The first method is a widely accepted and sensitive enzyme recycling assay based on a procedure reported by Tietze (1 (link)) and modified by Adams et al (2 (link)) that requires no specialized equipment. GSH is oxidized by 5,5′-dithiobis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB) resulting in the formation of GSSG and 5-thio-2-nitrobenzoic acid (TNB). GSSG is then reduced to GSH by glutathione reductase (GR) using reducing equivalent provided by NADPH. The rate of TNB formation is proportional to the sum of GSH and GSSG present in the sample and is determined by measuring the formation of TNB at 412 nm. Specific changes have been described to increase assay sensitivity enabling measurements in plasma from populations with inherently low GSH or GSSG levels (3 (link), 4 (link)).
The second method uses HPLC separation and fluorometric detection. The original method, developed by Reed et al (5 (link)), used iodoacetic acid (IAA) to form S-carboxymethyl derivatives with free thiols and fluorodinitrobenzene which reacts with amines to facilitate UV absorbance detection at 365 nm. Martin and White (6 (link)) later altered this method using dansyl chloride as the derivatizing agent with fluorescence detection thereby increasing the sensitivity of the assay substantially. Finally, Jones et al (7 (link)) further refined the method to minimize artifactual oxidation and increase sensitivity. A technique using iodoactetic acid as the thiol akylating agent followed by dansyl chloride derivatization for fluorometric detection is presented. This method is advantageous because it is amenable to small sample quantities and detects thiols and disulfides of several small molecules, GSH, GSSG cystiene, cystine, and mixed disulfides in a single run using ion-paring chromatography. The alkylation and derivatization processes are rather time-consuming and iodoacetic acid (IAA) reacts rather slowly with free thiols (8 (link), 9 (link)). While relative comparisons can be made using this method, caution should be taken in making conclusions about absolute concentrations; specifically of the disulfide species.
The second method uses HPLC separation and fluorometric detection. The original method, developed by Reed et al (5 (link)), used iodoacetic acid (IAA) to form S-carboxymethyl derivatives with free thiols and fluorodinitrobenzene which reacts with amines to facilitate UV absorbance detection at 365 nm. Martin and White (6 (link)) later altered this method using dansyl chloride as the derivatizing agent with fluorescence detection thereby increasing the sensitivity of the assay substantially. Finally, Jones et al (7 (link)) further refined the method to minimize artifactual oxidation and increase sensitivity. A technique using iodoactetic acid as the thiol akylating agent followed by dansyl chloride derivatization for fluorometric detection is presented. This method is advantageous because it is amenable to small sample quantities and detects thiols and disulfides of several small molecules, GSH, GSSG cystiene, cystine, and mixed disulfides in a single run using ion-paring chromatography. The alkylation and derivatization processes are rather time-consuming and iodoacetic acid (IAA) reacts rather slowly with free thiols (8 (link), 9 (link)). While relative comparisons can be made using this method, caution should be taken in making conclusions about absolute concentrations; specifically of the disulfide species.