The largest database of trusted experimental protocols
> Chemicals & Drugs > Organic Chemical > Chloroxylenol

Chloroxylenol

Chloroxylenol is a phenolic antiseptic and germicide used in various disinfectant and antimicrobial products.
It has been studied for its efficacy against a range of microorganisms, including bacteria, fungi, and viruses.
Researchers can use PubCompare.ai's AI-powered platform to optimize their Chloroxylenol research protocols by easily locating and comparing published literature, pre-prints, and patents.
The intelligent algorithm helps navigate the research landscape and make informed decisions to identify the most reproducible and effective methods for Chloroxylenol studies.
Explore PubCompare.ai today and take your Chloroxylenol research to the next level.

Most cited protocols related to «Chloroxylenol»

Traps containing small mammals were transferred to a mobile laboratory and placed in an airtight box with the addition of cotton wool soaked with 10 ml of the inhalational anaesthetic isoflurane. Animals were only removed from the trap once dead. All animal handling and euthanasia procedures followed international guidelines [30 (link), 31 ]. All field and mobile laboratory protocols and procedures followed the “Protocols for field and laboratory rodent studies” 2011 guide [32 ]. This study was approved by the Oxford Tropical Research Ethics Committee (OxTREC 48–15 & 52–14) and by the Kasetsart University Animal Ethics Committee, Bangkok, Thailand (ACKU 62-VTN-010).
Small mammals were weighed in grams and the head and body, tail, hind foot, ear and skull measured in millimetres. Using a combination of morphological features and measurements, small mammals were identified to species level wherever possible following the keys in Chaval [33 ] and Francis [34 ]. Prior to harvesting tissues, scissors and forceps were thoroughly washed consecutively in Dettol (chloroxylenol), sterile water and 70% ethanol to prevent cross-contamination. Small pieces (< 50 mg) of lung, liver and spleen were collected into pre-labelled cryotubes and stored on dry ice in the field and subsequently at − 80 °C in the laboratory.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2021
Anesthetics Animal Ethics Committees Animals chloroxylenol Cranium Dettol Dry Ice Ethanol Ethics Committees, Research Euthanasia Foot Forceps Gossypium Head Human Body Inhalation Isoflurane Liver Lung Mammals Rodent Spleen Sterility, Reproductive Tail Tissues

Protocol full text hidden due to copyright restrictions

Open the protocol to access the free full text link

Publication 2009
Ammonium Anti-Bacterial Agents Anti-Infective Agents, Local Biological Assay Cells chloroxylenol Clorox Cytopathogenic Effect, Viral Hepatocyte Hyperostosis, Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Microscopy Mus Pinus Serum Sodium Sterility, Reproductive Technique, Dilution TEST mixture Virus Viscosity

Protocol full text hidden due to copyright restrictions

Open the protocol to access the free full text link

Publication 2020
Chloroxylenol, metyrapone, proadifen hydrochloride, 1-aminobenzotriazole, sodium azide, 2,20-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS), and N, O-bis(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide (BSTFA) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Poznań, Poland). High purity grade ethyl acetate and 96% ethanol were purchased from POCH S.A. (Gliwice, Poland). All PCR reagents came from Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA, USA). All the other chemicals were from Sigma-Aldrich (Darmstadt, Germany), POCH S.A. (Gliwice, Poland) and Chempur (Piekary Śląskie, Poland).
Full text: Click here
Publication 2021
1-aminobenzotriazole chloroxylenol Ethanol ethyl acetate Metyrapone N,N-bis(trimethylsilyl)-2,2,2-trifluoroacetamide Proadifen Hydrochloride Sodium Azide trifluoroacetamide

Protocol full text hidden due to copyright restrictions

Open the protocol to access the free full text link

Publication 2020
Chloroform chloroxylenol Fibrosis Homozygote MAT2A protein, human Polymers Suby's G solution

Most recents protocols related to «Chloroxylenol»

Protocol full text hidden due to copyright restrictions

Open the protocol to access the free full text link

Publication 2024

Example 4

Ryegrass is often grown in fertile soil and is an important crop in forage production. It would be desirable therefore to use the process of directed selection to identify a group of microbes that are able to increase the biomass of ryegrass in a fertile substrate without experimentally-imposed selection pressures.

Seventy-three soil samples (treatments) from the North Island of New Zealand were used as a source of microbial diversity for the start of the process. Soil samples were mixed with sand:vermiculite (1:1 or 1:2) as required to increase drainage and volume. Samples were placed in ten replicate 28 ml tubes and planted with ryegrass seeds (Loliism perenne cultivar One50, nil endophyte). Seeds were watered with a misting hose until germinated, then showered to saturation three times weekly with additional watering as required to prevent seedlings drying out. For standard growing conditions see Table 1.

TABLE 1
Standard growing conditions
VariableConditions
WateringThree times each week to saturation with
water or synthetic fertilizer
TemperatureConstant 22-24° C.
Daylight period16 hr followed by 8 hr darkness
Seed sterilization15 min in 1-2% sodium hypochlorite followed
by 30 min quenching in sodium thiosulphate as
described by Miche and Balandreau (2001)
Volume of soil/replicate28 ml
RandomisationAll treatment replicates and controls were
spatially randomised

Round 1 Selection

Sixty days after sowing (DAS) four plants from each sample were selected and processed to provide the microbial inoculum for the first round of selection. Foliage was cut 2 cm above the substrate and discarded. The roots and attached stems were shaken free of soil, washed to remove most soil fragments and drained before the roots and stems were combined in plastic bags. This material was then crushed within the bag with 10 mls of water added to suspend the root material. The liquid portion of the resulting suspension was used as the initial microbial inoculum. Surface-sterilised seeds were soaked for one hour in 1 ml of the root suspension for each sample. Soaked seeds were then planted into 28 ml tubes (15 reps for each treatment) containing potting mix (Kings Plant Barn, New Zealand; granulated bark, peat moss, pumice, and slow-release fertilisers) moistened with tap water. The remaining root suspension was made up to a sufficient final volume with SDW and 2 ml was pipetted over the planted seeds. After planting, the seeds were thinly covered with fresh dry substrate. Pots were subsequently watered with tap water 3 times weekly.

Round 2 Selection

At 118 DAS the foliage was harvested, weighed and treatments selected to provide microbial inoculum for the second round of selection. Only the 8 largest plants from each of the 21 treatments with the greatest mean foliar weight of the original 73 treatments were chosen for processing. In addition four composite treatments of four plants each were created from the sixteen individual plants with the greatest foliar biomass. Foliage was cut 2 cm above substrate level and weighed. The roots and basal stems of each plant were shaken free of substrate then rinsed, combined in plastic bags, crushed and used to inoculate the second round of selection in the same way as described for selection round 1, with the exception that 30 replicates were planted for each treatment and the final volume of inoculum was 65 mls.

Round 3 Selection

Plants from the second round of selection were harvested at 39 DAS. Foliage was cut 2 cm above substrate, weighed and discarded. The three largest plants from the top 15 treatments were selected to create the inoculum for selection round 3. Roots and stems were crushed as described above and used for 30 replicates of each treatment.

Microbial Isolation

Foliage from round 3 selection was harvested and weighed at 63 DAS and the largest plants from the five treatments with the greatest mean foliar weights were selected to provide inoculum for microbial isolations. The roots and 2 cm stems were rinsed and then crushed in plastic bags as described previously. A small volume of the inoculum was drawn off to make a ten-fold dilution series plated on R2A. Pieces of crushed root from each of the preparations were also inoculated into 10 ml N-deficient semi-solid malate (NDSM) medium (Eckford et al, 2002. After 2-4 days incubation at room temperature the resulting pellicles were drawn off and spread onto R2A agar for isolation of individual colonies. A selective isolation step for actinomycetes was performed in which ethanol was added to the root suspension at a final concentration of 25%, incubated at room temperature (RT) for 30 min then plated on R2A. For fungal isolations, pieces of crushed root were embedded in molten PDA (cooled to 45° C.). After 24-72 hr incubation at 25° C. R2A and PDA plates were examined under a dissecting microscope. Bacterial and fungal colonies were assessed for abundance, grouped according to morphology and representative isolates were picked and streaked onto fresh R2A or PDA plates. Standard methods were used to identify isolates to species level by DNA extraction, PCR amplification and sequencing of 16S rRNA genes (bacteria) or ITSS region (fungi).

Microbial Evaluation

Microbial evaluation was performed on 61 individual isolates and 28 consortia chosen on the basis of abundance, diversity, and species characteristics. Selected isolates were spread on R2A (bacteria) or PDA (fungi), incubated at 25° C. for 72 hours then scraped off the agar surface with added SDW into sterile containers. Bacteria were harvested into 2 ml SDW. Fungi were sieved through a sterile tea strainer with 5-10 ml SDW to remove clumps of mycelia and pieces of attached agar. Serial dilutions of the harvested cells were plated and incubated at 25° C. for 24 hours to estimate the number of colony forming units (CFU) in each suspension. Dilution volumes corresponding to 1×107 (bacteria) and 1×103 (fungi) CFU per ml were calculated from these plate counts. Ryegrass seeds (One50 nil endophyte) were soaked for one hour in microbe suspensions then individually planted in 28 ml tubes containing moistened potting mix. Two millilitres of isolate suspension was pipetted over the seeds which were then covered with substrate. All plants were subsequently watered with tap water 3 times weekly. Foliage was cut and weighed at 41 DAS. Roots were washed, blotted dry and weighed. The microbial treatments that resulted in plant biomass gains of at least 5% over the microbe-free controls are shown in Table 2.

TABLE 2
Microbial treatments associated with increased ryegrass biomass
Treatment% IOC% IOC% IOC
BDNZ#FWRWBMID
5891822.925.423.5Microbacterium ginsengiterrae
5890025.37.721.3Bacillus cereus
5891321.516.620.4Microbacterium oxydans
Consortium18.95.115.8Rhizobium pusense,
Curtobacterium ginsengisoli
5908421.8−7.415.2Penicillium daleae
5889413.34.311.3Brevundimonas vesicularis
5891013.62.311.1Aeromicrobium ponti
5889511.25.59.9Microbacterium
hydrocarbonoxydans
589118.95.38.1Sphingopyxis chilensis
589507.88.47.9Arthrobacter keyser
5908813.6−14.67.3Penicillium melinii
588928.40.46.6Rhizobium grahamii
589488.6−2.26.2Brevundimonas vesicularis
Consortium5.19.76.2Rhizobium pusense,
Curtobacterium ginsengisoli,
Herbaspirillum
rubrisubalbicans
588916.7−0.25.1Rhizobium etli
Consortium4.95.65.0Exiguobacterium indicum,
Mesorhizobium amorphae,
Brevundimonas vesicularis,
Arthrobacter keyser
FW = fresh foliar weight;
RW = fresh root weight;
BM = plant biomass (roots + foliage)
Italics indicate a significant IOC (increase over controls; Fisher’s LSD)
ID-Putative identification based on closest sequence match in RDPII and/or NCBI databases

The three microbial treatments that resulted in a significant increase in foliar weights (Fisher's LSD) were all isolated from the site that produced the greatest increase in foliar weight in the third selection round.

These results provide evidence that the method for directed selection of microbes, also referred to herein as accelerated microbial selection, described by the present disclosure is capable of identifying a set of microbes that significantly improve the growth of ryegrass grown under favorable conditions.

Furthermore, as indicated by Table 2, the methods are able to identify microbial consortia that significantly improve the growth of ryegrass grown under non-selective conditions.

Example 5

Soil samples from 43 sites in the North Island of New Zealand were used as a source of microbial diversity for this process.

Samples were mixed with sand:vermiculite (1:2) as required to increase drainage and volume. Each sample was used to fill five replicate 28 ml tubes which were planted with 3-5 basil seeds (Ocium basilicum, variety Sweet Genovese) per tube. Seedlings were germinated in a plant growth room under conditions described in Table 1. Watering was carried out with tap water as required to prevent wilting.

Approximately 14 DAS the plants were harvested and the foliage cut and discarded. For each sample the basal stems and roots were shaken free of soil, rinsed in sterile distilled water (SDW) and the replicates combined in a plastic bag. The plant material was then crushed thoroughly within the plastic bags. 10 ml SDW was added to the crushed roots and the resulting suspension used as the microbial inoculum for the first selection round.

Basil seeds were soaked for a minimum of one hour in the root extract then planted into 28 ml tubes containing potting mix (40% v/v peat, 30% composted pine bark, 30% fine pumice, adjusted to pH 6.1 with lime) moistened with 6 ml of liquid fertiliser (Miracle-Gro, Scotts Australia Pty Ltd). The remaining root suspension was diluted with 40 ml of SDW and 2 ml was pipetted over the seeds. Ten replicate tubes were prepared for each sample alongside a set of 20 no-microbe controls that were prepared using seeds soaked in sterile distilled water. All tubes were randomised across racks. Seedlings were germinated in a plant growth room under conditions described above. After germination each tube was weeded to leave one randomly selected seedling.

Round 1 Selection

At 20 DAS half of the plants from each treatment were randomly selected for harvest. The remainder of the plants were retained in the growth room for preparation of extracts to inoculate the second round of selection. Plants selected for harvest were removed from the pots, washed to remove adherent potting mix, dried on paper towels and weighed before being placed into a 2 ml tube containing a single stainless steel ball bearing. Samples were then frozen at −20□° C. pending analysis for water soluble carbohydrate.

The concentration of water soluble carbohydrate (WSC) in plant extracts was determined using the anthrone method as generally described by Yemm and Willis (Biochem. J. 1954, 57: 508-514). Whole-plant extracts were prepared by bead beating for 2 minutes at 22 hz. One mL of sterile distilled water was then added to each sample. After mixing, 0.5 mL of the liquid suspension was transferred a 96-well microtube block which was placed in a boiling water bath for 30 minutes. Each block was then transferred to a cold water bath for five minutes followed by centrifugation at 3000 rcf for 10 minutes to pellet debris. Supernatants were recovered, diluted 1:25 in SDW, and 40 μL, samples transferred to new 96-well microtube blocks. Samples were then overlaid with 200 μL, of freshly-prepared anthrone solution (2 mg/mL in 70% sulphuric acid). Blocks were cooled for 5 minutes in an ice-cold water bath, mixed by inversion, placed in a boiling water bath for 60 seconds, then immediately returned to the cold water bath. Once cooled, a 100 ul sample of each reaction was transferred to a flat-bottomed microtitre tray and the absorption measured at 600 nm on a SpectraMax M5e spectrophotometer. Glucose standards were prepared in ultra-pure water and processed as per plant extracts to generate a calibration curve. Results are reported in glucose equivalents (mg) per gram of plant tissue.

Twenty of the 43 treatments yielded a positive increase in median sugar content over the no-microbe control.

Round 2 Selection

The 13 treatments yielding the greatest median sugar content were selected for the second selection round. Microbial extracts were prepared from the remaining 5 plants in each treatment and applied to basil seeds according to the procedure described above with the exception that the number of replicates was increased to 30 for each treatment and 60 for no-microbe controls.

Fifteen days after sowing (DAS) 15 of the plants from each treatment were harvested. The remainder of the plants were retained in the growth room for subsequent isolation experiments. Plants selected for harvest were removed from pots and processed for analysis of water soluble carbohydrate as described previously, with the exception that the anthrone solution was prepared in 80% sulphuric acid to reduce formation of precipitates.

Eight of the 13 treatments yielded a positive increase in median sugar content over the no-microbe control. At this point the rounds of iterative selection were concluded and microbial isolations were performed.

Microbial Isolation

Bacteria and fungi were isolated from up to five of the remaining plants from each of the seven treatments with the greatest median WSC. For each treatment, the roots and lower 1 cm of stem material from each plant were shaken free of substrate and rinsed in sterile distilled water then divided into two portions. One portion was surface sterilized in 6.6% Dettol® (active ingredient: chloroxylenol 4.8%) for 1 minute followed by 3 rinses in SDW for 1 min each. The surface sterilized roots were cut into pieces (about 1-2 cm long) using sterile scissors and dropped into test tube containing NDSM medium (Eckford et al., 2002). After 2-4 days incubation at room temperature the tubes were observed and obvious pellicles drawn off and purified by subculture on R2A agar (Difco).

The roots from one portion were combined in a plastic bag and crushed within the bag with 10 mls of water added to suspend the root material. Pieces of crushed root were retrieved and either placed on PDA plates, or embedded in molten PDA at 45° C. Ten-fold serial dilutions of the suspension were prepared in SDW and used to prepare spread plates on R2A agar (Difco). R2A and PDA plates were incubated at 25° C. and examined under a dissecting microscope after 24-72 hours incubation. Colonies were assessed for abundance, grouped according to morphology and representative isolates were picked and streaked for purity onto fresh R2A or PDA plates. Standard methods were used to identify isolates to species level by DNA extraction, PCR amplification and sequencing of 16S rDNA (bacteria) or ITSS region (fungi).

Microbial Evaluation

Two rounds of microbial evaluation were performed on isolates selected on the basis of abundance, diversity, and species characteristics. In the first evaluation round, 80 treatments were tested comprising 68 individual isolates and 12 consortia.

Selected bacterial and fungal isolates were cultured on R2A and PDA plates respectively and suspensions prepared in SDW for inoculation of seeds as generally described in example 4.

The suspensions were diluted to 1×107 (bacteria) and 1×103 (fungi) per ml for use as individual treatments. Consortia were prepared using equal volumes of each individual microbial suspension. Basil seeds were soaked for one hour in microbial suspensions then planted into 28 ml tubes containing commercial potting mix (described in example 4) that had been moistened with 6 ml of tap water. Two ml of microbial suspension was pipetted over the top of each seed. Thirty replicates were prepared for each treatment and 45 replicates were prepared for the no-microbe control.

Thirteen DAS 15 plants from each treatment and 22 no-microbe controls were selected for harvest and WSC determination. Sample preparation was performed as described previously with the exception that after bead beating, 0.8 ml of SDW was added to each tube and a second round of bead beating was performed. A 0.5 mL sample of the resulting mixed suspension was then transferred to a 96-well microtube dilution block and stored at −20° C. Blocks were thawed and assayed for carbohydrate as previously described.

A total of 36 microbial treatments yielded median carbohydrate concentrations greater than microbe-free controls. This data was used to generate a refined set of 44 treatments comprising 34 individual isolates and 10 consortia for a second round of microbial evaluation. Treatments were selected on the basis of results for increased WSC and included individual isolates that performed well in consortia, as well as new consortia prepared from highly ranked microbes.

Microbial treatments were prepared and the basil seed was soaked and planted as described above with the exception that the number of treatment replicates was increased to 45 and no-microbe controls increased to 90.

All plants were harvested 14 days after sowing and processed for WSC analysis as described above, with the exception that blocks were frozen overnight after the first 30 minute heating step. Samples were then thawed and processed as previously described. A dilution series of a single basil sample was loaded onto all blocks to serve as an internal control and enable normalisation of between-block variation.

A total of 20 microbial treatments yielded median WSC concentrations greater than microbe-free controls with 11 treatments yielding greater than 5% increases over the control (IOC; Table 3).

The treatment yielding the highest median carbohydrate concentration was a new microbial consortium of the three top-ranking individual isolates from the first round of microbial evaluation.

TABLE 3
Microbial treatments yielding carbohydrate concentrations greater
than microbe-free controls in round 2 microbial evaluation.
Treatment BDNZ#ID% IOC
60706, 60784,Sphingomonas mali, Flavobacterium 14.0
61090micromati, Penicillium sp.
60695, 60696,Sphingobium chlorophenolicum, Massilia 12.4
60697, 60698,niastensis, Flavobacterium limicola,
60699, 60700Rhizobium alamii, Sphingopyxis sp.,
Pelomonas aquatica
60587Azospirillum lipoferum11.4
60732, 60739,Mesorhizobium amorphae, Asticcacaulis 10.6
60740, 60744,taihuensis, Ralstonia solanacearum,
61082Microbacterium foliorum,
Trichoderma
60805Burkholderia megapolitana10.2
60732Mesorhizobium amorphae7.9
61043Umbelopsis sp7.5
60734Aquabacterium fontiphilum7.2
60797Rhodanobacter terrae7.1
60706Sphingomonas mali7.1
60578, 60580,Sphingobium xenophagum, Pseudomonas5.0
60696, 60697,moraviensis, Massilia niastensis,
61043Flavobacterium limicola, Umbelopsis sp.
No-microbe control0.0
ID-putative identification based on closest match in NCBI and/or RDPII databases

These results provide evidence that the method for directed selection of microbes, also referred to herein as accelerated microbial selection, described by the present disclosure is capable of producing a set of microbes that improve the production of water soluble carbohydrate in basil.

Furthermore, as indicated by Table 3, the methods are able to identify microbial consortia that significantly improve the concentration of water soluble carbohydrate in basil.

Example 6

Endophytic microbes are closely associated with or contained within plant tissues, therefore may be less exposed to competition and stressors than microbes associated with the plant rhizosphere. It would be desirable to create a group of endophytic microbes that are capable of promoting maize growth by means such as increasing plant biomass or grain yield. In this example an endophytic microbe is defined as one that is still viable after surface sterilisation of maize plant tissues with 6.6% Dettol® (active ingredient: chloroxylenol 4.8%) for 1 minute.

Seventy-three soil samples from the North Island of New Zealand were used as the source of microbial diversity. Soil samples (treatments) were mixed with sterile sand:vermiculite (1:1 or 1:2) as required to increase drainage and volume. The resulting mixtures were placed in 28 ml tubes and planted with 15 replicates of maize (Pioneer Zea mays hybrid seeds 37Y12) in each treatment. Seedlings were watered with a misting hose until germinated, then showered to saturation three times weekly with additional watering as required. For remaining standard growing conditions see Table 1.

Three plants from each treatment were selected at 60 days after sowing (DAS). The stems of the maize plants were cut 5 cm above the soil and discarded. The roots and attached stems were shaken free of soil, washed to remove soil fragments and drained before the roots and stems were combined in plastic bags. This material was then crushed within the bag with 10 ml of water added to suspend the root material. The liquid portion of the resulting suspension was used as the microbial inoculum for a non-selective enrichment round. The purpose of this extra round was to increase the abundance of microbes growing within maize tissues. Surface-sterilised maize (37Y12) seeds were soaked for one hour in 1 ml of the root suspension for each sample. Soaked seeds were then planted into 28 ml tubes (15 reps for each treatment) containing sterile sand and vermiculite 1:2 moistened with 6 ml Phostrogen® soluble plant food (diluted 1/450 v/v in sterile distilled water). The remaining root suspension was made up to a final volume of 40 ml using sterile distilled water (SDW) and 2 ml was pipetted over the planted seeds.

Round 1 Selection

Sixty days after sowing (DAS) the five largest plants in each treatment were selected and processed to provide the microbial inoculum for the first round of selection. The foliage of each of the selected plants was cut 5 cm above substrate level and discarded. The remaining basal stem and roots were washed thoroughly in tap water to remove any adherent soil and then combined within treatments in plastic bags before being surface sterilised with 6.6% Dettol® for 1 minute to select for endophytic microbes. Roots were then rinsed 3 times in SDW for 1, 5 then 10 minutes with agitation. Rinsed roots were crushed within the plastic bags as described above, and suspended in a final volume of 20 ml SDW. The resulting suspension was used to inoculate 15 surface-sterilised maize seeds (Pioneer Zea mays P9400) by soaking them for one hour in 10 ml of the inoculum before they were planted into sterile sand:vermiculite 1:3 moistened with sterile synthetic fertiliser (Fahraeus, 1957). The remaining suspension was made up to a final volume of 40 ml for each treatment and 2 ml was pipetted over the top of each planted seed. Thirty replicate tubes of microbe-free control seeds were soaked in SDW and pipetted with 2 mls of water per tube in a duplicate process free of microbial inoculum. After planting the seeds were covered with fresh dry substrate. Pots were watered with SDW for the first week after planting to maintain sterile conditions, then with tap water three times weekly.

Round 2 Selection

Plants were harvested at 26 DAS. Foliage was cut and weighed as described above. The remaining basal stem and roots of each plant were rinsed clean, blotted dry with fresh paper towels then weighed and bagged individually. The inoculum for the second round of selection was prepared from the 20 treatments yielding the greatest mean biomass and the five largest individual plants from all treatments. The roots and basal stems of the 10 largest plants from each selected treatment were pooled, surface sterilised and crushed as described above. The five largest individual plants were processed individually as above. Thirty replicates (Pioneer P9400 seeds) were planted for each of the 25 treatments in sterile sand:vermiculite 1:3 moistened with sterile synthetic fertiliser.

Round 3 Selection

Plants were harvested at 26 DAS and processed as described previously. The six largest plants from the 7 treatments yielding the greatest mean biomass were selected to create the inoculum for the third round of selection. Plants were grown for 28 days, harvested and assessed as described for previous rounds. The roots and basal stems of the three largest plants from the top three treatments were pooled, and the two largest plants in the experiment were selected individually to provide inoculum for microbial isolation.

Microbial Isolation

Microbial isolations were performed on root suspensions used to inoculate the R3 selection and on the suspensions prepared from the R3 plants selected above. Bacterial and fungal isolations were performed as generally described above using R2A, PDA and NDSM media. A selective isolation step for actinomycetes was performed in which ethanol was added to the root suspension at a final concentration of 25%, incubated at RT for 30 min then plated on R2A. Plates were examined after 1-7 days incubation at 25° C. Colonies were assessed for abundance, grouped according to morphology and representative isolates were picked and subcultured on to R2A. Standard methods were used to identify isolates to species level by DNA extraction, PCR amplification and sequencing of 16S rRNA gene (bacteria) or ITSS regions (fungi).

Microbial Evaluation Rounds

Two rounds of microbial evaluation were performed. In the first evaluation round 79 strains were selected based on abundance, diversity and species characteristics. Bacterial isolates were prepared and used to inoculate surface-sterilised seeds as described in example 4, with the exception that maize seeds (P9400) were used. Fungal strains were plated on PDA, incubated at 25° C. for 7 days then scraped off plates with 5-10 ml SDW and sieved through a tea strainer to remove clumps of mycelia and pieces of attached agar. The number of spores/hyphae was determined using a Neubauer improved haemocytometer and compound microscope and a dilution series of 5×102, 1×103 and 2×103 was prepared. Each dilution was then pipetted over 10 planted seeds thereby totalling 30 seeds per replicate each at 3 dose levels. For both fungi and bacteria, surface-sterilised maize seeds (Pioneer P9400) were planted in 28 ml tubes containing sterile potting mix (40% peat, 30% composted pine bark, 30% fine pumice, adjusted to pH 6.1 with lime) moistened with Fahraeus solution (Fahraeus, 1957) before being covered with fresh dry substrate. All plants were subsequently watered with tap water 3 times weekly.

Plants were harvested 24 DAS and both foliage and roots were weighed. Microbial isolates yielding an average increase in foliar and/or root weight over microbe-free controls were selected for a second round of evaluation. The chosen strains were processed and planted as described above, with the exception that seeds were soaked and inoculated with fungal strains at a concentration of 1×103 rather than three dilutions and 15 replicates were planted for all strains. Foliage and roots were harvested and weighed at 20 DAS. The results are shown in Table 4. Four of the isolates resulted in significantly higher biomass than the microbe-free controls.

TABLE 4
Endophytic microbes producing increased maize biomass
% IOC% IOC% IOC
BDNZ#CountFWRWBMID
571191213.19.911.8Herbaspirillum frisingense
575831414.35.110.6Acinetobacter sp.
57122159.612.210.6Xanthomonas translucens
571151414.43.910.2Pseudomonas marginalis
575351210.78.910.0Herbiconiux ginsengi
571481210.09.89.9Burkholderia cepacia
57531146.414.79.7Microbacterium oxydans
571501411.86.19.5Pseudomonas moraviensis
57597159.58.69.1Azotobacter chroococcum
57155147.810.68.9Pseudomonas
frederiksbergensis
57154156.68.47.3Sphingomonas rosa
57602146.28.67.2Rhizobium endophyticum
57619158.54.87.0Bacillus thioparans
57127154.011.06.8Terriglobus roseus
57612158.23.96.5Novosphingobium rosa
58016144.78.66.2Azospirillum lipoferum
57565125.65.15.4Streptomyces
thermocarboxydus
57613157.31.65.0Herbaspirillum frisingense
Italics indicate a significant difference from microbe-free control(Fisher’s LSD);
% IOC, percentage increase over controls
Putative ID based on closest match in RDPII database to partial 16S rRNA sequence

These results provide evidence that the method for directed selection of microbes, also referred to herein as accelerated microbial selection, described by the present disclosure is capable of producing a set of endophytic microbes that improve the growth of maize.

Furthermore, the microbes provided in Table 4 can be utilized to identify microbial consortia that are capable of improving the growth of maize.

The disclosure has been described herein, with reference to certain embodiments, in order to enable the reader to practice the disclosure without undue experimentation. However, a person having ordinary skill in the art will readily recognise that many of the components and parameters may be varied or modified to a certain extent or substituted for known equivalents without departing from the scope of the disclosure. It should be appreciated that such modifications and equivalents are herein incorporated as if individually set forth. In addition, titles, headings, or the like are provided to enhance the reader's comprehension of this document, and should not be read as limiting the scope of the present disclosure.

Full text: Click here
Patent 2024
Not available on PMC !
The concentration of chloroxylenol in Dettol bottle used in this study was 4.85%. MICs of chloroxylenol were detected by a modified agar dilution method according to the recommendations of Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI)(CLSI, 2020). From a pure overnight culture, at least 3-4 colonies were picked and suspended entirely in about 5 ml normal saline using a vortex. Broth culture was visually compared with the McFarland 0.5 standard. The inoculum suspension (200μl) was spotted onto Muller Hinton agar surface. Subsequently, the inoculum spots were dried and plates were positioned upside down prior to incubation, then all plates were incubated overnight at 37°C. The MIC was read as the lowest concentration without visible growth (17) . Detection of qaqA\B, smr , and tpi in S.aureus isolates DNA was extracted using ABIOpure TM Total DNA kit (ABIOpure, USA) from 25 S. aureus isolates resistant to chloroxylenol. Conventional PCR technique was carried out to amplify fragments of tpi, qacA\B, and smr using specific primer pairs (Table 1).The PCR reaction protocol listed in (Table 2) was carried out in 20μl as a final volume.PCR products were analyzed in1.5% agarose gels by electrophoresis (6) . Table 1.Primers used to detect qaq A/B, smr gene and tpi (18) . ,(MLST Database )
Publication 2023
Sample of the in-use disinfectant were directly tested for efficacy against selected bacterial strains while samples of in-stock disinfectant were reconstituted to obtain 0.5% sodium dichloroisocyanurate (NaDCC) and 1:20 chloroxylenol. Briefly, to make 0.5% of NaDCC, 4 tablets of NaDCC were dissolved in 1 L of tap water as documented previously13 . The NaDCC was stored in closed plastic container for 3 days and tested each day to see if there is a decrease in efficacy. Whereas, to make 1:20 of chloroxylenol 4.8%, 2 mL of chloroxylenol were diluted in 40 mL of tap water14 (link).
Full text: Click here
Publication 2023
Bacteria chloroxylenol sodium dichloroisocyanurate Strains
In routine practices, cleaning include daily wiping of the surfaces (tables, chairs and floor, sinks) and emptying waste bins twice a day. Detergent and chloroxylenol are used in cleaning the surfaces and NaDCC in cleaning the reusable non-autoclavable equipment like oxygen musk and in case there is a spillage. Dusting was done twice per week using chloroxylenol (Dettol).
Full text: Click here
Publication 2023
chloroxylenol Detergents Dettol musk Oxygen

Top products related to «Chloroxylenol»

The Nylon foam swab is a laboratory equipment item designed for sample collection and cleaning tasks. It features a nylon fiber head attached to a plastic handle, providing a durable and absorbent tool for various laboratory applications.
Sourced in Poland, United States
Chloroxylenol is a chemical compound used as a disinfectant and antiseptic agent. It is a broad-spectrum antimicrobial agent effective against a variety of bacteria, fungi, and viruses.
Sourced in United Kingdom, United States
1-Aminobenzotriazole is a chemical compound used as a laboratory reagent. It is a white crystalline solid. The core function of 1-Aminobenzotriazole is to serve as a synthetic intermediate in the production of other chemical compounds.
Sourced in United States, France, Germany, Poland, Canada
Mueller-Hinton broth is a microbiological growth medium used for the cultivation and susceptibility testing of bacteria. It provides the necessary nutrients for the growth of a wide range of microorganisms.
Sourced in Germany, United States, Italy, India, China, United Kingdom, France, Poland, Spain, Switzerland, Australia, Canada, Brazil, Sao Tome and Principe, Ireland, Belgium, Macao, Japan, Singapore, Mexico, Austria, Czechia, Bulgaria, Hungary, Egypt, Denmark, Chile, Malaysia, Israel, Croatia, Portugal, New Zealand, Romania, Norway, Sweden, Indonesia
Acetonitrile is a colorless, volatile, flammable liquid. It is a commonly used solvent in various analytical and chemical applications, including liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, and other laboratory procedures. Acetonitrile is known for its high polarity and ability to dissolve a wide range of organic compounds.
Sourced in United States, Poland, Germany, Australia, Belgium, United Kingdom
Statistica 13.1 is a comprehensive data analysis and predictive analytics software. It provides a wide range of statistical and data mining techniques for various applications.
Sourced in United States, Japan, Singapore
The QTRAP 4500 mass spectrometer is a quadrupole-linear ion trap hybrid instrument designed for high-performance LC-MS/MS analysis. It features a QTRAP configuration, combining the selectivity of a triple quadrupole with the versatility of a linear ion trap. The instrument provides high sensitivity, resolution, and speed for a wide range of qualitative and quantitative applications.
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom, Germany, Japan
The FTIR spectrometer is a scientific instrument used for molecular analysis. It measures the absorption of infrared radiation by a sample, providing information about the chemical composition and structure of the material. The core function of the FTIR spectrometer is to generate and detect infrared radiation, and analyze the interaction between the radiation and the sample.
Sourced in United States, Germany, United Kingdom, Spain, France, Australia, Belgium, Canada
Annexin V is a calcium-dependent phospholipid-binding protein that has a high affinity for phosphatidylserine (PS). Annexin V can be used to detect and quantify apoptotic cells.
Sourced in Poland
Proadifen hydrochloride is a chemical compound used in various laboratory applications. It serves as a reagent or intermediate in scientific research and analysis. The core function of Proadifen hydrochloride is to provide a specific chemical structure and properties that can be utilized in experimental procedures. No further details on its intended use can be provided in an unbiased and factual manner.

More about "Chloroxylenol"

Chloroxylenol, a phenolic antimicrobial agent, has been extensively studied for its efficacy against a diverse range of microorganisms, including bacteria, fungi, and viruses.
This versatile disinfectant and germicide is commonly used in various antimicrobial and disinfectant products.
Researchers can leverage the power of PubCompare.ai's AI-driven platform to optimize their Chloroxylenol research protocols.
The platform's intelligent algorithm helps researchers navigate the vast research landscape, easily locating and comparing published literature, pre-prints, and patents related to Chloroxylenol.
This enables researchers to identify the most reproducible and effective methods for their Chloroxylenol studies, empowering them to make informed decisions.
Explore PubCompare.ai's comprehensive resources on Chloroxylenol, including its use in Nylon foam swabs, its interaction with 1-Aminobenzotriazole, and its efficacy testing in Mueller-Hinton broth.
Discover cutting-edge analytical techniques, such as Acetonitrile-based QTRAP 4500 mass spectrometry and FTIR spectrometry, that can be employed to study Chloroxylenol's properties and mechanisms of action.
Additionally, researchers can investigate the impact of Chloroxylenol on cellular processes, such as apoptosis, using Annexin V and Proadifen hydrochloride as important tools.
Leverage the power of Statistica 13.1 to analyze your Chloroxylenol research data and uncover valuable insights.
Take your Chloroxylenol research to new heights by exploring PubCompare.ai today.
Unlock the full potential of this versatile antimicrobial agent and make groundbreaking discoveries in the field of microbiology and disinfection.