Ginsenoside M1
It has been the subject of increasing research interest due to its potential therapeutic properties, including anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidant, and neuroprotective effects.
PubCompare.ai's AI-driven protocols can help optimize your research on Ginsenoside M1 by locating relevant protocols from the literature, pre-prints, and patents, and using advanced AI comparisons to identify the best protocols and products.
This can simplify your research and accelerate your discoveries around this important comound.
Most cited protocols related to «Ginsenoside M1»
Example 3
To gain further insight into the mode of action of ginsenoside M1, three assays targeting hallmarks of apoptosis, namely (1) the apoptotic DNA breaks assayed by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay, (2) the cell cycle assayed by flow cytometry after propidium iodide (PI)-staining nuclei, (3) the PI/Annexin V double staining assay, and (4) caspase activation were performed. Plate 1×106 human oral cancer cells OECM-1 per 6-cm dish in 2 ml of culture medium and were grown overnight at 37° C. in a 5% CO2 incubator. The cells were incubated for 24 h with ginsenoside M1 (10˜20 μg/ml), 50 μM cistaplatin (CDDP) or vehicle. Each group contains a final DMSO concentration of 0.1%. Thereafter, three assays were performed. We found that 20 μg/ml ginsenoside M1 and 50 μM CDDP, but not 10 μg/ml ginsenoside M1 significantly induced apoptotic DNA breaks in OECM-1 cells (
Example 6
To evaluate the anti-cancer activity of ginsenoside M1 in vivo, human oral cancer xenografts were used. Six-week-old male congenital athymic BALB/c nude (nu/nu) mice were purchased from BioLASCO Taiwan Co., Ltd (Ilan, Taiwan), and housed in a room under controlled temperature (23±3° C.) and relative humidity (50±5%). Animal experiments were performed with the approval of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the National Ilan University (approval number: No. 106-13) according to the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Xenografts mice were established by subcutaneous (SC) injection of 2×106 human oral cancer cells SAS (in 75 μl PBS+75 μl Matrigel) on the backs of the nude mice. After the tumor has reached about 40˜60 mm3 in size, the mice were randomized into six groups (six mice each): (1) oral vehicle control; (2) oral 30 mg/kg ginsenoside M1; (3) oral 60 mg/kg ginsenoside M1; (4) oral 90 mg/kg ginsenoside M1; (5) SC vehicle control; (6) SC 20 mg/kg ginsenoside M1. The mice were given a daily oral administration or SC injection of either vehicle or ginsenoside M1 for 5 successive days. The mice were scarified at 24 h after received the last dose of ginsenoside M1 or vehicle. The tumor volume (TV) was determined by measurement of the length (L) and width (W) of the tumor. The TV on day n (TVn) was calculated as TV (mm3)=(L×W2)/2. The relative tumor volume on day n (RTVn) versus day 0 was expressed according to the following formula: RTVn=TVn/TV0. We found that oral administration of ginsenoside M1 at 90 mg/kg significantly reduced the tumor size compared to vehicle control group; however, oral administration of ginsenoside M1 at 30 and 60 mg/kg did not significant reduce the tumor size (
In addition, SC injection of 20 mg/kg ginsenoside M1 also significantly reduced the tumor size (
Example 2
Plate 5×105 normal human gingival epithelioid cell line SG per 6-cm dish in 2 ml of culture medium and were grown overnight at 37° C. in a 5% CO2 incubator. The cells were incubated for 24 h with ginsenoside M1 (5˜20 μg/ml), ginsenoside Rh2 (5˜20 μg/ml) or vehicle. Each group contains a final DMSO concentration of 0.1%. Thereafter, the cell numbers were counted by Trypan blue exclusion method. We found that ginsenoside M1 showed less toxic to SG cells than ginsenoside Rh2 (
Example 1
Plate 5×105 human oral cancer cells SAS per 6-cm dish in 2 ml of culture medium and were grown overnight at 37° C. in a 5% CO2 incubator. The cells were incubated for 24 h with ginsenoside M1 (5˜20 μg/ml), ginsenoside Rh2 (5˜20 μg/ml) or vehicle. Each group contains a final DMSO concentration of 0.1%. Thereafter, the cell numbers were counted by Trypan blue exclusion method. We found that ginsenoside M1 and ginsenoside Rh2 dose-dependently inhibited the cell numbers of human oral cancer SAS cells (
Most recents protocols related to «Ginsenoside M1»
The total ginsenoside content was determined using the reference method of the product of geographical indication-Jilin Changbaishan ginseng (GB/T 19506-2009), Ginsenoside Re (National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, China)was used as the standard to calculate the content of the gross ginsenoside. In order to prepare the ginsenoside Re standard solution, 10 mg ginsenoside Re was put into a 10 mL volumetric flask, dilute to scale with methanol as solvent and mixed. 10 μL, 20 μL, 30 μL, 40 μL, 60 μL, 80 μL, and 100 μL of the standard solution and 30 μL sample solution were transferred to 10 mL tubes and dried (60°C water bath). Then, 0.5 ml 8% vanillin-ethanol and 5 ml 72% concentrated sulfuric acid were added to the prepared tubes. After fully shaking and mixing, the solution was heated in a 60°C water bath for 10 min and then cooled down in an ice-water bath for 10 min immediately. The mixed reagent without ginsenoside was used as a reference. Finally, both were determined at 544 nm using an enzyme calibration (Infinite M200 PRO, Tecan, Switzerland). To reduce the error in determining the gross ginsenosides content, three parallel extracts were obtained from the same origin of GF raw materials. The changes in gross ginsenosides content in GFs of various ages were then compared. The following equation was used to calculate the gross ginsenoside content:
Equation (
Development of the “Ginsenoside Sieve” was generally consistent with our previous report [44 (link)], which was based on the fixed variation range MDF and the in-house ginsenoside library. In detail, these 579 ginsenosides collected in the in-house database were in accordance with 185 different masses after removing the repeated values. The integer mass and decimal mass were distinguished by using the mod and trunc functions of Excel. The variation range, {Decimal mass − 10 mDa, Decimal mass + 10 mDa}, combined with the integer mass, could generate a sieve for ginsenosides. The established “Ginsenoside Sieve” was utilized to screen target m/z values from the MS1 raw data of PJM processed by the MassHunter Workstation software.
Example 3
To gain further insight into the mode of action of ginsenoside M1, three assays targeting hallmarks of apoptosis, namely (1) the apoptotic DNA breaks assayed by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay, (2) the cell cycle assayed by flow cytometry after propidium iodide (PI)-staining nuclei, (3) the PI/Annexin V double staining assay, and (4) caspase activation were performed. Plate 1×106 human oral cancer cells OECM-1 per 6-cm dish in 2 ml of culture medium and were grown overnight at 37° C. in a 5% CO2 incubator. The cells were incubated for 24 h with ginsenoside M1 (10˜20 μg/ml), 50 μM cistaplatin (CDDP) or vehicle. Each group contains a final DMSO concentration of 0.1%. Thereafter, three assays were performed. We found that 20 μg/ml ginsenoside M1 and 50 μM CDDP, but not 10 μg/ml ginsenoside M1 significantly induced apoptotic DNA breaks in OECM-1 cells (
Example 6
To evaluate the anti-cancer activity of ginsenoside M1 in vivo, human oral cancer xenografts were used. Six-week-old male congenital athymic BALB/c nude (nu/nu) mice were purchased from BioLASCO Taiwan Co., Ltd (Ilan, Taiwan), and housed in a room under controlled temperature (23±3° C.) and relative humidity (50±5%). Animal experiments were performed with the approval of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the National Ilan University (approval number: No. 106-13) according to the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Xenografts mice were established by subcutaneous (SC) injection of 2×106 human oral cancer cells SAS (in 75 μl PBS+75 μl Matrigel) on the backs of the nude mice. After the tumor has reached about 40˜60 mm3 in size, the mice were randomized into six groups (six mice each): (1) oral vehicle control; (2) oral 30 mg/kg ginsenoside M1; (3) oral 60 mg/kg ginsenoside M1; (4) oral 90 mg/kg ginsenoside M1; (5) SC vehicle control; (6) SC 20 mg/kg ginsenoside M1. The mice were given a daily oral administration or SC injection of either vehicle or ginsenoside M1 for 5 successive days. The mice were scarified at 24 h after received the last dose of ginsenoside M1 or vehicle. The tumor volume (TV) was determined by measurement of the length (L) and width (W) of the tumor. The TV on day n (TVn) was calculated as TV (mm3)=(L×W2)/2. The relative tumor volume on day n (RTVn) versus day 0 was expressed according to the following formula: RTVn=TVn/TV0. We found that oral administration of ginsenoside M1 at 90 mg/kg significantly reduced the tumor size compared to vehicle control group; however, oral administration of ginsenoside M1 at 30 and 60 mg/kg did not significant reduce the tumor size (
In addition, SC injection of 20 mg/kg ginsenoside M1 also significantly reduced the tumor size (
Example 2
Plate 5×105 normal human gingival epithelioid cell line SG per 6-cm dish in 2 ml of culture medium and were grown overnight at 37° C. in a 5% CO2 incubator. The cells were incubated for 24 h with ginsenoside M1 (5˜20 μg/ml), ginsenoside Rh2 (5˜20 μg/ml) or vehicle. Each group contains a final DMSO concentration of 0.1%. Thereafter, the cell numbers were counted by Trypan blue exclusion method. We found that ginsenoside M1 showed less toxic to SG cells than ginsenoside Rh2 (
Top products related to «Ginsenoside M1»
More about "Ginsenoside M1"
It has garnered increasing research interest due to its potential therapeutic benefits, including anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and neuroprotective effects.
PubCompare.ai's AI-driven protocols can optimize your Ginsenoside M1 research by locating relevant protocols from literature, preprints, and patents, and using advanced AI comparisons to identify the best protocols and products.
This can simplify your research and accelerate your discoveries around this important compound.
Ginsenoside M1, also known as 20(S)-Ginsenoside Rh1, is a triterpenoid saponin that can be extracted from the Panax ginseng plant.
It has been the subject of numerous studies exploring its pharmacological properties and potential applications in various medical fields.
Research has indicated that Ginsenoside M1 may possess anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and neuroprotective effects, making it a promising candidate for the treatment of conditions such as neurodegenerative diseases, cancer, and metabolic disorders.
To optimize your research on Ginsenoside M1, PubCompare.ai's AI-driven protocols can help you locate relevant experimental protocols from the literature, preprints, and patents.
These protocols may include methods for the extraction and purification of Ginsenoside M1, as well as in vitro and in vivo assays to evaluate its biological activities.
The AI-driven comparisons can help you identify the most effective and efficient protocols, saving you time and resources in your research.
In addition to locating relevant protocols, PubCompare.ai's tools can also help you identify the best products and reagents for your Ginsenoside M1 research.
This may include 3H-thymidine for cell proliferation assays, the ABI 7500 system for gene expression analysis, Dihydroethidium (DHE) for oxidative stress measurement, the FACSCalibur analyzer for flow cytometry, and antibodies such as anti-mouse CD3 for immunological studies.
By streamlining your access to these essential research tools, PubCompare.ai can help you accelerate your discoveries around Ginsenoside M1 and its potential therapeutic applications.
Furthermore, PubCompare.ai's platform can provide insights into the latest research trends and developments related to Ginsenoside M1, including the identification of key subtopics such as the role of β-actin, SIRT3, and 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein diacetate in Ginsenoside M1-mediated cellular processes.
This information can help you stay up-to-date with the latest advancements in the field and inform the direction of your own research.
In summary, PubCompare.ai's AI-driven protocols can be a valuable resource for optimizing your Ginsenoside M1 research.
By locating relevant protocols, identifying the best products and reagents, and providing insights into the latest research trends, PubCompare.ai can simplify your research process and accelerate your discoveries around this important natural compound.