The largest database of trusted experimental protocols
> Chemicals & Drugs > Organic Chemical > Phenylethyl Alcohol

Phenylethyl Alcohol

Phenylethyl Alcohol is a chemical compound with the formula C6H5CH2CH2OH.
It is a clear, colorless liquid with a floral, rose-like odor, and is commonly used in perfumes, flavors, and personal care products.
This alcohol derivative has a variety of applications, including as a precurser for other chemicals and in the production of pharmaceuticals.
PubCompare.ai can help optimize your Phenylethyl Alcohol research by locating the best protocols from literature, preprints, and patents, and comparing them to identify the most reproducible and accurate methods.
Enhance your research with PubCompare.ai's powerful, convienent tool.

Most cited protocols related to «Phenylethyl Alcohol»

Data were obtained from 9139 subjects [4928 females aged 5–96 years (M = 31.8, SD = 18.9) and 4211 males aged 5–91 years (M = 30.7, SD = 17.7)]. Among them, 3432 (37.5%) had been included in a previous study to establish normative data [15 (link)]. According to the inclusion criteria for the respective studies, all subjects were healthy and none reported histories for any olfactory disturbances.
Odors were delivered using felt-tip pens (“Sniffin’ Sticks”) of approximately 14 cm length and an inner diameter of 1.3 cm. These pens carry a tampon soaked with 4 ml of liquid odorant. For odor presentation, the cap was removed from the pen for approximately 3 s, the pen’s tip brought in front of the subject’s nose and carefully moved from left to right nostril and backwards [3 (link)].
The threshold was obtained in a three alternative forced choice paradigm (3 AFC) where subjects were repeatedly presented with triplets of pens and had to discriminate one pen containing an odorous solution from two blanks filled with the solvent. Phenylethanol (dissolved in propylene glycol) or n-butanol (dissolved in water) were used, with both odorants having been found equivalent in olfactory sensitivity testing: scores obtained with both are correlated [17 (link)]. The highest concentration was a 4% odor solution. Sixteen concentrations were created by stepwise diluting previous ones by 1:2. Starting with the lowest odor concentration, a staircase paradigm was used where two subsequent correct identifications of the odorous pen or one incorrect answer marked a so-called turning point, and resulted in a decrease or increase, respectively, of concentration in the next triplet. Triplets were presented at 20 s intervals. The threshold score was the mean of the last four turning points in the staircase, with the final score ranging between 1 and 16 points.
The discrimination task used the same 3 AFC logic. Two pens of any triplet contained the same odorant, while the third pen smelled differently. Subjects were asked to indicate the single pen with a different smell. Within-triplet intervals were approximately 3 s. As the odors used in this subtest were more intense, between-triplets intervals were 20–30 s. The score was the sum of correctly identified odors. Hence, the scores in this task ranged from 0 to 16 points. Importantly, subjects were blindfolded for the threshold and discrimination tasks to avoid visual identification of target pens.
Odor identification comprised common and familiar odorants (recognized by at least 75% of the population). Subjects were presented with single pens and asked to identify and label the smell, using four alternative descriptors for each pen. Between-pen intervals were approximately 20–30 s. The total score was the sum of correctly identified pens, thus subjects could score between 0 and 16 points.
The final “TDI score” was the sum of scores for Threshold, Discrimination and Identification subtests, with a range between 1 and 48 points.
Publication 2018
Butyl Alcohol Discrimination, Psychology Feelings Females Hypersensitivity Males Nose Odorants Odors Phenylethyl Alcohol Propylene Glycol Sense of Smell Solvents Triplets

Protocol full text hidden due to copyright restrictions

Open the protocol to access the free full text link

Publication 2008
Calcium Capillaries cis-vaccenyl acetate ethyl caproate Forceps isobutylene Kidney Glomerulus Lip Microscopy Nervousness Odorants Odors Oil, Mineral Phenylethyl Alcohol Poaceae Pulses Reading Frames Sense of Smell Stimulations, Electric Strains Student Suction Drainage

GAUSSIAN09 (Frisch et al., 2009 ▸ ) was used to determine all pairwise intermolecular/interionic energies for calibration purposes, based on B3LYP-D2 calculations corrected for BSSE. For a very small number of crystal structures involving anion–cation pairs, supermolecule calculations at this level did not converge and these ion–ion pairs were not included in the fitting process, although energies for all other possible molecule/ion pairs in those structures were included. HF/3-21G monomer calculations also failed to converge for some open-shell molecules/ions [Cambridge Structural Database (CSD; Groom et al., 2016 ▸ ) refcodes ACACCR07, ACACVO04, CPNDYV07, IGACEC, JIYKEH, AFATAE and AGEFEX], and those structures were not included in the determination of scale factors for the CE-HF energy model. Perhaps of more consequence, the B3LYP-D2 counterpoise-corrected benchmark calculations provided quite obviously unacceptable energies for the crystalline salts ferrocenium tris­(hexa­fluoro­acetylacetonato)manganese(II) (AGEFEX), the 1,2-di­phenyl­ethylenediammonium N-phenyliminodiacetate ethanol sol­vate (KOLDUL), calcium α-ethylmalonate (CUZHEK) and sodium dihydrogen citrate (NAHCIT). For these crystal structures, the B3LYP-D2 counterpoise-cor­rected energies between pairs of ions were consistently much more binding than obtained with a simple electrostatic model; MP2/6-31G(d,p) counterpoise-corrected calculations were used as benchmark energies instead.
Publication 2017
Anions Calcium Electrostatics ethylmalonate ferrocenium Hexosaminidase A Hydrogen Ions Manganese Molecular Structure Phenylethyl Alcohol Salts Sodium Citrate Tromethamine
Total lignin content was determined by the two-step acid hydrolysis method according to Laboratory Analytical Procedure of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory. The lignin includes acid-insoluble and -soluble lignin. The acid-insoluble lignin was calculated gravimetrically after correction for ash, and the acid-soluble lignin was measured by UV spectroscopy.
For acid-insoluble lignin determination, a 0.5-g sample was recorded as W1. The sample was extracted with benzene-ethanol (2:1, v/v) in a Soxhlet for 4 h, and then air-dried in a hood overnight. The sample was hydrolyzed with 10 mL 72% H2SO4 (v/v) in a shaker at 30°C for 1.5 h. After hydrolysis, the acid was diluted to a concentration of 2.88%, and then placed in the autoclave for 1 h at 121°C (15 psi). The autoclaved hydrolysis solution was vacuum-filtered through the previously weighed filtering crucible. The filtrate was captured in a filtering flask for acid-soluble lignin. The lignin was washed free of acid with hot distilled water and the crucible and acid-insoluble residue was dried in an oven at 80°C until constant weight was achieved. Then, the samples were removed from the oven and cooled in a dry container. The weight of the crucible and dry residue was recorded to the nearest 0.1 mg (W2). Finally the dried residue was ashed in the muffle furnace at 200°C for 30 minutes and at 575°C for 4 h. The crucibles and ash were weighed to the nearest 0.1 mg and we recorded the weight (W3). The acid-insoluble lignin (AIL) of the original sample was calculated as follows:
AIL%=W2W3×100/W1%.
Each sample was tested in biological triplicate. For the acid-soluble lignin determination, the acid-soluble lignin was solubilized during the hydrolysis process, and was measured by UV spectroscopy. The hydrolysis liquor obtained previously was transferred into a 250-mL volumetric flask and brought up to 250 mL with 2.88% sulfuric acid. The absorbance of the sample was read at 205 nm using UV–vis spectroscopy (Beckman Coulter Inc., Du800), and 2.88% sulfuric acid was used as blank. The method of calculation for the amount of acid-soluble lignin was as follows:
ASL%=A×D×V/1000×K×W1×100%
Where A is the absorption value, D is the dilution ratio of the sample, and K (the absorptivity constant) = 110 L/g/cm.
Totallignin%=ASL%+AIL%.
All experiments were carried out in triplicate.
Publication 2013
Acids Amniotic Fluid Biopharmaceuticals Hydrolysis Lignin Phenylethyl Alcohol Spectrum Analysis Sulfuric Acids Technique, Dilution Vacuum
For the strains and plasmids used in this study and a detailed description of their construction, see Text S1. Unless otherwise noted, P. putida KT2440 and E. coli strains were maintained on solidified (1.5% [wt/vol] agar) LB medium (66 ). Strains were routinely cultured in liquid LB medium, a modified M9 salt medium containing 68 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7), 18.6 mM NH4Cl, 8.6 mM NaCl, 2 mM MgSO4, and 100 µM CaCl2 with a trace element solution containing Na3-citrate at 51 µM, ZnSO4 at 7 µM, MnCl2 at 5 µM, CuSO4 at 4 µM, FeSO4 at 36 µM, H3BO3 at 5 µM, NaMoO4 at 137 nM, and NiCl2 at 84 nM or modified MP medium (67 (link)) containing 100 instead of 20 µM CaCl2 supplemented with succinate or 2-phenylethanol as the sole source of carbon and energy at 30°C with shaking. Where indicated, 40 µg ml−1 kanamycin or 15 µg ml−1 gentamicin for E. coli or 40 µg ml−1 kanamycin, 20 µg ml−1 5-fluorouracil, or 30 µg ml−1 gentamicin for P. putida strains was added to the medium for maintenance and selection, respectively.
Publication 2017
Agar Buffers Carbon Citrates Escherichia coli Fluorouracil Gentamicin Kanamycin manganese chloride Phenylethyl Alcohol Phosphates Plasmids Sodium Chloride Strains Succinate Sulfate, Magnesium Trace Elements

Most recents protocols related to «Phenylethyl Alcohol»

All reagents were used as received without further purification. Nickel chloride hexahydrate (NiCl2·6H2O), pyrazine, pyrimidine, 4,4-bipyridine, ethanol (≥ 99.7%), N,N-dimethylformamide, methanol, 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol, 2-phenylethanol, 1-propanol, 3-propanol, furfural, 1,4-butanediol, 1,6-hexanediol, ethylamine, 1-phenylethylamine, cyclohexanol, cyclohexylamine, 1-propylamine, 2-aminoethanol, urea, glycerol, glucose, 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (5-HMF), ethylene glycol and 1-hexanethiol were all purchased from Aladdin Industrial Corporation (China). Potassium hydroxide (KOH) was purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (China). 1,1,1-trifluoro-2-propanol, 1-phenylethanol, benzaldehyde and 2-propylamine were purchased from Innochem Alfa Acros (China). Methyl mercaptan was purchased from Macklin Biochemical Co., Ltd. (China). 2,2,2-trifluoroethylamine and benzylamine were purchased from Shanghai Titan Scientific Co., Ltd. (China). Ultrapure deionized water (18.2 MΩ·cm−1, 25 oC) was obtained from ELGA purification system (China). Anion exchange membrane was obtained from Fumatech (FAB-PK-130, Germany). Carbon fiber paper was purchased from Hesen Electric Co., Ltd. (HCP020N, China).
Publication 2023
1-phenylethanol 1-Propanol 2-propylamine 5-hydroxymethylfurfural Anions benzaldehyde Benzylamines Butylene Glycols Carbon Fiber Cyclohexanol Cyclohexylamines Dimethylformamide Electricity Ethanol Ethanolamine ethylamine Furaldehyde Glucose Glycerin Glycol, Ethylene Methanol methylmercaptan nickel chloride hexahydrate Phenethylamines Phenylethyl Alcohol PK 130 potassium hydroxide Propylamines Pyrazines Pyrimidines Tissue, Membrane Trifluoroethanol trifluoroethylamine Urea
Mechanical detection and pain thresholds and electrical detection and pain thresholds were obtained at baseline and after 3 months of olfactory training. Testing areas were the volar lower arms. The mechanical detection threshold (MDT) was measured with a standardized set of modified von Frey hairs that exert forces between 0.25 and 512 mN (21 (link)). Mechanical pain threshold (MPT) was measured using the PinPrick stimulators, which exert forces between 8 and 512 mN (21 (link)). For both tests, the geometric mean of five series of ascending and descending stimulus intensities was selected as the threshold value. For the electrical detection and pain thresholds, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) equipment was used. TENS is used in a therapeutic setting, so it is a well-tolerated system to measure electric thresholds in children and adolescents (22 (link)). The electrical detection threshold was measured by a single stimulus of increasing electric current until participants detected the stimulus. After that, a stepwise increase in mA led to the level of perception of pain.
Olfactory testing was performed before and after the 3-month training period using the “Sniffin' Sticks” test kit (23 (link)), which involves tests for odor threshold, odor discrimination, and odor identification. The threshold test comprises 16 triplets of Sniffin' Stick pens, where one of the three pens is impregnated with N-butanol or phenylethylalcohol (BUT/PEA) diluted in a solvent according to a decreasing concentration. The children should specify the odor pen among the set of three pens presented. The second subtest assessed the ability of the patients to discriminate different odors. In this test, patients were also exposed to 16 triplets of odors, including two identical odors and one different odor. The task was to identify the odor, which differed from the other two pens. Eyes must be closed or blindfolded for both threshold and discrimination tests. The identification subtest consists of 16 common odors. The study participants were asked to choose from a list of four written proposals (24 (link)). The sum of the scores of the three subtests resulted in the Threshold, Discrimination, Identification (TDI) score, with a maximum of 48 points.
Publication 2023
Adolescent Arm, Upper Butyl Alcohol Child Discrimination, Psychology Electricity Eye Hair Menstruation Disturbances Odors Pain Perception Patients Phenylethyl Alcohol Sense of Smell Solvents Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation Triplets
All extracts were analyzed using a GC fitted with a DB-5MS UI column (30 m × 0.25 mm ID × 0.25 μm film, product: 122-5532UI; Agilent Tech., Santa Clara, CA, USA) and coupled to a mass spectrometer (GC-MS; GC: 7890A, MS: 5062C, Agilent Tech.). Helium was used as a carrier gas flowing at 1 mL min−1 with a temperature program beginning at 45–50 °C (held for 2 min), followed by an increase of 3 °C min−1 to 70 °C, then 5 °C min−1 to 130 °C, after that 12 °C min−1 to 170 °C, and finally the column temperature was brought to 300 °C (held 2 min) at a rate of 30 °C min−1. A 1 μL sample injection volume was used; the injector temperature was 250 °C, and samples were run in splitless mode. The Sim and Scan acquisition mode was conducted simultaneously; while Sim mode allows us to acquire low traces of VOC and terpene compounds, Scan mode is performed for identification purposes. The NIST 2017 Mass Spectral library version 2.3 was used for the verification of all compounds. All compounds were quantified based on the following standards availability: Monoterpenes: limonene (Chem Purity: >99%, racemic mixture), β-pinene (CP: >99%, RM), β-myrcene (CP: 90%), α-pinene (CP: 98%, RM), β-phellandrene (CP: 96%, RM), α-phellandrene (CP: 95%), p-cymene (CP: >99%), terpinolene (CP: 90%), 3-carene (CP: 98.5%, RM), camphene (CP: 90%, RM), α-terpinene (CP: 85%), γ-terpinene (CP: 97%), ocimene (CP: 90%), Oxygenated monoterpenes: (-)-borneol (>99%), camphor (CP: 95%), α-terpineol (CP: 90%, RM), linalool (CP: 97%), cis-grandisol (CP: >95%), verbenone (CP: >99%), Phenylpropenes: 4-allylanisole (CP: 98.5%), Sesquiterpenes: (+) aromadendrene (CP: 97%), caryophyllene oxide (CP: 95%), β-caryophyllene (CP: 80%), Aliphatics/others: iso-butanol (CP: >99%), phenethyl alcohol (CP: >99%), 2-methyl-1-butanol (CP: >99%), phenethyl acetate (CP: >98%), 3-methyl-1-butanol (CP: >98%), iso-amyl acetate (CP: >97%), acetoin (CP: >96%),. All standards were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Oakville, ON, Canada), except β-phellandrene from TRC Canada (Toronto, ON, Canada). For the quantitation of some sesquiterpene compounds, due to their unavailability in the market, we used some of the above-mentioned standards to quantify based on hydrocarbon groups along with unique ion masses.
Publication 2023
3-carene 4-cymene A(2)C Acetate Acetoin amyl acetate ARID1A protein, human aromadendrene beta-caryophyllene borneol Butyl Alcohol camphene Camphor caryophyllene oxide d-Limonene DNA Library estragole Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry grandisol Helium Hydrocarbons isopentyl alcohol linalool Monoterpenes myrcene Phenylethyl Alcohol Radionuclide Imaging Sesquiterpenes Terpenes terpinolene tert-amyl alcohol verbenone
Standards of volatile and phenolic compounds were commercially obtained as follows: (Z)-3-hexen-1-ol (Toronto research chemicals Inc., Toronto, CA, USA); linalool, nonanal, phenylethyl alcohol, decanal, eugenol, 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene, 3-hydroxytyrosol, caffeic acid, vanillin, trans-p-coumaric acid, trans-o-coumaric acid, apigenin-7-glucoside, oleuropein, pinoresinol, quercetin, luteolin, apigenin, diosmetin tyrosol, rutin, luteolin-7-glucoside, oleacein, and ligstroside from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA); verbascoside (HWI group, Rülzheim, Germany); and oleuroside (Phytolab, Vestenbergsgreuth, Germany). Alkane standard solutions C8-C20 and C10, C20-C40, and derivatization reagent N,O-Bis(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacet-amide (BSTFA) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA); pentane, diethyl-ether, acetonitrile, and methanol were from VWR (Radnor, PA, USA); and anhydrous sodium sulfate was from Kemika (Zagreb, Croatia).
Publication 2023
3-hexen-1-ol 4-hydroxyphenylethanol acetonitrile acteoside Alkanes Amides Apigenin apigetrin caffeic acid Coumaric Acids decanal diosmetin Ethyl Ether Eugenol hydroxytyrosol ligstroside linalool Luteolin luteolin-7-glucoside Methanol N,N-bis(trimethylsilyl)-2,2,2-trifluoroacetamide nonanal oleacein oleuropein pentane Phenylethyl Alcohol pinoresinol Quercetin Rutin sodium sulfate vanillin
Residual oil was extracted from the culture medium with 50 mL chloroform (2:1 v/v); the extract was separated by centrifugation for 30 min at 4500 rpm and dried by stirring over 3 g anhydrous sodium sulphate. To remove the chloroform, the tare tubes with 5 mL of the extract were incubated at 70–75 °C for 4 h and then at 35–40 °C overnight and weighed.
The fractional composition of residual oil was assessed by adsorption chromatography using micro-columns filled with 0.7 g silica gel 60, 63–200 microns RE (70–230 mesh) (Panreac, Spain). The sorbent was equilibrated with hexane. Samples (50 mg each) obtained by extraction during the weight analysis were dispersed in 1 mL of hexane, applied on microcolumns and left for 20 min. Elution of hydrocarbons was carried out with hexane, benzene, and a benzene/ethanol mixture in a ratio of 1:1 (v/v) in four portions of 1 mL into tare tubes. The obtained hexane, benzene and alcohol–benzene fractions were evaporated in air and dried in a ventilated desiccator at 75 °C to constant weight. The content of the fractions was calculated in terms of the original sample weight. Losses of the original sample due to irreversible sorption on silica gel in these conditions were conventionally taken as asphaltenes and high molecular weight resinous substances.
Publication 2023
A-A-1 antibiotic Adsorption asphaltene Benzene Centrifugation Chloroform Chromatography Culture Media Ethanol Hydrocarbons n-hexane Phenylethyl Alcohol Resins, Plant Silica Gel sodium sulfate Vicia sativa

Top products related to «Phenylethyl Alcohol»

Sourced in Germany, United States, Poland, United Kingdom
2-phenylethanol is a chemical compound used in various laboratory applications. It is a clear, colorless liquid with a rose-like odor. 2-phenylethanol is commonly used as a precursor in chemical synthesis and as a fragrance ingredient.
Sourced in United States, Germany, China, India, United Kingdom, Canada, Italy, Spain, Belgium, Australia
Benzaldehyde is a clear, colorless liquid with a characteristic almond-like odor. It is a widely used organic compound that serves as a precursor and intermediate in the synthesis of various chemicals and pharmaceuticals.
Sourced in United States, Germany, Italy, United Kingdom, China, Spain, France, Brazil, Switzerland, Poland, Australia, Hungary, Belgium, Sao Tome and Principe
Linalool is a naturally occurring terpene alcohol found in various plant species. It is a colorless to pale yellow liquid with a floral, citrus-like aroma. Linalool is commonly used as a fragrance ingredient in personal care products and as a flavoring agent in food and beverages. Its core function is as a chemical precursor and intermediate in the synthesis of other compounds.
Sourced in Germany, United States, India, Italy, United Kingdom, Poland, France, Spain, Sao Tome and Principe, China, Australia, Switzerland, Macao, Chile, Belgium, Brazil, Ireland, Canada, Portugal, Indonesia, Denmark, Mexico, Japan
Ethyl acetate is a clear, colorless liquid solvent commonly used in laboratory applications. It has a characteristic sweet, fruity odor. Ethyl acetate is known for its ability to dissolve a variety of organic compounds, making it a versatile tool in chemical research and analysis.
Sourced in United States, China, Germany
Phenylethyl alcohol is a colorless liquid organic compound with a floral, rose-like aroma. It is commonly used as a fragrance and flavoring agent in various industries.
Sourced in United States, Germany, United Kingdom, Brazil, Italy, Macao, China, India, Belgium, France
Geraniol is a naturally occurring alcohol compound commonly found in the essential oils of various plant species, such as geraniums, lemongrass, and citronella. It is a colorless or pale yellow liquid with a floral, rose-like aroma. Geraniol is used as a fragrance component in personal care products and as a flavoring agent in food and beverage applications.
Sourced in United States, Germany, Spain, Italy
Ethyl octanoate is a colorless, mobile liquid compound. It has the chemical formula C10H20O2. Ethyl octanoate is commonly used as a flavoring agent and in the production of various industrial chemicals.
Sourced in United States, Germany, United Kingdom, India, Macao, China, Sweden, France
Benzyl alcohol is a colorless organic liquid that is commonly used as a solvent and preservative in various laboratory applications. It has a mild, aromatic odor and is miscible with water, alcohol, and many organic solvents. Benzyl alcohol is a versatile chemical that serves as a key component in numerous laboratory procedures and experiments.
Sourced in United States, Germany, China, Spain, United Kingdom
Ethyl hexanoate is a colorless, volatile, and flammable organic compound. It is commonly used as a flavoring agent and solvent in various industries. Ethyl hexanoate has a fruity, sweet aroma and is naturally found in some fruits and fermented products.
Sourced in United States, Germany, China, United Kingdom
Isoamyl acetate is a colorless, volatile liquid with a distinctive banana-like aroma. It is commonly used as a flavoring agent and in the production of various solvents and chemicals.

More about "Phenylethyl Alcohol"