The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

DB 60

DB 60 is a research protocol that employs advanced artificial intelligence (AI) to optimize experimental procedures and enhance reproducibility.
The PubCompare.ai platform offers AI-driven comparisons across scientific literature, preprints, and patents, enabling researchers to discover the most effective DB 60 protocols.
This cutting-edge tool helps locate the best protocols and products effortlessly, empowering scientists to achieve unparalled accuracy and reproducibility in their experiments.

Most cited protocols related to «DB 60»

Validation of the equivalency and inherent variability in the newly formed sentence lists was accomplished by testing 15 cochlear implant users on all 33 sentence lists. Participants had monosyllabic word scores of 36 to 88 percent correct (avg = 61%, s.d. = 16). To avoid ceiling effects, sentence lists were presented in +5 dB SNR (multi-talker noise) for subjects with word scores of 85% or greater, +10 dB SNR for subjects with word scores between 65% and 84%, and in quiet for subjects with word scores below 65%. Sentence list order was randomized for each subject and lists were tested in 5 blocks, each containing 7 lists. For each subject, the final list of block 1 was repeated as the final list of blocks 3 and 5, resulting in a total of 35 test lists. Only the score from the first presentation of each list was considered in the validation analysis.
During testing, subjects were seated in a sound-treated booth. Sentences were presented at 60 dB SPL in the sound field from a single loudspeaker at 0 degrees azimuth on the horizontal axis. Subjects were instructed to repeat back each sentence and to guess when unsure of any word. Prior to testing, subjects completed a practice list of 50 sentences that were not included in the 33 lists. Following completion of each block of sentence lists, subjects were asked to exit the sound booth and relax for a minimum of 15 minutes. Each sentence was scored as the number of words repeated correctly and a percent correct score was calculated for each list.
Publication 2012
DB 60 Epistropheus Implantations, Cochlear Sound
This study was conducted with 12 week old, male Albino Wistar rats having a body weight of 200 g, which were randomly assigned to six rats/group/interval. Rats were bred in-house at the Pharmacology Animal Facility, School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia. The animal facility was registered by the Directorate of Veterinary (Reg. No: HR-POK-007). Laboratory rats were acclimated for 5 days and randomly assigned to their respective treatment groups. Laboratory animals were housed in polycarbonate (PC) cages under conventional laboratory conditions at 20–24 °C, relative humidity of 40–70%, and noise level of 60 dB. Each cage was identified with dates, number of the study, group, dose, number, and sex of each animal. Fluorescent lighting provided illumination for 12 h per day. A standard Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) diet and fresh water were provided ad libitum. Animal care was in compliance with the standard operating procedures (SOPs) of the animal facility and the European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals used for Experimental and other Scientific Purposes (ETS 123). This study was approved (Number: 641-01/17-02101; Date: 02 November 2017 (by the local ethics committee. Ethical principles of the study complied with the European Directive 010/63/E, the Law on Amendments to the Animal Protection Act (Official Gazette 37/13), the Animal Protection Act (Official Gazette 135/06), the ordinance on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes (Official Gazette 55/13), recommendations of the Federation of European Laboratory Animal Science Associations (FELASA), and the recommendations of the Ethics Committee of the School of Medicine, University of Zagreb. The experiments were assessed by observers blinded to the treatment.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2021
Albinism Animals Animals, Laboratory Body Weight Conferences DB 60 Ethics Committees Europeans Humidity Lighting Males Pharmaceutical Preparations polycarbonate Rats, Laboratory Rats, Wistar Rattus norvegicus Regional Ethics Committees Vertebrates
All procedures were approved by Vanderbilt and Harvard Animal Care and Use Committees and followed the guidelines established by the National Institutes of Health for the care and use of laboratory animals. Female C57BL6 mice aged 4-7 weeks were brought to a surgical plane of anesthesia using a combination of pentobarbital sodium (50 mg/kg followed by 10-15 mg/kg supplements as needed) and chlorprothixene (0.2 mg). Multiunit responses were recorded from the middle cortical layers of AI (420-440 μm from pial surface) with epoxylite-coated tungsten microelectrodes (2.0 MΩ at 1 kHz, FHC) and from MGB with 16-channel silicon probes (177 μm2 contact area, 50 μm inter-contact separation, Neuronexus Technologies). Frequency response areas (FRAs) were measured with pseudo-randomly presented tone pips of variable frequency (5.5 to 45.3 kHz in 0.1 octave increments, 20 ms duration, 5 ms raised cosine onset/offset ramps, 600 ms intertrial interval) and level (0-60 dB SPL in 5 dB increments) delivered from a free field electrostatic speaker placed 12 cm from the contralateral ear.
Auditory core fields (AI and AAF) were identified by an unmistakable caudal-to-rostral mirror-reversal in tonotopy bounded by sites that with poor or abruptly-shifted frequency tuning. The tonotopic zone amounted to a narrow (< 0.5 mm) swath of cortical tissue with inter-animal variations that could not be predicted by vascular landmarks or position relative to bregma. For MGB recordings, the silicon probe was inserted through the auditory cortex at 15 degrees off the horizontal plane under stereotaxic guidance to match the plane of section used in tracer reconstruction and thalamocortical slice experiments. In order to avoid recording from the dorsal division of the MGB, the probe was initially inserted lateral to the auditory core fields, approximately 3.5 mm caudal to bregma. The ventral edge of the MGB was identified by documenting the most lateral cortical insertion point that yielded driven responses from the MGB, some 2.5 – 3.0 mm from the cortical surface. Reconstruction of lesions and electrode tracks confirmed that this corresponded to the ventral shell of the MGB. To target the MGBv and MGBm, the silicon probe was inserted 0.5 mm medial to this point, a trajectory that reliably corresponded to the center of the MGBv, as evidenced by histologic reconstruction of lesions and electrode tracks.
FRAs were reconstructed across the full rostral-to-caudal extent of the MGB by making successive penetrations rostral and caudal to the starting position (50-100 μm between penetrations), until the recording probe had advanced beyond the caudal and rostral poles of the MGB. FRAs were also compared along the full lateral-to-medial extent of the MGBv and MGBm by documenting variations in response properties across the linear array of contact sites spanning 0.75 mm. In some cases, electrolytic lesions were made at various rostral-caudal positions in the MGB identified with the silicon probe. FRAs were measured at different insertion depths with a tungsten microelectrode and small lesions were made by passing 0.8 μA of current for 12 seconds at one or two points of interest along the lateral-to-medial penetration (e.g. the lateral or medial extremes of tone-driven recording sites or reversals in frequency tuning).
Publication 2011
Anesthesia Animals Animals, Laboratory Auditory Area Auditory Perception Blood Vessel Chlorprothixene Cortex, Cerebral DB 60 Dietary Supplements Electrolytes Electrostatics Mice, House Microelectrodes Neoplasm Metastasis Operative Surgical Procedures Pentobarbital Sodium Reconstructive Surgical Procedures Silicon Tissues Tungsten Woman
To evaluate equivalency of lists and characterize the inherent variability of the sentence materials, validation studies were conducted first with adult listeners and then with pediatric listeners. Given the complexity of pediatric testing, adult testing was used to initially validate equivalency and provide an opportunity to discard outlier lists prior to pediatric evaluation. A total of 16 adult, experienced cochlear implant users, were tested at Arizona State University, and 9 pediatric listeners (4 hearing aid users and 5 cochlear implant users) were tested at Desert Voices Elementary School. Pediatric listeners ranged in age from 3 to 7 years of age (mean = 4 years, 8 months) and were deemed to be appropriate for sentence testing by classroom teachers or the school speech language pathologist. All testing was completed with approval of the Institutional Review Board.
For both studies, the objective was to obtain scores from each listener on all 16 sentence lists. Adult listeners were tested in quiet or in noise (20-talker babble), based on their Consonant Nucleus Consonant (CNC, Peterson and Lehiste, 1962) monosyllabic word score. The signal-to-noise ratio used for sentence testing was determined by the individual’s CNC word score. Sentences were presented in quiet, +10 dB SNR, and +5 dB SNR for individual’s with word scores at or below 65% (n=13), between 66% and 85% (n=3), and between 86% and 100% (n=0), respectively. All pediatric listeners were tested in quiet. Adult testing was conducted in a double-walled sound booth. Pediatric testing was conducted in a quiet room3. In both cases, sentences were presented through a loudspeaker at a calibrated presentation level of 60 dB SPL at the position of the listener’s head. Listeners completed a practice session (2 AzBio lists and 5 sentences from the unused pediatric corpus) prior to testing. Test lists were presented in a novel random order for each listener. To avoid fatigue, listeners were encouraged to take short breaks between lists and required to take a break after every 4th test list. All adult listeners completed testing within a single session. Pediatric listeners were evaluated over multiple sessions and not all listeners were able to complete all lists. Testing the pediatric listeners across sessions can add more variability despite randomization of list order; however, given that pediatric implant recipients will also be assessed across clinical testing sessions, it could be considered to more closely reflect real-world design.
Publication 2014
Adult Cell Nucleus DB 60 Ethics Committees, Research Fatigue Head Hearing Aids Implantations, Cochlear Pathologists Sound Speech
Recording sites were selected by their response to a broad-band noise (BBN). We searched for sites while continuously presenting 200 ms BBN bursts (0–50 kHz) with inter-stimulus time interval (ISI, onset to onset) of 500 ms and a level of 30 dB attenuation. The LFP responses were averaged online, and the electrodes were positioned at the location and depth that showed the largest evoked LFP responses over all the electrodes. Once selected, we validated and recorded the BBN responses of the recording site using a sequence of 280 BBN bursts with duration of 200 ms, 10 ms linear onset and offset ramps, ISI of 500 ms, and seven different attenuation levels, between 0 and 60 dB with 10 dB steps, that were presented pseudo-randomly so that each level was presented 40 times. The main data were collected if noise threshold level was at least 30 dB attenuation and noise-evoked potentials changed regularly with level; otherwise, the electrodes were moved to a different location.
Quasi-random frequency-level sequence of 777 tone bursts (50 ms duration, 5 ms onset/offset linear ramps, 500 ms ISI) at 37 frequencies (1–64 kHz, 6 tones/octave) and 7 attenuation levels (80–20 dB, 10dB steps, roughly corresponding to 20–80 dB SPL) were used to measure the frequency response area (FRA) of the recording site (3 presentations at each frequency-level combination). When the FRA was narrow or not smoothly graded with level, 370 tone bursts (300 ms ISI) at 37 frequencies (1–64 kHz, or narrower ranges when the FRA was narrow) were presented at a fixed attenuation level, in order to better characterize the frequency response in the level at which the main paradigm would be presented.
Once the recording site was characterized in terms of the best frequency and the minimum threshold, two frequencies, f1 and f2, were selected for the main experimental paradigm. Both tone had to be within the FRA, usually close and symmetric around the best frequency, and to have about the same response amplitude. The possible values of the difference between the two frequencies, defined as: Δf = f2/f1−1, were 10%, 21%, 44% or 96%.
We tested the responses to these frequencies in sets of up to seven different sequences. In most cases, each sequence consisted of 30 ms tone beeps with ISI (onset to onset) of 300 ms. A limited amount of data were recorded using sequences with ISIs of 500, 700, 1000, 1200 and 1800 ms. Each set of sequences was presented at a constant sound level, 20 – 40 dB above the minimum threshold of the recording site. The sequences are described in details in the Results section and in Figs. 1A and 3A. Each set of the seven sequences tested the responses to f1 and f2 in six different conditions.
In order to get comparable data from many paradigms in the same recording site, the sequences had to be as short as possible. Preliminary experiments showed that 25 presentations were enough to estimate an average response with a reasonable signal to noise ratio. Therefore, with the lowest presentation probability of each frequency being 5%, we used sequences of 500 tone beeps.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2011
DB 60 Evoked Potentials Figs Sound

Most recents protocols related to «DB 60»

Participants sat in a quiet, dark room, 180 cm away from the center of a 24 modules custom-made array (Fig 1A) spanning ± 36° of visual angle (with 0° being the center of the array, negative and positive values indicating leftward and rightward position, respectively). All testing procedures took place in total darkness so that the array was not visible to the participants, excluding the possibility that responses were influenced by contextual cues (such as the array’s silhouette). Each module could deliver either visual or auditory stimulation. Visual stimuli were red flashes with a diameter of 3° of visual angle at participant’s viewing position, while auditory stimuli were 2 kHz sine wave pulses with 60 dB Sound Pressure Level (SPL). Every module could deliver only one stimulus at a time, i.e., a module could produce either a sound or a flash, never both simultaneously (even though participants were unaware of that). The array was linked to the computer used to run the experiment through a USB cable. The connection between the array and the laptop was also powered via a dedicated host. The experiment was developed and run using MATLAB (v. 2013b).
Full text: Click here
Publication 2023
Acoustic Stimulation Auditory Perception Darkness DB 60 Pulse Pressure Short Interspersed Nucleotide Elements Sound
To confirm the accuracy of the algorithm for determining vocal dose and effort, four singers (soprano, alto, tenor, and baritone) completed a set of between 10 and 11 tasks while recording with the MA device, each lasting for 1 min with 1 min of rest in between. A handy video recorder (Q8, Zoom) for all participants simultaneously recorded acoustic audio samples. The tasks included normal speaking, speaking over 60 dB of ambient noise, whispered speaking, moderately loud singing (low to mid range), moderately loud singing (mid to high range), very loud singing (low to mid range), very loud singing (mid to high range), singing without vibrato (low to mid range), staccato arpeggios throughout the vocal range, and strained speaking. Each participant selected one excerpt to use for the low- to mid-range tasks and another piece to use for the mid- to high-range tasks. For the speaking exercises, participants read from “Practicing Vocal Music Efficiently and Effectively: Applying ‘Deliberate Practice to a New Piece of Music’” by Ruth Rainero (21 ). The strained speaking task was completed only by the alto participant.
Publication 2023
Acoustics DB 60 Medical Devices Singer
All sites followed standardized procedures for the VEP and AEP recording. The VEP stimuli consisted of 400 trials of a reversing black and white checkerboard presented continuously (0.5 cpd, 100% contrast, 2 Hz refresh rate). One study site (BCH) employed eye tracking (Tobii Technology, Danderyd, Sweden) to pause the visual paradigm when participants looked away from the stimulus. At the other sites, the stimuli ran continuously. An experimenter or parent was in the room with the child to redirect attention when necessary. Prior analyses have indicated similar findings between the site with eye-tracking and the sites using experimenter/parent redirection to the stimuli [16 (link)]. The AEP stimuli consisted of 520 trials of 500 Hz sinusoidal tones (300 ms duration) with a varying interstimulus interval of 0.6 to 2 s. The tones were presented at 60 dB SPL using a free-field speaker.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2023
Attention Child DB 60 Parent Sinusoidal Beds
After constructing BrainWAVE stimulators, testing was performed to determine whether the devices generate appropriate stimulus intensity, timing, and other signal properties. Light illuminance and audio volume were measured with a light meter and decibel meter, respectively, with the distance between the sensor and meter approximating the distance from the sensory to the subjects’ eyes and ears (Extended Data Table 3-1). For mouse studies, light intensity was set at ∼150 lux and sound intensity at 60–65 dB (Garza et al., 2020 (link); Martorell et al., 2019 (link)). For human studies, we adjusted stimulus intensity for each subject based on tolerance, with the levels ranging from 0 to 1400 lux for brightness and 0–80 dBA for sound (He et al., 2021 (link)). We measured the frequency and duty cycle of the audio and visual stimuli in real-time using an oscilloscope connected to the analog output ports of the light and decibel meters (Fig. 3A). Alternatively, the timing of the light and sound stimulus may be measured with a photodiode and a microphone connected to an oscilloscope, or the stimulus may be recorded on a laptop and analyzed on a computer. Audio and visual signals were measured simultaneously to compare their duty cycle, frequency, and phase timing.
To modulate neural activity, we generated sensory signals at specific frequencies depending on the experimental design. Visual γ flicker (40 Hz) was produced using a 5.17-V, 40-Hz square wave with a 50% duty cycle (Fig. 3B). The voltage must be greater than 4 V to operate the MOSFET. Auditory γ flicker was produced with a pure sinusoid tone signal that was modulated by a 40 Hz square wave with a 50% duty cycle for audiovisual stimulation, and a 4% duty cycle for audio-only stimulation (Fig. 3C). The pure tone used was adjusted to fall within the center of the hearing range of the species tested: 10 kHz for mice and 7 or 8 kHz for humans (Heffner and Heffner, 2007 ). We used a 4% duty cycle for audio-only stimulation to more closely match the timing of clicks in studies on auditory steady-state responses evoked with 40-Hz click trains (Galambos et al., 1981 (link); Stapells et al., 1984 (link); Osipova et al., 2006 (link); Ma et al., 2013 (link); Thuné et al., 2016 (link)). Other frequencies of sensory were generated in a similar manner typically with a 50% duty cycle. Randomized stimulation was used to compare periodic to aperiodic flicker stimulation and had varying duty cycles (from 33% to 99%). Audio and visual signals were typically synchronized with similar duty cycles, but offset signals or different duty cycles may be desired in some cases (Fig. 3D–G,I).
Full text: Click here
Publication 2023
Auditory Perception Brain Waves DB 60 Ear Eye Homo sapiens Immune Tolerance Light Medical Devices Mus Nervousness Sinusoidal Beds Sound
Stimuli were generated by a custom rig and transduced via ER-3A insert earphones, and data acquisition was handled by the Interacoustics Eclipse hardware and software. While trans-tympanic needle electrodes or tympanic membrane electrodes provide larger electrophysiological responses, we favored the use of ear canal electrodes (tiptrodes) to provide better comfort to our participant. Subjects' ear canals were prepped by scrubbing with a cotton swab coated in Nuprep® Electrode gel (Nuprep, Aurora, CO) was applied on the cleaned portion of the canal and over the gold-foil of ER3-26 A/B tiptrodes before insertion. A horizontal montage was used, with a ground on the forehead at midline, one tiptrode as the inverting electrode, and the other as the non-inverting electrode in the opposite ear. Low (<5 kΩ) and balanced impedance readings were obtained with inter-electrode impedance values within 2 kΩ of each other. Acoustic stimuli were delivered via silicone tubing connected to the ER-3A earphones. Stimuli were 100 μs-clicks delivered at 125 dB peak SPL in alternating polarity at a presentation rate of 9.1 or 40.1 Hz. The total noise dose for all EcochG measurements was well within Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) standards. Electrical responses were amplified 100 000 times, and 2000 sweeps were averaged for each recording.
Average traces acquired by the Eclipse software (passband 3.3 Hz–5000 Hz) were exported to matlab R2018a for further analyses using custom scripts. Specifically, EcochG waveforms were processed using standard highpass()/lowpass()matlab functions with infinite impulse “iir” response type, a stop band attenuation of 60 dB and a “steepness” argument of 0.95 (resulting in a filter slope of 38.8 dB/octave). The cutoff frequencies were 3.3–470 Hz for the low-pass filter and 470–3000 Hz for the high-pass filter.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2023
Acoustics DB 60 Electricity External Auditory Canals Forehead Gold Gossypium Needles Pulp Canals Silicones STEEP1 protein, human Tympanic Cavity Tympanic Membrane

Top products related to «DB 60»

Sourced in United States, United Kingdom, Germany, Canada, Japan, Sweden, Austria, Morocco, Switzerland, Australia, Belgium, Italy, Netherlands, China, France, Denmark, Norway, Hungary, Malaysia, Israel, Finland, Spain
MATLAB is a high-performance programming language and numerical computing environment used for scientific and engineering calculations, data analysis, and visualization. It provides a comprehensive set of tools for solving complex mathematical and computational problems.
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom, Germany
The Elexsys E500 is a compact, high-performance electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectrometer designed for a wide range of applications. It features a stable and sensitive detection system, allowing for the analysis of various paramagnetic species. The Elexsys E500 is capable of continuous-wave (CW) and pulsed EPR measurements, providing users with a versatile tool for their research and analysis needs.
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom, Japan, China, Austria, Germany, France, Italy
The LOGIQ E9 is an ultrasound imaging system designed for general diagnostic use. It features advanced image processing capabilities to produce high-quality images. The system provides a range of functionality to support clinical decision-making.
Sourced in United States, Germany, United Kingdom, Japan, Switzerland, Canada, Australia, Netherlands, Morocco
LabVIEW is a software development environment for creating and deploying measurement and control systems. It utilizes a graphical programming language to design, test, and deploy virtual instruments on a variety of hardware platforms.
The Open Field Apparatus is a laboratory equipment used to assess exploratory behavior and locomotor activity in rodents. It consists of a square or circular arena with high walls to prevent the subject from escaping. The apparatus is often used in behavioral neuroscience research to study factors that may influence an animal's willingness to explore a novel environment.
Sourced in United States
The SR-LAB is a compact and versatile laboratory equipment designed for various scientific applications. It functions as a signal generator, providing a range of waveform options, including sine, square, triangle, and pulse waves. The device offers adjustable frequency and amplitude, enabling users to generate precise signals for their experimental needs. The SR-LAB is a reliable tool for researchers, engineers, and technicians working in diverse fields that require precise signal generation.
Sourced in United States
The Sound-attenuating box is a laboratory equipment designed to reduce ambient noise levels. It is a self-contained unit that provides a controlled acoustic environment for various experiments and measurements.
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom
MATLAB 2014 is a software application developed by MathWorks for numerical computing. It provides a programming environment for algorithm development, data visualization, and analysis. MATLAB 2014 offers a wide range of mathematical, engineering, and scientific functions, as well as tools for various applications.
Sourced in United States
E-Prime is a software package for designing and running psychological experiments. It provides tools for creating, presenting, and collecting data from a variety of experiment types. E-Prime supports the integration of hardware devices and the creation of complex experimental paradigms.
Sourced in Sweden
Eye tracking is a technology that measures the movement and position of the eyes. It records where a person is looking and the duration of their gaze. The core function of eye tracking is to capture and analyze eye movement data.

More about "DB 60"

DB 60 is a cutting-edge research protocol that leverages advanced artificial intelligence (AI) to optimize experimental procedures and enhance reproducibility.
The PubCompare.ai platform offers AI-driven comparisons across scientific literature, preprints, and patents, empowering researchers to discover the most effective DB 60 protocols.
This innovative tool helps scientists effortlessly locate the best protocols and products, enabling them to achieve unparalleled accuracy and reproducibility in their experiments.
By utilizing AI-powered analysis, PubCompare.ai allows researchers to compare a wide range of experimental techniques, including those involving MATLAB, Elexsys E500 spectrometers, LOGIQ E9 imaging systems, LabVIEW software, Open field apparatuses, SR-LAB startle response systems, and sound-attenuating boxes.
The platform's advanced algorithms can also integrate data from MATLAB 2014, E-Prime software, and eye tracking technologies to provide comprehensive insights and recommendations for optimizing DB 60 protocols.
This cutting-edge approach helps scientists stay at the forefront of their fields, driving advancements in areas such as biomedical research, material science, and environmental studies.
Whether you're a seasoned researcher or just starting out, PubCompare.ai's AI-driven comparisons can help you discover the most effective DB 60 protocols, leading to groundbreaking discoveries and unparalled reproducibility in your experiments.