance definition under most scenarios. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) were defined as Klebsiella spp, Escherichia coli, or Enterobacter spp that tested R to imipenem, meropenem, doripenem, or ertapenem. All other pathogen-antimicrobial combinations (phenotypes) were described using a metric for nonsusceptibility, which included pathogens that tested I or R to the applicable drugs. To be defined as nonsusceptible to extended-spectrum cephalosporins (ESCs), pathogens must have tested I or R to either ceftazidime or cefepime (Pseudomonas aeruginosa) or to ceftazidime, cefepime, ceftriaxone, or cefotaxime (Klebsiella spp and E. coli). For Enterobacter spp, evaluation of nonsusceptibility to ESCs was limited to cefepime due to Enterobacter’s inducible resistance to other ESCs. Fluoroquinolone nonsusceptibility was defined as a result of I or R to either ciprofloxacin or levofloxacin (P. aeruginosa) or to ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, or moxifloxacin (E. coli). Carbapenem nonsusceptibility in P. aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp was defined as a result of I or R to imipenem, meropenem, or doripenem. Nonsusceptibility to aminoglycosides was defined as a result of I or R to gentamicin, amikacin, or tobramycin. Finally, multi-drug-resistance (MDR) was approximated by adapting previously established definitions18 (link) that require nonsusceptibility to at least 1 agent within 3 different drug classes. For Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa, 5 classes were considered in the criteria: ESCs (or cefepime for Enterobacter spp), fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides, carbapenems, and piperacillin (PIP) or piperacillin/tazobactam (PIPTAZ). A sixth class, ampicillin/sulbactam, was included in the criteria for Acinetobacter spp.
Data were analyzed using SAS version 9.4 software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). For all HAIs and pathogens, absolute frequencies and distributions were calculated by HAI, location, and surgical category. The 15 most commonly reported pathogens were identified, and their frequencies and ranks within each stratum were calculated. A pooled mean percentage nonsusceptible (%NS) was calculated for each phenotype as the sum of nonsusceptible (or resistant) pathogens, divided by the sum of pathogens tested for susceptibility, and multiplied by 100. Percentage NS was not calculated for any phenotype for which <20 pathogens were tested. Differences in the %NS across location types or surgical categories were assessed for statistical significance using a mid-P exact test, and P < .05 was considered statistically significant. The percentage of pathogens with reported susceptibility results (referred to as “percentage tested”) is defined elsewhere3 (link) and was calculated for each bacterial phenotype, as well as for select Candida spp. Pathogens and susceptibility data for CLABSIs categorized as MBI-LCBI were analyzed separately and are presented in the online supplement.14 “Selective reporting” occurs when laboratories suppress AST results as part of antimicrobial stewardship efforts. This practice could contribute to a higher number of pathogens reported to the NHSN as “not tested” to certain drugs. To assess the impact of selective reporting on the national %NS, we applied an alternate calculation for CRE and ESC nonsusceptibility. If a pathogen was reported as “not tested” to carbapenems, susceptibility was inferred as S if the pathogen tested susceptible to at least 2 of the following: ampicillin, ampicillin/sulbactam, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, PIPTAZ, cefazolin, cefoxitin, or cefotetan. If a pathogen was reported as “not tested” to ESCs, susceptibility was inferred as S if the pathogen tested susceptible to at least 2 of the following: ampicillin, aztreonam, or cefazolin. Therefore, the number of tested isolates increases under the alternate calculation. Percentage NS was calculated using both the traditional (ie, strictly as reported) and alternate approaches.
Statistical analyses were not performed to test for temporal changes in the %NS; thus, this report does not convey any conclusions regarding changes in resistance over time. Due to differences in the stratification levels, inclusion criteria, and patient populations, the %NS values in this report should not be compared to those published in previous iterations of this report.
Publication 2019
Acinetobacter Adult Amikacin Aminoglycosides Amox clav Ampicillin ampicillin-sulbactam Antimicrobial Stewardship Asymptomatic Infections Aztreonam Bacteremia Bacteria Blood Circulation Candida Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Carbapenems Cefazolin Cefepime Cefotaxime Cefotetan Cefoxitin Ceftazidime Ceftriaxone Cephalosporins Ciprofloxacin Clinical Laboratory Services Conferences Dietary Supplements Doripenem Enterobacter Enterobacteriaceae Enterococcus Ertapenem Escherichia coli Fluoroquinolones Gentamicin Imipenem Injuries Klebsiella Klebsiella oxytoca Klebsiella pneumoniae Laboratory Infection Lanugo Levofloxacin Medical Devices Meropenem Methicillin Methicillin-Resistant Microbicides Moxifloxacin Mucous Membrane Multi-Drug Resistance Neoplasms Operative Surgical Procedures Outpatients Oxacillin pathogenesis Patients Patient Safety Pets Pharmaceutical Preparations Phenotype Piperacillin Piperacillin-Tazobactam Combination Product Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated polyvinylacetate phthalate polymer Population Group Pseudomonas aeruginosa Sepsis Staphylococcus aureus Infection Streptococcus viridans Substance Abuse Detection Susceptibility, Disease Tobramycin Urinary Tract Vancomycin Vancomycin Resistance Wound Infection
Bacteria were identified via the Phoenix automated phenotypic identification criteria (Becton Dickinson, Oxford, UK) or with API 20E strips (bioMerieux, Basingstoke, UK). Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and carbapenem resistance were established by microbroth dilution (Phoenix), British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (BSAC) agar dilution, or disc diffusion.
Modified Hodge (cloverleaf) test involving distorted carbapenem inhibition zones and imipenem-EDTA synergy tests by disc, or the MBL Etest (AB bioMerieux, Solna, Sweden) were used to screen for metallo-β-lactamase production.23 (link) The presence of blaNDM-1 was established by PCR with specific primers targeting the gene.22 (link) PCR and sequencing were used to identify other resistant genes (blaCMY-4 and blaCTX-M-15) carried by the bacterial isolates.
Conjugational transfer of antibiotic resistance to the laboratory strain E coli J53 was done on blood agar without selection. After 18 h, the mixed cultures were washed from the plates, suspended in saline, and plated onto MacConkey agar containing sodium azide (100 mg/L) and meropenem (2 mg/L). Transconjugants were confirmed to have blaNDM-1 by PCR analysis. Plasmids were subsequently isolated and typed on the basis of their origins of replication, as described by Carattoli and colleagues.11 (link)
Genomic DNA was prepared in agarose blocks and digested with the restriction enzyme XbaI (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). DNA fragments were separated by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) on a CHEF-DR III apparatus (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) for 20 h at 6 V/cm at 14°C with an initial pulse time of 0·5 s and a final pulse time of 30 s. Dendrograms of strain relatedness were created with BioNumerics software.
Genomic DNA in agarose blocks was digested with the restriction enzyme S1 (Invitrogen, Abingdon, UK). DNA fragments were separated by PFGE as above. In-gel hybridisation was done with a blaNDM-1 probe labelled with 32P (Stratgene, Amsterdam, Netherlands) with a random-primer method.22 (link) Plasmid DNA bands that hybridised with blaNDM-1 were cut from the gel, purified, and typed as described by Carattoli and colleauges.11 (link)
Full text: Click here
Publication 2010
Acid Hybridizations, Nucleic Agar Antibiotic Resistance, Microbial Bacteria beta-Lactamase Blood Carbapenems Diagnosis Diffusion DNA Restriction Enzymes Edetic Acid Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field Epsilometer Test Escherichia coli Genes Genome Imipenem Meropenem Microbicides Minimum Inhibitory Concentration Oligonucleotide Primers Pharmacotherapy Phenotype Plasmids Psychological Inhibition Pulse Rate Replication Origin Saline Solution Sepharose Sodium Azide Technique, Dilution
A total of 1522 E. coli isolates were initially included in the study. Of these, 1098 were from the BSAC Bacteraemia Resistance Surveillance Programme (www.bsacsurv.org) (Reynolds et al. 2008 ) between 2001 and 2011 (Supplemental Table S2). Up to 10 isolates (when available) were obtained for each year from 11 contributing laboratories distributed across England. The 11 centers were selected in order to provide geographical and temporal diversity. A further 424 isolates were sourced from the diagnostic laboratory at the CUH. Using the laboratory database, we selected every third isolate associated with bacteremia that had been stored in the −80°C freezer archive between 2006 and 2012. Thirteen isolates were subsequently excluded (four CUH isolates and nine BSAC isolates) based on the low quality of sequence data or species misidentification, giving a final sample size of 1509 isolates. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using the Vitek2 instrument with the N206 card (bioMerieux) for isolates from the CUH and using the agar dilution method for the BSAC collection (Andrews 2001 (link)). For the purposes of this analysis, we combined phenotypic antibiotic-resistance data from BSAC and CUH and grouped together the intermediate and resistant isolates in the analyses to represent the nonsusceptible part of the population. Since the isolates from the BSAC and CUH have been tested against different antibiotic combinations, we have antibiotic resistance data from 2001–2011 for amoxicillin and imipenem; from 2006–2012 for amikacin, tobramycin, ampicillin, ertapenem, meropenem, aztreoman, cefalotin, cefoxitin, cefepime, and trimethoprim; and throughout the study period (2001–2012) for gentamicin, tigecycline, cefuroxime, ceftazidime, cefotaxime, ciprofloxacin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, and piperacillin-tazobactam.
The National Research Ethics Service (ref. 12/EE/0439) and the CUH Research and Development (R&D) Department approved the study protocol.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2017
Agar Amikacin Amox clav Amoxicillin Ampicillin Antibiotic Resistance, Microbial Antibiotics Bacteremia Cefepime Cefotaxime Cefoxitin Ceftazidime Cefuroxime Cephalothin Ciprofloxacin Diagnosis Ertapenem Escherichia coli Gentamicin Imipenem Meropenem Microbicides Phenotype Piperacillin-Tazobactam Combination Product Susceptibility, Disease Technique, Dilution Tigecycline Tobramycin Trimethoprim
Biotin-D-lysine (BDL) and synthetic Lipid II analog were prepared as previously described.29 (link),42 (link) Moenomycin A was isolated from Flavomycin stock. Vancomycin hydrochloride was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. 2-sulfonatoethyl methanethiosulfonate (MTSES) was purchased from Toronto Research Chemicals. Beta-lactam drugs were purchased from the indicated vendors: piperacillin sodium salt (VWR), imipenem monohydrate (Toronto Research Chemicals), methicillin sodium salt, mecillinam vetranal, cefaclor, oxacillin sodium salt and cephradine (Sigma-Aldrich). S. aureus lipids, 16:0 phosphatidylglycerol (abbreviated as PG), 14:0 cardiolipin (abbreviated as CL), and 16:0 lysyl-phosphatidylglycerol (abbreviated as LPG), were purchased from Avanti Polar Lipids. Nalgene Oak Ridge High-Speed Centrifuge Tubes used for lipid extractions were purchased from Thermo Scientific. Streptavidin-HRP antibody was purchased from Pierce (Catalog #21130). Amersham ECL Prime Western Blotting Detection Reagent was purchased from GE Healthcare. Primers were purchased from Integrated DNA Technologies. Restriction endonucleases were purchased from New England Biolabs. Vectors and expression hosts were obtained from Novagen. Non-stick conical vials and pipette tips used for enzymatic reactions were from VWR. Tryptic Soy Broth and Luria Broth were purchased from Becton Dickinson.
S. aureus strain was grown at 37 °C in Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB) media under aeration with shaking. B. subtilis and E. coli MurJA29C strain were grown at 37 °C in Luria Broth (LB) media under aeration with shaking. LC/MS chromatograms were obtained on an Agilent Technologies 1100 series LC-MSD instrument using electrospray ionization (ESI). HRMS data was obtained on a Bruker Maxis Impact LC-q-TOF Mass Spectrometer using ESI. Western blots were developed using Biomax Light Film (Kodak) or imaged using an Azure C400 imaging system. ImageJ was used for densitometric analysis of western blots.
Publication 2017
(2-sulfonatoethyl)methanethiosulfonate Amdinocillin Azure A beta-Lactams Biotin Cardiolipins Cefaclor Cephradine Cloning Vectors Densitometry DNA Restriction Enzymes Enzymes Escherichia coli Flavomycin Hydrochloride, Vancomycin Imipenem Immunoglobulins Light lipid II Lipids Lysine lysylphosphatidylglycerol Methicillin Sodium moenomycin A Oligonucleotide Primers Pharmaceutical Preparations Phosphatidylglycerols Sodium, Piperacillin Sodium Chloride Sodium Oxacillin Staphylococcus aureus Strains Streptavidin tryptic soy broth Western Blot

Most recents protocols related to «Imipenem»

All patients routinely received perianal screening for CRE within 48 hours of each hospital admission. In addition, some patients received perianal bacterial culture tests when they were suspected of infection by a competent physician during hospitalization. Perianal skin and throat swab samples were collected and submitted for examination by specially trained medical staff. Bacterial culture, identification and drug sensitivity test were conducted by special technicians in the microbiology laboratory, and the target bacteria were CRE. All CRE strains were isolated from perianal skin swabs and blood samples. Blood culture was performed using an automatic blood culture system (BD, USA). The isolation and identification of bacteria were carried out strictly following the relevant provisions of the National Clinical Laboratory Procedures. VITEK 2 compact (bioMérieux, France) was used to identify the isolates and MALDI-TOF MS (bioMérieux, France) was used for further confirmation. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed in the microbiology laboratory of the hospital using an automated system (VITEK 2 Compact) with the broth microdilution and disk diffusion methods. The following antibiotics were tested: penicillins (ticarcillin, piperacillin), β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, piperacillin/tazobactam, cefoperazone/sulbactam), cephalosporins (cefazolin, cefuroxime, ceftazidime, cefepime, cefotaxime, cefotetan, cefpodoxime, ceftizoxime), quinolones (levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin), carbapenems (imipenem, meropenem, doripenem), aminoglycosides (amikacin, tobramycin), tetracyclines (tetracycline, minocycline), aztreonam, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and tigecycline. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was measured according to the guidelines of the 31st Edition of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M100-Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing.14 The detection of carbapenemases in CRE according to the modified carbapenem inactivation assay (mCIM and eCIM) provided by the CLSI 31th Edition.
Publication 2023
Amikacin Aminoglycosides Amox clav Antibiotics Aztreonam Bacteria beta-Lactamase Inhibitors Biological Assay Blood Blood Culture carbapenemase Carbapenems Cefazolin Cefepime Cefoperazone Cefotaxime Cefotetan cefpodoxime Ceftazidime Ceftizoxime Cefuroxime Cephalosporins Ciprofloxacin Clinical Laboratory Services Clinical Laboratory Techniques Diffusion Doripenem Hemic System Hospitalization Hypersensitivity Imipenem Infection isolation Levofloxacin Medical Staff Meropenem Microbicides Minimum Inhibitory Concentration Minocycline Moxifloxacin Norfloxacin Patients Penicillins Pharynx Physicians Piperacillin Piperacillin-Tazobactam Combination Product Quinolones Skin Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization Strains Substance Abuse Detection Sulbactam Susceptibility, Disease Tetracycline Tetracyclines Ticarcillin Tigecycline Tobramycin Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole Combination
Since 2009, the NRC has been located in the Department for Medical Microbiology at the Ruhr-University Bochum in Bochum, Germany. For German primary diagnostic laboratories, both clinical and private, it exclusively provides the free service for the verification and genotyping of suspected carbapenemase-producing isolates. These laboratories are requested, but not obliged, to send Enterobacterales isolates that fulfil specific criteria, for E. coli these are: elevated minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) for ertapenem (> 0.5 mg/L), meropenem or imipenem (> 2 mg/L) or decreased inhibition zone diameters of < 25 mm for ertapenem (10 µg) or < 25 mm for meropenem (10 µg) or imipenem (10 µg), largely following the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) guidelines [23 ]. Along with the sample, diagnostic laboratories are asked to provide basic epidemiological data by filling in a structured submission form in accordance with the German data protection law, including information on the patients’ sex, date of birth, inpatient or outpatient status, geographical location as based on first three numbers of the German five-digit postal code referring to the hospital or surgery where the isolate was sampled, isolate source, infection status and information on prior hospitalisation or stay abroad 6 months before detection.
Details on phenotypic and molecular methods used at the NRC for the identification of carbapenemases are described elsewhere [24 (link)]. In brief, a comprehensive range of phenotypic tests is used to detect Enterobacterales isolates suggestive of being carbapenemase-producing. Individual PCR amplifications of KPC-, VIM-, IMP-, NDM- and OXA-48-encoding genes followed by the sequencing of PCR amplicons are routinely used to confirm and identify the carbapenemase genes.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2023
carbapenemase Childbirth Diagnosis Ertapenem Escherichia coli Europeans Genes Imipenem Infection Inpatient Meropenem Microbicides Minimum Inhibitory Concentration Operative Surgical Procedures Outpatients Patients Phenotype Psychological Inhibition Susceptibility, Disease Thumb
AST was performed by the broth microdilution method using the VITEK 2 Compact System (BioMerieux, Lyon, France). The antimicrobial agents tested included piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP), cefoxitin (FOX), cefuroxime (CXM), ceftazidime (CAZ), cefotaxime (CTX), cefepime (FEP), imipenem (IPM), meropenem (MPN), amikacin (AMK), gentamicin (GEN), ciprofloxacin (CIP), levofloxacin (LEV), tetracycline (TE), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (STX), chloramphenicol (C), and aztreonam (ATM), The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were interpreted according to the recommendations of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) for Aeromonas spp. (Institute, 2015 ) E.coli ATCC25922 was used as the quality-control strain. Multidrug resistance (MDR) was defined as non-susceptibility to at least one agent in three or more antimicrobial categories (Magiorakos et al., 2012 (link)).
Full text: Click here
Publication 2023
Aeromonas Amikacin Aztreonam Cefepime Cefotaxime Cefoxitin Ceftazidime Cefuroxime Chloramphenicol Ciprofloxacin Clinical Laboratory Services Escherichia coli Gentamicin Imipenem Levofloxacin Meropenem Microbicides Minimum Inhibitory Concentration Multi-Drug Resistance Piperacillin-Tazobactam Combination Product Strains Susceptibility, Disease Tetracycline Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole Combination
Stocks of antibiotics to test were prepared by dissolving them according to CLSI M100 Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing41 in the indicated solvent and diluent to a final concentration of 5.12 mg/ml. Salts were corrected for their mass. Used antibiotics: Ciprofloxacin hydrochloride monohydrate (Sigma-Aldrich; European Pharmacopoeia Reference Standard), piperacillin sodium (Sigma-Aldrich, analytical standard), imipenem (Sigma-Aldrich; European Pharmacopoeia Reference Standard), ceftazidime pentahydrate (Sigma-Aldrich; European Pharmacopoeia Reference Standard) and aztreonam (United States Pharmacopeia Reference Standard).
Working stocks were then prepared by serial dilution in MHB II medium. Plates for checkerboards were prepared by adding 25 µl of each antibiotic at 4x the final concentration to be tested in the respective well in a flat bottom, transparent 96 well plate (Greiner). In one column a growth control was prepared by adding 50 µl of MHB II medium. A sterility control was prepared in a second column by adding 100 µl of MHB II medium. Inocula of the strain to be tested were prepared by inoculating physiological NaCl solution to a McFarland standard of 0.5 from overnight cultures. In total, 125 µl of this solution were then added to 15 mL of MHB II medium and 50 µl of this inoculum added to the wells containing antibiotics as well as to the growth control wells. Plates were incubated for 20 h at 37 °C. After incubation the OD600 values were determined using a Tecan Infinite® 200 PRO. Each assay was prepared in duplicate. For each replicate, the ratio of signal for each well and the mean of the sterility control was calculated. The mean value of both replicates was calculated. If the value was smaller than 1.5, this concentration was considered to be inhibitive. From these values, the MIC and FIC-I for the tested antibiotics were calculated as follows: FICA=MICA(combined)/MICA(singleantibiotic) FICB=MICB(combined)/MICB(singleantibiotic) FIC-I=FICA+FICB
Interpretation of FIC-I: ≤ 0.5: Synergism; >0.5 to 1: additive effect; >1 to 4: indifferent effect; >4: Antagonism
Full text: Click here
Publication 2023
antagonists Antibiotics Antibiotics, Antitubercular Apathy Aztreonam Biological Assay Ceftazidime Pentahydrate DNA Replication Europeans Hydrochloride, Ciprofloxacin Imipenem MICA protein, human Microbicides mutalipocin II physiology Psychological Inhibition Salts Sodium, Piperacillin Sodium Chloride Solvents Sterility, Reproductive Strains Susceptibility, Disease Technique, Dilution
Steady-state kinetic experiments were performed following the hydrolysis of the β-lactams at 25 °C in 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.5) plus 100 μM ZnCl2. The data of the real-time absorbances of meropenem (298 nm), imipenem (297 nm), ceftazidime (257 nm), aztreonam (318 nm), cefotaxime (264 nm), cefepime (254 nm), piperacillin (232 nm), ceftriaxone (240 nm), and ampicillin (235 nm) were collected with a SHIMADZU UV2550 spectrophotometer (Kyoto, Japan). Kinetic parameters were determined under initial-rate conditions using the GraphPad Prism 8.1 software to generate Michaelis–Menten curves or by analyzing the complete hydrolysis time courses [9 (link)].
Full text: Click here
Publication 2023
Ampicillin Aztreonam Cefepime Cefotaxime Ceftazidime Ceftriaxone HEPES Hydrolysis Imipenem Kinetics Lactams Meropenem Piperacillin prisma

Top products related to «Imipenem»

Sourced in France, United States, Germany, Italy, Macao, United Kingdom, Sweden, Belgium, India, Japan, Brazil
The Vitek 2 system is an automated microbiology platform designed for the rapid identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of microorganisms. The system utilizes miniaturized biochemical testing to provide accurate results for a wide range of bacterial and yeast species.
Sourced in United States, Germany, France, China, Sao Tome and Principe, United Kingdom, Italy, India, Spain, Brazil, Canada
Imipenem is a broad-spectrum antibiotic medication used to treat various bacterial infections. It is a member of the carbapenem class of antibiotics and functions by inhibiting bacterial cell wall synthesis, leading to cell death.
Sourced in France, Sweden, United States, United Kingdom, Germany, Denmark, Italy, Australia, Spain, Switzerland, Japan
Etest is a quantitative antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) method developed by bioMérieux. It provides minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values for specific antimicrobial agents. Etest utilizes a predefined antimicrobial gradient on a plastic strip to determine the MIC of a tested microorganism.
Sourced in United Kingdom, United States, Italy
Imipenem is a broad-spectrum antibiotic that belongs to the carbapenem class of antibiotics. It is used in the treatment of various bacterial infections. Imipenem functions by inhibiting the synthesis of the bacterial cell wall, leading to cell death.
Sourced in United Kingdom, United States, Germany, Italy, Belgium, Ireland, India
Ciprofloxacin is a synthetic antibiotic that belongs to the fluoroquinolone class. It is a broad-spectrum antimicrobial agent effective against a variety of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.
Sourced in France, United States, Germany, Italy, United Kingdom, Canada, Poland, Macao
The Vitek 2 is a compact automated microbiology system designed for the identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of clinically significant bacteria and yeasts. The system utilizes advanced colorimetric technology to enable rapid and accurate results for clinical decision-making.
Sourced in United Kingdom, United States, Italy, Germany, France, India, Spain, China
Mueller-Hinton agar is a microbiological growth medium used for the antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bacteria. It is a standardized agar formulation that supports the growth of a wide range of bacteria and allows for the consistent evaluation of their susceptibility to various antimicrobial agents.
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom, Germany, Canada, France, Belgium, Switzerland, Italy, Spain, China, Ireland, Israel, Sweden, Austria, Australia, Japan, India, Argentina, Denmark, Netherlands, Macao, Brazil, Portugal, Panama
Gentamicin is a laboratory reagent used for the detection and quantification of the antibiotic gentamicin in biological samples. It is a commonly used tool in research and clinical settings.
Sourced in France, United States, Germany, Poland, Macao
The VITEK 2 Compact system is a compact automated microbiology instrument used for the identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of microorganisms. It is designed to perform rapid and accurate analysis of clinical samples in a laboratory setting.
Sourced in United Kingdom, United States, Ireland
Amikacin is an antibiotic medication used to treat bacterial infections. It is a type of aminoglycoside antibiotic that works by inhibiting protein synthesis in bacteria, leading to their death or inhibition of growth. Amikacin is commonly used to treat infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria, such as Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter, and Klebsiella.

More about "Imipenem"

Imipenem is a broad-spectrum carbapenem antibiotic used to treat severe bacterial infections caused by a wide range of Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa and many drug-resistant strains.
It works by inhibiting cell wall synthesis, leading to bacterial cell death.
Researchers can utilize the Vitek 2 system, a automated microbiology platform, to perform antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) for Imipenem.
The Etest, a gradient diffusion method, can also be used to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of Imipenem.
Ciprofloxacin, another antibiotic, may be tested alongside Imipenem using the Vitek 2 or Etest methods on Mueller-Hinton agar.
Additionally, other antibiotics like Gentamicin and Amikacin can be evaluated in conjunction with Imipenem to assess the efficacy against a broader range of pathogens.
The VITEK 2 Compact system is a compact version of the Vitek 2 platform, providing a streamlined solution for Imipenem and other antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
PubCompare.ai, an AI-driven platform, can help researchers locate the most accurate and reproducible protocols for Imipenem research from literature, preprints, and patents, allowing side-by-side comparisons of multiple methods to identify the optimal approach for individual research needs and helping to optimize Imipenem studies.