The largest database of trusted experimental protocols
> Chemicals & Drugs > Antibiotic > Tobramycin

Tobramycin

Tobramycin is an aminoglycoside antibiotic used to treat bacterial infections, particularly those caused by Gram-negative bacteria.
It is commonly used to manage pulmonary exacerbations in patients with cystic fibrosis.
Tobramycin works by interfering with bacterial protein synthesis, leading to cell death.
Researchers can leverage PubCompare.ai to optimize Tobramycin protocols by easily locating and comparing procedures from literature, preprints, and patents.
This AI-driven analysis enhances reproducibility and accuracy, ensuring researchers find the best protocols and products for their work.
Experiecne the power of data-driven decision making with PubCompare.ai to enhance your Tobramycin research.

Most cited protocols related to «Tobramycin»

Protocol full text hidden due to copyright restrictions

Open the protocol to access the free full text link

Publication 2009
2-(dimethylaminostyryl)-1-ethylpyridinium Amikacin Amiloride Aminoglycosides ARID1A protein, human Auditory Hair Cell Cell Survival Embryo Fishes Gentamicin Hair Investigational New Drugs Kanamycin Larva Neomycin Pharmaceutical Preparations Streptomycin Tobramycin tricaine Zebrafish
The CLABSIs,7 CAUTIs,8 select VAEs,9 and SSIs10 that occurred between 2015–2017 and had been reported to the NHSN’s Patient Safety Component as of July 1, 2018, were included in this report. These HAIs were reported by acute-care hospitals, critical access hospitals, LTACHs, and IRFs from all US states and territories. Unless otherwise noted, CLABSI data included events classified as mucosal barrier injury laboratory-confirmed bloodstream infection (MBI-LCBI). VAE data were limited to events classified as possible ventilator-associated pneumonia (PVAP) because this is the only subtype of VAE for which a pathogen can be reported. Asymptomatic bacteremic urinary tract infections, CLABSIs reported from IRFs, and outpatient SSIs were excluded.
The NHSN protocols provide guidance for attributing device-associated (DA) HAIs (ie, CLABSIs, CAUTIs, and PVAPs) to a CDC-defined location type, and SSIs to a CDC operative procedure code. Due to known differences in pathogens and resistance patterns between adult and pediatric populations,11 ,12 (link) this report was limited to DA HAIs attributed to adult location types, and to SSIs that occurred in patients ≥18 years old at the time of surgery. Comparable data from pediatric locations and patients are described in a companion report.13 (link)Unless otherwise noted, DA HAIs were stratified into 5 mutually exclusive location categories: hospital wards (inclusive of step-down, mixed acuity, and specialty care areas), hospital intensive care units (ICUs), hospital oncology units (ie, oncology ICUs and wards), LTACHs (ie, LTACH ICUs and wards), and IRFs (ie, freestanding IRFs and CMS-certified IRF units located within a hospital). SSI data were stratified into mutually exclusive surgical categories based on the operative procedure code. Pathogen distributions were also analyzed separately for each operative procedure code and are available in the online supplement.14 Up to 3 pathogens and their antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) results can be reported to the NHSN for each HAI. The AST results for the drugs included in this analysis were reported using the interpretive categories of “susceptible” (S), “intermediate” (I), “resistant” (R), or “not tested.” Instead of “intermediate,” cefepime had the category interpretation of “intermediate/susceptible-dose dependent” (I/S-DD), which was treated as I for this analysis. Laboratories are expected to follow current guidelines from the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) for AST.15 Naming conventions for pathogens generally adhered to the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms (SNOMED CT) Preferred Term.16 In some cases, pathogens were grouped by genus or clinically recognized group (eg, viridans group streptococci) (Appendices A2A4 online). Results for Klebsiella spp were limited to K. pneumoniae and K. oxytoca; K. aerogenes was considered part of Enterobacter spp due to the timing of the NHSN’s adoption of its name change.17 (link)Staphylococcus aureus was defined as methicillin-resistant (MRSA) if the isolate was reported as R to oxacillin, cefoxitin, or methicillin. Enterococcus spp isolates were defined as vancomycin-resistant (VRE) if they tested R to vancomycin. VRE data were analyzed for all HAIs except PVAP because Enterococcus spp are excluded from the NHSN’s PVAP surveillance definition under most scenarios. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) were defined as Klebsiella spp, Escherichia coli, or Enterobacter spp that tested R to imipenem, meropenem, doripenem, or ertapenem. All other pathogen-antimicrobial combinations (phenotypes) were described using a metric for nonsusceptibility, which included pathogens that tested I or R to the applicable drugs. To be defined as nonsusceptible to extended-spectrum cephalosporins (ESCs), pathogens must have tested I or R to either ceftazidime or cefepime (Pseudomonas aeruginosa) or to ceftazidime, cefepime, ceftriaxone, or cefotaxime (Klebsiella spp and E. coli). For Enterobacter spp, evaluation of nonsusceptibility to ESCs was limited to cefepime due to Enterobacter’s inducible resistance to other ESCs. Fluoroquinolone nonsusceptibility was defined as a result of I or R to either ciprofloxacin or levofloxacin (P. aeruginosa) or to ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, or moxifloxacin (E. coli). Carbapenem nonsusceptibility in P. aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp was defined as a result of I or R to imipenem, meropenem, or doripenem. Nonsusceptibility to aminoglycosides was defined as a result of I or R to gentamicin, amikacin, or tobramycin. Finally, multi-drug-resistance (MDR) was approximated by adapting previously established definitions18 (link) that require nonsusceptibility to at least 1 agent within 3 different drug classes. For Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa, 5 classes were considered in the criteria: ESCs (or cefepime for Enterobacter spp), fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides, carbapenems, and piperacillin (PIP) or piperacillin/tazobactam (PIPTAZ). A sixth class, ampicillin/sulbactam, was included in the criteria for Acinetobacter spp.
Data were analyzed using SAS version 9.4 software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). For all HAIs and pathogens, absolute frequencies and distributions were calculated by HAI, location, and surgical category. The 15 most commonly reported pathogens were identified, and their frequencies and ranks within each stratum were calculated. A pooled mean percentage nonsusceptible (%NS) was calculated for each phenotype as the sum of nonsusceptible (or resistant) pathogens, divided by the sum of pathogens tested for susceptibility, and multiplied by 100. Percentage NS was not calculated for any phenotype for which <20 pathogens were tested. Differences in the %NS across location types or surgical categories were assessed for statistical significance using a mid-P exact test, and P < .05 was considered statistically significant. The percentage of pathogens with reported susceptibility results (referred to as “percentage tested”) is defined elsewhere3 (link) and was calculated for each bacterial phenotype, as well as for select Candida spp. Pathogens and susceptibility data for CLABSIs categorized as MBI-LCBI were analyzed separately and are presented in the online supplement.14 “Selective reporting” occurs when laboratories suppress AST results as part of antimicrobial stewardship efforts. This practice could contribute to a higher number of pathogens reported to the NHSN as “not tested” to certain drugs. To assess the impact of selective reporting on the national %NS, we applied an alternate calculation for CRE and ESC nonsusceptibility. If a pathogen was reported as “not tested” to carbapenems, susceptibility was inferred as S if the pathogen tested susceptible to at least 2 of the following: ampicillin, ampicillin/sulbactam, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, PIPTAZ, cefazolin, cefoxitin, or cefotetan. If a pathogen was reported as “not tested” to ESCs, susceptibility was inferred as S if the pathogen tested susceptible to at least 2 of the following: ampicillin, aztreonam, or cefazolin. Therefore, the number of tested isolates increases under the alternate calculation. Percentage NS was calculated using both the traditional (ie, strictly as reported) and alternate approaches.
Statistical analyses were not performed to test for temporal changes in the %NS; thus, this report does not convey any conclusions regarding changes in resistance over time. Due to differences in the stratification levels, inclusion criteria, and patient populations, the %NS values in this report should not be compared to those published in previous iterations of this report.
Publication 2019
Acinetobacter Adult Amikacin Aminoglycosides Amox clav Ampicillin ampicillin-sulbactam Antimicrobial Stewardship Asymptomatic Infections Aztreonam Bacteremia Bacteria Blood Circulation Candida Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Carbapenems Cefazolin Cefepime Cefotaxime Cefotetan Cefoxitin Ceftazidime Ceftriaxone Cephalosporins Ciprofloxacin Clinical Laboratory Services Conferences Dietary Supplements Doripenem Enterobacter Enterobacteriaceae Enterococcus Ertapenem Escherichia coli Fluoroquinolones Gentamicin Imipenem Injuries Klebsiella Klebsiella oxytoca Klebsiella pneumoniae Laboratory Infection Lanugo Levofloxacin Medical Devices Meropenem Methicillin Methicillin-Resistant Microbicides Moxifloxacin Mucous Membrane Multi-Drug Resistance Neoplasms Operative Surgical Procedures Outpatients Oxacillin pathogenesis Patients Patient Safety Pets Pharmaceutical Preparations Phenotype Piperacillin Piperacillin-Tazobactam Combination Product Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated polyvinylacetate phthalate polymer Population Group Pseudomonas aeruginosa Sepsis Staphylococcus aureus Infection Streptococcus viridans Substance Abuse Detection Susceptibility, Disease Tobramycin Urinary Tract Vancomycin Vancomycin Resistance Wound Infection
A total of 1522 E. coli isolates were initially included in the study. Of these, 1098 were from the BSAC Bacteraemia Resistance Surveillance Programme (www.bsacsurv.org) (Reynolds et al. 2008 ) between 2001 and 2011 (Supplemental Table S2). Up to 10 isolates (when available) were obtained for each year from 11 contributing laboratories distributed across England. The 11 centers were selected in order to provide geographical and temporal diversity. A further 424 isolates were sourced from the diagnostic laboratory at the CUH. Using the laboratory database, we selected every third isolate associated with bacteremia that had been stored in the −80°C freezer archive between 2006 and 2012. Thirteen isolates were subsequently excluded (four CUH isolates and nine BSAC isolates) based on the low quality of sequence data or species misidentification, giving a final sample size of 1509 isolates. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using the Vitek2 instrument with the N206 card (bioMerieux) for isolates from the CUH and using the agar dilution method for the BSAC collection (Andrews 2001 (link)). For the purposes of this analysis, we combined phenotypic antibiotic-resistance data from BSAC and CUH and grouped together the intermediate and resistant isolates in the analyses to represent the nonsusceptible part of the population. Since the isolates from the BSAC and CUH have been tested against different antibiotic combinations, we have antibiotic resistance data from 2001–2011 for amoxicillin and imipenem; from 2006–2012 for amikacin, tobramycin, ampicillin, ertapenem, meropenem, aztreoman, cefalotin, cefoxitin, cefepime, and trimethoprim; and throughout the study period (2001–2012) for gentamicin, tigecycline, cefuroxime, ceftazidime, cefotaxime, ciprofloxacin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, and piperacillin-tazobactam.
The National Research Ethics Service (ref. 12/EE/0439) and the CUH Research and Development (R&D) Department approved the study protocol.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2017
Agar Amikacin Amox clav Amoxicillin Ampicillin Antibiotic Resistance, Microbial Antibiotics Bacteremia Cefepime Cefotaxime Cefoxitin Ceftazidime Cefuroxime Cephalothin Ciprofloxacin Diagnosis Ertapenem Escherichia coli Gentamicin Imipenem Meropenem Microbicides Phenotype Piperacillin-Tazobactam Combination Product Susceptibility, Disease Technique, Dilution Tigecycline Tobramycin Trimethoprim
Susceptibility was tested by disc diffusion following the CLSI recommendations using Mueller–Hinton agar (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) and 10 antimicrobial agents, which are primarily effective against A. baumannii[37] (link). The resistance breakpoints were adjusted according to the known distribution of inhibition zone diameters among A. baumannii strains. These values were identical to those of the CLSI for intermediate susceptibilities except for tetracycline and piperacillin, for which the CLSI values for resistance were used. The agents (µg per disc; resistance breakpoint in mm) included ampicillin+sulbactam (10+10; ≤14), piperacillin (100; ≤17), ceftazidime (30; ≤17), imipenem (10; ≤15), gentamicin (10; ≤14), tobramycin (10; ≤14), amikacin (30; ≤16), ofloxacin (5; ≤15), sulfamethoxazole+trimethoprim (23.75+1.25; ≤15) and tetracycline (30; ≤14) (Oxoid). Multidrug resistance was defined as resistance to at least one representative of three or more of the five classes of antimicrobial agents, i.e. beta-lactams, aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, tetracyclines or the combination of sulfonamide and diaminopyrimidine.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2010
Agar Amikacin Aminoglycosides ampicillin-sulbactam beta-Lactams Ceftazidime Diffusion Fluoroquinolones Gentamicin Imipenem Microbicides Multi-Drug Resistance Ofloxacin Piperacillin Psychological Inhibition Strains Sulfonamides Susceptibility, Disease Tetracycline Tetracyclines Tobramycin Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole Combination
MICs of aminoglycosides (amikacin, gentamicin, tobramycin, apramycin, neomycin, paromomycin, and streptomycin), ciprofloxacin, imipenem, meropenem, piperacillin-tazobactam and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole were determined using broth microdilution following the recommendations of the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) (CLSI, 2017 ). Concentrations of these agents ranged from 0.5 to 256 μg/ml except for trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 was used as the quality control and all tests were performed in triplicate. Breakpoints defined by CLST for amikacin, gentamicin and tobramycin (for amikacin, susceptible [S] ≤16 μg/ml, intermediate [I] 32 μg/ml, resistant [R], ≥64 μg/ml; for gentamicin and tobramycin, S ≤4 μg/ml, I 8 μg/ml, R ≥16 μg/ml), ciprofloxacin, imipenem, meropenem, piperacillin-tazobactam and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (CLSI, 2017 ) was used, while no CLSI- or the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST)-defined breakpoints for the other four agents are available. Breakpoints defined by US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or the National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System were used for streptomycin (S, ≤32 μg/ml; R, ≥64 μg/ml) and apramycin (S, ≤8 μg/ml; I, 16 or 32 μg/ml; R, ≥64 μg/ml) (Smith and Kirby, 2016 (link)), respectively. Those defined by Comite de L'Antibiogramme de la Société Française de Microbiologie (http://www.sfm-microbiologie.org/) were used for neomycin and paromomycin (S, ≤8 μg/ml; R, >16 μg/ml; for both agents).
Full text: Click here
Publication 2017
Amikacin Aminoglycosides apramycin Ciprofloxacin Clinical Laboratory Services Comite Escherichia coli Europeans Gentamicin Imipenem Meropenem Microbicides Minimum Inhibitory Concentration Neomycin Paromomycin Piperacillin-Tazobactam Combination Product Streptomycin Susceptibility, Disease Tobramycin Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole Combination

Most recents protocols related to «Tobramycin»

All patients routinely received perianal screening for CRE within 48 hours of each hospital admission. In addition, some patients received perianal bacterial culture tests when they were suspected of infection by a competent physician during hospitalization. Perianal skin and throat swab samples were collected and submitted for examination by specially trained medical staff. Bacterial culture, identification and drug sensitivity test were conducted by special technicians in the microbiology laboratory, and the target bacteria were CRE. All CRE strains were isolated from perianal skin swabs and blood samples. Blood culture was performed using an automatic blood culture system (BD, USA). The isolation and identification of bacteria were carried out strictly following the relevant provisions of the National Clinical Laboratory Procedures. VITEK 2 compact (bioMérieux, France) was used to identify the isolates and MALDI-TOF MS (bioMérieux, France) was used for further confirmation. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed in the microbiology laboratory of the hospital using an automated system (VITEK 2 Compact) with the broth microdilution and disk diffusion methods. The following antibiotics were tested: penicillins (ticarcillin, piperacillin), β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, piperacillin/tazobactam, cefoperazone/sulbactam), cephalosporins (cefazolin, cefuroxime, ceftazidime, cefepime, cefotaxime, cefotetan, cefpodoxime, ceftizoxime), quinolones (levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin), carbapenems (imipenem, meropenem, doripenem), aminoglycosides (amikacin, tobramycin), tetracyclines (tetracycline, minocycline), aztreonam, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and tigecycline. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was measured according to the guidelines of the 31st Edition of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M100-Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing.14 The detection of carbapenemases in CRE according to the modified carbapenem inactivation assay (mCIM and eCIM) provided by the CLSI 31th Edition.
Publication 2023
Amikacin Aminoglycosides Amox clav Antibiotics Aztreonam Bacteria beta-Lactamase Inhibitors Biological Assay Blood Blood Culture carbapenemase Carbapenems Cefazolin Cefepime Cefoperazone Cefotaxime Cefotetan cefpodoxime Ceftazidime Ceftizoxime Cefuroxime Cephalosporins Ciprofloxacin Clinical Laboratory Services Clinical Laboratory Techniques Diffusion Doripenem Hemic System Hospitalization Hypersensitivity Imipenem Infection isolation Levofloxacin Medical Staff Meropenem Microbicides Minimum Inhibitory Concentration Minocycline Moxifloxacin Norfloxacin Patients Penicillins Pharynx Physicians Piperacillin Piperacillin-Tazobactam Combination Product Quinolones Skin Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization Strains Substance Abuse Detection Sulbactam Susceptibility, Disease Tetracycline Tetracyclines Ticarcillin Tigecycline Tobramycin Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole Combination
Initially, an intracanalicular ointment infiltration (IOI) treatment with an ophthalmic corticosteroid/antibiotic combination (tobramycin and dexamethasone eye ointment; TobraDex; Alcon) was adopted for all patients, which was a safe and non-invasive approach that was initially introduced by Xu et al (9 (link)). Specifically, the discharges and concretions were expressed thoroughly, followed by lacrimal duct irrigation with physiological saline. Subsequently, ~0.2 ml antibiotic/corticosteroid eye ointment was injected into the lacrimal duct weekly for 2-8 weeks and topical antibiotic eye drops were administered four times a day.
A total of five patients who responded poorly to IOI underwent routine surgical treatment. First, a silicone Crawford tube (Shandong Bausch & Lomb Freda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.,) was intubated into the lacrimal passage through the upper and lower lacrimal puncta under topical anesthesia. Using probe guidance, an incision was made on the canaliculus, parallel to the eyelid margin and at a distance of 2 mm from the punctum. The canalicular lumen was exposed to remove intracanalicular dacryoliths and hyperplastic granulation tissue. After that, the canalicular incision was closed with an 8-0 absorbable thread. Subsequently, the lacrimal duct was irrigated and injected with 0.2 ml antibiotic/corticosteroid eye ointment. Irrigation and injection with eye ointment were performed weekly for 2-8 weeks after surgery. In addition, the patients were treated with topical antibiotic eye drops four times daily. The silicone drainage tube remained in place for 3-6 months.
Publication 2023
Administration, Ophthalmic Adrenal Cortex Hormones Antibiotics Dexamethasone Drainage Duct, Lacrimal Eye Drops Eyelids Granulation Tissue Hyperplasia Lacrimal Punctum Ointments Operative Surgical Procedures Patients Pharmaceutical Preparations physiology Saline Solution Silicones TobraDex Tobramycin Topical Anesthetics
The MIC of amikacin, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, chloramphenicol and imipenem (all obtained from Sigma), and tobramycin (obtained from TCI Europe) was determined according to the EUCAST guidelines [37 ]. Briefly, twofold serial dilutions of antibiotics were made in Mueller–Hinton broth (Neogen) and approx. 105 c.f.u. ml−1P. aeruginosa was added to the wells of a flat bottom 96-well microtitre plate (total volume of 200 µl/well). After 24 h growth at 37 °C, the optical density (OD)590 was measured with an Envision multimode plate reader (PerkinElmer) and the MIC was defined as the antibiotic concentration that fully inhibited the growth. MICs were determined for the WT P. aeruginosa PAO1 and the lineages that were experimentally evolved in the presence of tobramycin, C-30 or the combination of both (three lineages for each treatment, the median MIC for the three lineages was calculated).
Full text: Click here
Publication 2023
Amikacin Antibiotics Antibiotics, Antitubercular Chloramphenicol Ciprofloxacin Gentamicin Imipenem Pseudomonas aeruginosa Technique, Dilution Tobramycin Vision
The in vivo murine peritonitis/sepsis model was set up as previously described [48 (link)]. Briefly, eight NMRI mice per treatment group received an intraperitoneal injection with 5×106 c.f.u. of P. aeruginosa PAO1. One hour after infection the mice were treated with 30 mg kg−1 BW tobramycin, 1 mg kg−1 BW C-30 or a combination of both, and an untreated control group was treated with saline. The clinical condition of the mice was scored with a score from 0 to 6 (0=unaffected, 1=slightly affected, 2=affected, 3=clearly affected, 4=very affected and mouse must be sacrificed, 5=motionless and cold, 6=dead) as previously described [48 (link)]. The number of c.f.u. in the blood and peritoneal fluid 2 and 4 h after treatment was determined via serial dilution and drop plating on modified Conradi-Drigalski agar (10 g l−1 detergent, 1 g l−1 Na2S2O3 H2O, 0.1 g l−1 bromothymol blue, 9 g l−1 lactose and 0.4 g l−1 glucose, pH8.0; SSI, Denmark).
Full text: Click here
Publication 2023
Aftercare Agar BLOOD Bromthymol Blue Common Cold Detergents Glucose Infection Injections, Intraperitoneal Lactose Magnetic Resonance Imaging Mus Peritoneal Fluid Peritonitis Pseudomonas aeruginosa Saline Solution Sepsis Technique, Dilution Tobramycin Training Programs
The strains used in this study were obtained by experimental evolution as previously described [30 (link)] (Tables S1 and S2, available with the online version of this article). Briefly, P. aeruginosa PAO1 biofilms were repeatedly exposed to the QSI C-30 (100 µg ml−1), tobramycin (20 µg ml−1), or a combination of C-30 and tobramycin, in SCFM2, during 16 cycles. P. aeruginosa was maintained on tryptone soy agar (TSA, Neogen) and all overnight cultures were prepared in Lysogeny Broth (LB, Neogen). For each condition three independent replicate populations (lineages) were used. Whole populations of the evolved lineages were used for subsequent analyses.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2023
Agar Biofilms Biological Evolution DNA Replication Lysogeny Population Group Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strains Tobramycin

Top products related to «Tobramycin»

Sourced in United States, Germany, Italy, United Kingdom, Singapore, Sao Tome and Principe, Canada
Tobramycin is a laboratory-grade antibiotic used in research and development. It is a broad-spectrum aminoglycoside antibiotic effective against a variety of gram-negative bacteria, including Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Tobramycin is commonly utilized in microbiology and molecular biology studies.
Sourced in France, United States, Germany, Italy, Macao, United Kingdom, Sweden, Belgium, India, Japan, Brazil
The Vitek 2 system is an automated microbiology platform designed for the rapid identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of microorganisms. The system utilizes miniaturized biochemical testing to provide accurate results for a wide range of bacterial and yeast species.
Sourced in United Kingdom, United States
Tobramycin is a broad-spectrum antibiotic used in laboratory settings. It is a type of aminoglycoside antibiotic that is effective against a variety of gram-negative bacteria. Tobramycin is commonly used in research and diagnostic applications that require antibiotic selection or inhibition of bacterial growth.
Sourced in United States, Germany, United Kingdom, France, Australia, Italy, Spain, Poland, Switzerland, India, Canada, Sao Tome and Principe, China, Ireland, Czechia, Japan, Macao, Israel, Belgium, Portugal
Ciprofloxacin is a broad-spectrum antibiotic that belongs to the fluoroquinolone class of antimicrobial agents. It is used in the treatment of various bacterial infections. Ciprofloxacin functions by inhibiting the activity of bacterial DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV, which are essential enzymes for bacterial DNA replication and transcription.
Sourced in France, Sweden, United States, Germany, United Kingdom, Denmark, Italy, Australia, Spain, Switzerland, Japan
Etest is a quantitative antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) method developed by bioMérieux. It provides minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values for specific antimicrobial agents. Etest utilizes a predefined antimicrobial gradient on a plastic strip to determine the MIC of a tested microorganism.
Sourced in United Kingdom, United States, Germany, Italy, Belgium, Ireland, India
Ciprofloxacin is a synthetic antibiotic that belongs to the fluoroquinolone class. It is a broad-spectrum antimicrobial agent effective against a variety of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.
Sourced in United States, Belgium
Tobramycin is a broad-spectrum aminoglycoside antibiotic used for the treatment of various bacterial infections. It is a laboratory product designed for research and clinical applications.
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom, Germany, Canada, France, Belgium, Switzerland, Italy, Spain, China, Ireland, Israel, Sweden, Austria, Australia, Japan, India, Argentina, Denmark, Netherlands, Macao, Brazil, Portugal, Panama
Gentamicin is a laboratory reagent used for the detection and quantification of the antibiotic gentamicin in biological samples. It is a commonly used tool in research and clinical settings.
Sourced in United Kingdom, United States, Ireland
Amikacin is an antibiotic medication used to treat bacterial infections. It is a type of aminoglycoside antibiotic that works by inhibiting protein synthesis in bacteria, leading to their death or inhibition of growth. Amikacin is commonly used to treat infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria, such as Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter, and Klebsiella.
Sourced in France, United States, Germany, Poland, Macao
The VITEK 2 Compact system is a compact automated microbiology instrument used for the identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of microorganisms. It is designed to perform rapid and accurate analysis of clinical samples in a laboratory setting.

More about "Tobramycin"

Tobramycin is an aminoglycoside antibiotic used to manage bacterial infections, particularly those caused by Gram-negative bacteria.
It is commonly prescribed for treating pulmonary exacerbations in patients with cystic fibrosis.
Tobramycin works by interfering with bacterial protein synthesis, leading to cell death.
Researchers can leverage PubCompare.ai to optimize Tobramycin protocols by easily locating and comparing procedures from literature, preprints, and patents.
This AI-driven analysis enhances reproducibility and accuracy, ensuring researchers find the best protocols and products for their work.
The Vitek 2 system is a commonly used automated microbial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing platform.
It can be used to determine the susceptibility of bacteria, including those treated with Tobramycin, to various antibiotics like Ciprofloxacin and Gentamicin.
The Etest is another method for determining antimicrobial susceptibility, which can be useful for Tobramycin resistance testing.
Amikacin is another aminoglycoside antibiotic that, like Tobramycin, is used to treat Gram-negative bacterial infections.
The VITEK 2 Compact system is a smaller, more compact version of the Vitek 2 system, which can also be leveraged for antibiotic susceptibility testing, including for Tobramycin and other aminoglycosides.
Experiecne the power of data-driven decision making with PubCompare.ai to enhance your Tobramycin research and optimize your protocols for better outcomes.