Bortezomib
It works by blocking the activity of the proteasome, a large protein complex that plays a crucial role in the degradation of unwanted or damaged proteins within cells.
This disruption of protein homeostasis can lead to cell death, particularly in rapidly dividing cancer cells.
Bortezomib has demonstrated efficacy in improving overall survival and progression-free survival in patients with these hematological malignancies.
Reserchers can utilize the PubCompare.ai platforrm to streamline Bortezomib-related studies, optimizing their research approach through AI-powered comparisons of protocols from literature, preprints, and patents.
Most cited protocols related to «Bortezomib»
Patients were randomly assigned at enrollment to either standard AML treatment or standard treatment with bortezomib. Randomization was conducted in blocks of four. Bortezomib was administered at a dose of 1.3 mg/m2 once on days 1, 4, and 8 of each chemotherapy course.
Patients with high allelic ratio FLT3 ITD were offered enrollment on a phase I sorafenib treatment arm if that arm was open. Patients with HAR FLT3 ITD who declined enrollment in the sorafenib arm, or who enrolled while the arm was suspended, continued to receive treatment according to their initial randomization. These patients were included in safety analyses but were excluded from all efficacy analyses.
Patients were classified as low- or high-risk after Induction I. Low-risk patients received four courses of chemotherapy and high-risk patients received three courses of chemotherapy followed by allogeneic SCT. High-risk patients without an appropriate donor received four courses of chemotherapy.
The primary end point was EFS from study entry. EFS was defined as the time from study entry until death, refractory disease, or relapse of any type, whichever occurred first. The secondary end points were OS, remission rates, relapse risk, post induction disease-free survival (DFS), and treatment-related mortality (TRM). OS was defined as time from study entry until death. Relapse risk was defined as the time from the end of Induction II for patients in complete remission (CR) to relapse, where deaths without a relapse were considered competing events. DFS was defined as the time from end of Induction II for patients in CR until relapse or death. Refractory disease was defined as the persistence of central nervous system (CNS) disease after Induction I, or the presence of morphologic bone marrow blasts ≥5% or any extramedullary disease at the end of Induction II. Patients with refractory disease were removed from protocol therapy. TRM was defined as the time from either study entry, or from end of Induction II for patients in CR, to deaths without a relapse, with relapses considered as competing events. Patients without an event were censored at their date of last known contact. However, for TRM analyses, patients were censored 30 days post end of therapy or 200 days post SCT.
For in vivo analysis, OP-Puro (50mg/kg body mass; pH 6.4–6.6 in PBS) was injected intraperitoneally. One hour later mice were euthanized, unless indicated otherwise. Bone marrow was harvested, and 3×106 cells were stained with combinations of antibodies against cell surface markers as described below. After washing, the cells were fixed, permeabilized, and the azide-alkyne cycloaddition was performed as described above. “Relative rates of protein synthesis” were calculated by normalizing OP-Puro signals to whole bone marrow after subtracting autofluorescence background. “Mean OP-Puro fluorescence” reflected absolute fluorescence values for each cell population from multiple independent experiments.
To assess the effect of proteasome activity on OP-Puro incorporation mice were administered an intravenous injection of bortezomib (Cell Signaling; 1mg/kg body mass) 1 hour before OP-Puro administration. OP-Puro incorporation was assessed as described above 1 hour later unless indicated otherwise.
Most recents protocols related to «Bortezomib»
EXAMPLE 4
To determine the effect bortezomib and delta-2 tubulin accumulation have on mitochondrial motility, DRG neurons were transduced with lentivirus to express wild-type tubulin or delta-2 tubulin. As shown in
EXAMPLE 3
CCP1 is a tubulin enzyme that participates in the generation of delta-2 tubulin (
Example 8
The asymmetric synthesis of bortezomib-prodrug (
Top products related to «Bortezomib»
More about "Bortezomib"
This versatile drug works by blocking the activity of the proteasome, a crucial protein complex responsible for the degradation of unwanted or damaged proteins within cells.
By disrupting this delicate protein homeostasis, Bortezomib can induce cell death, particularly in rapidly dividing cancer cells.
The efficacy of Bortezomib in improving overall survival and progression-free survival in patients with these hematological malignancies has been well-documented.
Researchers can leverage the power of the PubCompare.ai platform to streamline their Bortezomib-related studies, optimizing their research approach through AI-powered comparisons of protocols from literature, preprints, and patents.
Bortezomib's mechanism of action is similar to that of other proteasome inhibitors, such as Cycloheximide and MG132.
These compounds share the ability to disrupt the delicate balance of protein degradation within cells, leading to cell death.
Researchers may also utilize cell culture media like RPMI 1640, along with supplements like FBS and Penicillin/streptomycin, to create the optimal environment for studying the effects of Bortezomib and related compounds.
Carfilzomib, another proteasome inhibitor, has also been explored as a potential treatment option for hematological malignancies.
Researchers can leverage the PubCompare.ai platform to compare and contrast the efficacy and safety profiles of Bortezomib and Carfilzomib, as well as investigate the potential synergistic effects of combining these therapies.
By harnessing the power of PubCompare.ai, researchers can streamline their Bortezomib-related studies, optimize their research approach, and uncover novel insights that can contribute to the advancement of personalized cancer treatments.
The platform's AI-driven comparisons of protocols from literature, preprints, and patents can provide invaluable guidance, helping researchers navigate the complex landscape of Bortezomib research and, ultimately, improve patient outcomes.