The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Chlorophyll b

Chlorophyll b is a chlorophyll variant found in plants and some photosynthetic organisms.
It plays a key role in light harvesting and energy transfer within the photosynthetic apparatus.
Chlorophyll b has a distinct absorption spectrum compared to chlorophyll a, allowing plants to optimize light capture across a broader range of wavelengths.
This molecule is essetial for efficient photosynthesis and plant growth.
Researchers studying chlorophyll b can leverage AI-driven tools like PubCompare.ai to identify the best experimental protocols from literature, preprints, and patents, enhancing the reproducibility and accuracy of their studies.
Experencing the power of AI-driven insights can unlock new depths of scientific discovery in chlorophyll b research.

Most cited protocols related to «Chlorophyll b»

Growth was measured in terms of fresh weight. Seedlings were selected randomly from control and treated samples and then their fresh weight was determined. For the estimation of photosynthetic pigments (total chlorophyll, chlorophyll a + chlorophyll b), the method of Lichtenthaler (1987) (link) was adopted. For the assessment of photosynthetic performance, chlorophyll a fluorescence measurements were taken in the dark adapted leaves of control and treated seedlings using hand held leaf fluorometer (FluorPen FP 100, Photos System Instrument, Czech Republic). The estimation of NO was performed according to the method of Zhou et al. (2005) (link) as described in Singh et al. (2015) (link).
Full text: Click here
Publication 2017
ARID1A protein, human Chlorophyll Chlorophyll A chlorophyll b Fluorescence Photosynthesis Pigmentation Plant Leaves Seedlings

Cell culture and reagents: SUPT1/CCR5 CL.30 cells (provided by J. Hoxie, University of Pennsylvania) and 174×CEM cells (AIDS Research and Reagent Program, courtesy of Peter Cresswell) were maintained in RPMI 1640 (Cellgro; Fisher Scientific, Springfield, N.J.) with 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (FCS, Cellgro). The TZM.bl cell line (AIDS Research and Reagent Program, courtesy of Dr. John C. Kappes, Dr. Xiaoyun Wu and Tranzyme Inc) was maintained in DMEM (Cellgro) with 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated FCS. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from HIV seronegative leukocyte-enriched preparations purchased from the New York Blood Center using Ficoll-Hypaque density gradient centrifugation (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden). Monocytes were isolated using CD14 magnetic cell sorting (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA), with washing and elution in cold 1× PBS supplemented with 1% AB human serum (Cellgro) and 1 mM EDTA (Sigma). Monocyte purity was verified in each experiment by CD14 (MP9) and CD3 (Leu-4) staining (both Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA), with cut-off purities of 2% CD3 T cells. Monocytes were subsequently cultured in RPMI 1640 (Cellgro) containing 10 mM HEPES (GIBCO-BRL, Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY), 2 mM L-glutamine (GIBCO-BRL), 50 μM 2-mercaptoethanol (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), penicillin (100 U/ml)-streptomycin (100 μg/ml) (GIBCO-BRL), and 1% heparinized human plasma (Innovative Research, Southfield, MI) supplemented with 100 U/ml recombinant human interleukin-4 (IL-4) (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) and 1000 U/ml recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) (Biosource/Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). To generate mature DCs, day 5-cultured immature DCs were exposed to a maturation cocktail of IL-1β (10 ng/ml), IL-6 (1,000 U/ml), TNF-α (10 ng/ml) (all from R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MI) and PGE2 (1 μg/ml) (Sigma) for 48 hours. The phenotype of immature and mature DCs was routinely monitored by two-color flow cytometry using FITC-conjugated mouse Ab against HLA-DR (Becton Dickinson) combined with the following panel of phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated mouse anti-human monoclonal Abs (MAbs): anti-CD25, -CD80, -CD86 (all Becton Dickinson), and -CD83 (PN IM2218; Immunotech, Marseille, France).
Microbicide preparations: Carraguard (Lot numbers 032805, 102505, 032906-A, 011005-B, and 010908) was prepared as a 3% (w/v) stock as described [34] (link). PC-817 (Lot numbers 032805, 102705, 040306-B, 011005, and 032707-A) was prepared adding a DMSO (Sigma) or ethanol solution of MIV-150 (Medivir AB, Sweden) to Carraguard, to a final concentration of 500 μM. 2.5% (25 mg/ml) methylcellulose (MC; Lot numbers 032805, 110205, 033006-A, 011005-A, 032807, and 011008) (Fisher) was used as a placebo vehicle control gel for the in vivo studies. To test the in vivo activity of MIV-150 alone, MIV-150 was mixed with 25 mg/ml MC (Lot numbers 040306-A, 032707B, and 011908). All gels were stored at room temperature. In vitro assays with MIV-150 were set up using 10 mM MIV-150 stocks dissolved in DMSO. 3% Carraguard stock solutions were diluted initially 1∶10 (v/v) with 1× PBS using a positive displacement pipette (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany).
Virus stocks and titering: HIVMN and HIVBal stocks were sucrose gradient purified lots #P3764 and #P3953 (courtesy of the AIDS and Cancer Virus Program, SAIC-Frederick, Inc., National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD). The RT-SHIV construct is a hybrid of SIVmac239 bearing the reverse transcriptase gene derived from HIV HXB2 [38] (link), [39] (link). RT-SHIV stocks for in vivo inoculations were grown in PHA activated human PBMCs (kindly provided by Disa Böttiger, Medivir AB, Sweden). RT-SHIV stocks were titered using the 174×CEM cell line and TCID50 was calculated according to the Reed and Muench formula.
For in vitro assays, a purified and high titer stock of RT-SHIV was generated as follows: 4 liters of viral supernatant were produced in the 174×CEM cell line and harvested over a period of 28 days. Viral supernatant was pre-cleared of cellular debris, by centrifugation at 1800×g for 30 min at 4°C using a benchtop centrifuge (Eppendorf). Virus was then concentrated 100 fold, using a Labscale tangential filter flow apparatus connected in parallel with two Pellicon XL 50 Cassettes with 1000 kDa molecular weight cut-off (Millipore, Billerica, MA). For 37 ml of virus filter concentrate, virus pellets were generated by ultracentrifugation in a SW28 rotor (Beckman-Coulter, Fullerton, CA) at 100,000 g through a 1 ml 20% glycerol cushion and then virus was resuspended in 400 μl of PBS and layered onto a 9 step 24% to 56% sucrose gradient. Virus was subsequently ultracentrifuged in a SW55Ti rotor (Beckman-Coulter) at 100,000×g for 3 hours with acceleration and deceleration set at 5 and 9 respectively. For sucrose gradients, peak viral fractions were harvested by analyzing A280 using a spectrophotometer and were later confirmed to correspond to peak infectivity using the TZM.bl cell line [15] (link). Harvested fractions were diluted 1 in 5 ml in 1× PBS and subsequently pelleted at 100,000×g for 90 min in a SW55 rotor (Beckman-Coulter). The pellets were resuspended overnight in 1 ml of PBS and stored at −80°C. The titer (2.49×108 TCID50/ml) was determined using 174×CEM cells as described above.
HIV/SIV infections and mature DC transfer assays: TZM.bl cells (plated at 5×103 cells/well in 96 well flat-bottomed plates 16 hours earlier) or PBMCs activated for 48 hours with 5 μg/ml PHA (Sigma) (106 cells/ml in 200 μl in 96 well round-bottomed plates) were treated with compounds for 30 min at 37°C and then challenged with 300 TCID50 of HIVBal or HIVMN or 600 TCID50 of RT-SHIV. Activated PBMCs were recultured with complete media supplemented with 10 U/ml of IL2(Roche). For immature and mature DCs, 1.5×105 cells (in 150 μl) were pretreated with compounds and pulsed with either 3000 TCID50 of HIVBal, 4500 TCID50 of RT-SHIV or 3000 TCID50 of VSVg pseudotyped, delta HIV envelope NL43 in 96 well V-bottomed plates (Corning, NY). After 2 hours at 37°C, mature DCs were washed 4 times in media and then 103 DCs were added to 5×103 TZM.bl indicator cells or 5×103 DCs were also added to equal numbers of either SUPT1/CCR5 CL.30 cells (for HIVBal) or 174×CEM cells (for RT-SHIV). Detection of virus transfer to TZM.bl cells was by X-gal staining as described [15] (link), [40] (link). Detection of transfer to SUPT1/CCR5 CL.30 cells was by Q-PCR for HIV gag DNA and RT-SHIV transfer to 174×CEM cells was by Q-PCR for SIV gag DNA, as a function of cell numbers by using Q-PCR for albumin DNA [41] (link), [42] (link). Virus-pulsed immature DCs were washed before being cultured in 96 well round-bottomed plates at 106 cells/ml in 200 μl of IL-4/GM-CSF media. Infection of immature DCs was monitored using intracellular stain for HIV gag p24 [43] (link). The percent inhibition of infection was calculated using the following equation:
Microbicide application and in vivo challenge: Adult female Chinese rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) were housed at the Tulane National Primate Research Center (TNPRC; Covington, LA). All studies were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the TNPRC. Animal care procedures were in compliance with the regulations detailed in the Animal Welfare Act [44] and in the “Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals” [45] . All naïve animals tested negative for simian type D retroviruses, simian T cell leukemia virus-1, and SIV prior to use. Prior to virus challenge, animals received a single 30 mg i.m. injection of Depo-Provera. 35 days later, the macaques were sedated and 3 ml of compound were introduced atraumatically into the vaginal vault using a pliable French catheter. 1 ml of virus was applied 30 min later. At appropriate time points, pre and post viral challenge, animals were anesthetized with ketamine-HCl (10 mg/kg) prior to EDTA blood samples being taken (no more than 10 ml/kg/month/animal).
Anti-CD8 depletion: Monkeys were treated with the mouse-human chimeric anti-CD8 mAb cM-T807 (NIH Nonhuman Primate Reagent Resource-Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA), receiving 10 mg/ml s.c. at day 0, followed by 5 mg/kg i.v. on days 3, 7, and 10 [46] (link). To verify CD8 cell depletion, whole blood was stained according to the manufacturer's guidelines for phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated anti-CD8 (clone DK25; BD Pharmingen), fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated anti-CD4 (clone L200; Dako), peridinin-chlorophyll-Cychrome (PerCP-Cy5.5)-conjugated anti-CD3 (clone SP34; BD Pharmingen).
Plasma viral load: Plasma was collected from whole EDTA blood after bench top centrifugation (Eppendorf) at 800×g for 10 min. Contaminating platelets were removed by a second centrifugation at 800×g for 10 min. Plasma was then stored in 1 ml aliquots at −80°C until plasma viral load RNA detection. Measurement of plasma viral loads by quantitative RT-PCR was performed as previously described [47] (link), [48] (link). We defined animals that were “infected” as those which recorded greater than 1000 RNA copies/ml in ≥2 samples post infection. Animals defined as “uninfected” had undectectable viral RNA for the duration of the viral challenge study (20 weeks) or <1000 RNA copies per ml at <2 time points post challenge.
ELISPOT assay: ELISPOT assays were performed as previously described [47] (link), [49] using 300 ng p27/ml of AT-2 inactivated SIVmneE11S [50] (link) (Lot# p3926, courtesy of the AIDS and Cancer Virus Program, SAIC-Frederick) as the SIV antigen (vs the no virus microvesicle controls). SIV-specific responses were determined by subtracting the responses detected in control cultures from those induced by AT-2 SIV. In each experiment, PBMCs were also cultured with 5 μg/ml Concanavalin A (Sigma) to control for PBMC functionality and assay integrity. Spots were counted using an AID ELISPOT reader (Cell Technology, Columbia, MD) with once optimized settings through all experiments and the mean (±SEM) numbers of spot forming cells (SFCs) from triplicate or duplicate cultures per animal were enumerated.
SIV specific antibody response: Plasma samples obtained were monitored for the presence of SIV envelope Abs by using an established ELISA protocol [51] (link).
Whole blood CD8/CD4 T-cell counts: Absolute CD4 and CD8 cell counts were monitored by TruCount (BDBiosciences, Palo Alto, CA) staining of whole blood at the indicated time points.
Statistical analyses used in this study: Unless otherwise stated, data was tested for normal distribution using Origin software (Shapiro-Wilk test) (Originlab corporation, Northhampton, MA). For statistical comparisons, 2-tailed and paired t tests were used for the in vitro analyses. Fisher's Exact was calculated for in vivo analyses [52] , with the aid of software published online at http://www.langsrud.com/fisher.htm. Standard p values <0.05 were taken as statistically significant.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2008
To analyze the chlorophylls and total carotenoids content in the transgenic lines, 200 mg of leaves homogenized in liquid nitrogen was extracted twice with 2 ml of 100% methanol. Extraction was carried out at room temperature for 1 h in the dark with constant shaking. Methanol fraction from both extracts was pooled and diluted 5 folds before their absorbance values at wavelengths 666 nm, 653 nm and 470 nm were determined using an Infinite M2000 microplate reader (Tecan, Switzerland). The relative amount of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and total carotenoids were calculated from their absorbance values using previously reported formula [46 (link)].
Full text: Click here
Publication 2019
Animals, Transgenic Carotenoids Chlorophyll Chlorophyll A chlorophyll b Methanol Nitrogen
Two different protocols were used for immunofluorescence and both produced similar results. The first protocol was based on a procedure by Huang et al. (1988) in which 3% paraformaldehyde was used to fix cell wall–less mutants (cw92) in suspension before attachment to coverslips and labeling. cw92 cells from logarithmic phase liquid cultures were harvested by gentle centrifugation at 84 g for 6 min. The cells were resuspended in 3% paraformaldehyde (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Fort Washington, PA) in 0.1 M KHPO4, pH 7.4, and then fixed for 30 min at room temperature. Fixed cells were washed three times in PBS by sedimenting 1.5-ml aliquots of cells in a microfuge at 4,000 rpm for 2 min. Washed cells were resuspended in 0.5 ml H2O and adsorbed onto No. 1 glass coverslips by thoroughly coating one side with the cell suspension and immediately removing any excess liquid. The cells were allowed to air dry on the coverslips, which were subsequently placed into Coplin jars for the following extractions. Cells were permeabilized in 0.5% NP-40 in PBS for 2 min and then washed several times with H2O. Chlorophyll was extracted with three changes of ice-cold acetone for 5 min each. After a brief rinse in distilled H2O, excess liquid was wicked away and the coverslips were placed cell side up in a humidity chamber. 150–250 μl primary antibody diluted in blocking buffer A (10 mM K2HPO4, pH 7.2, 5% normal goat serum [Jackson Immunoresearch, West Grove, PA], 5% glycerol, and 1% cold water fish gelatin [Sigma Chemical Co.]) was incubated on each coverslip at 37°C for 2 h. The coverslips were washed three times with PBS in Coplin jars for 5 min each and returned to the humidity chambers. 150–250 μl aliquots of secondary antibody in blocking buffer A were incubated on the coverslips at 37°C for 1 h. After secondary antibody incubation, the coverslips were washed three times with PBS as described above, rinsed briefly with distilled H2O, and then mounted onto slides in a medium containing 2% N-propyl gallate (Sigma Chemical Co.), 30% 0.1 M Tris, pH 9, and 70% glycerol.
The alternate protocol, used for staining wild-type (cc125), bld2, and fla10 mutants, was adapted from Sanders and Salisbury (1995) (link). This procedure allowed simultaneous fixation and extraction of cells that possessed cell walls. Coverslips were coated with 1% poly-l-lysine (Sigma Chemical Co.) for 5 min, rinsed with distilled H2O, and then air dried for 30–60 min. Cells were placed on the coverslips for 5–10 min, rinsed briefly in fresh MI media, extracted in −20°C methanol in Coplin jars for 10 min, and then air dried for 10–15 min. The following steps were performed in humidity chambers at room temperature. The dried cells were rehydrated with PBS for 10 min and then treated for 30 min with 5× blocking buffer B containing 5% BSA, 1% cold water fish gelatin in PBS. The cells were incubated for another 30 min with 10% normal goat serum in 5× blocking buffer B in PBS. The cells were incubated with primary antibody in 1× blocking buffer B for 6–12 h, and then washed with six changes of 1× blocking buffer B before a 60-min incubation with secondary antibody in 1× blocking buffer B. The coverslips were washed six times with 1× blocking buffer B before mounting on slides with ProLong antifade reagent (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR).
Stained cells were viewed on a Nikon Diaphot 300 inverted microscope. Images were collected with an Image Point CCD camera (Photometrics, Tucson, AZ) and Metamorph Imaging System software (Universal Imaging Corp., West Chester, PA) running on Windows 95 (Microsoft, Redmond, WA). Images were prepared for final publication using Photoshop (Adobe Microsystems, Mountain View, CA).
Publication 1998
We studied the effects of bacterial inoculation of durum wheat seeds (Triticum durum Desf., cv. Bashkirskaya 27) on plant growth and productivity under conditions of salinity.
Bacterial strains and culture media. Gram-positive aerobic cytokinin-producing bacterium Bacillus subtilis IB-22 (GenBank MT590663) [31 (link)] and Gram-negative auxin-producing bacterium Pseudomonas mandelii IB-Ki14 (All-Russian collection of microorganisms VCM B-3250) [32 (link)] from the collection of microorganisms of Ufa Institute of Biology, RAS, were used for seed bacterization. Both bacteria are moderate halophiles (5–7% NaCl) [32 (link)] and were characterized by very low level of ABA accumulation measured in the culture media before inoculation (1–2 ng/mL, not less than 300 times lower than IAA and cytokinin concentrations in corresponding cytokinin (Bacillus subtilis IB-22 [33 (link)]) and auxin (Pseudomonas mandelii IB-Ki14 [34 (link)]) producing strains). Bacterial inoculates for seeds treatments were obtained by cultivating B. subtilis IB-22 on K1G medium as described in [34 (link)], while King B medium [35 (link)] was used for cultivation of bacteria of P. mandelii IB-Ki14. Strains of microorganisms were cultured in Erlenmeyer flasks with the appropriate nutrient medium on a shaker (160 rpm): for 72 h at 37 °C—in the case of B. subtilis IB-22, and for 48 h at 28 °C—in the case P. mandelii IB-Ki14. The biomass was separated from the nutrient solution by centrifugation for 20 min at 4000 rpm and diluted with tap water to reach appropriate inoculate density (indicated below).
Field experiments were performed in 2016–2019. Seeds were sown at a depth of 5–6 cm. There were four 1.5 m2 plots in an experimental field (54°50′ N, 55°44′ E, 170 m a.s.l.). The soil was a leached Chernozem of South wooden steppes of Bashkortostan. The ploughing horizon of unfertilized soil contained 3.65% Corg (organic carbon), was characterized by slightly acidic soil solution, high content of absorbed bases with dominating calcium (350 mmol/kg of Ca2+, 120 mmol/kg of Mg2+), and moderate availability of mobile phosphorus and alkaline hydrolysable nitrogen. Crop yields were measured in 2016, 2018, and 2019. The rainfall was about 150 mm in April–June of all the seasons. The average temperature in May–June was highest in 2016 (17°C) and lowest in 2018 (12°C). Salinity was artificially created by adding 5% (in 2019) and 10% (in 2018) NaCl solution to the soil at the rate of 10 L m−2. Microbe biomass was separated by centrifugation during 20 min at 4000 rpm and diluted in tap water to yield inoculate density of 106 colony forming units (CFU) per seed. Carboxymethylcellulose sodium salt (Na-CMC) was added during bacterization and control treatment. Unbacterized seeds treated with Na-CMC served as the control.
At the tillering stage (28 days after planting) we determined the shoots mass, leaf relative water content (RWC), osmotic potential, concentration of ABA in the leaves and roots, and chlorophyll content. Crop yield was estimated at the end of the growing season.
Laboratory experiments. To ensure proper drainage, a layer of gravel was placed at the bottom of 500 cm3 vessels. After installing a glass tube (for gas exchange), the vessels were filled with 0.45 kg of dry soil (agro-chernozem clay-illuvial, characterized by medium humus content (6.3%) and slightly acidic soil solution), containing 10% sand. Three days before the experiment, the soil in the vessels was moistened with either water or 100 mm NaCl solution to reach 100% of the total field capacity. Wheat seeds were sterilized by soaking in a solution of 96% ethanol:3% H2O2 (1:1, v/v) for 5 min and then repeatedly washed with distilled water and germinated for 24 h in darkness. Ten seedlings were placed in each vessel, and suspension of bacterial cells (1 mL (108 CFU mL−1) per each seedling) was simultaneously added to the rhizosphere by applying to the surface of the soil around roots of each seedling. Tap water (1 mL per each seedling) was added to the plants untreated with bacteria. Since total volume of water in the pot was about 200 mL, addition of 10 mL (1 mL to each of 10 seedlings in the pots) of either tap water or bacterial cells separated from the nutrient solution by centrifugation did not significantly influence concentrations of mineral nutrients or NaCl. Only single bacterial inoculation was performed without refreshed bacterial inoculation into the rhizosphere, since the used bacteria have been previously shown to efficiently colonize roots and persist on their surface [34 (link)]. Diluted supernatant obtained after peletting bacterial cells as well as the clear nutrient media processed in the same way as bacterial preparation did not influence plants growth. Plants were grown at 24 °C, 420 µmol m−2 s−1 PAR irradiance, and 14-h photoperiod. Plants grown in the soil without introduced bacteria served as the control. Soil moisture was maintained at 70% of the total field capacity by watering the plants with distilled water. The amount of water needed for irrigation was calculated by daily weighing vessels with plants. Transpiration, relative water content in the mature (first) leaf (RWC), water potential of the soil and leaves, and hydraulic conductivity were evaluated on the 13th day after the beginning of the experiments (the moment of plant inoculation). Roots and shoots were sampled for ABA analysis on the 11th day after inoculation. Fourteen days after plant inoculation, the fresh mass of roots and shoots and the area of leaves were evaluated.
Characteristics of water relations. Samples for measurement of tissue osmotic potential were obtained after freezing and thawing of leaves and subsequent centrifugation. Leaf osmolality was measured with the freezing point depression osmometer (Osmomat 030, Gonotec, Berlin, Germany). Leaf and soil water potentials were measured using a psychrometer (PSYPRO, “Wescor”, Logan, UT, USA). To determine RWC, mature first leaves of 10 plants were weighed and immersed in distilled water with the base; a vessel was tightly closed to saturate the air with moisture, and placed in darkness at room temperature. After 24 h, the turgid weight (TW) was determined after blotting and the dry mass was determined after drying for 24 h at 80 °C. Fresh weight (FW), dry weight (DW), and TW were used to determine relative water content: RWC = (FW − DW)/(TW − DW). Transpiration was measured by the weight loss of pots with plants, in which soil was covered for 4 h with parafilm to prevent water evaporation. The hydraulic conductivity of water pathway from roots to leaves (L) was calculated, as described [36 (link)], using the formula: L = T/[(Ψs − Ψl) f.wt.], where T is the transpiration, f.wt. is the root fresh weight, and Ψs and Ψl are the water potential of the soil and leaf, respectively.
ABA assay. Shoots and roots of four plants were sampled from different vessels (number of replicates, n = 6) (shoots of four plants and roots of 25 plants were sampled for each repetition (n = 6) in the field experiments). Before homogenization, roots were thoroughly washed from the soil. The hormones were extracted for 16 h with 80% ethanol in a ratio of 1:10. Then the alcohol extract separated by filtration was evaporated to an aqueous residue, from which the abscisic acid was extracted with diethyl ether as described [37 (link)]. In short ABA was partitioned with diethyl ether from the aqueous residue, after its dilution with distilled water and acidification with HCl to pH 2.5 (ratio of organic to aqueous phases being 3:1). Then, ABA was transferred from the organic phase into a solution of NaHCO3, (ratio of aqueous/organic phase being 1:3), reextracted from the acidified aqueous phase with diethyl ether, ABA quantitative determination was performed with ELISA using specific antibodies as described [38 (link)]. The reliability of the method was due to the specificity of the antibodies obtained against ABA and the use of a modified ABA extraction method based on reducing the volume of extractants at each stage of extraction and re-extraction, which allows efficient extraction of ABA while reducing the amount of extracted impurities. The sufficiency of ABA purification prior to immunoassay was proved by studying the chromatographic distribution of the immunoreactive material, which showed that the peak of immunoreactivity coincides only with the position of the internal ABA standard.
Membrane lipid peroxidation was determined as the amount of malondialdehyde (MDA), a product of lipid peroxidation [39 (link)].
Leaf chlorophyll index was measured by DUALEX SCIENTIFIC+ (FORCE-A, France).
Leaf area was measured by ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).
Statistics. Data were expressed as means ± S.E., which were calculated in all treatments using MS Excel. Significant differences between means were analyzed by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with bacterial and salt treatment as main factors, and a least significance difference (LSD) test to discriminate means.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2020

Most recents protocols related to «Chlorophyll b»

Chlorophylls were extracted in 80% acetone, and the absorption coefficient can be used to calculate the number of chlorophylls present: In 1971, Witham et al. The leaves were dried for four days (45 C0) in an oven. One gramme of finely ground leaf powder was combined with five millilitres of 80 percent acetone and ground in a clean mortar. The supernatant was used to measure the amount of chlorophyll by centrifuging the mixture at 5000 rpm for five minutes. The absorbance of the solution at 663 nm for chlorophyll A, 645 nm for chlorophyll B, and 652 nm for total chlorophyll was then compared to the solvent blank. Witham et al.27 used the following equation to calculate the number of chlorophylls: In the following equation, factor = 20.2 for chlorophyll is found: mg chlorophyll/gdw = Factor × (A) × V/(1000xw). In order to determine the amount of chlorophyll per gramme of dry weight (mg/gdw), Witham et al.27 calculated the number of chlorophylls using the following equation: Factor = 20.2 for chlorophyll A, 8.02 for B, and 28.8 for total A = absorbance. V is the total volume of the chlorophyll extract. W is the weight of the extracted tissue.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2024
Chlorophyll a (Chl a), chlorophyll b (Chl b), total chlorophyll (Chl T), and carotenoids (CAR) were calculated using methods presented by Arnon (33) and Lichtenthaler (34) . Accordingly, 0.5 g of fresh tissue of the leaf blade for each sample was first weighed and rubbed in a stone mortar with 80% aqueous acetone. Then, the obtained scum was isolated by a filter paper and volumetric flask, and the resulting scum was again rubbed and then isolated. Next, the product was diluted to 10 ml with 80% acetone and immediately transferred to a cell and absorbed by a spectrophotometer (Jenway 6300 model) at different wavelengths of 645, 663, and 470 nm. Eventually, Chl a, b, total Chl, and CAR contents were determined using the following formulas. It should be noted that 80% aqueous acetone was used as a Blank solution. In which V is the final volume of extract per milliliter, W is tissue weight per gram, and D is optical absorption
Publication 2024
The concentration of chlorophyll (Chl) of one gram of fresh leaves was extracted with 5 mL N,N-dimethyl-formamid overnight at 5 °C, then Chl. a and b were estimated using a spectrophotometer at 663 and 647 nm as mg/g f w [67 (link)]. The concentrations were calculated with the following equations:
Full text: Click here
Publication 2024
The decreases in chlorophyll concentrations are related to leaf yellowing, which is a sign of termination of vase life [27 ]. As a result, the photosynthetic pigments of the leaves were evaluated under various treatments at the maximum flower diameter stage [31 (link)]. Fresh leaf samples (0.1 g) were washed and incubated overnight at a cool temperature (4-5 °C) in 5 ml of N,N-dimethyl formamide solution. A spectrophotometer (Unico W49376 Spectrophotometer 1200, China) was used to quantify chlorophyll a, b, total chlorophyll, and carotenoids at 647, 663, and 470 nm [32 (link)] formulae were used to compute chlorophylls and carotenoids (mg/g fresh weight) as follows:

Chl. a =12.70 A663 – 2.79 A647

Chl. b =20.76 A647 – 4.62 A663

Total Chls =17.90 A647 + 8.08 A663

Carotenoids = [1000 A470 – (3.72 chl. a - 104 chl. b)]/229

Full text: Click here
Publication 2024
Chlorophyll a and b of the leaves, and carotenoid content of leaves and fruits were determined as described by Lichtenthaler60 (link) with little modification. A 0.2 g of both ground leaf tissues and fruit pericarp were separately homogenized in 2 mL of 80% acetone. The mixture was centrifuged at 15,000×g for 15 min and the absorbance of the supernatant was measured at 646.8, 663.2, and 470 nm using a UV–Vis spectrophotometer (Jenway, Staffordshire, UK) against 80% acetone as blank. Leaf chlorophyll a and b, and the total carotenoid content of both leaves and fruits were expressed as a µg/g FW of the sample.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2024

Top products related to «Chlorophyll b»

Sourced in Japan, United States, Germany, Switzerland, China, United Kingdom, Italy, Belgium, France, India
The UV-1800 is a UV-Visible spectrophotometer manufactured by Shimadzu. It is designed to measure the absorbance or transmittance of light in the ultraviolet and visible wavelength regions. The UV-1800 can be used to analyze the concentration and purity of various samples, such as organic compounds, proteins, and DNA.
Sourced in United States
The LI-6400 is a portable photosynthesis system designed for measuring gas exchange in plants. It is capable of measuring net carbon dioxide and water vapor exchange, as well as environmental conditions such as temperature, humidity, and light levels.
Sourced in Japan, United States, United Kingdom, Germany
The SPAD-502 is a portable, hand-held spectrophotometer designed to measure the Soil Plant Analysis Development (SPAD) index, which is a relative measure of leaf chlorophyll content. It provides quick and non-destructive measurements of leaf greenness or chlorophyll concentration in plants.
Sourced in United States, Germany, United Kingdom
The LI-6400XT is a portable photosynthesis system designed for measuring gas exchange in plants. It is capable of measuring net photosynthesis, transpiration, stomatal conductance, and other physiological parameters. The system consists of a control unit and a leaf chamber that encloses a portion of a plant leaf.
Sourced in Japan, United States, Germany, Switzerland, Singapore, China, Malaysia, Italy
The Shimadzu UV-1800 spectrophotometer is a laboratory instrument used for the quantitative analysis of various samples. It measures the absorption of light by a sample across the ultraviolet and visible light spectrum. The instrument is designed to provide accurate and reliable results for a wide range of applications.
Sourced in Japan, China, United Kingdom, New Zealand, United States
The UV-2550 is a UV-Vis spectrophotometer manufactured by Shimadzu. It is designed to measure the absorbance or transmittance of samples in the ultraviolet and visible light wavelength ranges.
Sourced in Germany, United States, China, Poland
Chlorophyll a is a naturally occurring pigment found in green plants, algae, and cyanobacteria. It is essential for the process of photosynthesis, which converts light energy from the sun into chemical energy for the organism. Chlorophyll a absorbs light in the blue and red regions of the visible light spectrum, allowing it to efficiently capture and utilize solar energy.
Sourced in United States, Germany, Poland
Chlorophyll b is a naturally occurring pigment found in the chloroplasts of plants. It is responsible for the green color of most plants and plays a crucial role in the process of photosynthesis.
Sourced in Germany, United States, United Kingdom, Italy, India, Spain, China, Poland, Switzerland, Australia, France, Canada, Sweden, Japan, Ireland, Brazil, Chile, Macao, Belgium, Sao Tome and Principe, Czechia, Malaysia, Denmark, Portugal, Argentina, Singapore, Israel, Netherlands, Mexico, Pakistan, Finland
Acetone is a colorless, volatile, and flammable liquid. It is a common solvent used in various industrial and laboratory applications. Acetone has a high solvency power, making it useful for dissolving a wide range of organic compounds.
Sourced in Germany
The Mini-PAM is a laboratory equipment device that measures the photosynthetic activity of plants and other photosynthetic organisms. It provides a reliable and quantitative assessment of photosynthetic performance.

More about "Chlorophyll b"