The GABAAR-β3cryst structure was solved by molecular replacement using the C. elegans glutamate-gated chloride channel α (GluClα66 (link), PDB accession code 3RHW) as a search model in Phaser67 (link). An initial round of automated model building, structure refinement and density modification was performed using Phenix AutoBuild68 (link) followed by iterative steps of manual model building in Coot69 (link) and refinement in Buster70 . During the refinement/building process it became clear that the N-terminal region of one GABAAR-β3cryst monomer (chain A) adopted a distinct, well-ordered, conformation because of its involvement in crystal contacts. As a result, the strict five-fold non-crystallographic symmetry (NCS) restraints strategy was replaced at later stages by a local structural similarity restraints NCS approach, to allow pruning of genuine differences among matching chains from the NCS relation71 (link). The final model contains one GABAAR-β3cryst homopentamer per asymmetric unit. The complete polypeptide chains could be built, except the C-terminal TETSQVAPA purification tag and the first nine N-terminal residues (QSVNDPGNM) in chains B, C, D and E. Furthermore, clear electron density is visible for benzamidine molecules, one of which occupies every orthosteric ligand binding site, as well as 11 out of the 15 N-linked glycosylation sites, the remaining four being located in the N-terminal disordered regions of chains B-E. Glycans attached to Asn 149 in each chain were protected from endoglycosidase F1 cleavage due to extensive interactions with the protein core, underlying their important structural role. Stereochemical properties of the model were assessed in Coot69 (link) and Molprobity72 (link). Protein geometry analysis revealed no Ramachandran outliers, with 96.98% residues in favoured regions and 3.02% residues in allowed regions. Molprobity clash score after adding hydrogens is 5.74 (100th percentile) and the overall Molprobity score is 1.85 (100th percentile).
Sequence and structural alignments were performed in ClustalW73 (link) and SHP74 (link), respectively. Protein interfaces were analysed using the PDBePISA web server at the European Bioinformatics Institute (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/pdbe/prot_int/pistart.html )75 (link) and residue conservation was mapped onto the crystal structure using ProtSkin76 (link). Electrostatic surface potential calculations were performed using the APBS Tools plug-in in PyMOL77 (link) and pore/tunnel dimensions were analysed using the Caver 3.0 software for a probe radius of 1.4 Å78 (link). Structural figures were prepared with the PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 1.6, Schrödinger, LLC.
Sequence and structural alignments were performed in ClustalW73 (link) and SHP74 (link), respectively. Protein interfaces were analysed using the PDBePISA web server at the European Bioinformatics Institute (