Example 9
Conditionally active antibodies to an antigen that are more active at pH 6.0 than the wild type antibody and less active at pH 7.4 than the wild type antibody were screened in this example. The screening steps were conducted using the buffers in Tables 2 and 3 below. The buffers in Table 2 were based on Krebs buffer, with additional components added as shown in column 1 of Table 2.
TABLE 2
Krebs Buffer Based Assay Buffers
Buffer 1Buffer 2Buffer 3Buffer 4Buffer 5
AdditionalpH of the buffers
comopents inpH 6.0pH 7.4pH 6.0pH 7.4pH 6.0pH 7.4pH 6.0pH 7.4pH 6.0pH 7.4
D-Glucose001.81.81.81.81.81.81.81.8
Magnesium Chloride0.04680.0468000.04680.04680.04680.04680.04680.0468
Potassium Chloride0.340.340.340.34000.340.340.340.34
Sodium Chloride7777770077
Sodium Phosphate0.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.100
Dibasic
Sodium Phosphate0.180.180.180.180.180.180.180.180.180.18
Monobasic
Sodium1.261.261.261.261.261.261.261.261.261.26
Bicarbonate
Lactic acid16 mM 1 mM16 mM1 mM15 mM1 mM16 mM1 mM16 mM1 mM
BSA10101010101010101010
Buffer 6Buffer 7Buffer 8
Additional pH of the buffers
comopents inpH 6.0pH 7.4pH 6.0pH 7.4pH 6.0pH 7.4
D-Glucose1.81.81.81.81.81.8
Magnesium Chloride0.04680.04680.04680.04680.04680.0468
Potassium Chloride0.340.340.340.340.340.34
Sodium Chloride777777
Sodium Phosphate0.10.10.10.10.10.1
Dibasic
Sodium Phosphate000.180.180.180.18
Monobasic
Sodium1.261.26001.261.26
Bicarbonate
Lactic acid16 mM1 mM16 mM1 mM16 mM1 mM
BSA101010101010
Some assay buffers based on PBS buffer with additional components are shown in Table 3 below. The components in the buffers of Tables 3 and 4 are presented as amount in grams added in one liter of buffer. But the concentration of human serum is 10 wt. % of the buffer.
TABLE 3
PBS Buffer Based Assay Buffers
AdditionalBuffer 9 Buffer 10
Component(PBS, commercial)(PBS + NaHCO3)
pH of bufferspH 6.0pH 7.4pH 6.0pH 7.4
KH2PO40.1440.1440.1440.144
NaCl9999
Na2HPO40.7950.7950.7950.795
Lactic acid16mM1mM16mM1nM
Sodium NANA1.261.26
Bicarbonate
BSA10101010
The screening was carried out using an ELISA assay with these assay buffers. The ELISA assay was carried out as described in Examples 7-8. The selected conditionally active antibodies for each of the 10 assay buffers were presented in Table 4 below. The OD 450 absorbance is reversely correlated with the binding activity in the ELISA assay.
TABLE 4
Selected Conditionally Active Antibodies (Mutants)
Using Different Assay Buffers
OD 450Selected mutantswild type
Buffer 1pH 6.00.8591.6414
pH 7.40.08831.2474
Buffer 2pH 6.00.65991.1708
pH 7.40.07171.1839
Buffer 3pH 6.00.48060.7765
pH 7.40.07231.3497
Buffer 4PH 6.01.73641.7777
pH 7.40.44571.6173
Buffer 5pH 6.00.67761.6905
pH 7.40.07471.3987
Buffer 6pH 6.00.72441.4123
pH 7.40.07311.3439
Buffer 7pH 6.00.62121.348
pH 7.40.80441.7381
Buffer 8pH 6.00.79771.3893
pH 7.40.10421.5535
Buffer 9pH 6.00.4681.5087
pH 7.40.44551.347
Buffer 10pH 6.00.56261.3439
pH 7.40.07271.2547
The selectivity of some of the selected conditionally active antibodies was confirmed using buffers 8 and 9 and it was found that they do have the desired selectivity in pH 6.0 over pH 7.4, as presented in FIG. 1. Note that using different buffers affected the selectivity of the conditionally active antibodies.
Example 13
Conditionally active antibodies against ROR2 that were selected using assay solutions containing sodium bicarbonate (as described in Example 9) were tested in different buffers: CAB-P was a standard phosphate saline buffer (PBS buffer) used at a pH of 6.0 or 7.4; CAB-PSB was a PBS buffer supplemented with 15 mM of sodium bicarbonate at a pH off 6.0 or 7.4; and CAB-PSS was a PBS buffer supplemented with 10 mM of sodium sulfide nonahydrate at a pH off 6.0 or 7.4.
The activity of these conditionally active antibodies was measured according to the following ELISA protocol:
-
- 1. One day before ELISA: the plate was coated with 100ul of 1 ug/ml antigen overnight in PBS at 4° C.
- 2. Wash plates twice with 200 ul of CAB-P, CAB-PSB, or CAB-PSS buffer according to the plate layout.
- 3. Block plates with 200 ul of CAB-P, CAB-PSB, or CAB-PSS buffer according to palte layout at room temperature for 1 hour.
- 4. Dilute antibody sample and positive control in of CAB-P, CAB-PSB, or CAB-PSS buffer as indicated in the plate layout.
- 5. Flicked off blocking buffer from 96 well plate, blot dry on paper towels.
- 6. Add 100 ul of diluted antibody samples, positive control or negative control to each well according to the plate layout.
- 6. Incubate the plates at room temperature for 1 hour.
- 7. Prepare Secondary antibody in of CAB-P, CAB-PSB, or CAB-PSS buffer according to the palte layout.
- 8. Flicked off buffer from 96 well plate, blot dry on paper towels.
- 9. Wash the plates for a total of 3 times with 200 ul of CAB-P, CAB-PSB, or CAB-PSS buffer according to the plate layout.
- 10. Add diluted secondary antibody in of CAB-P, CAB-PSB, or CAB-PSS buffer to each well according to the plate layout.
- 11. Incubate the plate at room temperature for 1 hour.
- 12. Flicked off buffer from 96 well plates, blot dry on paper towels.
- 13. Wash the plates for a total of 3 times with of CAB-P, CAB-PSB, or CAB-PSS buffer.
- 14. Bring 3,3′, 5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) substrate to room temperature.
- 15. Flick off buffers from plate, blot dry on paper towels.
- 16. Add 50 ul of TMB substrate.
- 17. Stop development with 50 ul 1N HCl. Development time was 3 min.
- 18. Read at OD450 nm using a plate reader.
The activity of these conditionally active antibodies against ROR2 is presented in FIG. 7. The conditionally active antibodies showed higher activity in CAB-PSB buffer at pH 6.0 than at pH 7.4, i.e., selectivity at pH 6.0 over pH 7.4. This selectivity was lost or significantly reduced in CAB-P buffers for several conditionally active antibodies. But this selectivity was also observed in CAB-PSS buffers at pH 6.0 over pH 7.4. On the contrary, the wild-type antibody showed relatively minimal or no selectivity in any of the buffers.
This example demonstrates that bisulfide has similar function as the bicarbonate for mediating the conditional binding for the tested conditionally active antibodies against ROR2.
Example 14
Conditionally active antibodies against Axl that were selected using assay solutions containing sodium bicarbonate (as described in Example 9) were tested in different buffers: CAB-P, CAB-PSB, and CAB-PSS, as described in Example 13. The activities of these conditionally active antibodies against Axl were measured using the same ELISA protocol as described in Example 13 and is presented in FIG. 8. The conditionally active antibodies showed higher activity in CAB-PSB buffer at pH 6.0 than at pH 7.4, i.e., selectivity at pH 6.0 over pH 7.4. This selectivity was lost or significantly reduced in CAB-P buffers for these conditionally active antibodies. The selectivity was also observed in CAB-PSS buffers at pH 6.0 over pH 7.4. On the contrary, the wild-type antibody showed essentially no selectivity in any of the buffers.
This example also demonstrates that bisulfide had a similar function as the bicarbonate for mediating the conditional binding for the tested conditionally active antibodies against Axl.