The development assay presented in
Calcium hypochlorite
It is composed of calcium, chlorine, and oxygen, and is commonly found in bleaching powders, swimming pool treatments, and water treatment applications.
Calcium hypochlorite is known for its ability to effectively kill a variety of microorganisms, making it a valuable tool in maintaining public health and hygiene.
Researchers can utilize PubCompare.ai's AI-driven platform to easily locate and compare protocols from scientific literature, preprints, and patents, enhancing the reproducibility and accuracy of their calcium hypochlroite research.
This powerful tool can help optimize research efforts and ensure researchers find the best protocols and products for their specific needs.
Most cited protocols related to «Calcium hypochlorite»
The development assay presented in
Synthesis and Characterization of Glutathione‐Protected Au Clusters: Glutathione‐protected Au clusters were fabricated according to the previously reported method with modification.
Cell Culture: Mouse macrophage RAW 264.7 cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). The cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium‐F12 (DMEM/F12 1:1) (GibcoTM) supplemented with 10% inactivated FBS, 100 U mL−1 penicillin, and 100 µg mL−1 streptomycin in 5% CO2 and 95% air at 37 °C. The cells were seeded on 24‐well plates (5 × 105 cells mL−1) and treated with 1 µg mL−1 LPS (Sigma‐Aldrich, USA) and various concentrations of Au clusters in serum‐free medium.
The Induction of OC Formation in vitro: Osteoclastogenesis was induced by primary cultured rat BMMs. Monocytes were isolated from the femoral and tibial bone marrow of 2‐week‐old SD rats
Cell Viability Assay: The RAW 264.7 cells or BMMs were inoculated into 96‐well culture plates at 5 × 103 cells per well. After incubation overnight, the culture medium was then replaced with different concentrations of Au clusters or monovalent gold compound, auranofin. The cells were incubated at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere for 24–48 h. The cell viability was investigated using a cell counting kit (CCK‐8) (Dojindo Molecular Technologies Inc., Japan) assay.
In vitro OC Formation and Resorption Assay: OC formation was evaluated by TRAP staining and actin ring formation assays. After osteoclastogenic induction for 4 days in the presence of different doses of Au clusters (10 × 10−6, 50 × 10−6, and 100 × 10−6
For the actin ring formation assay, BMMs were seeded onto glass‐bottom dishes (35 mm, MatTek Corporation) at a density of 2 × 104 cells per dish and were incubated in inducing medium for 4 days in the presence of different doses of Au clusters (10 × 10−6, 50 × 10−6, and 100 × 10−6
Resorption activity was evaluated by OC‐mediated pit formation. BMMs were cultured in Corning Osteo Assay Surface 24‐well plates coated with calcium phosphate substrate at a density of 2 × 104 cells/well. The medium was removed after 24 h of incubation, and inducing medium containing different doses of Au clusters (10 × 10−6, 50 × 10−6, and 100 × 10−6
Measurement of NO Release: RAW 264.7 cells were seeded into 96‐well plates (1 × 105 cells/well) and treated with or without LPS (1 µg mL−1) and different concentrations of Au clusters (5, 10, 20 and 50 µmol L−1). After incubation for 24 h at 37 °C, 100 µL of culture supernatant was mixed with an equivalent volume of Griess reagent (0.1% N‐[1‐naphthyl]‐ethylenediamine and 1% sulfanilamide in 5% phosphoric acid) (Beyotime Biotechnology, China) and incubated at room temperature for 10 min. The absorbance at 540 nm was measured using a microplate absorbance reader (Bio‐Rad Laboratories Inc.), and a series of known concentrations of sodium nitrite was used to construct a standard curve.
Enzyme‐Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA): The concentrations of TNF‐α, IL‐1β, IL‐6, and PGE2 in the culture supernatants and the serum and joint tissues lysate supernatants from rats were determined by ELISAs using TNF‐α, IL‐1β, IL‐6, and PGE2 ELISA kits (Shanghai Haling Biological Technology Co., Ltd., China) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Western Blot Analysis: RAW 264.7 cells were seeded into 6‐well plates at a density of 2 × 106 cells/well. After incubation without or with LPS (1 µg mL−1) and different concentration of Au nanoclusters for 24 h, the cells were collected and lysed with RIPA buffer (50 mmol L−1 Tris‐HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mmol L−1 NaCl, 1% Triton X‐100, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 1 mmol L−1 sodium orthovanadate, 50 mmol L−1 NaF, and 1 mmol L−1 ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid) along with protease inhibitor (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). The lysate was centrifuged at 13 000 rpm for 10 min, and the supernatant was stored for subsequent analysis. The concentration of protein was determined using a microplate spectrophotometer (SpectraMax M4, Molecular Devices, USA) at a wavelength of 595 nm. An equal quantity of protein (50 µg) was separated by 10% SDS‐PAGE and transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane (0.45 µm, Millipore, USA). After blocking, the membrane was incubated with specific antibodies for i‐NOS (Cell Signaling Technologies, 13120, 1:1000), COX‐2 (Cell Signaling Technologies, 12282, 1:1000), IL‐1β (Cell Signaling Technologies, 12703, 1:1000), IL‐6 (Cell Signaling Technologies, 12912, 1:1000), TNF‐α (Cell Signaling Technologies, 11948, 1:1000), phosphor‐p65 (Cell Signaling Technologies, 3033, 1:1000), p65 (Cell Signaling Technologies, 3034, 1:1000), phosphor‐IκBα (Cell Signaling Technologies, 2859, 1:1000), IκBα (Cell Signaling Technologies, 4812, 1:1000), IKKα (Cell Signaling Technologies, 2682, 1:1000), IKKβ (Cell Signaling Technologies, 8943, 1:1000), phosphor‐IKKα/β (Cell Signaling Technologies, 2697, 1:1000), phosphor‐p38 (Thr180/Tyr182) (Cell Signaling Technology, 9211, 1:200), p38 (Cell Signaling Technology, 9212, 1:1000), phosphor‐Erk (Thr202/Tyr204) (Cell Signaling Technology, 9101, 1:1000), Erk (Cell Signaling Technology, 4695, 1:1000), phosphor‐JNK (Thr183/Tyr185) (Cell Signaling Technology, 9251, 1:1000), JNK (Cell Signaling Technology, 9258, 1:1000), and actin (Cell Signaling Technologies, 4970, 1:5000), followed by incubation with an appropriate secondary antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (Beyotime Biotechnology, China). To detect protein in BMMs, the cells were stimulated with 30 ng mL−1 M‐CSF and 50 ng mL−1 RANKL for 5, 15, and 30 min along with 100 µmol L−1 Au clusters; the cells were then lysed and subjected to western blotting as described above using specific antibodies for MAPK and NF‐κB signaling pathway analysis.
Reverse‐Transcriptase PCR and Quantitative Real‐Time PCR (qPCR): Total RNA was extracted using an RNeasy Plus Mini Kit (Qiagen NV, Venlo, the Netherlands). First, 1 µg of purified total RNA was reverse transcribed into complementary DNA using an Oligo(dT)15 Primer (Promega Corporation, Fitchburg, WI, USA) and M‐MLV Reverse Transcriptase (Promega) following the manufacturer's instructions. The concentrations of mRNA were quantified by absorption at 260 nm. Equal amounts of mRNA were used to perform PCR with the corresponding primers, and β‐actin was used as an internal control. The amplification products were visualized by agarose gel electrophoresis. The oligonucleotide primers used were as follows: i‐NOS, sense, 5′‐AGCTCCTCCCAGGACCACAC‐3′, and antisense, 5′‐ACGCTGAGTACCTCATTGGC‐3′; COX‐2, sense, 5′‐ACGGAGAGAGTTCATCCCTGACCC‐3′, and antisense, 5′‐TGACTGTGGGGGGATACACCTCTC‐3′; IL‐1β, sense, 5′‐CAGGATGAGGACATGAGCACC‐3′, and antisense, 5′‐CTCTGCAGACTCAAACTCCAC‐3′; TNF‐α, sense, 5′‐CCTGTAGCCCACGTCGTAGC‐3′, and antisense, 5′‐TTGACCTCAGCGCTGAGTTG‐3′; IL‐6, sense, 5′‐GTACTCCAGAAGACCAGAGG‐3′, and antisense, 5′‐TGCTGGTGACAACCACGGCC‐3′; and β‐actin, sense, 5′‐GTGGGCCGCCCTAGGCACCAG‐3′, and antisense, 5′‐GGAGGAAGAGGATGCGGCAGT‐3′.
qPCR was performed with the iQ5 Multicolor Real‐Time PCR Detection System (Bio‐Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Total RNA was extracted using an RNeasy Plus Mini Kit (Qiagen NV, Venlo, the Netherlands). Purified RNA was reverse transcribed into complementary DNA by using an Oligo(dT)15 Primer (Promega Corporation, Fitchburg, WI, USA) and M‐MLV Reverse Transcriptase (Promega) following the manufacturer's instructions. qPCR was performed with the iQ SYBR Green Supermix (Bio‐Rad) via the standard protocol. Sequences of the primers were as follows: c‐fos, sense, 5′‐GGATTTGACTGGAGGTCTGC‐3′, and antisense, 5′‐TTGCTGATGCTCTTGACTGG‐3′; NFATc1, sense, 5′‐CTCGAAAGACAGCACTGGAGCAT‐3′, and antisense, 5′‐CGGCTGCCTTCCGTCTCATAG‐3′; TRAP, sense, 5′‐CTGGAGTGCACGATGCCAGCGACA‐3′, and antisense, 5′‐TCCGTGCTCGGCGATGGACCAGA‐3′; OSCAR, sense, 5′‐TCTGCCCCCTATGTGCTATC‐3′, and antisense, 5′‐CTCCTGCTGTGCCAATCAC‐3′; and glyceraldehyde 3‐phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), sense, 5′‐CATGGCCTTCCGTGTTCCTACCC‐3′, and antisense, 5′‐CCTCAGTGTAGCCCAAGATGCCCT‐3′. The amplification factor was calculated by the comparative threshold cycle method. The ratios of gene expression fold changes were calculated using GAPDH as a control.
Immunofluorescence: RAW 264.7 cells were seeded onto glass‐bottom dishes (35 mm, MatTek Corporation) and treated with or without LPS (1 µg mL−1) and/or 5–50 µmol L−1 of Au clusters. After 24 h, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min, permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X‐100 for 20 min, and blocked with 5% BSA in PBS at room temperature for 1 h. Then, the cells were incubated with the primary antibodies for phosphor‐p65 (1:100), p65 (1:100), phosphor‐IκBα (1:100), and IκBα (1:100) at 37 °C for 1 h, followed by a 1 h incubation with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)‐conjugated goat‐antirabbit IgG (Beyotime, China). The cell nuclei were stained with 10 µg mL−1 DAPI (Invitrogen) for 10 min. After being washed three times with PBS, the cells were observed and imaged by confocal laser scanning microscopy (Nikon Ti‐e microscope, CLSM) with excitation at wavelengths of 405 and 488 nm.
CIA and Treatment Protocols: All animal care and experiments were conducted in compliance with the requirements of the National Act on the use of experimental animals (China) and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Ethic Committee at the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Approved No. SYXK (jing) 2014‐0023). An immune emulsion was prepared by dissolving bovine type II collagen (CII) (Chondrex, Inc.) in 0.1 × 10−3
At 14 days after the secondary CII immunization, and only when the clinical scores reached 3–4, the rats were randomly assigned to the following groups, each consisting of 10 animals: Group I, saline‐injected normal control; Group II, saline‐injected CIA control; Group III, arthritic rats orally administered MTX (Shanghai Xinyi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, China; Batch number: 036151102) as reference (0.5 mg kg−1, twice a week); and Group IV, arthritic rats injected (i.p.) with Au clusters in saline (5 mg of Au kg−1 day−1). Treatment was initiated from day 22 and continued up to day 64 after primary immunization. On day 64 after arthritis induction, blood was collected from all the groups of animals for hematological and blood biochemical evaluation as well as for the measurement of cytokine levels in serum specimens. Rats were euthanized by excess CO2 inhalation, and ankle joint tissues were isolated from the hind paws of rats and homogenized with T‐PER reagent containing 1 × cocktail protease inhibitor for the detection of tissue cytokines. The major organs were excised and fixed in 10% formalin for histopathological examination.
MicroCT Analyses and Histopathological Analysis: The hind limb of each rat was harvested after sacrifice and imaged with 3D microcomputed tomography (microCT, Siemens Inveon MM Gantry CT, Germany) at a voltage of 70 kV and an electric current of 400 µA. The exposure time was 800 ms, and the scan area was 26.42 mm × 26.42 mm × 30 mm around the metatarsal bone articulations. 3D analysis and BMD were analyzed using microCT software.
For histopathological analysis, hind paws were fixed in 10% formalin after removal of the skin and were then decalcified in 5% formic acid, embedded in paraffin, microtomically sectioned into 5 µm slices, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin.
Immunohistochemistry: The hind paws were treated as above for histopathological analysis, except they were decalcified with 10% EDTA instead of 5% formic acid. The 5 µm tissue sections were deparaffinized, rehydrated, and rinsed in PBS. To inactivate endogenous peroxide, 3% H2O2 was applied. Antigens in the tissue sections were repaired by heating for 20 min in sodium citrate buffer at 95 °C in a microwave oven, followed by cooling for 20 min at room temperature. The sections were blocked with 5% goat serum; incubated with primary antibodies against phosphor‐p65 (Abcam, ab86299, 1:70), phosphor‐IκBα (Geme Tex, GTX32224, 1:30), phosphor‐IKKα/β (Geme Tex, GTX52310, 1:50), and RANK (Bioss, bs‐2695R, 1:50) at 37 °C for 70 min; and then incubated for 30 min with HRP‐conjugated secondary antibody (Beyotime, China) at 37 °C. After rinsing extensively, the sections were incubated with a diaminobenzidine (DAB) solution for 3 min at room temperature and were then counterstained with hematoxylin. The images were observed and analyzed using an Olympus CX31 light microscope.
Statistical Analyses: Sample size was determined according to preliminary data and observed effect sizes. Data are represented as the mean ± SD Data were previously tested with homogeneity of variance using Levene's test. Statistical significance of overall differences between multiple groups was determined by one‐way analysis of variance. If the test was significant, pairwise comparisons were performed using the Student's t‐test. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Four weeks later, the canals of another 3 dogs were instrumented using K-files and finished at #25 by the step-back technique, with irrigation by 1.0% sodium hypochlorite (Longly, Wuhan, China). Then, the root canals were dried with sterile paper points and filled with calcium hydroxide (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein), followed by access cavity sealing with FiltekTMZ350XT adhesive resin (3M, St. Paul, MN, USA). CBCT was taken to observe the periapical lesion for all 3 dogs, and one of the dogs was sacrificed for histopathological examination.
After 2 weeks of disinfection, the canals of the remaining two dogs were divided into the control group, E. faecalis group and multi-bacteria group. Then, the canals were prepared to #30 and irrigated with 1.0% sodium hypochlorite (Longly, Wuhan, China), followed by inoculation of bacterial suspension. For the E.faecalis group, the bacteria concentration was 106 colony-forming units [CFUs]/mL. For the multi-bacteria group, bacterial suspensions were mixed to obtain an inoculum containing E.faecalis (106 CFUs/mL), L. acidophilus (106 CFUs/mL), A. neisseriae (106 CFUs/mL) and S. gordonii (106 CFUs/mL). For the control group, the root canals were injected with sterile normal saline. The cavity was sealed with adhesive resin (3M, St. Paul, MN, USA). Two weeks later, CBCT was taken to observe the periapical lesion for 2 dogs, and all of them were sacrificed for histopathological examination.
Most recents protocols related to «Calcium hypochlorite»
Example 41
At room temperature, a first glass member and a second glass member were respectively washed in acetone, a peracetic acid solution or a calcium hypochlorite solution in sequence for 30 min, removed, washed with pure water and dried. The washed first glass member and second glass member were treated for 60 min in a mixed solution of sodium hypochlorite and aqueous ammonia (containing, in percentage by weight, 5% of sodium hypochlorite, 5% of aqueous ammonia, and 90% of deionized water) at room temperature. The residual solution on the surface was washed off for 10 min with pure water. Then the glass members were blow dried. In this way, the surfaces of the glass members were activated.
Example 39
At room temperature, a first glass member and a second glass member were respectively washed in acetone, a peracetic acid solution or a calcium hypochlorite solution in sequence for 30 min, removed, washed with pure water and dried. The washed first glass member and second glass member were treated for 30 min in a mixed solution of sodium hypochlorite and aqueous ammonia (containing, in percentage by weight, 5% of sodium hypochlorite, 15% of aqueous ammonia, and 80% of deionized water) at room temperature. The residual solution on the surface was washed off for 10 min with pure water. Then the glass members were blow dried. In this way, the surfaces of the glass members were activated.
Example 40
At room temperature, a first glass member and a second glass member were respectively washed in acetone, a peracetic acid solution or a calcium hypochlorite solution in sequence for 30 min, removed, washed with pure water and dried. The washed first glass member and second glass member were treated for 20 min in a mixed solution of sodium hypochlorite and aqueous ammonia (containing, in percentage by weight, 10% of sodium hypochlorite, 30% of aqueous ammonia, and 60% of deionized water) at room temperature. The residual solution on the surface was washed off for 10 min with pure water. Then the glass members were blow dried. In this way, the surfaces of the glass members were activated.
Top products related to «Calcium hypochlorite»
More about "Calcium hypochlorite"
It is composed of calcium, chlorine, and oxygen, and is commonly found in bleaching powders, swimming pool treatments, and water treatment applications.
Calcium hypochlorite is known for its ability to effectively kill a variety of microorganisms, making it a valuable tool in maintaining public health and hygiene.
It is commonly used in water treatment facilities, hospitals, and other settings where cleanliness and sanitation are of utmost importance.
Researchers can utilize PubCompare.ai's AI-driven platform to easily locate and compare protocols from scientific literature, preprints, and patents, enhancing the reproducibility and accuracy of their calcium hypochlroite research.
This powerful tool can help optimize research efforts and ensure researchers find the best protocols and products for their specific needs.
In addition to calcium hypochlorite, other related chemicals and compounds like sodium hypochlorite, nitric acid, and magnesium sulfate can also be utilized in various research and industrial applications.
Bone resorption assay kits, for example, may involve the use of these chemicals to assess the activity of osteoclasts, which are responsible for bone resorption.
Quercetin, a natural compound found in many plants, has also been studied for its potential anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties, and may be used in conjunction with calcium hypochlorite or other compounds in various research and therapeutic applications.
Sodium hydroxide, on the other hand, is a commonly used chemical in the production of soap, paper, and textiles, and may also be employed in certain research protocols or industrial processes involving calcium hypochlorite.
Researchers can also utilize digital cameras and other imaging technologies to capture and analyze the effects of calcium hypochlorite and related compounds on various biological systems or materials.
Potassium dihydrogen phosphate, a salt commonly used in buffer solutions, may also be relevant in research involving calcium hypochlorite or other related compounds, as it can help maintain the desired pH and ionic conditions for various experimental procedures.