The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Artemether

Artemether is a semisynthetic derivative of artemisinin, a natural compound extracted from the Artemisia annua plant.
It is a potent antimalarial drug used to treat severe and uncomplicated falciparum malaria.
Artemether acts by disrupting the parasite's metabolic processes, leading to its destruction.
It is particularly effective against multidrug-resistant strains of Plasmodium falciparum.
Artemether is typically administered as an intramucsular or oral formulation, and its use has been shown to reduce morbidity and mortality in malaria-endemic regions.
Researchers studying Artemether can utilize PubCompare.ai's AI-powered platform to locate the most reliable experimental protocols from literature, preprints, and patents, allowing for enhanced reproducibility and accuracy in their research.

Most cited protocols related to «Artemether»

The PK/PD modelling now allows for artemisinin absorption and conversion (described above), so the ability to track more than two drug concentrations simultaneously and convert them into a drug-killing rate is crucial. This feature is absent from previous pharmacological models of malaria, which track only a single drug [1] (link) although we previously extended the methodology to track up to two drugs [13] . Existing pharmacological models typically use a standard differential equation [1] (link) to find a mathematical description for the rate of change in total parasite growth and death rates where P is the number of parasites in the infection, t is time after treatment (days), a is the parasite growth rate (per day), f(C) represents the drug-dependent rate of parasite killing which depends on the drug concentration C, and f(I) the killing resulting from the hosts background immunity.
As antimalarial drugs are now typically deployed as combination therapies and as each drug may affect parasites in its unconverted and/or converted forms, predicting the changing numbers of parasites requires an expansion of Equation 9 where r is the number of drugs, the drug effect f(Cd) is the effect of each drug, d. Note that we regard each active entity as a distinct “drug”. For example artemether-lumefantrine (AR-LF) includes three drug forms lumefantrine (LF), artemether (AR) (unconverted) and its active metabolite DHA (dihydroartemisinin). Note that Equation 10 assumes drugs kill independently; this is discussed further below.
Integrating Equation 10 allows us to predict the number of parasites at any time, t, after treatment with any number of drugs. This was done by first integrating Equation 9 using the separation-of-variables technique
Integrating both sides of Equation 11 gives so
Taking the exponential of both sides (and noting that a times 0 = 0) gives so
The problem is now to integrate f(C). Assuming there are r separate drugs/metabolites with antimalarial activity. In this case, f(C) becomes
So for each drug/metabolite d we need to calculate its concentration over time Cd using the compartment model Equations (7 and 8) and the substitute Cd into the killing rate equation
Note in Equation 14, is the maximum drug killing Vmax for drug d.
Substituting Equation 13 into 12 gives or, equivalently,
Note that Cd may be a complicated expression (including Equations 7 and 8) and so has to be integrated numerically. As before [13] , if the predicted parasite number (Pt) falls below 1 we assume the infection has been cleared and the patient cured, immunity is currently ignored (see Winter & Hastings [13] for further discussion).
Full text: Click here
Publication 2013
Aftercare Antimalarials Antiparasitic Agents Artemether artemisinine artenimol Combined Modality Therapy Infection Lumefantrine Lumefantrine, Artemether Malaria Parasites Patients Pharmaceutical Preparations Response, Immune
A number of field studies were carried out in Kisii and Rachuonyo South districts between 2009 and 2011 with the goal of establishing an evidence base to help malaria control programme managers monitor malaria transmission and implement and adjust malaria control interventions. Data from these studies are currently being analysed and will be described in detail in forthcoming publications. For the purposes of the modelling work described in this paper, the datasets used are described in Table
1.
Where data were not available from MTC surveys, parameter inputs were identified via a literature review of publications using the PubMed electronic database using the key words “Kenya, Nyanza, Rachuonyo, western Kenya, malaria, Plasmodium falciparum, transmission, antimalarials, artemether- lumfantrine, insecticide residual spraying, insecticide-treated nets, larviciding, intermittent preventive treatment, modelling, malaria incidence, treatment seeking, mosquito resting duration, extrinsic incubation period, Anopheles.” An internet review was also conducted on the websites for the Kenyan Ministry of Health, Division of Malaria Control, the National Bureaus of Statistics, and the National Demographic Health Surveys. The sources were prioritized in the following strata in order of precedence: study area districts MTC data collection, study area districts existing literature, study area provincial data, national level data, existing model parameterization. Where more than one data source was found within any one stratum the study with the closest site characteristics or, where applicable, date of data collection closest to that of the MTC studies was used.
To determine the annual average EIR, the transmission parameter in the model, seroconversion rates using the MSP-1 antigen were estimated from the July 2009 cross-sectional survey as described in Drakeley et al. 2005
[29 (link)] and derived EIR equivalents were calculated as described in Corran et al. 2007
[30 (link)]. The average monthly EIR values used to calibrate the seasonal pattern of transmission in the scenario were calculated by separating the annual average EIR from existing literature for a neighboring district into the monthly proportion of rainfall in Rachuonyo South recorded by the Kogalo weather station so that the peak malaria transmission month corresponded to one month later than the peak rainfall month (Figure
2). Because the annual average EIR is based on serology, the model incorporates the overall temperature and humidity effects but excludes the seasonality of these effects.
In practice, many of the entomological and health system parameters were based on data from elsewhere used in other modelling exercises
[26 (link)-32 (link)] as they are thought to be fairly standard across anopheline species and anti-malarials. However, because several entomological parameters are sensitive to temperature, particularly the extrinsic incubation period (EIP) and mosquito resting duration
[33 (link),34 ], these values were adjusted for each study area based on the average annual temperature collected by the Kogalo weather station. Also, the latest data from the study site challenges the assumption that vectors are normally predominantly endophilic and endophagic
[35 (link)]. For the purposes of this experiment, emphasis was placed on overall vector biting behaviour rather than simulating individual species. This was due to the design of the entomological field studies for which results were available at the time of model parameterization that focused on indoor/outdoor species composition and trap evaluation rather than the biting behaviour within individual species. The efficacy of LLINs and IRS were adjusted to affect the indoor mosquitoes but not the outdoor mosquitoes and the proportion of bites on a human compared to other mammals was reduced for the outdoor mosquitoes.
The monitoring measures serving as the outputs simulated by the model were chosen based on the indicators of malaria transmission measured by the field studies described above.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2012
Anopheles Antigens Antimalarials Artemether Bites Cloning Vectors Culicidae Homo sapiens Humidity Insecticides Malaria Mammals Merozoite Surface Protein 1 Plasmodium falciparum SLC6A2 protein, human Transmission, Communicable Disease
The primary outcome was protection against malaria infection in a P. falciparum sporozoite challenge model. To assess the efficacy of the vaccines the 24 vaccinated subjects and 6 unvaccinated infectivity control subjects underwent experimental challenge with Plasmodium falciparum, fourteen days after the final vaccination. Laboratory-reared Anopheles stephensi mosquitoes were infected with the chloroquine-sensitive 3D7 strain of P. falciparum parasites in an adapted model [16] (link) as described before [6] (link), to assess the efficacy of the vaccines. From the evening of day 6 subjects attended clinic twice daily for review of symptoms, vital signs monitoring (pulse, blood pressure and oral temperature) and withdrawal of 3 mL of blood for thick film and PCR analysis. Field's stain thick films were examined immediately by experienced microscopists for the appearance of viable parasites. A minimum of 200 high power fields were examined before a subject was declared slide negative. Subjects who reached day 15 without blood film evidence of malaria infection were followed up daily until day 21. All subjects were treated immediately with Riamet (artemether 20 mg, lumefantrine 120 mg, Novartis) on diagnosis of malaria by the identification of a viable parasite on thick film. Subjects returned to clinic on two consecutive days for negative blood films post treatment. During the challenge follow-up period blood samples were analysed by PCR in real time (method discussed in [17] (link)), the clinicians assessing the subjects were blinded to the results. Efficacy was assessed by measuring the number of subjects who developed malaria infection and the time between exposure and parasitaemia as detected by thick-film blood smear, as well as measurement of parasite growth rates by PCR. Comparisons were made between the two vaccine groups and between all vaccinated volunteers and unvaccinated controls. Parasite growth rates were calculated using a method previously described [18] . This method is based on a statistical model of parasite distribution, using a convolution of two probability density functions to estimate the numbers of parasites present in the blood and being sequestered at any time. The model was coded into an Excel ™ spreadsheet, and the in-built Solver minimization routine was used to estimate the best solution by minimization of the squared difference between calculated and predicted values.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2008
Anopheles Artemether BLOOD Blood Pressure Chloroquine Culicidae Diagnosis Infection Infection Control Lumefantrine Malaria Parasitemia Parasites Plasmodium falciparum Pulse Rate Signs, Vital Sporozoites Stains Strains Vaccination Vaccines Voluntary Workers
The full study methodology was published by Tiono et al. [21 (link)]. A brief summary of the methodology is given here.
This was a single-center, controlled, parallel, cluster-randomized study that evaluated the effect of systematic treatment of P. falciparum asymptomatic carriers on the incidence of symptomatic malaria episodes in children (<5 years) and adults over a 12-month period after completion of three community screening and treatment campaigns, compared with no treatment of asymptomatic carriers. In total, 18 clusters (each comprising one village) were randomized and assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the intervention or control arm.
Before the study implementation phase, all inhabitants of the 18 clusters were provided with long-lasting insecticide-treated nets (LLINs; OLYSET® nets [Sumitomo Chemical Co, Ltd, Tokyo, Japan]). Compliance with mosquito net use was checked every two months during home visits to the trial participants by Demographic Surveillance System (DSS) fieldworkers.
During the implementation phase, inhabitants of the intervention and control clusters participated in the three screening campaigns that took place ~1 month apart between January and April 2011, before the start of the rainy season. A fourth campaign was conducted in January 2012 after the rainy season had ended to mark the end of the study at ~12 months (Figure 1). At each campaign, finger-prick blood samples were taken from the entire study population in the intervention arm and a randomly selected 40% in the control arm for microscopic screening for P. falciparum asexual forms and gametocytes. In the intervention arm, the population was also screened using a rapid diagnostic test (RDT; First Response® Malaria Ag, Premier Medical Corp Ltd., Nani-Daman, India) to identify asymptomatic carriers. Those individuals with a positive RDT received treatment with artemether-lumefantrine (20 mg artemether and 120 mg lumefantrine [Coartem®, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland]) or artemether-lumefantrine dispersible, twice a day for three consecutive days. Subjects in the control arm were not screened by RDT – microscopy alone with delayed reading was used to ensure that study personnel and screened subjects remained unaware of subject status.
Following the third screening campaign, study participants in both arms were followed up for passive detection of symptomatic malaria throughout the wet season, when malaria transmission is high. Participants were encouraged to report to their local healthcare facility or clinic as soon as they felt unwell. An RDT was performed for all participants attending the local healthcare facility with confirmed fever (axillary temperature ≥37.5°C) or history of fever within the last 24 hours. On day 1 of campaign 4, a blood sample was also collected for gametocyte assessment by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), which was conducted in 1,999 randomly selected subjects drawn from the entire intervention group and a 40% subgroup of the control population. In this study, a case of symptomatic malaria was defined as fever or history of fever within the previous 24 hours and a P. falciparum asexual parasite count >5,000/μL. Each episode of symptomatic malaria was treated and the patient followed up at day 7. Parasitological cure was assessed by microscopy for each symptomatic malaria episode on day 7.
The blood films obtained during visits and for symptomatic malaria assessment were air-dried and Giemsa-stained for examination by a light microscope fitted with a 100 X oil immersion lens at a single laboratory. At least 200 thick film fields were examined before a slide was declared negative. When P. falciparum was present, a count of the asexual forms against leukocytes was made using a tally counter. Counting was done based on at least 200 leukocytes according to WHO standards. If less than 10 parasites were identified from the 200 leukocyte screen, counting was extended to 1,000 leukocytes. If P. falciparum gametocytes were seen, a gametocyte count was performed against 1,000 leukocytes. All slides were read by two independent microscopists. If the ratio of densities from the first two readings was >1.5 or <0.67, or if less than 30 parasites were counted with an absolute difference of more than 10 in the number of parasites, the slide was evaluated by a third microscopist. The definitive result was the mean of the parasite density of the two most concordant reading results.
Microscopist competency was evaluated through two equivalent quality control (EQC) programs. The first EQC was carried out by College of American Pathology proficiency testing and included a set of 5 slides provided to each microscopist for reading thrice a year. The second EQC was performed by WHO (National Institute for Communicable Diseases) and involved the reading of a set of 20 slides every quarter by each microscopist. Only those with a score of at least 80%, graded as ‘competent’ , were involved in the reading of trial participants’ slides.
This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01256658.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2013
Adult Arm, Upper Artemether Axilla BLOOD Child Coartem Communicable Diseases Feelings Fever Fingers Hyperthermia, Local Insecticides Lens, Crystalline Leukocytes Light Microscopy Lumefantrine Lumefantrine, Artemether Malaria Microscopy Mosquito Nets Parasites Patients Rain Rapid Diagnostic Tests Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction SLC6A2 protein, human Stain, Giemsa Submersion Transmission, Communicable Disease Vision Visit, Home

Protocol full text hidden due to copyright restrictions

Open the protocol to access the free full text link

Publication 2017
Antibodies Antimalarials Artemether Asepsis Axilla Biological Assay BLOOD Chronic Condition Coinfection Combined Modality Therapy Complete Blood Count Creatinine D-Alanine Transaminase Dry Ice Eggs Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Ethanol Feces Filtration Flow Cytometry Forests Helminths Hepatocyte Homo sapiens Immunization Immunofluorescence Inclusion Bodies Liver Lumefantrine Malaria Microscopy Natural Killer Cells Needles Neoplasm Metastasis Ninhydrin Normal Saline Parasitemia Parasites Parasitic Diseases Pathologists PBMC Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells Physicians Placebos Proteins Psychological Inhibition Recombinant Proteins Safety Schistosoma haematobium Serum Sporozoites Sterility, Reproductive T-Lymphocyte Transmission, Communicable Disease Urine Vaccination Vaccines Veins

Most recents protocols related to «Artemether»

The definitions used for measurement of compliance outcomes are shown in Fig 1. Medication appropriateness was defined as administration of recommended parenteral antimalarials, including artemisinin, artemether, or quinine, plus oral ACTs (at least 1 dose of each); medication appropriateness was computed for the entire study population. Treatment compliance was defined as provision of at least 3 doses of an appropriate parenteral antimalarial (artesunate, artemether, or quinine) followed by administration, dispensing, or prescription of an ACT; treatment compliance was assessed for data from a post-implementation subsample for which the updated, more comprehensive data collection form was used.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2023
Antimalarials Artemether artemisinine Artesunate Parenteral Nutrition Pharmaceutical Preparations Quinine
This was a longitudinal, single-arm, prospective study to evaluate P. falciparum tolerance to ART and its derivatives in children with uncomplicated malaria aged 6 months to 14 years in 3 health facilities in the Greater Accra region of Ghana. The study focused mainly on day 3 post artemether-lumefantrine (AL) treatment parasitaemia, 72-h ex vivo RSA after dihydroartemisinin (DHA) exposure, 72-h parasite clearance in vitro against a panel of 6 drugs (ART, AS, artemether [AM], DHA, amodiaquine [AQ], lumefantrine [LUM], and the following molecular markers of drug tolerance / resistance: Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs), Multiple Nucleotide Polymorphisms (MNPs), Insertions & Deletions (INDEL) in Pfk13, Pfcoronin, P. falciparum multidrug resistance protein 1 (Pfmdr1), multidrug resistance protein 2 (Pfmdr2), dihydrofolate reductase (Pfdhfr), dihydropteroate synthetase (Pfdhps), signal peptide peptidase (Pfspp), and multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 (Pfmrp2) genes. It sought to set up correlates of ART tolerance.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2023
ABCB1 protein, human Amodiaquine Artemether artenimol Biological Markers Child derivatives Dihydropteroate Synthase Genes Genetic Polymorphism Immune Tolerance INDEL Mutation Lumefantrine Lumefantrine, Artemether Malaria Multidrug-Resistance Associated Protein 2 Nucleotides P-glycoprotein 2 Parasitemia Parasites Pharmaceutical Preparations signal peptide peptidase Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Tetrahydrofolate Dehydrogenase

Protocol full text hidden due to copyright restrictions

Open the protocol to access the free full text link

Publication 2023
Artemether artemisinine Artemisinins Artesunate Bath Cells Culture Media derivatives gephyrin Neurons Parent Sulfoxide, Dimethyl Synapses Treatment Protocols
Bovine serum albumin, phosphate buffer solution (PBS), trypsin, Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 Medium, Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM), DMEM/F-12, fetal bovine serum and penicillin & streptomycin & amphotericin B solution were purchased from Gibco, USA. CLIPPKF was purchased from Bank Peptide biological technology Co., Ltd, Hefei, China with the purity above 95%. Distearoyl phosphoethanolamine (DSPE)-PEG2000-Mal (Maleimide) was obtained from Laysan Bio Co., Arab, AL. Cholesterol (CHO), eggplant bottle, heparin sodium and Giemsa staining solutions were purchased from Titan Scientific Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China. Egg phosphatidylcholine (EPC), H2O2 and Tween-80 were purchased from J&K Chemical Ltd., Shanghai, China. Nile red (NR) and DAPI dye were from Beijing Fanbo Science and Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China. Percoll separation solution was obtained from Yibaiju Economic and Trade Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China. Annexin V-Cy5 and 10 × Annexin V binding buffer were from BioVision Inc, USA. Artemether, insulin and SYBR Green I was provided by Dalian Meilun Biology Technology Co., Ltd., Dalian, China. Carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester (CFDA-SE) was purchased from Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Beijing, China. The Hoechst 33,342 (HO), thiazole orange (TO), 5-(dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT), hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) staining kit, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay kit and DAB chromogenic kit were purchased from Sigma Aldrich, USA. Zoletil™ 50 and paraformaldehyde were purchased from Youchong Biological Technology Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, China. Anti-mouse TNF and IL-6, Streptavidin HRP were purchased from Shanghai Baiye Biotechnology Center, Shanghai, China. CellROX™ Deep Red Reagent, MitoTracker™ Deep Red FM, Texas Red®-X-conjugated WGA and TUNEL cell apoptosis detection kit were from Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA. Tissue autofluorescence quencher (AutoFluo Quencher) was purchased from Beijing Pulilai Gene Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China. Sodium citrate, xylene, physiological saline and hydrochloric acid ethanol were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., China. Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), dichloromethane, tetrahydrofuran, anhydrous ethanol and triethylamine were purchased from Sigma-aldrich, Germany. Nuclepore hydrophilic membrane was purchased from GE Healthcare life science, Whatman, England. PVDF blotting membrane, antibody CD47, HRP-conjugated secondary antibody, and Omni-Ecltm ultrasensitive chemiluminescence detection Kit were gained from Shanghai Epizyme Biomedical Technology Co., Ltd.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2023
5-(6)-carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester Absolute Alcohol Amphotericin Amphotericin B Annexin A5 Apoptosis Arabs Artemether Aubergine azo rubin S bicinchoninic acid Biological Assay Biomedical Technology Biopharmaceuticals Bromides Buffers CD47 protein, human Cells Chemiluminescence Cholesterol DAPI Eagle Edetic Acid Eosin Ethanol Fetal Bovine Serum Genes Heparin Sodium Hydrochloric acid Immunoglobulins In Situ Nick-End Labeling Insulin maleimide Methylene Chloride Mus paraform Penicillins Peptides Percoll Peroxide, Hydrogen phenethicillin Phosphates Phosphatidylcholines Phosphatidylethanolamines physiology polyvinylidene fluoride Saline Solution Serum Albumin, Bovine Sodium Citrate Streptavidin Streptomycin Sulfoxide, Dimethyl SYBR Green I tetrahydrofuran thiazole orange Tissue, Membrane Tissues triethylamine Trypsin Tween 80 Xylene Zoletil
The recruitment of children took place from August 2017 to August 2018 with an interruption from April to June 2018 (representing the dry season). For all consecutive children aged 0 to 15 years presenting at the paediatric emergency room at any time with a clinical presentation suggestive of severe malaria, an informed consent was obtained by study personnel from parents/legal representatives. Patients were further assessed by paediatric ward clinicians (who benefited from a refresher protocol specific training prior to the study start) and observations recorded using a standardized case report form. Data collected included the medical history, vital signs, a complete physical examination for signs of severity (affecting the airway, respiratory, circulatory, and neurological systems). Finger prick blood sample was taken for malaria smear (methods for microscopy examination of blood smears and criteria for diagnosis of severe malaria are given below), haemoglobin and glucose measurements using point of care devices (HemoCue® Hb 201 + and HemoCue® Glucose 201 + ; HaemoCue AB, Ängelholm, Sweden). If the RDT was positive, anti-malarial treatment was immediately initiated based on the NMCP guidelines.
Children received parenteral artesunate at 2.4 mg/kg body weight on admission (time zero), then after 12 and 24 h and then once a day, or artemether Injection at 3.2 mg/kg on admission, then 1.6 mg/kg body weight per day. In both cases, parenteral administration continued until the child improved and was able to take full course of oral ACT, using artemether-lumefantrine or artesunate-amodiaquine. Supportive therapy recommended for severe malaria includes the treatment of hypoglycaemia with dextrose when glucose < 2.2 mmol/l, blood transfusion for children with haemoglobin less than 5 g/dL. All treatments were free of charge. No adjusted dose of parenteral artesunate for children weighing less than 20 kg was adopted by the NMCP at the time of the study conduct.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2023
Amodiaquine Antimalarials Artemether Artesunate BLOOD Blood Circulation Blood Transfusion Body Weight Child Diagnosis Fingers Glucose Hemoglobin Hypoglycemia Lumefantrine, Artemether Malaria Medical Devices Microscopy N-methylchlorphentermine Parent Parenteral Nutrition Patients Physical Examination Point-of-Care Systems Respiratory Rate Signs, Vital

Top products related to «Artemether»

Sourced in Switzerland, Germany, United States
Coartem is a laboratory equipment product manufactured by Novartis. It is a device used for the detection and quantification of the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum in blood samples.
Sourced in United States, China, United Kingdom, Germany, Australia, Japan, Canada, Italy, France, Switzerland, New Zealand, Brazil, Belgium, India, Spain, Israel, Austria, Poland, Ireland, Sweden, Macao, Netherlands, Denmark, Cameroon, Singapore, Portugal, Argentina, Holy See (Vatican City State), Morocco, Uruguay, Mexico, Thailand, Sao Tome and Principe, Hungary, Panama, Hong Kong, Norway, United Arab Emirates, Czechia, Russian Federation, Chile, Moldova, Republic of, Gabon, Palestine, State of, Saudi Arabia, Senegal
Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) is a cell culture supplement derived from the blood of bovine fetuses. FBS provides a source of proteins, growth factors, and other components that support the growth and maintenance of various cell types in in vitro cell culture applications.
Sourced in United States, Germany
Lumefantrine is a laboratory equipment product manufactured by Merck Group. It is a synthetic antimalarial drug used for the treatment of malaria.
Sourced in United States, Germany, United Kingdom, China, Italy, Sao Tome and Principe, France, Macao, India, Canada, Switzerland, Japan, Australia, Spain, Poland, Belgium, Brazil, Czechia, Portugal, Austria, Denmark, Israel, Sweden, Ireland, Hungary, Mexico, Netherlands, Singapore, Indonesia, Slovakia, Cameroon, Norway, Thailand, Chile, Finland, Malaysia, Latvia, New Zealand, Hong Kong, Pakistan, Uruguay, Bangladesh
DMSO is a versatile organic solvent commonly used in laboratory settings. It has a high boiling point, low viscosity, and the ability to dissolve a wide range of polar and non-polar compounds. DMSO's core function is as a solvent, allowing for the effective dissolution and handling of various chemical substances during research and experimentation.
Sourced in United States
Artemether is a laboratory reagent used in the analysis and measurement of various compounds. It is a derivative of the antimalarial drug artemisinin and is commonly employed in analytical procedures. The core function of Artemether is to serve as an analytical tool for researchers and scientists.
Sourced in United States
Artemether is a pharmaceutical compound used as a labeling agent. It is a semi-synthetic derivative of artemisinin, a natural compound extracted from the Artemisia annua plant. Artemether is commonly used in various laboratory applications, such as cell staining and fluorescence microscopy, due to its light-absorbing and fluorescent properties.
Sourced in United States, Germany, United Kingdom, Italy, France, Switzerland, Australia, Spain, Belgium, Canada, China, Austria, Macao, Brazil, Poland, Japan, Ireland, Israel, Sao Tome and Principe, Denmark, Sweden, Netherlands, Czechia, Argentina, Hungary, Portugal, India, Singapore, Norway, Romania, New Zealand, Senegal
L-glutamine is a laboratory-grade amino acid that serves as a key component in cell culture media. It provides a source of nitrogen and energy for cellular metabolism, supporting the growth and proliferation of cells in vitro.
Sourced in United States, Germany, China, Brazil
Pyrimethamine is a pharmaceutical compound that functions as an antiparasitic agent. It is commonly used in the laboratory setting for research purposes.
Sourced in United States, Germany
Amodiaquine is a laboratory chemical used as a reference standard in analytical testing. It is a synthetic anti-malarial drug that can be utilized in the analysis and quality control of pharmaceutical products. The core function of Amodiaquine is to serve as a reference material for the identification and quantification of this compound in various samples.
Sourced in United States, France, Germany
Mefloquine is a synthetic compound used in the production of laboratory equipment. It is a key component in the manufacture of certain types of analytical instruments and devices used for research and testing purposes.

More about "Artemether"

Artemether is a potent antimalarial drug derived from the natural compound artemisinin, extracted from the Artemisia annua plant.
It is primarily used to treat severe and uncomplicated falciparum malaria, a life-threatening form of the disease caused by the Plasmodium falciparum parasite.
Artemether works by disrupting the parasite's metabolic processes, leading to its destruction.
It is particularly effective against multidrug-resistant strains of P. falciparum, making it a crucial tool in the fight against malaria in endemic regions.
Artemether is typically administered as an intramuscular or oral formulation, and its use has been shown to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with malaria.
Researchers studying Artemether can utilize the AI-powered PubCompare.ai platform to locate the most reliable experimental protocols from literature, preprints, and patents, enhancing the reproducibility and accuracy of their research.
Coartem, a combination of Artemether and Lumefantrine, is another important antimalarial drug that has been used effectively in the treatment of malaria.
DMSO (Dimethyl Sulfoxide) is a solvent that can be used to dissolve Artemether, while L-glutamine is an important nutrient for cell culture experiments involving Artemether.
Pyrimethamine and Amodiaquine are other antimalarial drugs that may be studied in conjunction with Artemether, while Mefloquine is an alternative treatment option for malaria.
By understanding the broader context of Artemether and its related compounds, researchers can enhance the effectiveness and impact of their Artemether-focused studies.