The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Chlorine

Chlorine is a highly reactive halogen gas that is essential for various industrial and medical applications.
It is widely used in water purification, disinfection, and the production of plastics, pesticides, and other chemicals.
Chlorine has a distinctive green-yellow color and a pungent odor.
Exposure to high concentrations of chlorine can be hazardous, causing respiratory irritation and other health effects.
Researchers studying chlorine and its applications can utilize the PubCompare.ai platform to easily locate relevant protocols from literature, preprints, and patents, as well as leverage AI-driven comparisons to identify the most effective protocols and products for their chlorine-related studies.
This streamlines the research process and helps ensure more reliable and reproducible results.

Most cited protocols related to «Chlorine»

All the structures were solved by either Patterson or direct methods with SHELXS (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶ ). They were refined by full-matrix least squares against F2 using SHELXL-2014/3 with the help of the SHELXle graphical user interface (Hübschle et al., 2011 ▶ ). All non-H atoms were refined with anisotropic displacement parameters (ADPs). The H atoms were set to idealized positions and refined using a riding model with their isotropic displacement parameters constrained to be 1.5 times the equivalent isotropic displacements of the atoms to which they were attached for methyl H atoms and 1.2 times for all other H atoms. The bromine/chlorine disorder in 2 was treated with EADP/EXYZ constraints in SHELXL-2014/3. In compound 6 the chlorine/bromine disorder and the rotational disorder of the tertiary butyl group attached to N1 were refined using distance and ADP restraints.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2015
Anisotropy Bromine Chlorine Displacement, Psychology
Chemical structures were standardized with the function StandardiseMolecules from the R package camb [41 ] with the following options: (i) inorganic molecules were removed, and (ii) molecules were selected irrespectively of the number of fluorines, chlorines, bromines or iodines present in their structure, or of their molecular mass. Morgan fingerprints [42 (link),43 (link)] were calculated using RDkit (release version 2013.03.02) [44 ,45 ]. For the calculation of unhashed Morgan fingerprints [45 ], each compound substructure in the dataset, with a maximal diameter of four bonds, was assigned to an unambiguous identifier. Subsequently, substructures were mapped into an unhashed (keyed) array of counts. Physicochemical descriptors (PaDEL) [46 (link)] were calculated with the function GeneratePadelDescriptors from the R package camb. The R package vegan was used to generate the distributions of pairwise compound similarities (Jaccard distance) [47 ].
The amino acids composing the binding site of the mammalian cyclooxygenases considered in this study (Table 1), were described with five amino acid extended principal property scales (5 z-scales) [48 (link)]. Z-scales were calculated with the R package camb [41 ].
Full text: Click here
Publication 2015
Amino Acids Binding Sites Bromine Chlorine Fluorine Iodine Mammals Prostaglandin-Endoperoxide Synthase Vegan
The WASH Benefits Bangladesh study was a cluster-randomised trial conducted in rural villages in Gazipur, Kishoreganj, Mymensingh, and Tangail districts of Bangladesh (appendix p 2). We grouped pregnant women who lived near enough to each other into a cluster to allow delivery of interventions by a single community promoter. We hypothesised that the interventions would improve the health of the index child in each household. Each measurement round lasted about 1 year and was balanced across treatment arms and geography to minimise seasonal or geographical confounding when comparing outcomes across groups. We chose areas with low groundwater iron and arsenic (because these affect chlorine demand) and where no major water, sanitation, or nutrition programmes were ongoing or planned by the government or large non-government organisations. The study design and rationale have been published previously.10
The latrine component of the sanitation intervention was a compound level intervention. The drinking water and handwashing interventions were household level interventions. The nutrition intervention was a child-specific intervention. We assessed the diarrhoea outcome among all children in the compound who were younger than 3 years at enrolment, which could underestimate the effect of interventions targeted only to index households (drinking water, and handwashing) or index children (nutrition). After the study results were unmasked, we analysed diarrhoea prevalence restricted to index children (ie, children directly targeted by each intervention).
The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Review Committee at The International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (PR-11063), the Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects at the University of California, Berkeley (2011-09-3652), and the institutional review board at Stanford University (25863).
Full text: Click here
Publication 2018
Arm, Upper Arsenic Child Children's Health Chlorine Diarrhea Dietary Modification Ethical Review Ethics Committees, Research Homo sapiens Households Iron Obstetric Delivery Pregnant Women Youth

Protocol full text hidden due to copyright restrictions

Open the protocol to access the free full text link

Publication 2018
Acetate Acetic Acid Acetone Adenosine Monophosphate Ammonium C.I. 42655 Chlorine Chloroform Cytidine Monophosphate Deoxycholic Acid dinitrophenylhydrazine Dithiothreitol DNA Fingerprinting Edetic Acid Ethanol ethyl acetate Glucose Guanidine hen egg lysozyme Hexanes High-Performance Liquid Chromatographies Hydrochloric acid Hypochlorite Inferior Colliculus Iron Methanol Mucosa, Gastric Pepsin A Peroxide, Hydrogen Phenol Phosphates Pigs Salmo salar Serum Albumin, Bovine Sodium sodium borohydride Sodium Carboxymethylcellulose Sodium Chloride Sodium Hydroxide Streptomycin Sulfate Sulfate, Sodium Dodecyl Sulfates, Inorganic Thymidine Monophosphate Trichloroacetic Acid triphosphate Tromethamine Urea
Reagent-grade NaOCl was purchased from J. T. Baker. Hypochlorous acid was prepared in 154 mM NaCl by acidifying reagent-grade NaOCl to the pH range of 3.5 to 4.0 with dilute HCl. A Beckman pH meter was used to accurately measure the final pH values. The concentration of active total chlorine species in solution expressed as [HOCl]T (where [HOCl]T = [HOCl] + [Cl2] + [Cl3] + [OCl]) in 0.9% saline was determined by converting all the active chlorine species to OCl with 0.1 M NaOH and measuring the concentration of OCl. The concentration of OCl was determined spectrophotometrically at 292 nm (ε = 362 M− 1 cm− 1)15 (link) with an Agilent 8453 UV-visible spectrophotometer.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2007
Chlorine Hypochlorous acid Normal Saline Sodium Chloride Technique, Dilution

Most recents protocols related to «Chlorine»

Example 8

Characterization of Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, and Excretion of Oral [14C]Vorasidenib with Concomitant Intravenous Microdose Administration of [13C315N3]Vorasidenib in Humans

Metabolite profiling and identification of vorasidenib (AG-881) was performed in plasma, urine, and fecal samples collected from five healthy subjects after a single 50-mg (100 μCi) oral dose of [14C]AG-881 and concomitant intravenous microdose of [13C3 15N3]AG-881.

Plasma samples collected at selected time points from 0 through 336 hour postdose were pooled across subjects to generate 0—to 72 and 96-336-hour area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)-representative samples. Urine and feces samples were pooled by subject to generate individual urine and fecal pools. Plasma, urine, and feces samples were extracted, as appropriate, the extracts were profiled using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and metabolites were identified by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS and/or LC-MS/MS) analysis and by comparison of retention time with reference standards, when available.

Due to low radioactivity in samples, plasma metabolite profiling was performed by using accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS). In plasma, AG-881 was accounted for 66.24 and 29.47% of the total radioactivity in the pooled AUC0-72 h and AUC96-336 h plasma, respectively. The most abundant radioactive peak (P7; M458) represented 0.10 and 43.92% of total radioactivity for pooled AUC0-72 and AUC96-336 h plasma, respectively. All other radioactive peaks accounted for less than 6% of the total plasma radioactivity and were not identified.

The majority of the radioactivity recovered in feces was associated with unchanged AG-881 (55.5% of the dose), while no AG-881 was detected in urine. In comparison, metabolites in excreta accounted for approximately 18% of dose in feces and for approximately 4% of dose in urine. M515, M460-1, M499, M516/M460-2, and M472/M476 were the most abundant metabolites in feces, and each accounted for approximately 2 to 5% of the radioactive dose, while M266 was the most abundant metabolite identified in urine and accounted for a mean of 2.54% of the dose. The remaining radioactive components in urine and feces each accounted for <1% of the dose.

Overall, the data presented indicate [14C]AG-881 underwent moderate metabolism after a single oral dose of 50-mg (100 μCi) and was eliminated in humans via a combination of metabolism and excretion of unchanged parent. AG-881 metabolism involved the oxidation and conjugation with glutathione (GSH) by displacement of the chlorine at the chloropyridine moiety. Subsequent biotransformation of GSH intermediates resulted in elimination of both glutamic acid and glycine to form the cysteinyl conjugates (M515 and M499). The cysteinyl conjugates were further converted by a series of biotransformation reactions such as oxidation, S-dealkylation, S-methylation, S-oxidation, S-acetylation and N-dealkylation resulting in the formation multiple metabolites.

A summary of the metabolites observed is included in Table 2

TABLE 2
Retention
ComponentTimeMatrix
designation(Minutes)[M + H]+Type of BiotransformationPlasmaUrineFeces
Unidentified 17.00UnknownX
M2667.67a267N-dealkylationX
Unidentified 2UnknownX
Unidentified 3UnknownX
Unidentified 4UnknownX
Unidentified 5UnknownX
M51519.79b516OxidationX
M460-120.76b461OxidationX
M49921.22b500Dechloro-glutathioneXX
conjugation + hydrolysis
M51621.89b517Oxidative-deaminationX
M460-221.98b461OxidationX
M47222.76b473S-dealkylation + S-X
acetylation + reduction
M47622.76b477OxidationX
Unidentified 6UnknownX
M47423.63b475OxidationX
Unidentified 7UnknownX
M43025.88b431AG-881-oxidationX
M42630.62b427S-dealkylation + methylationX
M45831.03c459AG-69460X*
AG-88139.41b415AG-881XX
M42847.40b429S-dealkylation + oxidationX
Table 3 contains a summary of protonated molecular ions and characteristic product ions for AG-881 and identified metabolites

TABLE 3
RetentionCharacteristic
MetaboliteTimeProposed MetaboliteProduct Ions
designation(Minutes)[M + H]+Identification(m/z)Matrix
M266 7.88a267[Figure (not displayed)]
188, 187Urine
M51519.79b516[Figure (not displayed)]
429, 260, 164, 153Feces
M460-120.76b461[Figure (not displayed)]
379, 260, 164Feces
M49921.22b500[Figure (not displayed)]
437, 413, 260, 164, 137Urine Feces
M51621.89b517[Figure (not displayed)]
427, 260, 164, 153Feces
M460-221.98b461[Figure (not displayed)]
369, 260, 164, 139, 121, 93Feces
M47222.76b473[Figure (not displayed)]
429, 260, 179, 164, 153Feces
M47622.76b477[Figure (not displayed)]
395, 260, 164, 139, 119Feces
M47423.63b475[Figure (not displayed)]
260, 164, 68Feces
M43025.88b431[Figure (not displayed)]
260, 164, 155, 68Feces
M42630.62b427[Figure (not displayed)]
260, 164, 151Feces
M45831.03b459[Figure (not displayed)]
380, 311, 260, 183, 164, 130Plasma Fecesd
AG-88139.41b415[Figure (not displayed)]
319, 277, 260, 240, 164, 139, 119, 68Plasma Fecesd
M42847.40b429[Figure (not displayed)]
260, 164, 153Feces
Notes
aRetention time from analysis of a urine sample
bRetention time from analysis of a feces sample
cRetention time from analysis of a plasma sample
dM458 was only detected in feces by mass spectrometry, not by radioprofiling.
The proposed (theoretical) biotransformation pathways leading to the observed metabolites are shown in FIG. 1.

Full text: Click here
Patent 2024
Acetylation AG 30 Biotransformation Chlorine Dealkylation Deamination Elements, Radioactive Feces Glutamic Acid Glutathione Glycine Healthy Volunteers High-Performance Liquid Chromatographies Homo sapiens Hydrolysis Intravenous Infusion Ions Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry Metabolism Methylation Parent Plasma Radioactivity Retention (Psychology) Tandem Mass Spectrometry Urinalysis Urine vorasidenib

Example 12

Plant transformation—The Arabidopsis thaliana var Columbia (To plants) were transformed according to the Floral Dip procedure [Clough S J, Bent A F. (1998) Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 16(6): 735-43; and Desfeux C, Clough S J, Bent A F. (2000) Female reproductive tissues were the primary targets of Agrobacterium-mediated transformation by the Arabidopsis floral-dip method. Plant Physiol. 123(3): 895-904] with minor modifications. Briefly, Arabidopsis thaliana Columbia (C010) T0 plants were sown in 250 ml pots filled with wet peat-based growth mix. The pots were covered with aluminum foil and a plastic dome, kept at 4° C. for 3-4 days, then uncovered and incubated in a growth chamber at 18-24° C. under 16/8 hours light/dark cycles. The T0 plants were ready for transformation six days before anthesis.

Single colonies of Agrobacterium carrying the binary vectors harboring the genes of some embodiments of the invention were cultured in YEBS medium (Yeast extract 1 gr/L, Beef extract 5 gr/L, MgSO4*7H2O, Bacto peptone 5 gr/L) supplemented with kanamycin (50 mg/L) and gentamycin (50 mg/L). The cultures were incubated at 28° C. for 48 hours under vigorous shaking to desired optical density at 600 nm of 0.85 to 1.1. Before transformation into plants, 60 μl of Silwet L-77 was added into 300 ml of the Agrobacterium suspension.

Transformation of T0 plants was performed by inverting each plant into an Agrobacterium suspension such that the above ground plant tissue was submerged for 1 minute. Each inoculated T0 plant was immediately placed in a plastic tray, then covered with clear plastic dome to maintain humidity and was kept in the dark at room temperature for 18 hours to facilitate infection and transformation. Transformed (transgenic) plants were then uncovered and transferred to a greenhouse for recovery and maturation. The transgenic T0 plants were grown in the greenhouse for 3-5 weeks until siliques were brown and dry, then seeds were harvested from plants and kept at room temperature until sowing.

For generating T1 and T2 transgenic plants harboring the genes of some embodiments of the invention, seeds collected from transgenic T0 plants were surface-sterilized by exposing to chlorine fumes (6% sodium hypochlorite with 1.3% HCl) for 100 minutes. The surface-sterilized seeds were sown on culture plates containing half-strength Murashig-Skoog (Duchefa); 2% sucrose; 0.5% plant agar; 50 mg/L kanamycin; and 200 mg/L carbenicylin (Duchefa). The culture plates were incubated at 4° C. for 48 hours and then were transferred to a growth room at 25° C. for three weeks. Following incubation, the T1 plants were removed from culture plates and planted in growth mix contained in 250 ml pots. The transgenic plants were allowed to grow in a greenhouse to maturity. Seeds harvested from T1 plants were cultured and grown to maturity as T2 plants under the same conditions as used for culturing and growing the T1 plants.

Full text: Click here
Patent 2024
Agar Agrobacterium Aluminum Animals, Transgenic Arabidopsis Arabidopsis thalianas Bacto-peptone Beef Chlorine Cloning Vectors Culture Media Decompression Sickness Females Genes Genes, Plant Gentamicin Humidity Infection Kanamycin Marijuana Abuse Plant Diseases Plant Embryos Plants Plants, Transgenic Reproduction Saccharomyces cerevisiae silwet L-77 Sodium Hypochlorite Sucrose Sulfate, Magnesium Tissues
The bacterial strain used in this study, except those referenced in Fig. 6, Supplementary Figs. S1 and S11, was B. glumae MAFF301682 (MAFF designates strains from the culture collection of the National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (NARO) Genebank, formerly the culture collection of the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Japan). Bacterial inocula were incubated on Luria–Bertani (LB) media with 2% agar at 28 °C for 4 days and then suspended in sterilized, deionized water at a concentration of 108 CFU/ml. The rice seeds were sterilized by soaking in a chlorine bleach solution (available chlorine 2.5%) for 30 min, rinsed carefully with sterilized water, and then soaked in sterilized water for 3 days in a plant growth chamber at 28 °C. The sterilized seeds were subsequently placed in a freshly prepared bacterial suspension and held under vacuum (0.2 MPa) for 3 min. The inoculated seeds were dried for 2 h, sown in sterilized soil (Bonsol No. 2, Sumitomo Kagaku Kougyo, Osaka, Japan) and incubated in a growth chamber at 28 °C with 80% humidity under a 14-h photoperiod. The disease symptoms were measured 8 days after sowing on a scale of 1–3, where 1 = no symptoms, 2 = sheaths with reddish-brown lesions (mild infection), and 3 = necrotic seedlings or seeds that did not germinate (severe infection). The BSR severity was calculated from these scores as follows: BSRseverity%=N3-N1-N2/2×100/N3, where N1 = number of seedlings with a score of 1, N2 = number of seedlings with a score of 2, and N3 = number of seeds per replication. There were three or four replications per inoculation. As a control, we germinated uninoculated seeds and confirmed that the average germination rate was > 90%. The bacterial strain for evaluation of resistance to bacterial seedling blight was B. plantarii MAFF301723. The method for inoculating seeds was the same as that used for B. glumae. Five inoculated seeds and 95 uninoculated seeds were sown in sterilized soil in the same cell tray, and the disease severity of B. plantarii (Fig. 6) was calculated as described above. The bacterial strain shown in Supplementary Fig. S11 was B. glumae MAFF302744, and the panicle disease severity assay was conducted according to a previously described metohd53 (link).
Full text: Click here
Publication 2023
Agar ARID1A protein, human Bacteria Biological Assay Cells Chlorine DNA Replication Food Germination Humidity Infection Necrosis Oryza sativa Plant Development Plant Embryos Strains Vaccination Vacuum
Chicken skins were randomly collected from Koch Food Company (USA) and sliced into 10 cm × 10 cm samples. To minimize contamination, chicken skin was washed with 200 ppm chlorine solution (Sigma-Aldrich Co.) and sterilized DW. Then, 200 ml of the Salmonella cocktail was inoculated onto the chicken at concentrations ranging from 101 to 103 CFU/100 cm2. An equal amount of PBS was added onto other chicken skins as negative controls. The inoculated chicken skins were dried under a biosafety cabinet for bacterial attachment and placed in an Erlenmeyer flask prior to further incubation in a refrigerator (4°C) for 48 h. Next, 100 ml of brain heart infusion (BHI, EMD Science, Germany) or brilliant green (BG, Difco Laboratories Inc.) broth was added to each flask and incubated at 37°C in an orbital shaker at 250 rpm. Then, 100 μl of sample was collected from BHI and BG broths at 0, 2, 4, and 6 h, and the resuscitated bacterial population was measured using xylose lysine deoxycholate agar (Difco Laboratories Inc.) and recorded as log CFU/chicken for comparison. Subsequently, 20 ml of samples were obtained from both broths and washed 3 times by centrifugation at 4,000 ×g for 20 min. After resuspending with 1 ml of PBS, 100 μl of Salmonella suspension was used for ELISA and GB-LMIS, as described in the previous section. The results are expressed as log CFU/chicken for the comparison.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2023
Agar Bacteria Brain brilliant green Centrifugation Chickens Chlorine Deoxycholate Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Food Heart Keratosis pilaris Lysine Salmonella Xylose
Tap water samples from
8 cities in Europe (Prague, Venice, Sardinia, Marseille, Leipzig,
Brussels, Stockholm, and Uppsala) were collected during summer 2021.
Samples from 3 public swimming pools in Germany were taken in February
2022. Grab samples from 6 DWTPs before and after disinfection, including
DWTP 1 and 2 in Germany (5 sets each of repeated samples every 2 weeks),
DWTP 3, 4, and 5 in Hungary (3 sets each of repeated samples every
2 months), and DWTP 6 in Spain (1 set of sample), were collected during
January-November 2021 (sampling details are given below). DWTP 1 uses
the mixture of groundwater and river bank filtrate as source water.
The treatment trains include aeration, gravel filtration, and chlorine
gas disinfection. DWTP 2 uses river bank filtrate and utilizes aeration,
flocculation, gravel filtration, and chlorine dioxide disinfection.
DWTP 3, 4, and 5 use river bank filtrate. In DWTP 3 and 4, the raw
water is directly disinfected using sodium hypochlorite and chlorine
gas, respectively, without additional treatment. In DWTP 5, the raw
water is treated by ozone and sand filtration for iron and manganese
removal, followed by chlorine gas disinfection. The disinfected water
from DWTP 3, 4, and 5 was used to provide drinking water to a city
in Hungary. Two sets of additional samples from 2 entry points to
the distribution system and 2 drinking water storage reservoirs within
this city were collected in September and November 2021. DWTP 6 uses
surface water, which is treated through flocculation and filtration
and by chlorine gas, as the final step.
Samples were collected
in prewashed 100 mL borosilicate brown glass bottles, transported
to the lab in the thermobox (10–12 °C), and enriched within
24 h of collection (see section 2.3). The residual chlorine in all disinfected samples
was measured online or using a portable device (Pocket Colorimeter
II, HACH) during sampling, which was in the range of ∼0.2–0.3
mg/L as Cl2 except for DWTP 6 (i.e., ∼0.5–1.0
mg/L as Cl2). Lab tests suggested that some of the novel
halogenated sulfonic acids are not stable in the presence of a quenching
reagent (e.g., ascorbic acid, Supporting Information, Figure S1); thus no additional chemical was added to quench the
residual chlorine during sampling. A control sample prepared with
100 mL of ultrapure water spiked with 0.3 mg/L chlorine was preserved
for 24 h, enriched, and analyzed following the same procedure as water
samples. Results indicated that no contamination can occur during
sample processing and analysis due to the potential presence of a
trace amount of chlorine in the disinfected samples. Detailed information
on sampling dates and water parameters is given in Table S1.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2023
Ascorbic Acid Chlorine chlorine dioxide Disinfection Filtration Flocculation Iron Medical Devices Ozone Rivers Sodium Hypochlorite Sulfonic Acids

Top products related to «Chlorine»

Sourced in Germany, United States, India, United Kingdom, Italy, China, Spain, France, Australia, Canada, Poland, Switzerland, Singapore, Belgium, Sao Tome and Principe, Ireland, Sweden, Brazil, Israel, Mexico, Macao, Chile, Japan, Hungary, Malaysia, Denmark, Portugal, Indonesia, Netherlands, Czechia, Finland, Austria, Romania, Pakistan, Cameroon, Egypt, Greece, Bulgaria, Norway, Colombia, New Zealand, Lithuania
Sodium hydroxide is a chemical compound with the formula NaOH. It is a white, odorless, crystalline solid that is highly soluble in water and is a strong base. It is commonly used in various laboratory applications as a reagent.
Sourced in United States, Germany, Canada, France, Sweden, Portugal, Italy
Sodium hypochlorite is a chemical compound that is commonly used as a disinfectant and oxidizing agent in various applications. It has a chemical formula of NaOCl.
Sourced in United States, Germany, Spain
Sodium hypochlorite solution is a chemical compound commonly used as a disinfectant and oxidizing agent. It is a clear, greenish-yellow liquid with a characteristic chlorine-like odor. The solution contains sodium hypochlorite as the active ingredient, which is effective in killing a wide range of bacteria, viruses, and fungi.
Sourced in Germany, United States, United Kingdom, India, Italy, France, Spain, Australia, China, Poland, Switzerland, Canada, Ireland, Japan, Singapore, Sao Tome and Principe, Malaysia, Brazil, Hungary, Chile, Belgium, Denmark, Macao, Mexico, Sweden, Indonesia, Romania, Czechia, Egypt, Austria, Portugal, Netherlands, Greece, Panama, Kenya, Finland, Israel, Hong Kong, New Zealand, Norway
Hydrochloric acid is a commonly used laboratory reagent. It is a clear, colorless, and highly corrosive liquid with a pungent odor. Hydrochloric acid is an aqueous solution of hydrogen chloride gas.
Sourced in United States, Germany, United Kingdom, Italy, India, China, France, Spain, Switzerland, Poland, Sao Tome and Principe, Australia, Canada, Ireland, Czechia, Brazil, Sweden, Belgium, Japan, Hungary, Mexico, Malaysia, Macao, Portugal, Netherlands, Finland, Romania, Thailand, Argentina, Singapore, Egypt, Austria, New Zealand, Bangladesh
Acetic acid is a colorless, vinegar-like liquid chemical compound. It is a commonly used laboratory reagent with the molecular formula CH3COOH. Acetic acid serves as a solvent, a pH adjuster, and a reactant in various chemical processes.
Sourced in China, United States, Argentina
Sodium hydroxide is a chemical compound with the formula NaOH. It is a white, crystalline solid that is highly soluble in water. Sodium hydroxide has a wide range of applications in various industries, including as a pH regulator, cleaning agent, and chemical intermediate.
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom
Sodium hypochlorite is a chemical compound with the formula NaOCl. It is a powerful oxidizing agent commonly used as a disinfectant and bleaching agent in various laboratory and industrial applications.
Sourced in United States, Germany, Italy, Spain, France, India, China, Poland, Australia, United Kingdom, Sao Tome and Principe, Brazil, Chile, Ireland, Canada, Singapore, Switzerland, Malaysia, Portugal, Mexico, Hungary, New Zealand, Belgium, Czechia, Macao, Hong Kong, Sweden, Argentina, Cameroon, Japan, Slovakia, Serbia
Gallic acid is a naturally occurring organic compound that can be used as a laboratory reagent. It is a white to light tan crystalline solid with the chemical formula C6H2(OH)3COOH. Gallic acid is commonly used in various analytical and research applications.
Sourced in China, United States, Argentina
Hydrochloric acid is a chemical compound with the formula HCl. It is a colorless, corrosive liquid that can be used in various industrial processes.
Sourced in Germany, United States, Italy, India, China, United Kingdom, France, Poland, Spain, Switzerland, Australia, Canada, Brazil, Sao Tome and Principe, Ireland, Belgium, Macao, Japan, Singapore, Mexico, Austria, Czechia, Bulgaria, Hungary, Egypt, Denmark, Chile, Malaysia, Israel, Croatia, Portugal, New Zealand, Romania, Norway, Sweden, Indonesia
Acetonitrile is a colorless, volatile, flammable liquid. It is a commonly used solvent in various analytical and chemical applications, including liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, and other laboratory procedures. Acetonitrile is known for its high polarity and ability to dissolve a wide range of organic compounds.

More about "Chlorine"

Chlorine, a highly reactive halogen gas, is a versatile and essential chemical with a wide range of industrial and medical applications.
It is a key component in water purification, disinfection, and the production of various plastics, pesticides, and other chemicals.
The distinctive green-yellow color and pungent odor of chlorine make it readily identifiable.
Researchers studying chlorine and its applications can leverage the PubCompare.ai platform to seamlessly locate relevant protocols from literature, preprints, and patents.
This AI-driven platform also enables researchers to compare and identify the most effective protocols and products for their chlorine-related studies, streamlining the research process and ensuring more reliable and reproducible results.
In addition to chlorine, researchers may also encounter other related chemicals such as sodium hydroxide, sodium hypochlorite, sodium hypochlorite solution, hydrochloric acid, acetic acid, gallic acid, and acetonitrile.
These compounds often play complementary roles in chlorine-based processes and applications.
Sodium hydroxide, for example, is commonly used in the production of sodium hypochlorite, a widely used disinfectant.
Hydrochloric acid is another key chemical that interacts with chlorine, and acetic acid, gallic acid, and acetonitrile may be utilized in various analytical techniques and processes involving chlorine-based compounds.
By understanding the broader context of chlorine and its related chemicals, researchers can make more informed decisions, optimize their experimental designs, and ultimately achieve more robust and reproducible findings in their chlorine-focused studies.