The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Alexa 568

Alexa 568 is a fluorescent dye commonly used in biological research.
It is a bright, red-fluorescent dye with excitation/emission maxima of approximately 578/603 nm.
Alexa 568 is often employed for labeling proteins, cells, and other biological structures for visualization and analysis.
The dye's photostability and pH-insensitivity make it a reliable choice for a variety of imaging applications, including fluorescence microscopy, flow cytometry, and high-throughput screening.
Reseachers can optimize their protocols for Alexa 568 using the PubCompare.ai platform, which helps locate the best procotols from literature, pre-prints, and patents by effortlessly comparing them.
This AI-driven tool unleashes research potential and provides the perfect solution for Alexa 568 needs, allowing researchers to experince the future of research today.

Most cited protocols related to «Alexa 568»

EzColocalization was tested on images from experiments and on modified images created to test specific issues (e.g. misalignment). Unpublished images of bacterial cells (HL6187) were used to illustrate the different modules of EzColocalization (Figs 14). These bacteria had plasmid pHL1392 in strain HL333823 (link). pHL1392 has the ampicillin resistance gene, ColE1 origin, and the green fluorescent protein (GFP) fused to part of the sodB gene and transcribed from the PLlacO-1 promoter. The sources of the images used for the application experiments (Figs 58) are stated in the relevant Results section. Note: images presented in the figures are cropped so that it is easier to see individual cells.

Inputs and alignment tab. (A). Inputs tab in the GUI. (B) General steps for the alignment of images. The cell identification image stack (phase contrast; left column), reporter 1 image stack (DAPI staining of DNA; center column), and reporter 2 image stack (Cy5; right column) are images of a previously reported bacterial strain (HL6320)15 (link). Scale bar is 2 μm. Reporters 1 and 2 images are pseudocolored. Red coloring in the second row of images indicates the objects identified by thresholding of the signal in each channel (“Default” algorithm in ImageJ). Following alignment of the images, pixels that overhang are removed and gaps are filled with pixels with zero value (yellow areas) so that all images have the same area in the common aligned region.

Cell identification and cell filters tab. (A) Cell Filters tab in the GUI. (B) Cell selection and watershed segmentation. Red coloring in the image in the second row indicates objects identified by thresholding of the signal in the cell identification channel (“Default” algorithm in ImageJ). Cells are the same as in Fig. 1. (C) Selection of cells based on physical features using the cell filters. Scale bar is 2 μm. Phase contrast image from Fig. 1. Red outline indicates the objects that were identified by thresholding (Panel B), and in the case of the right image, are within the parameter range(s) selected by the filter. (D) Selection of cells based on signal intensity using the cell filters. Phase contrast (cell identification image) and DAPI stain (reporter channel) images of bacteria (HL6187). Scale bar is 2 μm. Note: the lower of the two cells (no red border) has been removed from the analysis by the cell filter (that is, it no longer has the red cell outline).

Visualization tab. Data are from bacteria (HL6187) with labeled sodB::gfp RNA (Cy3 channel) and DNA (DAPI). (A) Visualization tab in the GUI. (B) Heat maps of Cy3 and DAPI signals for bacteria with “cell scaling” (defined in main text). Scale bar is 2 μm. (C) Scatterplot of Cy3 and DAPI for the cell on the left and outlined in white in Fig. 3B. (D) Metric matrix for TOS (linear scaling) for the cell on the left and outlined in white in Fig. 3B. FT is the top percentage of pixels in the channel; for example, if FT for Cy3 is 80% then it refers to the 80% of pixels with the highest Cy3 signal. Black color on the left column and bottom row indicate that TOS values are not informative when one threshold is 100%; that is, the overlap of two reporters can only be 100% if 100% of pixels are selected for at least one channel.

Analysis tab. (A) Analysis tab in the GUI for selecting default metrics. Note: this example is for two reporter channels (see Fig. 8G for 3 reporter channels). (B) Analysis tab in the GUI for users to code custom metrics. The example code provided is for measuring colocalization by Pearson correlation coefficient. (C) Example of a data table showing metric values for Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) and some of the parameter values for some of the cells in the analysis. Label = the image and unique cell number to identify individual cells; Area = area of each cell in pixels; and X = the average x-value of all pixels in a cell. Data is from the example used in Fig. 3. (D) Summary report (“Log”) of the results in Fig. 4C. (E) Histogram generated from the results in Fig. 4C. The height of each bin is the relative frequency. The Count is the number of cells. Mean is the mean value. StdDev is the standard deviation. Bins is the number of bins. Min and Max are the minimum and maximum values of the lowest and highest bin respectively (which are shown immediately under the histogram). Mode is the mode value. Bin Width is the width of each bin within the histogram.

Application 1: Cell selection using reporter images and physical parameters. Images are rat hippocampal neurons labelled with an F-actin probe and anti-tubulin antibody visualized by fluorescence microscopy (see main text). (A) Workflow of the analysis. (B) Cell identification using the F-actin reporter and filters to remove small non-cell objects (yellow arrow) based on their size (i.e. Area option from the cell filters). Large yellow box in left panel is a zoomed in view of the smaller yellow box. Red outline of the neuron indicates it has been identified as an object (i.e. a cell) for analysis. Scale bar is 100 μm. (C) Heat maps with cellular normalization showing localization regions of signal intensity for the cell shown in panel B. Scale bar is the same as panel B. (D) Scatterplot showing relationship between the signal intensity for two reporter channels for a random cell in the sample. Pixels with the highest intensity signal for each reporter channel have the lowest intensity signals for the other reporter, which indicates anticolocalization (blue circles). Green dash lines indicate thresholds selected by Costes’ method. (E) Metric matrix for the median TOS (linear) value for all cells in the sample (n = 20). Green box indicates the threshold combination where F-actin and tubulin have the highest intensity signal (top 10% of pixels for each channel); the median TOS value is −0.36.

Application 2: Image alignment. Images are S. cerevisiae with TEM1 translationally fused to GFP and DAPI staining visualized by DIC microscopy and fluorescence microscopy (see main text). (A) Workflow of the analysis. (B) Cell identification by hand-drawn ROIs on a DIC image and creation of a binary image mask. Red outline indicates the boundary of the hand-drawn ROI. Scale bar is 3.5 μm. (C) Alignment of the reporter images using the binary mask image. Arrows indicate areas of misalignment that are corrected. Red outline is the same as for Panel B.

Application 3: Cell selection using signal intensity parameters. Images are whole adult C. elegans with GFP expressed from the clec-60 promoter and mCherry expressed from the myo-2 promoter that are visualized by bright-field microscopy and fluorescence microscopy (see main text). (A) Workflow of the analysis. (B) Selection of C. elegans so that only those individuals with an average intensity for the reporter signal that is above a threshold level are included in analyses. Left image shows the ROI manager with a list of ROIs that were hand-drawn around each C. elegans. Right image shows the reporter channel images with red outlines indicating the boundaries of the ROIs. C. elegans below the threshold level were excluded (yellow arrow) from the analyses by using the cell filters for signal intensity. Scale bar is 250 μm.

Application 4: Measurement of colocalization for three reporter channels. Images are of human bone cancer cells (U2OS) labelled as described in the main text. (A) Workflow of the analysis. (B) Images of cells in the cell identification and reporter channels. Top row are raw images. Bottom row, left image is the cell identification with pseudocolor (blue is the signal from Hoechst 33342 signal and green is the signal from phalloidin/Alexa Fluor 568 conjugate and wheat germ agglutinin/Alexa Fluor 555 conjugate) and boundaries of the ROIs in white (see main text). Bottom row (except left image) are heat maps for each of the three reporters with the boundaries of the ROIs shown. Signal intensity is indicated by the bar below each reporter image. Scale bar is 20 μm. (C) A three channel scatterplot for a single cell is shown for illustrative purposes only. (D–F) Metric matrices of median values for ICQ (D) TOS (E) and Manders’ colocalization coefficients M1, M2 and M3 (F) for all cells in the analysis (n = 66). Note: black color on metric matrix for ICQ indicates there were no pixels above all three thresholds for some cells, and therefore ICQ could not be calculated. (G) Analysis Metrics subtab for the Analysis tab for three reporter channels.

Full text: Click here
Publication 2018
Genes were introduced into HEK 293T or COS-7 cells either through transient transfection with Lipofectamine 2000 or lentiviral infection. For lipofection, 100 ng of the APEX-fusion plasmid and 0.7 μL Lipofectamine 2000 in MEM (without serum) was used per well of a 48-well plate (0.95 cm2) of cells at 60-80% confluence. 3-6 hours later, the cell culture medium was changed back to fresh growth media. After 24 hours, biotin-phenol labeling was initiated by changing the medium to 200 μL of fresh growth media containing 500 μM biotin-phenol. This was incubated at 37°C under 5% CO2 for 30 minutes according to previously published protocols 1 (link). Afterwards, 2 μL of 100 mM H2O2 was added to each well, for a final concentration of 1 mM H2O2, and the plate gently agitated for 1 minute. The reaction was then quenched by addition of 200 μL of 10 mM Trolox and 20 mM sodium ascorbate in DPBS (for a final concentration of 5 mM Trolox and 10 mM sodium ascorbate). Cells were washed with DPBS containing 5 mM Trolox and 10 mM sodium ascorbate three times and fixed with 3.7% paraformaldehyde in DPBS at room temperature for 10 min. Cells were then washed with DPBS three times and permeabilized with cold methanol at -20°C for 5 min. Cells were washed again three times with DPBS and blocked for 1 hour with 3% BSA in DPBS (“blocking buffer”) at 4°C. To detect APEX-fusion expression, cells were incubated with either mouse-α-FLAG antibody (Agilent, 1:500 dilution) or mouse-α-V5 antibody (Invitrogen, 1:500 dilution) for 1 hour to overnight at 4°C. After washing three times with 0.2% Tween in DPBS, cells were simultaneously incubated with secondary Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-mouse IgG (Life Technologies, 1:750 dilution) and homemade streptavidin-Alexa Fluor 568 conjugates for 1 hour at 4°C. Cells were then washed three times with 0.2% Tween in DPBS and maintained in DPBS on ice for imaging.
Confocal imaging was performed using a Zeiss Axio Observer. Z1 microscope equipped with a Yokogawa spinning disk confocal head and a Cascade II: 512 camera. The confocal head contained a Quad-band notch dichroic mirror (405/488/568/647 nm). Samples were excited by solid state 491 nm (∼20 mW) or 561 nm (∼20 mW) lasers. Images were acquired using Slidebook 5.0 software (Intelligent Imaging Innovations), through a 48 × oil-immersion objective for YFP/AF488 (528/38 emission filter), AF568 (617/73 emission filter), and differential interference contrast (DIC) channels. Acquisition times ranged from 10 to 1000 milliseconds. Imaging conditions and intensity scales were matched for each dataset presented together unless otherwise noted.
Publication 2014
Heat fixation and staining with anti-myosin heavy chain (MHC) antibody did not preserve the normal organization of apical myosin observed in live squ-GFP26 (link), squ-mCherry (Myosin-mCherry), and GFP-zipper (GFP-MHC)27 (link) embryos. Therefore, endogenous GFP fluorescence was used to visualize myosin. squ-GFP embryos were fixed with 10% paraformaldehyde/heptane for 20 minutes, manually devitellinized, stained with Alexa-568 Phalloidin (Invitrogen) to visualize actin, and mounted in AquaPolymount (Poysciences, Inc.).
Publication 2008
Actins alexa 568 Antibodies, Anti-Idiotypic Embryo Fluorescence Heptane Myosin ATPase Myosin Heavy Chains paraform Phalloidine
Clonal analysis using the spontaneously activated Gal4/UAS system in the larval fat body was carried out as described previously. [11] (link), [12] (link), [16] (link), [19] (link) Bisected third instar larvae were inverted and fixed with 3.7% paraformaldehyde in PBS overnight at 4°C. Next, samples were rinsed twice and washed for 2 hours in PBS, permeabilized for 15 minutes in PBTX-DOC (PBS with 0.1% Triton X-100 and 0.05% sodium deoxycholate) and blocked for 3 h in 3% goat serum in PBTX-DOC. Samples were then incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies rabbit polyclonal anti-p62 [1∶2,000] and mouse monoclonal anti-GFP [1∶1,500] (Invitrogen) in 1% goat serum in PBTX-DOC. After 3×30 minutes washes in PBTX-DOC, samples were incubated with secondary antibodies goat anti-mouse Alexa 488 and goat anti-rabbit Alexa 568 [1∶1,500] (Invitrogen) in 1% goat serum in PBTX-DOC for 4 hours at room temperature. Finally, after 3×15 minutes washes in PBTX-DOC and 1×15 minutes in PBS, fat bodies were dissected and mounted in 50% glycerol/PBS with 0.2 µM DAPI. For p62 staining of mCherry-Atg8a expressing cells Alexa 647-conjugated goat anti-rabbit antibody was used to avoid detection of signal from mCherry. Lysotracker stainings have been carried out as described previously. Images were captured on a Zeiss Axioimager M2 microscope equipped with an Apotome2 grid confocal unit, a Plan-NeoFluar 40×0.75 NA objective, Axiocam Mrm camera, and Axiovision software using a MinMax setting for automatically adjusting image levels. Lysotracker stainings were photographed in widefield mode, and single optical sections are shown for colocalisations and mCherry-Atg8a assays. For p62 stainings, 3 subsequent optical sections taken at 0.55 µm intervals were projected into a single plane using Maximum Intensity Projection.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2012
alexa 568 Anti-Antibodies Antibodies Antibodies, Anti-Idiotypic Biological Assay Cells Clone Cells DAPI Deoxycholic Acid, Monosodium Salt Fat Body FILIP1L protein, human Glycerin Goat Larva LysoTracker Microscopy Mus paraform Rabbits Serum Signal Detection (Psychology) Staining Triton X-100 Vision
Compounds were purchased from Chemdiv, San Diego CA: CK-0944636 (Catalog number 8012-5103), CK-0993548 (Catalog number K205-1650), CK-0944666 (Catalog number 8012-5153) and CK-0157869 (Catalog number K205-0942). We purified native Arp2/3 complex from human platelets12 (link), bovine thymus6 (link), Schizosaccharomyces pombe13 (link) and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Supplemental methods), actin from chicken skeletal muscle14 (link) and recombinant HsWASp, WASp105-502, WASp-VCA and Cdc4212 (link), N-WASp-VCA 428-505 (Supplemental methods), GST-ActA 36-170 (Supplemental methods) and S. pombe Cdc12p(FH2)-His 973-139015 (link) from E. coli. We used standard assays to measure polymerization of pyrenyl-actin16 (link) and to visualize actin filaments by fluorescence microscopy17 (link). Binding of etheno-ATP to Arp2/3 complex was performed as described previously with slight modifications18 (link). We crystallized BtArp2/3 complex7 (link) with either 0.5 mM CK-548 or 1 mM CK-636 in DMSO or soaked these compounds into crystals for 24 hours before freezing in liquid nitrogen. Diffraction data were collected at beamline X29A at Brookhaven National Laboratories. SKOV3 cells were infected with Listeria monocytogenes and fixed with 2% formaldehyde, permeabilized with 0.1% Triton-X in PBS, stained with Listeria antibody (US Biologics, Cleveland, Ohio) and Alexa Fluor 568 phalloidin (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR), and imaged by fluorescence microscopy. We used an Isodata threshold on background-subtracted images of Listeria to isolate individual bacterium and measure the ratio of colocalized actin to Listeria fluorescence. Monocyte THP-1 cells were differentiated in 50 nM phorbol myristate acetate (Sigma-Aldrich-Fluka) to form podosomes before treatment with compounds. Black molly keratocytes19 (link) were observed by time-lapse phase contrast microscopy.
Publication 2009
Actin-Related Protein 2-3 Complex Actins alexa 568 Bacteria Biological Assay Biological Factors Cattle Cells Chickens CK-0944636 CK-0944666 CK-0993548 Escherichia coli Fluorescence Formaldehyde Homo sapiens Immunoglobulins Isoenzyme CPK MB Listeria Listeria monocytogenes Microfilaments Microscopy, Fluorescence Microscopy, Phase-Contrast Molecular Probes Molly Monocytes Nitrogen Phalloidine Podosomes Polymerization Saccharomyces cerevisiae Schizosaccharomyces Schizosaccharomyces pombe Skeleton Sulfoxide, Dimethyl Tetradecanoylphorbol Acetate THP-1 Cells WASL protein, human WAS protein, human

Most recents protocols related to «Alexa 568»

Externalized PS detection in yeast was performed as previously described59 (link) with some modifications. Yeast cells were cultured in YPD for overnight, diluted to 1/10 in fresh YPD and then incubated for an additional 2–3 h. Cells were collected and washed once with Sorbitol buffer (35 mM potassium phosphate, pH 6.8, 0.5 mM MgCl2, 1.2 M sorbitol). Cells were incubated in 98 μl of Sorbitol buffer + 2 μl of 2.5 mg ml−1 Zymolyase 100T (Seikagaku) for 90 min (wild-type) or 60 min (pTEF1-VPS4) at room temperature with gentle shaking. Cells were then washed once with Sorbitol buffer, resuspended in 19 μl of Annexin V binding buffer + 1 μl of Annexin V–Alexa Fluor 568 and incubated for 20 min at room temperature with gentle shaking. Supernatant was removed, and cells were suspended in 9.8 μl of Annexin V binding buffer + 0.2 μl of Calcofluor white stain (Sigma-Aldrich, Fluka). Images were acquired using an AXIO Observer.Z1 (Zeiss, ZEN 2.3).
Full text: Click here
Publication 2024
For histological staining, tissues were fixed overnight in 4% paraformaldehyde. For cryosectioning fixed organoids were embedded in OCT (Sakura, 4583), cut at 18–20 μm thickness and processed for immunofluorescence using standard methods. The following primary antibodies were used: anti-SOX2 (Abcam, ab97959, 1:500), anti-NeuN (Millipore, MAB377, 1:500), anti-DCX (Santa Cruz, sc8066, 1:1,000), anti-MAP2 (Abcam, ab5392, 1:1,000), anti-Nestin (BD, 611658, 1:1,000), anti bIII-tubulin (Abcam, ab18207, 1:1,000), anti-BrdU (Thermo Fisher Scientific, B35128, 1:500), anti-phospho-vimentin(Ser82) (MBL, D095-3S, 1:250), anti-TTR (AbD Serotec, ahp1837, 1:500), anti-aPKC (SantaCruz, sc-17781, 1:100), anti-nestin (Abcam, ab105389, 1:1,000), anti-β-catenin (Sigma, C2206, 1:250), anti-N-cadherin (BD, 610920, 1:500), anti-ASPM (Bethyl Laboratories, IHC-00058, 1:100), anti-TBR2 (Abcam, ab23345, 1:250) and anti-TBR1 (Abcam, ab31940, 1:500). Secondary antibodies raised in donkey or goat were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific: donkey anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (IgG) (H+L), Alexa Fluor 488, A-21202, 1:1,000; donkey anti-rabbit IgG (H+L), Alexa Fluor 488, A-21206, 1:1,000; donkey anti-goat IgG (H+L), Alexa Fluor 488, A-11055, 1:1,000; donkey anti-sheep IgG (H+L), Alexa Fluor 488, A-11015, 1:1,000; goat anti-rabbit IgG (H+L), Alexa Fluor 488, A-11008, 1:1,000; goat anti-mouse IgG (H+L), Alexa Fluor 488, A-11001, 1:1,000; goat anti-mouse IgG1, Alexa Fluor 488, A-21121, 1:1,000; goat anti-rabbit IgG (H+L), Alexa Fluor 568, A-11011, 1:1,000; goat anti-mouse IgG (H+L), Alexa Fluor 568, A-11004, 1:1,000; donkey anti-goat IgG (H+L), Alexa Fluor 568, A-11057, 1:1,000; donkey anti-mouse IgG (H+L), Alexa Fluor 568, A-11037, 1:1,000; goat anti-mouse IgG2b, Alexa Fluor 568, A-21144, 1:1,000; donkey anti-chicken IgY (H+L), Alexa Fluor 568, A-78950, 1:1,000; donkey anti-rabbit IgG (H+L), Alexa Fluor 647, 31573, 1:1,000; donkey anti-goat IgG (H+L), Alexa Fluor 647, 21447, 1:1,000; goat anti-rabbit IgG (H+L), Alexa Fluor 647, 21245, 1:1,000; and goat anti-rabbit IgG (H+L), Alexa Fluor 647, 21244, 1:1,000. If possible, all secondary antibodies were of highly cross-adsorbed quality.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2024
Nuclei were isolated as described previously17 (link). For the labeling of glial cell nuclei and cerebellar granule cells, the isolated nuclei were washed once with homogenization buffer (0.25 M sucrose, 150 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 20 mM Tricine pH 7.8, 0.15 mM spermine, 0.5 mM spermidine, EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktail, 1 mM DTT, 20 U ml−1 SUPERase-In RNase inhibitor (ThermoFisher, #AM2696), 40 U ml−1 RNasin ribonuclease inhibitor (Promega, #N2515)). Each washing step constituted of resuspension of nuclei pellet followed by centrifugation (1,000 × g, 4 min, 4 °C). Resuspended nuclei were fixed in Homogenization buffer with 1% formaldehyde for 8 min at room temperature followed by quenching with 0.125 M glycine for 5 min. Following centrifugation, the nuclei were washed once with wash buffer (PBS, 0.05% TritonX-100, 0.5% BSA, 20 U ml−1 Superase-In RNase Inhibitor and 40 U ml−1 RNasin ribonuclease inhibitor) and incubated at room temperature on a shaker in wash buffer for permeabilization and blocking of unspecific binding. Nuclei were washed twice in wash buffer without TritonX-100 and resuspended in 100 µl 40% ethanol containing TrueBlack Lipofuscin Autofluorescence Quencher (Biotium, #23007) for 40–50 seconds. Nuclei were washed twice with wash buffer (w/o TritonX-100) and incubated overnight at 4 °C with the following antibodies: Rb x NeuN-Alexa-647 (1:400, Abcam, #ab190565), Rb x NeuN-Alexa594 (1:400, Abcam, #ab207279), Mm x EAAT1 (1:2,000, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, #sc-515839), Mm x IRF8-PE (1:65, ThermoFisher, #12-9852-82) and Goat x Olig2 (1:300, R&D Systems, #AF2418). After three washes with wash buffer (w/o TritonX-100), the nuclei were incubated for 30–45 min at room temperature with Donkey × Mm-Alexa-488 (1:1,000, ThermoFisher, #A-21202) and Donkey x Goat-Alexa-647 (1:300, ThermoFisher, # A-21447). After three washes with wash buffer (w/o TritonX-100), the nuclei were resuspended in Sorting buffer (PBS, 0.2% BSA, 40 U ml−1 RNasin ribonuclease inhibitor, 0.5 µg ml−1 DAPI) and separated with SONY MA900 Cell Sorter (software ver. 3.0.5). Aggregates of nuclei were excluded based on higher DAPI signal and the following gating strategies were used: neuronal nuclei (647+, 594+, 488−, large), oligodendrocyte nuclei (647+, 594−, 488−, small), microglia nuclei (647−, 594+, 488−, small) and astrocyte nuclei (647−, 594−, 488+, small). A separate sorting experiment was performed for collecting cerebellar granule cell nuclei. For this purpose, nuclei were labeled with Rb x NeuN-Alexa594 (1:400, Abcam, #ab207279) and Mm x ITPR1-Alexa-488 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, #sc-271197 AF488), and granule cell nuclei were collected (488−, 594+).
For labeling neuronal nuclei, PrimeFlow labeling kit (ThermoFisher, #88-18005-210) was used and fixation and permeabilization were carried out according to manufacturer’s instructions but with 200 U ml−1 Superase-In RNase inhibitor and 400 U ml−1 RNasin ribonuclease inhibitor present at every incubation step. For sorting, the nuclei were resuspended in sorting buffer (PBS, 0.2% BSA, 40 U ml−1 RNasin ribonuclease inhibitor, 0.5 µg ml−1 DAPI). Probes specific to DRD1 (Alexa-647, #VA1-3002351-PF), DRD2 (Alexa-488, #VA4-3083767-PF) and PPP1R1B (Alexa-568, #VA10-3266354-PF) were used to label dMSN (647+, 568+, 488−, large) and iMSN nuclei (647−, 568+, 488+, large). In a separate set of experiments, probes specific to TAC3 (Alexa-647, #VA1-16603-PF), ETV1 (Alexa-488, # VA4-3083818-PF), SST (Alexa-568, # VA10-3252595-PF) and PPP1R1B (Alexa-568, # VA10-3266354-PF) were used to label the nuclei of TAC3+ interneurons (647+, 568−, 488+), PVALB+ interneurons (647−, 568−, 488+), SST+ interneurons (647−, 568+++, 488−) and MSNs (647−, 568+, 488−, large). Probes specific to TRPC3 (Alexa-647, # VA1-3004835-PF), COL6A6 (Alexa-647, #VA1-3014134-PF) and PPP1R1B (Alexa-568, # VA10-3266354-PF) were used in another set of experiments to label cholinergic interneuron nuclei (647+, 568−, large) and MSN nuclei (647−, 568+, large). CA8 probe (Alexa-647, #VA1-3001892-PF) was used for sorting Purkinje neuron nuclei (647+, large). Aggregates of nuclei were always excluded based on higher intensity of DAPI staining. All PrimeFlow target probes were used at a dilution of 1:40.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2024
3D tumor spheroids were incubated for 24 h with 2 µM Alexa 568-conjugated pH-low insertion peptide variant 3 (pHLIP V3; NH2-ACDDQNPWRAYLDLLFPTDTLLLDLLW-COOH) (Weerakkody et al, 2013 (link)) to label acidic regions; an acid-independent Alexa 594 K-pHLIP peptide wherein aspartate residues were replaced by positively charged lysine residues was used as negative control. After cell dissociation using Accutase, cells were resuspended into PBS for FACS sorting. FACSAria III cell sorter (BD Biosciences) was used to isolate Alexa 568 pHLIP-positive and Alexa 594 K-pHLIP-negative cells.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2024
Primary antibodies: rabbit-anti-phospho-Smad1/5 (41D10, Cell Signaling, #9516; 1:200), mouse-anti-Wg (4D4, DSHB, University of Iowa, RRID:AB_528512; total staining: 1:120, extracellular staining: 1:120), mouse-anti-Ptc (DSHB, University of Iowa, RRID:AB_528441; total staining: 1:40), rat-anti-HA (3F10, Roche, 11867423001, RRID:AB_390914; total staining: 1:300, extracellular staining: 1:20), rat-anti-Ollas (L2, Novus Biologicals, NBP1-06713, RRID:AB_1968650; total staining: 1:300, extracellular staining: 1:20), mouse-anti-HS (F69-3G10, amsbio; 1:100).
The following secondary antibodies were used at 1:500 dilutions in this study. Goat anti-rabbit IgG (H+L) Alexa Fluor 488 (A11008 Thermo Fischer), goat anti-rabbit IgG (H+L) Alexa Fluor 568 (A11011 Thermo Fischer), goat anti-rabbit IgG (H+L) Alexa Fluor 680 (A21109 Thermo Fischer), goat anti-rat IgG (H+L) Alexa Fluor 568 (A11077 Thermo Fischer), goat anti-mouse IgG (H+L) Alexa Fluor 568 (A11004 Thermo Fischer), goat anti-rat IgG Fc 488 (ab97089 abcam), goat anti-mouse IgG Fc Alexa Fluor 680 (115625071 Jackson Immuno Research).
Full text: Click here
Publication 2024

Top products related to «Alexa 568»

Sourced in United States, United Kingdom, Germany, Canada, France, Italy, Panama, China, Australia, Netherlands, Japan
Alexa Fluor 568 is a fluorescent dye used in various life science applications. It has an excitation maximum of 578 nm and an emission maximum of 603 nm, making it suitable for detection and visualization experiments. The dye is known for its brightness and photostability, which are important characteristics for imaging and assay applications.
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom, Germany, Japan, France, Italy, Canada, China, Spain, Switzerland, Denmark, Australia, Hungary, Belgium, Ireland, Israel, Netherlands, Moldova, Republic of, India, Austria, Czechia, Poland
Alexa Fluor 488 is a fluorescent dye used in various biotechnological applications. It has an excitation maximum at 495 nm and an emission maximum at 519 nm, producing a green fluorescent signal. Alexa Fluor 488 is known for its brightness, photostability, and pH-insensitivity, making it a popular choice for labeling biomolecules in biological research.
Sourced in United States, Germany, United Kingdom, Japan, China, Canada, Italy, Australia, France, Switzerland, Spain, Belgium, Denmark, Panama, Poland, Singapore, Austria, Morocco, Netherlands, Sweden, Argentina, India, Finland, Pakistan, Cameroon, New Zealand
DAPI is a fluorescent dye used in microscopy and flow cytometry to stain cell nuclei. It binds strongly to the minor groove of double-stranded DNA, emitting blue fluorescence when excited by ultraviolet light.
Sourced in United States, Germany, Japan, United Kingdom, China, Italy, Sao Tome and Principe, France, Macao, Canada, Switzerland, Spain, Australia, Denmark, India, Poland, Israel, Belgium, Sweden, Ireland, Netherlands, Panama, Brazil, Portugal, Czechia, Puerto Rico, Austria, Hong Kong, Singapore
DAPI is a fluorescent dye that binds strongly to adenine-thymine (A-T) rich regions in DNA. It is commonly used as a nuclear counterstain in fluorescence microscopy to visualize and locate cell nuclei.
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom, Germany, Switzerland, France, Australia
Alexa Fluor 568 phalloidin is a fluorescent dye used for the detection and visualization of F-actin in cells. It binds specifically to F-actin, allowing for the labeling and imaging of the actin cytoskeleton. The Alexa Fluor 568 dye exhibits bright red fluorescence when excited at the appropriate wavelength.
Sourced in United States, Germany, United Kingdom, Italy, China, Japan, France, Canada, Sao Tome and Principe, Switzerland, Macao, Poland, Spain, Australia, India, Belgium, Israel, Sweden, Ireland, Denmark, Brazil, Portugal, Panama, Netherlands, Hungary, Czechia, Austria, Norway, Slovakia, Singapore, Argentina, Mexico, Senegal
Triton X-100 is a non-ionic surfactant commonly used in various laboratory applications. It functions as a detergent and solubilizing agent, facilitating the solubilization and extraction of proteins and other biomolecules from biological samples.
Sourced in United States, Germany, United Kingdom, Japan, China, France, Canada, Spain, Belgium, Italy, Australia, Austria, Denmark, Netherlands, Switzerland, Ireland, New Zealand, Portugal, Brazil, Argentina, Singapore, Poland, Ukraine, Macao, Thailand, Finland, Lithuania, Sweden
Hoechst 33342 is a fluorescent dye that binds to DNA. It is commonly used in various applications, such as cell staining and flow cytometry, to identify and analyze cell populations.
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom, Germany, Japan
Alexa 568 is a fluorescent dye used in various applications in life science research. It has an absorption maximum of 578 nm and an emission maximum of 603 nm, making it suitable for detection and labeling in fluorescence-based techniques.
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom, Germany, France, Japan, Switzerland, Canada, Panama, China, Italy, Denmark, Spain
Alexa 488 is a fluorescent dye used in various biological applications. It is a brighly fluorescent, green-emitting dye with excitation and emission maxima at 495 and 519 nm, respectively. Alexa 488 can be conjugated to biomolecules such as proteins, antibodies, or nucleic acids to enable their detection and visualization.
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom, Germany, Canada, Japan, France, Switzerland, Panama, Spain, China, Italy
Vectashield is a non-hardening, aqueous-based mounting medium designed for use with fluorescent-labeled specimens. It is formulated to retard photobleaching of fluorescent dyes and provides excellent preservation of fluorescent signals.

More about "Alexa 568"

Alexa 568 is a widely-used fluorescent dye in biological research.
This bright, red-fluorescent dye has excitation and emission maxima of approximately 578/603 nm, making it a popular choice for labeling proteins, cells, and other biological structures for visualization and analysis.
The dye's photostability and pH-insensitivity make it a reliable option for a variety of imaging applications, including fluorescence microscopy, flow cytometry, and high-throughput screening.
Researchers can optimize their protocols for Alexa 568 using the PubCompare.ai platform, which helps locate the best protocols from literature, pre-prints, and patents by effortlessly comparing them.
This AI-driven tool unleashes research potential and provides the perfect solution for Alexa 568 needs, allowing researchers to experince the future of research today.
Alexa Fluor 568 is a similar fluorescent dye with comparable properties, while Alexa Fluor 488 is a green-fluorescent alternative.
Other related fluorescent dyes include DAPI, a blue-fluorescent nuclear stain, and Alexa Fluor 568 phalloidin, which binds to actin filaments.
Triton X-100 is a detergent commonly used for permeabilization, and Hoechst 33342 is another nuclear stain.
Alexa 568 and Alexa 488 are common abbreviations for these dyes.
Vectashield is a mounting medium that can be used with Alexa 568-labeled samples.
By incorporating these related terms and concepts, researchers can optimize their Alexa 568 protocols and enhance their biological imaging and analysis.