Sodium tartrate
It is commonly used as a buffer, a complexing agent, and a food additive.
Sodium tartrate has been studied for its potential applications in fields such as biochemistry, analytical chemistry, and materials science.
Researchers often need to find the most reliable and effective protocols for working with sodium tartrate, which can be challenging given the large volume of available literature.
PubCompare.ai's AI-driven research protocol comparison can help scientists streamline their sodium tartrate experiments, improve reproducibility, and get better results by easily locating the best protocols from literature, pre-prints, and patents, while its AI-powered comparisons ensure the most reliable and effective methods are identified.
With PubCompare.ai, researchers can save time, reduce errors, and focus on advancing their sodium tartrate-related studies.
Most cited protocols related to «Sodium tartrate»
years old) were used in the present study. This study was conducted under Nihon University
Animal Care and Use Committee approval (AP12B015). All dogs were premedicated intravenously
with midazolam hydrochloride (0.2 mg/kg; Astellas Pharma Inc., Tokyo, Japan) and butorphanol
tartrate (0.2 mg/kg; Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Anesthesia was induced
with an intravenous injection of propofol (4.0 mg/kg; Intervet K.K., Osaka, Japan) and
maintained with 1.5 to 2.0% isoflurane (Intervet K.K.) in 100% oxygen given in an
endotracheal tube. Butorphanol tartrate (0.2 mg/kg) was again administered intravenously for
pain relief before awakening. Canine BMSCs were isolated as described previously [8 (link), 20 (link)]. Briefly,
canine bone marrow was aspirated from the humerus, and mononuclear cells were separated by
density gradient centrifugation using Histopaque-1077 (Sigma-Aldrich Inc., St. Louis, MO,
U.S.A.). Following collection, the mononuclear cells were then transferred to a
75-cm2 plastic culture flask (Corning Inc. Life Sciences, Lowell, MA, U.S.A.)
and static-cultured in an incubator at 5% CO2 and 37°C using α-modified Eagle
minimum essential medium (Life Technologies Co., Carlsbad, CA, U.S.A.) with 10% fetal bovine
serum (FBS; Life Technologies Co.). On the fourth day of culture, nonadherent cells were
removed when the culture medium was replaced, thus isolating canine BMSCs. Canine BMSCs were
harvested using 0.25% trypsin-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (Life Technologies Co.) once
they reached approximately 90% confluence. Then, the collected cells were seeded at a
density of 14,000 cells/cm2. The second-passage canine BMSCs were used for the
following all experiments.
Flow cytometry: Cultured canine BMSCs were characterized by flow cytometry
analysis based on the previous report [31 (link)]. The cells
were placed in 5 ml round-bottom tubes (BD Biosciences, Tokyo, Japan) at 1
× 105 cells/tube with phosphate buffered saline (PBS; Sigma-Aldrich Inc.)
containing 0.5% FBS and incubated with antibodies, including the anti-human CD29 mouse
monoclonal antibody (eBioscience Inc., San Diego, CA, U.S.A.), the PE-conjugated anti-canine
CD34 mouse monoclonal antibody (eBioscience Inc.), the anti-human/mouse CD44 rat monoclonal
antibody (eBioscience Inc.) and the FITC-conjugated anti-canine CD45 rat monoclonal antibody
(eBioscience Inc.) at 4°C for 45 min. Alexa fluor® 488-conjugated goat anti-mouse
or rat IgG antibody (Life Technologies Co.) was used to label anti-CD29 and anti-CD44
antibodies, respectively, in darkness at 4°C for 30 min. To exclude dying cells, propidium
iodide (Life Technologies Co.) was added at a final concentration of 2.5
µg/ml. An equal number of cells incubated with
respective isotype control antibodies or only secondary antibodies were used as a control
sample. The data were analyzed by recording 10,000 events on BD FACS Canto™ (BD Biosciences)
by means of BD FACS Diva™ software (BD Biosciences) and FLOWJO software (Tree star Inc.,
Ashland, OR, U.S.A.).
Neuronal induction using bFGF: Canine BMSCs were placed in a
25-cm2 plastic culture flask (Corning Inc. Life Sciences) at a density of 4,000
cells/cm2. The neuronal induction using bFGF was conducted as described
previously [10 (link), 37 (link)]. Briefly, the medium was changed to Neurobasal-A medium (Life Technologies
Co.) supplemented with 2% B-27 supplement (Life Technologies Co.) and 100
ng/ml recombinant human bFGF (Immunostep, Salamanca,
Spain) at 24 hr of passage. Neurobasal-A medium supplemented with 2% B-27 supplement without
bFGF was used as the medium in the control group. The neuronal induction medium was changed
every 3 days. The cells were harvested using 0.25% trypsin-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid
at 0, 3, 5 and 10 days after the treatment, and their viability was assessed by means of a
trypan blue exclusion assay (Wako Pure Chemical Industries Ltd., Osaka, Japan). The
morphology of these cells was evaluated under an inverted microscope at indicated time
points.
Real-time RT-PCR: Total RNAs were extracted from canine BMSCs before and
after 3, 5, 10 days of the incubation with bFGF by using TRIzol® reagent (Life
Technologies Co.). Canine BMSCs incubated in Neurobasal-A medium supplemented with 2% B-27
supplement without bFGF were used as a control group. The first-strand cDNA synthesis was
carried out with 500 ng of total RNA using PrimeScript® RT
Master Mix (TaKaRa Bio Inc., Otsu, Japan). Real-time RT-PCRs were performed with 2
µl of the first-strand cDNA in 25 µl (total reaction
volume) with primers specific for canine neuronal (microtubule-associated protein 2
[MAP2], neurofilament light chain [NF-L] and
neuron-specific enolase [NSE]), neural stem cells (nestin
[NES]) and glial (glial fibrillary acidic protein
[GFAP]) markers (
1
Gene Name | Gene bank ID | Primer sequences |
---|---|---|
Microtubule-associated protein 2 (MAP2) | XM_845165.1 | F: 5′-AAGCATCAACCTGCTCGAATCC-3′ |
R: 5′-GCTTAGCGAGTGCAGCAGTGAC-3′ | ||
Neurofilament light chain (NF-L) | XM_534572.2 | F: 5′-TGAATATCATGGGCAGAAGTGGAA-3′ |
R: 5′-GGTCAGGATTGCAGGCAACA-3′ | ||
Neuron-specific enolase (NSE) | XM_534902.2 | F: 5′-GCATCCAGGCAGAGCAATCA-3′ |
R: 5′-AATGGGTGGATGCAGCACAA-3′ | ||
Nestin (NES) | XM_547531.2 | F: 5′-GGACGGGCTTGGTGTCAATAG-3′ |
R: 5′-AGACTGCTGCAGCCCATTCA-3′ | ||
Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) | XM_537614.2 | F: 5′-GCAGAAGTTCCAGGATGAAACCA-3′ |
R: 5′-TCTCCAGATCCAGACGGGCTA-3′ | ||
Glucuronidase β (GUSB) | NM_001003191.1 | F: 5′-ACATCGACGACATCACCGTCA-3′ |
R: 5′-GGAAGTGTTCACTGCCCTGGA-3′ |
RT-PCRs of no template controls were performed with 2 µl of RNase- and
DNA-free water. In addition, real-time PCRs of no-reverse transcription controls were
performed with 2 µl of each RNA sample. The PCRs were conducted using
Thermal Cycler Dice® Real Time System II (TaKaRa Bio Inc.). The PCR reactions
consisted of 1 cycle of denaturing at 95°C for 30 sec, 40 cycles of denaturing at 95°C for 5
sec and annealing and extension at 60°C for 30 sec. The specificity of each primer was
verified using dissociation curve analysis and direct sequencing of each PCR product. The
results were analyzed by means of the second derivative method and the comparative cycle
threshold (ΔΔCt) method using TP900 DiceRealTime v4.02B (TaKaRa Bio Inc.). Amplification of
β-glucuronidase [GUSB] from the same amount of cDNA was used as an
endogenous control, and the amplification of the cDNA from non-treated canine BMSCs (0 day)
was used as a calibrator standard.
Western blotting: Canine BMSCs before and after 3, 5 and 10 days of the
induction with or without bFGF were lysed with lysis buffer containing 100 mM
4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid, 1 mM phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride and
complete mini EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) at pH 7.4.
Protein concentrations were adjusted using Bradford’s method [2 (link)]. Extracted proteins were boiled at 95°C for 5 min in sodium dodecyl sulfate
buffer. Samples containing 10 µg of protein were loaded in each lane of
7.5% Mini-PROTEAN TGX gel (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, U.S.A.) and electrophoretically separated.
Separated proteins were transferred to Immobilon-P Transfer Membranes (Merck Millipore,
Billerica, MA, U.S.A.), treated with Block Ace (DS Pharma Biomedical, Osaka, Japan) for 50
min at room temperature and incubated for 120 min at room temperature with the primary
antibodies: anti-human neurofilament light chain (NF-L) protein mouse monoclonal antibody
(1:100; Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Rockford, IL, U.S.A.), anti-human neuron-specific
enolase (NSE) mouse monoclonal antibody (1:200; DAKO North America Inc., Carpinteria, CA,
U.S.A.) and anti-β-actin mouse monoclonal antibody (1:5,000; Sigma-Aldrich Inc.). After
washing, the membranes were incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse IgG
(1:10,000; GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ, U.S.A.) for 90 min at room temperature.
Immunoreactivity was detected using ECL Western blotting Analysis System (GE Healthcare).
The chemiluminescent signals of the membranes were measured using ImageQuant LAS 4000 mini
(GE Healthcare).
Immunocytochemistry: Canine BMSCs were seeded on 35-mm glass base dish
(Iwaki, Tokyo, Japan) and cultured for 24 hr. Before and after 10 days of the neuronal
induction with or without bFGF, these cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (Nacalai
Tesque Inc., Kyoto, Japan) for 15 min and processed for immunocytochemistry to examine the
protein expression and the cellular localization of neuronal markers. The fixed cells were
permeabilized by means of incubation in 0.2% Triton™ X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich Inc.) for 15 min
at room temperature. Non-specific antibody reactions were blocked for 30 min with a
serum-free blocking solution (DAKO North America Inc.). These cells were then incubated for
90 min at room temperature with primary antibodies: an anti-human NF-L protein mouse
monoclonal antibody (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.) and an anti-human NSE mouse monoclonal
antibody (DAKO North America Inc.). After a wash with PBS, these cells were incubated and
visualized with Alexa fluor® 594-conjugated F (abʹ)2 fragments of goat
anti-mouse IgG (H+L) (Life Technologies Co.), Alexa fluor® 488-conjugated
phalloidin (Life Technologies Co.) and TO-PRO®-3-iodide (Life Technologies Co.)
for 60 min in darkness at room temperature. The cells were also incubated with only
secondary antibodies to control for nonspecific binding of the antibodies. Canine spinal
cords were used as a positive control. These samples were washed 3 times with PBS, dried,
mounted with ProLong® Gold Antifade Reagent (Life Technologies Co.) and observed
with a confocal laser scanning microscope (LSM-510; Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany).
Ca2+ imaging: Canine BMSCs were seeded on 35-mm glass base
dishes at a density of 4,000 cells/cm2. After 10 days of the neuronal induction
with or without bFGF, the cells were incubated in 1 ml of Neurobasal-A
medium containing 2% B-27 supplement and 4.0 µM Fluo3-AM (Dojindo Lab.,
Kumamoto, Japan) with or without 100 ng/ml bFGF for 30 min at 37°C in the dark. Following incubation, the
cells were washed twice in PBS. After washing, the culture medium was changed to a
Ca2+ imaging buffer (containing 120 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 0.96 mM
NaH2PO4, 1 mM MgCl2, 11.1 mM glucose, 1 mM
CaCl2, 1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin and 10 mM
4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid; pH 7.4). The glass base dishes with the
fluorescent dye-loaded cells were placed at room temperature on the stage of a confocal
laser scanning microscope (LSM510). Fluorescence of the dye was produced using excitation
from a 75-W xenon arc lamp with appropriate filter sets (excitation 488 nm and emission 527
nm). Frames in a time lapse sequence were captured every 2 sec. After baseline images were
acquired, the cells were stimulated with 50 mM KCl (Wako Pure Chemical Industries Ltd.) or
100 µM L-glutamate (Wako Pure Chemical Industries Ltd.). The relative
changes in intracellular Ca2+ concentrations over time were expressed as relative
change in baseline fluorescence.
Inhibitor treatments: Canine BMSCs were placed in a 25-cm2 plastic culture flask at a density of 4,000
cells/cm2. The cells were pretreated with Neurobasal-A medium supplemented with
2% B-27 supplement containing the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitor SU5402
(25 µM; Sigma-Aldrich Inc.), the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor
LY294002 (50 µM; Cell Signaling Technology Japan K.K., Tokyo, Japan) or the
Akt inhibitor MK2206 (1 µM; Selleck chemicals Llc., Houston, TX, U.S.A.)
for 1 hr as previously reported methods with slight modifications [37 (link)], and then, neuronal induction using bFGF (100
ng/ml) was performed. After 3 days of the neuronal
induction using bFGF, total RNAs were extracted from each sample, and then, real-time
RT-PCRs were performed to evaluate the mRNA expression of MAP2 as described
above.
Data analysis: The data for these experiments were calculated as mean ±
standard error. Statistical analyses were performed using StatMate IV (ATMS, Tokyo, Japan).
The comparison of the data between the bFGF group and the control group was analyzed by
means of the unpaired t test. The data from the time course study by real-time RT-PCR were
analyzed using two-way analysis of variance, and Tukey’s test was used as post hoc analysis.
The data from the inhibitor study were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance, and
Tukey’s test was used as post hoc analysis. The values of P less than 0.05 were considered
significant.
The samples were incubated at 60 ˚C for one hour before cooling to room temperature in accordance with the standard procedures. All the absorbances were corrected by the corresponding blank replicate. The absorbance of the blank solution was 0.048±0.006. Absorbance at 562 nm was measured by spectrophotometer (Tianmei Company, Beijing) using glass cuvettes with optical path length of 0.1 cm.
Preparation of reagents: 10 g of 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid plus 2 g of phenol, 0.5 g of sodium sulphite and 10 g of sodium hydroxide were dissolved in 800 mL of water. The volume was adjusted to 1 L and the solution stored in a sealed Duran bottle at room temperature (stable for >2 months). Rochelle’s salt solution was prepared by dissolving 80 g of potassium sodium tartrate in 120 mL of water and then adjusting the volume to 200 mL with water. The solution was stored in a sealed Duran bottle at room temperature and is stable for several years.
Preparation of substrate solutions: 1.0 g of beechwood xylan, birchwood xylan or wheat flour arabinoxylan was added to 90 mL of 100 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 4.5) and dissolved by stirring at approximately 50 °C for 10 min on a magnetic stirrer hotplate. The volume was adjusted to 100 mL with 100 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 4.5) and the solution stored in a well-sealed Duran bottle at room temperature. Substrate was also prepared in 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.0) using the same procedure. Two drops of toluene was added to each bottle to prevent microbial contamination.
Preparation of endo-xylanase preparations: Pure suspensions of endo-xylanase in ammonium sulphate (3.2 M) as supplied by Megazyme (see “
Assay procedure: Multiple aliquots of 1.8 mL of substrate solution in 16 × 120 mm glass test tubes were pre-equilibrated for 5 min at 40 °C. The reaction was initiated by adding 0.2 mL of pre-equilibrated, suitably diluted endo-xylanase solution and incubating the tubes at 40 °C. The reaction was terminated after various time intervals by adding 3 mL of DNSA reagent solution with vigorous stirring. Reagent blanks were prepared by adding 3 mL of DNSA reagent to 1.8 mL of substrate solution plus 0.2 mL of the buffer solution as used in the assay, and the tube contents were mixed immediately. Enzyme blanks were prepared by adding 3 mL of DNSA reagent to 1.8 mL of substrate solution plus 0.2 mL of the enzyme solution as used in the assay and the tube contents mixed immediately. The xylose/xylo-oligosaccharide standards were prepared by adding 3 mL of DNSA solution to 1.8 mL substrate solution plus 0.2 mL of xylose or xylo-oligosaccharide standard (0–2 μmoles/0.2 mL). All tubes (reaction, reagent blanks, enzyme blanks and xylose and xylo-oligosaccharide standards) were placed in a boiling water bath and incubated for 15 min. The tubes were removed from the boiling water bath, and 1 mL of 40 % Rochelles salt solution was added immediately and the tube contents mixed immediately on a vortex mixer. The tubes were cooled at room temperature over approximately 15 min, and the contents were then re-mixed. The absorbance of the xylose and xylo-oligosaccharide standards was measured against the reagent blank at 540 nm. Concurrently, the absorbance of the reaction solutions was measured against the enzyme blank at 540 nm. The rate of hydrolysis was calculated as micromoles of xylose reducing sugar equivalent released per minute. One unit of A. niger endo-xylanase activity is defined as the amount of enzyme required to release 1 μmole of xylose reducing sugar equivalents per minute from the xylan or arabinoxylan substrate at pH 4.5 and at 40 °C.
Most recents protocols related to «Sodium tartrate»
ethylene, n-hexane, gallic acid, sodium hydro-oxide,
dimethyl sulfoxide, acarbose, buffer solution, potassium sodium tartrate,
DNS (3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid), amylase (aspergillus), etc. were
used in the experiments. Majority of the reagents were purchased from
Sigma-Alrdich (Steinheim, Germany).
Top products related to «Sodium tartrate»
More about "Sodium tartrate"
It is a salt of tartaric acid and is widely used in scientific research and various industries.
Sodium tartrate is commonly employed as a buffer, complexing agent, and food additive due to its unique properties.
In biochemistry, sodium tartrate is often utilized as a buffer to maintain specific pH levels in experiments involving enzymes, proteins, and other biomolecules.
It is also used as a complexing agent to facilitate the extraction and purification of various compounds.
Within analytical chemistry, sodium tartrate plays a crucial role in colorimetric assays, such as the 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) assay, which is commonly used to measure the reducing sugars produced by enzymatic reactions.
Sodium tartrate can also be used in combination with other compounds, such as sodium hydroxide, potassium sodium tartrate tetrahydrate, and hydrochloric acid, to create buffer systems for various analytical applications.
In materials science, sodium tartrate has been investigated for its potential applications in areas like catalysis, energy storage, and the development of novel materials.
Researchers often explore the use of sodium tartrate as a precursor or template in the synthesis of advanced materials.
To ensure the reliability and effectiveness of their sodium tartrate-related experiments, scientists may consult the available literature, including scientific publications, preprints, and patents.
However, navigating the large volume of information can be challenging.
PubCompare.ai's AI-driven research protocol comparison can help researchers streamline their sodium tartrate experiments, improve reproducibility, and achieve better results by easily identifying the most reliable and effective protocols from the available literature.
By utilizing PubCompare.ai, researchers can save time, reduce errors, and focus on advancing their sodium tartrate-related studies, ultimately contributing to the progress in fields such as biochemistry, analytical chemistry, and materials science.