The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Azoles

Azoles are a class of heterocyclic organic compounds containing a 5-membered aromatic ring with at least one nitrogen atom.
These compounds have a wide range of pharmaceutical applications, particularly as antifungal, antiprotozoal, and anticancer agents.
Azoles work by disrupting the fungal cell membrane, inhibiting the synthesis of ergosterol, a key component of the fungal cell wall.
Common examples of azoles include fluconazole, itraconazole, and voriconazole.
Azoles are an important area of research, with ongoing studies exploring their mechanims of action, pharmacokinetics, and potential new therapeutic uses.
PubCompare.ai's AI-powered platform can help streamline Azoles research by locating the best protocols from literature, preprints, and patents through seamless comparisons, enhancing reproducibility and accuracy.

Most cited protocols related to «Azoles»

Reference antifungal susceptibility testing of all 212 isolates was performed by BMD (broth microdilution) exactly as described in CLSI document M27-A2 [29 ] against fluconazole (Pfizer, Sao Paulo, Brazil), itraconazole (Janssen, Beerse, Belgium) and amphotericin B (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA). The isolates were incubated at 35°C and the presence or absence of growth, after 48 h, was observed by visual inspection. The MIC endpoint for amphotericin B was considered the lowest tested drug concentration able to prevent any visible growth, while the MIC for azoles was considered the lowest tested drug concentration causing a significant reduction (approximately 50%) in growth compared to the growth of the drug-free positive control [29 ]. MIC interpretations follow the CLSI breakpoints [29 ] for fluconazol (≤8 ug/ml, susceptible; 16-32 ug/ml, SDD, ≥64, resistant) and itraconazole (≤0.125 μg/ml, susceptible; 0.25-0.5 ug/ml, SDD, ≥1, resistant). For amphotericin B, due to a lack of consensus about the definition of this drug's MIC, previous interpretative breakpoints described elsewhere [30 (link)] were employed (≤1 ug/ml, susceptible, ≥2, resistant).
Full text: Click here
Publication 2010
Amphotericin Amphotericin B Antifungal Agents Azoles Fluconazole Itraconazole MICB protein, human Substance Abuse Detection Susceptibility, Disease
Eligible participants had inadequately controlled asthma despite the use of moderate or higher doses of inhaled corticosteroids. Inclusion criteria were: age 18 years or older with a physician diagnosis of asthma supported by either a positive methacholine challenge test or a 12% increase in FEV1 with bronchodilators; 8 weeks of stable use of an inhaled corticosteroid equivalent to 400 ug/day or greater of fluticasone;27 poor asthma control defined by either: a Juniper Asthma Control Questionnaire score of 1.5 or greater29 (link) or more than one acute episode of asthma requiring unscheduled medical care in the past year. Participants were excluded if they had smoked cigarettes within six months or had 10 or more pack-years of smoking; had an FEV1 less than 50% predicted 30 (link); had anti-reflux or peptic ulcer surgery; or had clinical indications for acid suppression treatment (i.e. two or more episodes per week of heartburn requiring antacids). Participants were also ineligible if they had used anti-reflux medication within 1 month, or were taking drugs that could interact with PPIs such as theophylline, iron supplements, warfarin, anti-fungal drugs (“azoles”), or digitalis. Participants were also excluded if they were pregnant, intolerant of PPIs, or had any serious illness that would interfere with participation in the trial. Participants signed written consent statements approved by the local institutional review board.
Publication 2009
Acids Adrenal Cortex Hormones Antacids Asthma Azoles Bronchodilator Agents Diagnosis Dietary Supplements Digitalis Episode of Care Ethics Committees, Research Fluticasone Heartburn Iron Juniperus Methacholine Operative Surgical Procedures Peptic Ulcer Pharmaceutical Preparations Physicians Prepulse Inhibition Theophylline Warfarin
The RECOVERY trial is an investigator-initiated, streamlined, individually randomised, controlled, open-label, platform trial to evaluate the effects of potential treatments in patients hospitalised with COVID-19. Details of the trial design and results for other possible treatments (dexamethasone,7 (link) hydroxychloroquine,21 (link) lopinavir–ritonavir,22 (link) azithromycin,23 (link) tocilizumab,9 (link) and convalescent plasma24 (link)) have been published previously. The trial is underway at 177 hospitals in the UK, two hospitals in Indonesia, and two hospitals in Nepal (appendix pp 3–25). The trial is supported by the National Institute for Health Research Clinical Research Network, and is coordinated by the Nuffield Department of Population Health (University of Oxford, Oxford, UK), the trial sponsor. The trial was done in accordance with the principles of the International Conference on Harmonisation–Good Clinical Practice guidelines and approved by the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) and the Cambridge East Research Ethics Committee (20/EE/0101). The protocol, statistical analysis plan, and additional information are available online.
Patients admitted to hospital were eligible for the study if they had clinically suspected or laboratory confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and no medical history that might, in the opinion of the attending clinician, put the patient at significant risk if they were to participate in the trial. Children and pregnant women were not eligible to receive colchicine. Patients with severe liver impairment, significant cytopaenia, concomitant use of strong CYP3A4 (eg, clarithromycin, erythromycin, systemic azole antifungal, and HIV protease inhibitor) or P-glycoprotein inhibitors (eg, ciclosporin, verapamil, and quinidine), or hypersensitivity to lactose were excluded from the colchicine comparison (appendix p 81). Written informed consent was obtained from all patients, or a legal representative if patients were too unwell or unable to provide consent.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2021
Antifungal Agents Azithromycin Azoles Child Clarithromycin Colchicine Conferences COVID 19 Cyclosporins Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A4 Dexamethasone Erythromycin Ethics Committees, Research HIV Protease Inhibitors Hydroxychloroquine Hypersensitivity inhibitors Lactose Liver lopinavir-ritonavir drug combination P-Glycoprotein Patients Population Health Pregnant Women Quinidine tocilizumab Verapamil
We evaluated the activity of the free and loaded extracts against C. albicans ATCC 10231 and SC5314 strains, and against C. glabrata ATCC 2001 strain. In addition the free extract was also tested against some C. albicans strains that have mechanisms of resistance that have been previously characterized in the Lopez-Ribot laboratory (Perea et al., 2001 (link); Li et al., 2004 (link); Vila et al., 2015 (link)). We also used several C. albicans clinical isolates with previously characterized molecular mechanisms of azole resistance, TW2, TW3 and TW17, which represent a series of matched susceptible and resistant isolates from the same patient with oropharyngeal candidiasis (White, 1997 (link)). In addition, we used a set of genetically engineered C. albicans “gain of function” strains in key transcriptional regulators of azole resistance including TAC1, MRR1 and UPC2 (a kind gift from David Rogers) (Schubert et al., 2011 (link); Flowers et al., 2012 (link)). In the case of C. glabrata, we also used a series of clinical isolates with different levels of resistance against azoles or echinocandins, which were provided by the Fungus Testing Laboratory (FTL) at The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio. Antifungal susceptibility testing was performed using a broth microdilution technique following the methodology described in document M27-A3 published by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2008 ) with minor modifications, with determination of MIC90 as the concentration that inhibits 90% of the fungal yeast growth when compared to the growth control. MIC values were initially evaluated by visual analysis and confirmed by spectrophotometry at 490 nm in a microtiter plate reader.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2019
Antifungal Agents Azoles Candidiasis Cardiac Arrest Clinical Laboratory Services Echinocandins Flowers Fungi Oropharynxs Patients Spectrophotometry Strains Susceptibility, Disease Transcription, Genetic Yeasts
Representative time-kill studies were performed to investigate the activity of C12 and C14 in the presence or absence of POS against one azole-resistant strain, C. albicans ATCC 64124 (B). These assays were performed in 15 mL culture tubes using RPMI 1640 medium as previously described25 (link). Different sets of cell suspensions were prepared with C12 (8 μg/mL), C14 (4 μg/mL), and POS alone (10 μg/mL), or combinations of C12 (2 μg/mL) plus POS (2.5 μg/mL) or C14 (2 μg/mL) plus POS (1.25 and 2.5 μg/mL), or growth control (no drug) and sterility control (no cells and no drug). The final inoculum size of yeast cells used was 105 cfu/mL as confirmed by colony count. The cell suspensions were then incubated at 35 °C with constant shaking (200 rpm). Aliquot of 100 μL from each tubes were removed at 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 h, and serially diluted in sterile ddH2O. 50 μL of each dilution was plated onto potato dextrose agar (PDA) and then incubated at 35 °C. Colony counts were determined after 48 h of incubation. The experiments were performed in duplicate.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2015
Agar Azoles Biological Assay Candida albicans Cells Glucose Pharmaceutical Preparations Solanum tuberosum Sterility, Reproductive Strains Technique, Dilution Yeast, Dried

Most recents protocols related to «Azoles»

The collection time of the plasma sample included data from before administration of bepridil to up to 6 h after administration. To assess risk factors for achieving plasma bepridil concentrations ≥800 ng/mL at steady state, the eligible patients were divided into two groups based on their bepridil concentrations: ≥800 ng/mL and < 800 ng/mL.
The C/D ratio was calculated using the following equation:
C/D ratio of bepridil = plasma concentration of bepridil (ng/mL) / dose of bepridil (mg/day/kg body weight).
In this study, we defined the polypharmacy group as those who use six or more drugs, whereas the non-polypharmacy group was those who took fewer than six drugs. The relationship between plasma bepridil concentrations ≥800 ng/mL and baseline characteristics, including sex, age, height, body weight, body mass index, serum creatinine, creatinine clearance (Ccr), number of concomitant drugs used, typical inducers of CYPs (phenytoin, carbamazepine, phenobarbital, and rifampicin) [15 (link)], typical inhibitors of CYPs (erythromycin, clarithromycin, protease inhibitors, and azole antifungals) [15 (link)], aprindine, a competitive inhibitor of CYP2D6 [12 (link)], typical inhibitor of P-gp (amiodarone, diltiazem, nicardipine, nifedipine, propranolol, quinidine, cyclosporin, and tacrolimus) [16 (link)–18 (link)], and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), were examined. LVEF was measured using echocardiographic equipment provided at each hospital. Ccr was estimated using the Cockcroft–Gault formula [19 (link)].
The patient’s medical history and duration of bepridil treatment were collected from medical records.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2023
Amiodarone Antifungal Agents Aprindine Azoles Bepridil Body Weight Carbamazepine Clarithromycin Creatinine Cyclosporine Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6 Inhibitors Cytochrome P450 Diltiazem Echocardiography Erythromycin Index, Body Mass inhibitors Nicardipine Nifedipine Patients Pharmaceutical Preparations Phenobarbital Phenytoin Plasma Polypharmacy Propranolol Protease Inhibitors Quinidine Rifampin Serum Specimen Collection Tacrolimus Ventricular Ejection Fraction
All patients received standard prophylaxis with nebulized amphotericin B lipid complex for 1 month after LTx (patients with bronchial anastomosis necrosis at 1 month after LTx received prolonged targeted prophylaxis up to 3 months after LTx). No systemic antifungal prophylaxis with azoles was given in our cohort. Antifungal treatment with systemic voriconazole, posaconazole, isavuconazole, or amphotericin B was initiated at the treating clinician’s decision, in case of fungal disease.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2023
Amphotericin B amphotericin B lipid complex Antifungal Agents Azoles Bronchi isavuconazole Mycoses Necrosis Patients posaconazole Surgical Anastomoses Voriconazole
The X-ray crystal structure of SHBG (1D2S) was acquired from Protein Data Bank (PDB). The native ligands are dihydrotestosterone PUBChem Id 10635 and aminoglutethimide PUBChem Id 2145, which were used to understand the interaction pattern of hexaconazole 66461.
For molecular docking analyses, hexaconazole was docked with SHBG using the program AutoDock version 4.2 (San Diego, CA, USA) [18 (link)]. For the precise molecular interaction analyses, all crystallographic water was removed from SHBG (1D2S) protein and energy was minimized by Swiss PDBViewer, and the active site was obtained from PDBSUM. In addition, ligand energy was minimized by chimera (dihydrotestosterone PUBChem Id 10635, aminoglutethimide PUBChem Id 2145, and hexaconazole 66461). Before docking was run with AutoDock version 4.2, the structure of the target was optimized by Kollman with combined charges and solvation parameters. After this, hydrogen was added to SHBG in ideal geometry, and torsions were fixed. In addition, the protein’s van der Waals well depth was assigned, and the files were saved in PDBQT format. For the generation of grid parameters, AutoDock tools were used, and grid parameter files (GPFs) and docking parameter files (DPFs) were generated. For ligand and protein interaction analyses, the Lamarckian genetic algorithm [18 (link)] was applied. A total of 50 different poses were used to obtain the binding score [19 (link)]. The best complex was taken for molecular dynamics (MD) studies on the basis of a high binding score. For the visualization of the complex, Discovery Studio 16, molecular visualization software (Biovia, 2019) was used. In addition, molecular interaction analysis of hexaconazole-similar azole fungicide compounds with 1D2S was performed to understand the chemical feature of hexaconazole.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2023
Aminoglutethimide Azoles Chimera Crystallography Dihydrotestosterone hexaconazole Hydrogen Industrial Fungicides Ligands Molecular Dynamics Proteins Protein S Radiography Reproduction
A total of 105 participants were enrolled (55 patients with NVAF and 50 controls). Eligible participants comprised individuals with a history of AF documented by electrocardiogram within the 12 months before collection, and for whom chronic oral anticoagulation was indicated (CHA2DS2-VASC ≥ 2). The patients were enrolled from the outpatient clinics of the hospitals of Lifecenter, Semper, and Ipsemg (Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil) during the period from October 2013 to January 2017. A group of controls composed of individuals in sinus rhythm with no previous diagnosis of AF or use of any anticoagulant therapy was recruited from the local community.
Participants were excluded if they had used any antiplatelet agent, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, heparin, hormone replacement therapy, antifibrinolytics, amiodarone, verapamil, quinidine, azole antifungals, or ritonavir in the 4 weeks prior to the study. Subjects were also excluded if they presented a current diagnosis of an alcohol use disorder, chronic kidney disease (creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min), severe dyslipidemia, bleeding disorders, liver and thyroid diseases, infectious, inflammatory, autoimmune, or malignant diseases, pregnancy, puerperium, and breastfeeding.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2023
Alcohol Use Disorder Amiodarone Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal Anticoagulants Antifibrinolytic Agents Antifungal Agents Antiplatelet Agents Azoles Blood Coagulation Disorders Chronic Kidney Diseases Creatinine Diagnosis Dyslipidemias Electrocardiography Heparin Infection Inflammation Liver Patients Pregnancy Quinidine Ritonavir Sinuses, Nasal Therapeutics Therapy, Hormone Replacement Thyroid Diseases Verapamil
To verify the use of the new workflow for read-across, we used a dataset of 326 azole compounds with experimental values on human aromatase breast cancer cell line (MCF-7aro, cell-based assay). The starting dataset was initially collected from the Tox21 library considering only Tox21_Aromatase_Inhibition (activity test). This contained 20,992 compounds encoded as SMILES, name, and CAS number [29 ]. The assay was performed using aromatase breast cancer cell line (MCF-7 aro) (cell-based assay) and the concentrations of testosterone (an androgen and estradiol (an estrogen)) were measured before and after exposure to azole compounds tested. The qualitative outcome was recorded as an active agonist, active antagonist, and inactive, where quantitative agonist and antagonist activities were expressed in nanomolar (nM) units represented by AC50 in the original database [29 ]. Once the data was collected, it was subjected to a rigorous data curation procedure. The first step involved the retrieval of SMILES following the workflow developed by Gadaleta et al., 2018 [30 (link)]. The maximum purity was labeled “A” and only compounds with this label were considered. The detection of inorganic compounds, organometallic compounds, mixtures, neutralization of salts, tautomeric forms, and chemotype normalization was performed using the KNIME platform [31 (link)]. The compounds with inconclusive assay outcomes were discarded and duplicate structures were classified into two cases as follows: (i) activity range lower or equal to 1:3, and (ii) activity range higher than 1:3. In the first case, the mean of the activity was calculated, and in the second case, the structures were rejected. 3459 compounds were kept from the original dataset which had the purity “A” label. Furthermore, 67 compounds with ambiguous values, 10 compounds with trace element or inorganic compounds, 3 mixtures, 6 duplicates, and 6 ionic liquid compounds were removed. After this, the dataset was subjected to a manual inspection process and 119 compounds were found to have incorrect structures, and therefore removed. At this point, the dataset contained 3248 compounds and was filtered to extract azoles only. The total number of azoles was 351, from them 25 were tetrazoles and were discarded due to their poor representation. The quantitative outcome in nanomolar (nM) units was converted to molar (mole/liter) using the formulae (−logAC50 + 9). The qualitative activity values, active agonist and active antagonist, were recorded as “active”. The distribution of compounds in the final dataset of 326 azoles, considering the numbers of nitrogen in the azole ring and their qualitative activity value was:

82 monoazoles compounds of which 61 were inactive and 21 active.

198 diazoles of which 148 were inactive and 50 active.

46 triazoles which contained 26 inactive and 20 active.

More details regarding the data collection and data curation process are available in Caballero et al. [9 ,11 ].
Full text: Click here
Publication 2023
11-dehydrocorticosterone Androgens Aromatase Azoles Biological Assay cDNA Library Cells Estradiol Estrogens Homo sapiens Inorganic Chemicals Ionic Liquids MCF-7 Cells Molar Muscle Rigidity Nevus Nitrogen Organometallic Compounds Psychological Inhibition Salts Testosterone Tetrazoles Trace Elements Triazoles

Top products related to «Azoles»

Sourced in United States, Germany, China, Brazil, France, United Kingdom, Japan, Spain, Italy
Voriconazole is a laboratory product used as an antifungal agent. It is a synthetic triazole compound that inhibits the fungal enzyme lanosterol 14-alpha-demethylase, which is essential for the synthesis of ergosterol, a vital component of fungal cell membranes.
Sourced in United States, Germany, France, United Kingdom, Brazil, Hungary, India
Itraconazole is a broad-spectrum antifungal agent used in the treatment of various fungal infections. It functions by inhibiting the synthesis of ergosterol, a critical component of the fungal cell membrane, thereby disrupting the integrity and function of the fungal cell.
Sourced in United States, Germany, United Kingdom, Japan, Spain, France, India, Belgium
Posaconazole is a laboratory product manufactured by Merck Group. It is an antifungal agent used in research and development applications.
Sourced in United States, Germany, United Kingdom, China, Italy, Sao Tome and Principe, France, Macao, India, Canada, Switzerland, Japan, Australia, Spain, Poland, Belgium, Brazil, Czechia, Portugal, Austria, Denmark, Israel, Sweden, Ireland, Hungary, Mexico, Netherlands, Singapore, Indonesia, Slovakia, Cameroon, Norway, Thailand, Chile, Finland, Malaysia, Latvia, New Zealand, Hong Kong, Pakistan, Uruguay, Bangladesh
DMSO is a versatile organic solvent commonly used in laboratory settings. It has a high boiling point, low viscosity, and the ability to dissolve a wide range of polar and non-polar compounds. DMSO's core function is as a solvent, allowing for the effective dissolution and handling of various chemical substances during research and experimentation.
Sourced in United Kingdom, United States, Italy, Germany, Spain, Canada, India
Sabouraud dextrose agar is a culture medium used for the isolation and cultivation of fungi. It provides a nutritious environment for the growth of various fungal species.
Sourced in United States, Germany, United Kingdom, Japan, Italy, China, France, Sao Tome and Principe, Switzerland, Austria, Australia, Spain, Macao, Belgium, Canada, Hungary, Brazil, Sweden, Ireland, India, Poland, Israel, Mexico, Denmark, Hong Kong, Czechia, Argentina, Portugal, Holy See (Vatican City State)
RPMI-1640 is a widely used cell culture medium formulation, developed at Roswell Park Memorial Institute. It is a complete and balanced medium designed to support the growth and maintenance of a variety of cell types, including human and animal cell lines. The medium contains essential nutrients, vitamins, amino acids, and other components necessary for cell proliferation and survival in in vitro cell culture applications.
Sourced in France, United States, United Kingdom, Sweden, Spain
Etest strips are quantitative antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) products developed by bioMérieux. They provide a simple, standardized method for determining the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of antimicrobial agents against a wide range of clinically relevant microorganisms.
Sourced in United States, Germany, United Kingdom, Spain, Italy, Brazil, France, Japan, Poland, Austria, Australia, Switzerland, Macao, Canada, Belgium, Ireland, China, Sao Tome and Principe, Hungary, India, Sweden, Israel, Senegal, Argentina, Portugal
Amphotericin B is a laboratory reagent used as an antifungal agent. It is a macrolide antibiotic produced by the bacterium Streptomyces nodosus. Amphotericin B is commonly used in research and biomedical applications to inhibit the growth of fungi.
Sourced in United States, Germany, United Kingdom, Japan, Italy, China, Macao, Sao Tome and Principe, Australia, France, Poland, Switzerland, Canada, Spain, Hungary, India, Norway, Ireland, Israel, Sweden, Austria, Brazil, Czechia, Denmark, Belgium
RPMI 1640 is a widely used cell culture medium formulated for the growth of a variety of cell types, including human and animal cells. It provides the necessary nutrients and components to support cell growth and proliferation in a controlled laboratory environment.
Sourced in United States, Germany, United Kingdom, Brazil, Italy, Canada, Japan, Sao Tome and Principe, Hungary, Poland, France, Ireland, Spain, China, India
Fluconazole is a pharmaceutical product manufactured by Merck Group. It is an antifungal medication used to treat a variety of fungal infections. The core function of Fluconazole is to inhibit the growth and proliferation of fungal pathogens.

More about "Azoles"

Azoles are a class of heterocyclic organic compounds featuring a 5-membered aromatic ring with at least one nitrogen atom.
These versatile compounds have a wide array of pharmaceutical applications, particularly as potent antifungal, antiprotozoal, and anticancer agents.
Azoles work by disrupting the fungal cell membrane and inhibiting the synthesis of ergosterol, a crucial component of the fungal cell wall.
Common examples of azoles include the well-known antifungal drugs fluconazole, itraconazole, and voriconazole.
Posaconazole is another notable azole compound with potent antifungal activity.
These azole drugs are often used in the treatment of serious fungal infections, such as candidiasis, aspergillosis, and cryptococcosis.
The mechanism of action of azoles involves the inhibition of the enzyme lanosterol 14α-demethylase, which is essential for the biosynthesis of ergosterol.
By disrupting ergosterol production, azoles compromise the integrity and function of the fungal cell membrane, leading to the death or growth inhibition of the fungal pathogen.
In research settings, azoles are often studied in combination with other compounds, such as the solvent DMSO, which can enhance their solubility and bioavailability.
Sabouraud dextrose agar and RPMI-1640 medium are commonly used for the cultivation and susceptibility testing of fungal isolates in the laboratory.
Etest strips are a convenient method for determining the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of azole antifungals against various fungal species.
Amphotericin B, a polyene antifungal agent, is sometimes used as a comparator or in combination with azoles to evaluate the efficacy and safety of these compounds.
RPMI 1640 medium is also a widely used culture medium for conducting antifungal susceptibility testing.
Azoles represent an important area of ongoing research, with scientists continuously exploring their mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics, and potential new therapeutic applications.
PubCompare.ai's AI-powered platform can streamline the research process by helping researchers locate the best protocols from literature, preprints, and patents through seamless comparisons, enhancing reproducibility and accuracy in Azoles research.