The expected rate of the primary outcome in the placebo group was estimated from a pilot study of infants born in the late preterm period, adjusted downward to account for the proportion of women at risk for late preterm delivery who deliver at term (20-40%), as preterm delivery cannot reliably be predicted. We estimated that a sample size of 2,800 women would be required to detect a one third decrease in the primary outcome rate from 9.5% in the placebo arm to 6.3% in the steroid arm, with type 1 error of 5%, 2-sided, and power of at least 85%. Details are in the Supplementary Appendix .
Analyses were performed according to the intention-to-treat principle. We compared continuous variables using the Wilcoxon test and categorical variables using the chi-square test, and Fisher's exact test. An independent data and safety monitoring committee monitored the trial. A group sequential method was used to control the Type I error rate using the Lan-DeMets characterization of the O'Brien-Fleming boundary.14 (link) Two interim analyses were performed; in the final analysis of the primary outcome, a two-tailed P value of less than 0.048 was considered to indicate statistical significance. Since the adjustment is minimal we report the 95% confidence interval for the relative risk. For all secondary outcomes, a nominal P value of less than 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance, without adjustment for multiple comparisons; relative risks and 95% confidence intervals are reported. To determine whether there was a differential effect of betamethasone for the primary and severe respiratory composite outcomes within the pre-specified subgroups, the Breslow–Day interaction test was conducted; where a nominal P value less than 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.
Analyses were performed according to the intention-to-treat principle. We compared continuous variables using the Wilcoxon test and categorical variables using the chi-square test, and Fisher's exact test. An independent data and safety monitoring committee monitored the trial. A group sequential method was used to control the Type I error rate using the Lan-DeMets characterization of the O'Brien-Fleming boundary.14 (link) Two interim analyses were performed; in the final analysis of the primary outcome, a two-tailed P value of less than 0.048 was considered to indicate statistical significance. Since the adjustment is minimal we report the 95% confidence interval for the relative risk. For all secondary outcomes, a nominal P value of less than 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance, without adjustment for multiple comparisons; relative risks and 95% confidence intervals are reported. To determine whether there was a differential effect of betamethasone for the primary and severe respiratory composite outcomes within the pre-specified subgroups, the Breslow–Day interaction test was conducted; where a nominal P value less than 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.