The largest database of trusted experimental protocols
> Chemicals & Drugs > Organic Chemical > Tetrahydrofuran

Tetrahydrofuran

Tetrahydrofuran (THF) is a cyclic ether with the chemical formula C4H8O.
It is a versatile organic solvent used in a variety of applications, including chemical synthesis, polymer production, and pharmaceutical research.
THF is known for its ability to dissolve a wide range of polar and non-polar compounds, making it a valuable tool in organic chemistry.
Researchers utilize THF in a range of protocols, from purification and extraction to the synthesis of complex organic molecules.
The efficient optimization of THF-based research protocols can greatly enhance productivity and innovation in fields such as drug discovery and materials science.
PubCompare.ai's AI-driven platform offers a powerful solution for identifying the most effective THF-related methods and products, saving time and effort in the lab.

Most cited protocols related to «Tetrahydrofuran»

Protocol full text hidden due to copyright restrictions

Open the protocol to access the free full text link

Publication 2009
3,4-Dihydroxyphenylacetic Acid Acetic Acid acetonitrile Ascorbic Acid Biological Assay Brain Buffers Carbon Cerebrospinal Fluid Chromatography Dopamine Edetic Acid Ethanol Fishes Freezing High-Performance Liquid Chromatographies Hydroxyindoleacetic Acid Hypersensitivity Microscopy Perchloric Acid POU3F2 protein, human Proteins Pulse Rate Retention (Psychology) Serotonin Sodium Chloride sodium polymetaphosphate Solvents tetrahydrofuran
hsiRNA design. We designed and synthesized a panel of 94 hsiRNA compounds (Supplementary Table S1) targeting the human huntingtin gene. These sequences span the gene and were selected to comply with standard siRNA design parameters24 (link) including assessment of GC content, specificity and low seed compliment frequency,55 (link) elimination of sequences containing miRNA seeds, and examination of thermodynamic bias.56 (link),57 (link)Oligonucleotide synthesis, deprotection, and purification. Oligonucleotides were synthesized using standard phosphoramidite, solid-phase synthesis conditions on a 0.2–1 µmole scale using a MerMade 12 (BioAutomation, Irving, TX) and Expedite DNA/RNA synthesizer. Oligonucleotides with unmodified 3′ ends were synthesized on controlled pore glass (CPG) functionalized with long-chain alkyl amine and a Unylinker terminus (Chemgenes, Wilmington, MA). Oligonucleotides with 3′-cholesterol modifications were synthesized on modified solid support (Chemgenes). Phosphoramidite solutions were prepared at 0.15 mol/l in acetonitrile for 2′-TBDMS, 2′-O-methyl (Chemgenes), and Cy3 modifications or 0.13 mol/l for 2′-fluoro (BioAutomation) modifications. Phosphoramidites were activated in 0.25 mol/l 4,5-dicyanoimidazole in acetonitrile. Detritylation was performed in 3% dichloroacetic acid in dichloromethane for 80 seconds. Capping was performed in 16% N-methylimidazole in tetrahydrofuran and acetic anhydride:pyridine:tetrahydrofuran, (1:2:2, v/v/v) for 15 seconds. Oxidation was performed using 0.1 mol/l iodine in pyridine:water:tetrahydrofuran (1:2:10, v/v/v).
The CPG was removed from the solid-phase column and placed in a polypropylene screw cap vial. Dimethylsulfoxide (100 µl) and 40% methylamine (250 µl) are added directly to the CPG and shaken gently at 65 °C for exactly 16 minutes. The vial was cooled on dry ice before the cap was removed. The supernatant was transferred to another polypropylene screw cap vial, and the CPG was rinsed with two 150 µl portions of dimethylsulfoxide, which were combined with original supernatant. Oligonucleotides without 2′-TBDMS-protecting groups were lyophilized. Oligonucleotides with 2′-TBDMS-protecting groups were desilylated by adding 375 µl triethylamine trihydrofluoride (~1.5 volumes relative to 40% methylamine) and incubated for exactly 16 minutes at 65 °C with gentle shaking. Samples were quenched by transferring to a 15 ml conical tube containing 2 ml of 2 mol/l triethylammonium acetate buffer (pH 7.0). The sample was stored at −80 °C until high-performance liquid chromatography purification.
Oligonucleotides were purified by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography on a Hamilton PRP-C18 column (21 × 150 mm) using an Agilent Prostar 325 high-performance liquid chromatography (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA). Buffer A 0.05 mol/l tetraethylammonium acetate with 5% acetonitrile, Buffer B 100% acetonitrile, with a gradient of 0% B to 35% B over 15 minutes at 30 ml/minutes. Purified oligonucleotides were lyophilized to dryness, reconstituted in water, and passed over a Hi-Trap cation exchange column to exchange the tetraethylammonium counter-ion with sodium.
Cell culture. HeLa cells (ATCC, Manassas, VA; #CCL-2) were maintained in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (Cellgro, Corning, NY; #10-013CV) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco, Carlsbad, CA; #26140) and 100 U/ml penicillin/streptomycin (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA; #15140) and grown at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Cells were split every 2 to 5 days and discarded after 15 passages.
Preparation of primary neurons. Primary cortical neurons were obtained from FVB/NJ mouse embryos at embryonic day 15.5. Pregnant FVB/NJ females were anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of 250 mg Avertin (Sigma, St Louis, MO; #T48402) per kg weight, followed by cervical dislocation. Embryos were removed and transferred into a Petri dish with ice-cold Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium/F12 medium (Invitrogen; #11320). Brains were removed, and meninges carefully detached. Cortices were isolated and transferred into a 1.5-ml tube with prewarmed papain solution for 25 minutes at 37 °C, 5% CO2, to dissolve tissue. Papain solution was prepared by suspending DNase I (Worthington, Lakewood, NJ; #54M15168) in 0.5 ml Hibernate E medium (Brainbits, Springfield, IL; #HE), and transferring 0.25 ml DNase I solution to papain (Worthington, Lakewood, NJ; #54N15251) dissolved in 2 ml Hibernate E medium and 1 ml Earle's balanced salt solution (Worthington; #LK003188). After the 25-minute incubation, papain solution was replaced with 1 ml NbActiv4 medium (Brainbits; #Nb4-500) supplemented with 2.5% FBS. Cortices were dissociated by repeated pipetting with a fire-polished, glass, Pasteur pipette. Cortical neurons were counted and plated at 1 × 106 cells per ml.
For live-cell imaging, culture plates were precoated with poly-l-lysine (Sigma; #P4707), and 2 × 105 cells were added to the glass center of each dish. For silencing assays, neurons were plated on 96-well plates precoated with poly-l-lysine (BD BIOCOAT, Corning, NY; #356515) at 1 × 105 cells per well. After overnight incubation at 37 °C, 5% CO2, an equal volume of NbActiv4 supplemented with anti-mitotics, 0.484 µl/ml of UTP Na3 (Sigma; #U6625), and 0.2402 µl/ml of FdUMP (Sigma; #F3503), was added to neuronal cultures to prevent growth of nonneuronal cells. Half of the media volume was replaced every 48 hours until the neurons were treated with siRNA. Once the cells were treated, media was not removed, only added. All subsequent media additions contained antimitotics.
Direct delivery (passive uptake) of oligonucleotides. Cells were plated in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium containing 6% FBS at 10,000 cells per well in 96-well tissue culture plates. hsiRNA was diluted to twice the final concentration in OptiMEM (Gibco; #31985-088), and 50 μl diluted hsiRNA was added to 50 μl of cells, resulting in 3% FBS final. Cells were incubated for 72 hours at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Based on previous experience, we know that 1.5 µmol/l active hsiRNA supports efficient silencing without toxicity. The primary screen for active Htt siRNAs, therefore, was performed at 1.5 µmol/l compound, which also served as the maximal dose for in vitro dose–response assays.
hsiRNA lipid-mediated delivery. Cells were plated in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium with 6% FBS at 10,000 cells per well in 96-well tissue culture–treated plates. hsiRNA was diluted to four times the final concentration in OptiMEM, and Lipofectamine RNAiMAX Transfection Reagent (Invitrogen; #13778150) was diluted to four times the final concentration (final = 0.3 µl/25 µl/well). RNAiMAX and hsiRNA solutions were mixed 1:1, and 50 µl of the transfection mixture was added to 50 µl of cells resulting in 3% FBS final. Cells were incubated for 72 hours at 37 °C and 5% CO2.
mRNA quantification in cells and tissue punches. mRNA was quantified using the QuantiGene 2.0 Assay (Affymetrix; #QS0011). Cells were lysed in 250 μl diluted lysis mixture composed of 1 part lysis mixture (Affymetrix; #13228), 2 parts H2O, and 0.167 μg/μl proteinase K (Affymetrix; #QS0103) for 30 minutes at 55 °C. Cell lysates were mixed thoroughly, and 40 μl (~8,000 cells) of each lysate was added per well to a capture plate with 40 μl diluted lysis mixture without proteinase K. Probe sets were diluted as specified in the Affymetrix protocol. For HeLa cells, 20 μl human HTT or PPIB probe set (Affymetrix; #SA-50339, #SA-10003) was added to appropriate wells for a final volume of 100 μl. For primary neurons, 20 μl of mouse Htt or Ppib probe set (Affymetrix; #SB-14150, #SB-10002) was used.
Tissue punches (5 mg) were homogenized in 300 μl of Homogenizing Buffer (Affymetrix; #10642) containing 2 μg/μl proteinase K in 96-well plate format on a QIAGEN TissueLyser II (Qiagen, Valencia, CA; #85300), and 40 μl of each lysate was added to the capture plate. Probe sets were diluted as specified in the Affymetrix protocol, and 60 μl of Htt or Ppib probe set was added to each well of the capture plate for a final volume of 100 μl. Signal was amplified according to the Affymetrix protocol. Luminescence was detected on either a Veritas Luminometer (Promega, Madison, WI; #998–9100) or a Tecan M1000 (Tecan, Morrisville, NC).
Western blot. Cell lysates (25 µg) were separated by SDS–PAGE using 3–8% Tris-acetate gels (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY; #EA03785BOX) and transferred to nitrocellulose using a TransBlot Turbo apparatus (BioRad, Hercules, CA; #1704155). Blots were blocked in 5% nonfat dry milk (BioRad; #1706404) diluted in Tris-buffered saline with 0.1% Tween-20 (TBST) for 1 hour at room temperature then incubated in N-terminal antihuntingtin antibody Ab158 (link) diluted 1:2,000 in blocking solution overnight at 4 °C with agitation. After washing in TBST, blots were incubated in peroxidase-labeled antirabbit IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA; #711035152) diluted in blocking buffer for 1 hour at room temperature, washed in TBST, and proteins were detected using SuperSignal West Pico Chemiluminescent Substrate (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL; #34080) and Hyperfilm ECL (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK; #28906839). Blots were reprobed with anti-β tubulin antibody (Sigma; #T8328) as a loading control. Films were scanned with a flatbed scanner (Epson Perfection V750 Pro; Epson, Long Beach, CA), and densitometry was performed using NIH ImageJ software to determine total intensity of each band. The huntingtin signal was divided by the tubulin signal to normalize to protein content, and percent of untreated control was determined for each set of samples (N = 5).
Live cell imaging. To monitor live cell hsiRNA uptake, cells were plated at a density of 2 × 105 cells per 35-mm glass-bottom dish. Cell nuclei were stained with NucBlue (Life Technologies; #R37605) as indicated by the manufacturer. Imaging was performed in phenol red-free NbActiv4 (Brainbits; #Nb4-500). Cells were treated with 0.5 μmol/l Cy3-labeled hsiRNA, and live cell imaging was performed over time. All live cell confocal images were acquired with a Leica DM IRE2 confocal microscope using 63x oil immersion objective (Buffalo Grove, IL), and images were processed using ImageJ (1.47v) software.
Stereotaxic injections. FVB/NJ mice (50% male and 50% female for each dose group, 6–8 weeks old) were deeply anesthetized with 1.2% Avertin (Sigma; #T48402) and microinjected by stereotactic placement into the right striatum (coordinates relative to bregma: 1.0 mm anterior, 2.0 mm lateral, and 3.0 mm ventral). For both toxicity (DARPP-32 staining) and efficacy studies, mice were injected with either PBS or artificial CSF (2 μl per striata), 12.5 μg of nontargeting hsiRNA (2 μl of 500 µmol/l stock per striata), 25 μg of HTT10150 hsiRNA (2 μl of 1 mmol/l stock per striata), 12.5 μg of HTT10150 hsiRNA (2 μl of 500 μmol/l stock per striata), 6.3 μg of HTT10150 hsiRNA (2 μl of 250 μmol/l stock per striata), or 3.1 μg of HTT10150 hsiRNA (2 μl of 125 μmol/l stock per striata). For toxicity studies, n = 3 mice were injected per group, and for efficacy studies, n = 8 mice were injected per group. Mice were euthanized 5 days post-injection, brains were harvested, and three 300-μm coronal sections were prepared. From each section, a 2-mm punch was taken from each side (injected and noninjected) and placed in RNAlater (Ambion, Carlsbad, CA; #AM7020) for 24 hours at 4 °C. Each punch was processed as an individual sample for Quantigene 2.0 assay analysis (Affymetrix) and averaged for a single animal point. All animal procedures were approved by the University of Massachusetts Medical School Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (protocol number A-2411).
Immunohistochemistry/immunofluorescence. Mice were injected intrastriatally with 12.5 µg of Cy3-labeled hsiRNA. After 24 hours, mice were sacrificed and brains were removed, embedded in paraffin, and sliced into 4-μm sections that were mounted on glass slides. Sections were deparaffinized by incubating in Xylene twice for 8 minutes. Sections were rehydrated in serial ethanol dilutions (100%, 95%, and 80%) for 4 minutes each, and then washed twice for 2 minutes with PBS.
For NeuN staining,39 (link),40 (link) slides were boiled for 5 minutes in antigen retrieval buffer (10 mmol/l Tris/ 1mmol/l EDTA (pH 9.0)), incubated at room temperature for 20 minutes, and then washed for 5 minutes in PBS. Slides were blocked in 5% normal goat serum in PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20 (PBST) for 1 hour and washed once with PBST for 5 minutes. Slides were incubated with primary antibody (Millipore, Taunton, MA; MAB377, 1:1,000 dilution in PBST) for 1 hour and washed three times with PBST for 5 minutes. Slides were then incubated with secondary antibody (Life Technologies; #A11011, 1:1000 dilution in PBST) for 30 minutes in the dark and washed three times with PBST for 5 minutes each. Slides were then counterstained with 250 ng/ml 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (Molecular Probes, Life Technologies; #D3571) in PBS for 1 minute and washed three times with PBS for 1 minute. Slides were mounted with mounting medium and coverslips and dried overnight before imaging on a Leica DM5500 microscope fitted with a DFC365 FX fluorescence camera.
For toxicity studies, injected brains were harvested after 5 days. For microglial activation studies, brains were harvested after 6 hours or 5 days. Extracted, perfused brains were sliced into 40-µm sections on the Leica 2000T Vibratome (Leica Biosystems, Wetzlar, Germany) in ice-cold PBS. Every sixth section was incubated with DARPP-32 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK; #40801; 1:10,000 in PBS) or IBA-1 (Wako; #019-19741; 1:1,000 in PBS) antibody, for a total of nine sections per brain and eight images per section (four per hemisphere). IBA-1 sections were incubated in blocking solution (5% normal goat serum, 1% bovine serum albumin, 0.2% Triton-X-100, and 0.03% hydrogen peroxide in PBS) for 1 hour, and then washed with PBS. Sections were incubated overnight at 4 °C in primary antibody, anti-Iba1 (polyclonal rabbit anti-mouse/human/rat; dilution: 1:1,000 in blocking solution) (Wako; #019-19741). Sections were then stained with goat antirabbit secondary antibody (1:200 dilution) (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA), followed by a PBS wash, the Vectastain ABC Kit (Vector Laboratories), and another PBS wash. IBA-1 was detected with the Metal Enhanced DAB Substrate Kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL). For DARPP32 staining, sections were washed for 3 minutes in 3% hydrogen peroxide, followed by 20 minutes in 0.2% TritonX-100 and 4 hours in 1.5% normal goat serum in PBS. Sections were incubated overnight at 4 °C in DARPP32 primary antibody (1:10,000 dilution) (Abcam; #40801) made up in 1.5% normal goat serum. Secondary antibody and detection steps were conducted as described for IBA-1 staining. DARPP-32 sections were mounted and visualized by light microscopy with 20× objective on a Nikon Eclipse E600 with a Nikon Digital Sight DSRi1 camera (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). The number of DARPP-32-positive neurons was quantified manually using the cell counter plug-in on ImageJ for tracking. Activated microglia were quantified by morphology of IBA-1-positive cells42 (link),43 (link),44 (link),45 (link) from the same number of sections captured with 40× objective. Counting of both IBA-1- and DARPP-32-positive cells was blinded. Coronal section images were taken with a Coolscan V-ED LS50 35-mm Film Scanner (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan).
Statistical analysis. Data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 6 software (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA). Concentration-dependent IC50 curves were fitted using a log(inhibitor) versus response–variable slope (four parameters). The lower limit of the curve was set at zero, and the upper limit of the curve was set at 100. For each independent mouse experiment, the level of knockdown at each dose was normalized to the mean of the control group (the noninjected side of the PBS or artificial CSF groups). In vivo data were analyzed using a two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance with Tukey's multiple comparisons test for dose and side of brain. Differences in all comparisons were considered significant at P values less than 0.05 compared with the NTC- injected group. P values reported represent significance of the entire dose group relative to NTC and are not specific to the ipsilateral or contralateral side. For microglial activation, significance was calculated using a parametric, unpaired, two-tailed t-test for comparison between dose groups, and paired t-test for comparison between ipsilateral and contralateral hemispheres within the same dose group.
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALFigure S1. Active hsiRNAs silence huntingtin mRNA in a concentration dependent manner in HeLa cells.
Figure S2. HTT10150 does not affect primary cortical neuron viability.
Figure S3. HTT10150 causes a slight increase in total resting microglia 5 days post injection.
Figure S4. HTT10150 shows limited toxicity at the site of injection at the 25 µg dose.
Table S1. Detailed sequence, chemical modification patterns, and efficacy of hsiRNAs.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2015
Microarrays
were synthesized using a chemical photolithographic method termed
Maskless Array Synthesis (MAS).10 (link),29 (link) MAS uses a computer
controlled optical imaging system, synchronized with a chemical delivery
system, to direct the stepwise synthesis of complex, high-density
microarrays of nucleic acid oligomers on glass substrates. A UV light
source and associated condenser lens(es) fill the entrance to a light
pipe, which spatially shapes and homogenizes the intensity of the
light beam via multiple reflections on the first surface aluminum
mirrors that constitute the inner surface of the light pipe.32 (link) The output of the light homogenizer functions
as a rectangular, highly spatially homogeneous source for illuminating,
via a 2× magnification telescope, a 0.7″ (diagonal) digital
micromirror device (DMD). The DMD is imaged, via 1:1 Offner relay
optics, to the surface of the substrate in the reaction chamber33 (link) where the microarray synthesis is taking place.
One of two tilt positions of each of the mirrors of the DMD, either
ON or OFF, determines whether photodeprotection will take place at
each microarray position. The low numerical aperture of the system,
combined with the large number of reflections needed to form a highly
homogeneous beam of light, as well as to modulate it spatially and
direct it to the target, results in very low system light throughput.
The optimum source has previously been a 350 W Hg arc lamp, which
has an effective plasma size (0.8 × 2.7 mm) that is a reasonably
good match to the entrance optics. Higher power lamps have larger
plasma dimensions which would overfill the entrance pupil and not
result in the collection of significantly more light. The mercury
lamp source is a 350 W high pressure short arc mercury lamp (Newport
6286) in an F/0.7 500 W housing (Newport 66905). The light from the
lamp was filtered using two 350–450 nm primary-range dichroic
mirrors (Newport). Ozone generated in the lamp housing was catalytically
converted to O2 using an Ozone Eater (Newport 66087). For
both the mercury lamp and the UV LED, the radiant intensity of light
reaching the reaction cell was measured using a calibrated SÜSS
MicroTec Model 1000 UV intensity meter with a 365 nm probe.
Microarray synthesis chemistry is quite similar to the standard phosphoramidite
chemistry used in solid phase synthesis.34 (link) The primary modification is the use of a (2-(2-nitrophenyl)propyloxycarbonyl
(NPPOC) photolabile protecting group in the place of the acid labile
dimethoxytrityl (DMT) group. During photodeprotection, the reaction
chamber is filled with a solution of 1% imidazole in DMSO, as the
photoinduced β-elimination pathway of the NPPOC group is favored
by the presence of a small amount of an amine base.35 (link) The substitution of light for the acid deblocking step
greatly reduces the requirement for oxidizing the phosphite triester
resulting from the coupling reaction, which is unstable under acidic
conditions, to the fully stable phosphotriester.34 (link) Thus, photolithographic microarray synthesis, in comparison
with normal solid-phase synthesis, eliminates the health and environmental
toxicity associated with the use of the deblock solution (di- or trichloroacetic
acid in dichloromethane), and greatly reduces the use of tetrahydrofuran,
as well as pyridine, a “red category” solvent that is
an essential component of the oxidizer solution.
To test the
light exposure needed to remove the NPPOC or SPh-NPPOC
5′-hydroxyl protecting groups on the growing oligonucleotide,
and to verify that the exposure and synthesis outcome using the UV
LED source are the same as with a Hg source, microarrays bearing a
single oligonucleotide sequence (5′-GTC ATC ATC ATG AAC CAC
CCT GGT C) were synthesized, but photodeprotection was carried out
using a spatial gradient of light exposures.29 (link),36 (link) After synthesis, the protecting groups on the DNA oligonucleotides
were removed using a solution of 1:1 (v/v) ethylenediamine/ethanol
for 2 h at room temperature. After the deprotection solution was washed
off with deionized water, the exposure gradient microarrays were hybridized
for 2 h at 42 °C with the Cy3-labeled complementary sequence
and then washed. The hybridization buffer consisted of 150 μL
of 2× 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid (MES),
110 μL of nuclease free water, 13.3 μL of acetylated bovine
serum albumin (BSA), and 26.7 μL of 100 nM 5′-Cy3-labeled
complementary oligonucleotide. The washing steps start with vigorous
shaking in a 50 mL centrifuge tube filled with 30 mL nonstringent
wash buffer (SSPE; 0.9 M NaCl, 0.06 M phosphate, 6 mM EDTA, 0.01%
Tween 20) for 2 min, followed by a stringent wash (100 mM MES, 0.1
M NaCl, 0.01% Tween 20) for 1 min, and a quick dip in final wash buffer
(0.1× saline–sodium citrate buffer) to remove excess salt.
The arrays were imaged in a microarray scanner at a resolution of
5 μm using the 532 nm laser and the 550–600 nm bandpass
filter. Data was extracted from the scan image using NimbleScan v2.1.
Data was normalized and fit with the four parameter sigmoidal function
in Sigmaplot.
Publication 2016
Apo-6′-lycopenal, apo-8′-lycopenal, apo-12′-lycopenal, and β-apo-12′-carotenal were purchased from Carotenature (Lupsingen, Switzerland). Pure lycopene was isolated and crystallized from tomato paste following a procedure outlined below. Acetone, acetonitrile, butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), calcium carbonate, chloroform, dichloromethane, hexane, methanol, methyl tert.-butyl ether, potassium hydroxide, te trahydrofuran, and toluene were purchased from Fisher Scientific (Pittsburgh, PA). Tetrahydrofuran was stabilized before use by passing the solvent through a column of alumina. Formic acid, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), diatomaceous earth, β-apo-8′-carotenal, and β-carotene were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO).
Publication 2010
Acetone acetonitrile apo-8'-lycopenal apo-12'-lycopenal Carbonate, Calcium Carotene Chloroform Earth, Diatomaceous Edetic Acid formic acid Lycopene Methanol Methylene Chloride methyl tert-butyl ether n-hexane Oxide, Aluminum Paste potassium hydroxide Solvents tetrahydrofuran Toluene Tomatoes
Oleic acid coated magnetite nanoparticles (NP-OA) were synthesized via thermal decomposition of iron oleate complex.[5 (link)] To a 5 ml of toluene solution containing 50 mg (iron content) of NP-OA, 40 mL of acetone was added, and the nanoparticles were collected by centrifugation. The nanoparticles were redispersed in 50 mL anhydrous toluene and transferred to a three-neck flask equipped with a heater. After the system was sealed and purged with nitrogen, 0.15 mL of SAS was injected, and the solution was heated to 100°C for 12 hours. The nanoparticles were precipitated by the addition of hexane, and collected using a rare earth magnet. The nanoparticles were washed twice with hexane and redispersed in anhydrous tetrahydrofuran (THF). To this solution, 100 mg of H2NPEG-NH2 and 2.5 mg of N,N′-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC) were added, and the reaction mixture was sonicated in a sonication bath for 12 hrs at 25°C. The nanoparticles was precipitated by the addition of 200 mL of hexane, and collected using a rare earth magnet. The precipitated nanoparticles were redispersed in 50 mL of anhydrous THF, and 250 mg of PEG-bis(amine) and 12.5 mg of DCC were added. The reaction mixture was kept in a sonication bath for 16 hrs at 25°C. The resulting product was precipitated by the addition of hexane, and collected using a rare earth magnet. After two additional cycles of THFredispersion and ether-precipitation, the residue solvent was evaporated and the nanoparticles were redispersed in 5 mL PBS. After passing through a 0.2 μm syringe filter, the nanoparticles were purified through gel filtration chromatography by Sephacryl S-200 column. The nanoparticles were stored in 0.1 M sodium bicarbonate buffer (pH 8.5). The concentration of nanoparticles was determined by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES).
Publication 2009
Acetone Amines Bath Bicarbonate, Sodium Buffers Centrifugation Dicyclohexylcarbodiimide Ethyl Ether Gel Chromatography Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectroscopy Iron Magnetite Nanoparticles Metals, Rare Earth n-hexane Neck Nitrogen Oleate Oleic Acid Solvents Syringes tetrahydrofuran Toluene

Most recents protocols related to «Tetrahydrofuran»

Example 103

[Figure (not displayed)]

(S)—N-(3-(2-((4-((tetrahydrofuran-3-yl)oxy)phenyl)amino)quinazolin-8-yl)phenyl)acrylamide (85 mg) was prepared as described for (S)—N-(3-(2-((4-((1-acetylpyrrolidin-3-yl)oxy)phenyl)amino)quinazolin-8-yl)phenyl)acrylamide. LRMS (M+H+) m/z calculated 453.2, found 453.1. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz) δ10.29 (s, 1H), 9.77 (s, 1H), 9.31 (s, 1H), 8.04 (s, 1H), 7.77-7.93 (m, 5H), 7.33-7.51 (m, 3H), 6.65 (d, 2H), 6.43-6.52 (m, 1H), 6.22-6.28 (m, 1H), 5.74-5.78 (m, 1H), 4.84-4.88 (m, 1H), 3.69-3.87 (m, 4H), 2.12-2.19 (m, 1H), 1.85-1.94 (m, 1H).

Full text: Click here
Patent 2024
1H NMR Acrylamide Sulfoxide, Dimethyl tetrahydrofuran

Example 106

[Figure (not displayed)]

(R)—N-(3-(2-((4-((tetrahydrofuran-3-yl)oxy)phenyl)amino)quinazolin-8-yl)phenyl)acrylamide (55.0 mg) was prepared as described for (S)—N-(3-(2-((4-((1-acetylpyrrolidin-3-yl)oxy)phenyl)amino)quinazolin-8-yl)phenyl)acrylamide. LRMS (M+H+) m/z calculated 453.2, found 453.1. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz) δ 10.29 (s, 1H), 9.76 (s, 1H), 9.31 (s, 1H), 8.04 (s, 1H), 7.78-7.93 (m, 5H), 7.33-7.50 (m, 3H), 6.66 (d, 2H), 6.44-6.50 (m, 1H), 6.23-6.28 (m, 1H), 5.74-5.77 (m, 1H), 4.85-4.87 (m, 1H), 3.37-3.86 (m, 4H), 2.12-2.17 (m, 1H), 1.89-1.91 (m, 1H).

Full text: Click here
Patent 2024
1H NMR Acrylamide Sulfoxide, Dimethyl tetrahydrofuran

Example 101

[Figure (not displayed)]

(S)—N-(3-(2-((4-((tetrahydrofuran-3-yl)amino)phenyl)amino)quinazolin-8-yl)phenyl)acrylamide (55.9 mg) was prepared as described for (S)—N-(3-(2-((4-((1-acetylpyrrolidin-3-yl)oxy)phenyl)amino)quinazolin-8-yl)phenyl)acrylamide. LRMS (M+H+) m/z calculated 452.2, found 452.2. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz) δ10.27 (s, 1H), 9.50 (s, 1H), 9.24 (s, 1H), 7.98 (s, 1H), 7.86-7.88 (m, 2H), 7.76-7.78 (m, 1H), 7.59 (d, 2H), 7.35-7.46 (m, 3H), 6.24-6.51 (m, 4H), 5.74-5.77 (m, 1H), 5.42-5.44 (m, 1H), 3.67-3.86 (m, 4H), 3.42-3.46 (m, 1H), 2.09-2.14 (m, 1H), 1.66-1.72 (m, 1H).

Full text: Click here
Patent 2024
1H NMR Acrylamide Sulfoxide, Dimethyl tetrahydrofuran

Example 105

[Figure (not displayed)]

(R)—N-(3-(2-((4-((tetrahydrofuran-3-yl)amino)phenyl)amino)quinazolin-8-yl)phenyl)acrylamide (37.2 mg) was prepared as described for (S)—N-(3-(2-((4-((1-acetylpyrrolidin-3-yl)oxy)phenyl)amino)quinazolin-8-yl)phenyl)acrylamide. LRMS (M+H+) m/z calculated 452.2, found 452.2. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz) δ10.26 (s, 1H), 9.49 (s, 1H), 9.24 (s, 1H), 7.98 (s, 1H), 7.87 (d, 2H), 7.76 (d, 1H), 7.59 (d, 2H), 7.35-7.46 (m, 3H), 6.44-6.51 (m, 1H), 6.37 (d, 2H), 6.24-6.29 (m, 1H), 5.74-5.77 (m, 1H), 5.41-5.43 (m, 1H), 3.68-3.86 (m, 4H), 3.43-3.46 (m, 1H), 2.09-2.14 (m, 1H), 1.66-1.70 (m, 1H).

Full text: Click here
Patent 2024
1H NMR Acrylamide Sulfoxide, Dimethyl tetrahydrofuran

Example 2

[Figure (not displayed)]

The title compound was prepared using general method A with Intermediate 1 (0.31 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and (R)-(+)-tetrahydro-3-furylamine toluenesulfonate salt (124 mg, 1.5 eq). The crude product was purified by flash chromatography using ethyl acetate in heptanes to yield (R)-2-(5-((3-ethoxypyridin-2-yl)oxy)pyridin-3-yl)-N-(tetrahydrofuran-3-yl)pyrimidine-5-carboxamide (91 mg, 70%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 1.38 (t, 3H), 1.89-1.98 (m, 1H), 2.15-2.28 (m, 1H), 3.5 (dd, 1H), 3.70-3.78 (m, 1H), 3.85-3.92 (m, 2H), 4.19 (q, 2H), 4.46-4.55 (m, 1H), 7.19 (dd, 1H), 7.58 (dd, 1H), 7.69 (dd, 1H), 8.37 (dd, 1H), 8.64 (d, 1H), 8.96 (d, 1H), 9.28 (s, 2H), 9.39 (d, 1H). MS (ES+) 408.3 (M+H).

Full text: Click here
Patent 2024
1H NMR Chromatography ethyl acetate Heptanes Pyrimidines Salts Sulfoxide, Dimethyl tetrahydrofuran

Top products related to «Tetrahydrofuran»

Sourced in United States, Germany, United Kingdom, Spain, Italy, France, China, Belgium, Switzerland, Australia, Sao Tome and Principe, India, Greece
Tetrahydrofuran is a colorless, volatile, and flammable organic compound. It is commonly used as a polar aprotic solvent in various industrial and laboratory applications. Tetrahydrofuran's core function is to serve as a versatile solvent for a wide range of organic compounds, including polymers, resins, and other materials.
Sourced in United States, Germany, United Kingdom, Italy, Japan, India, China, Poland, Spain, Greece, Singapore
Tetrahydrofuran (THF) is a colorless, volatile organic compound. It is a commonly used laboratory solvent and reagent. THF is miscible with water and a wide range of organic solvents. It has a cyclic ether structure and serves as a versatile reaction medium for various organic synthesis applications.
Sourced in Germany, United States, Italy, India, United Kingdom, China, France, Poland, Spain, Switzerland, Australia, Canada, Sao Tome and Principe, Brazil, Ireland, Japan, Belgium, Portugal, Singapore, Macao, Malaysia, Czechia, Mexico, Indonesia, Chile, Denmark, Sweden, Bulgaria, Netherlands, Finland, Hungary, Austria, Israel, Norway, Egypt, Argentina, Greece, Kenya, Thailand, Pakistan
Methanol is a clear, colorless, and flammable liquid that is widely used in various industrial and laboratory applications. It serves as a solvent, fuel, and chemical intermediate. Methanol has a simple chemical formula of CH3OH and a boiling point of 64.7°C. It is a versatile compound that is widely used in the production of other chemicals, as well as in the fuel industry.
Sourced in Germany, United States, United Kingdom, Italy, India, France, China, Australia, Spain, Canada, Switzerland, Japan, Brazil, Poland, Sao Tome and Principe, Singapore, Chile, Malaysia, Belgium, Macao, Mexico, Ireland, Sweden, Indonesia, Pakistan, Romania, Czechia, Denmark, Hungary, Egypt, Israel, Portugal, Taiwan, Province of China, Austria, Thailand
Ethanol is a clear, colorless liquid chemical compound commonly used in laboratory settings. It is a key component in various scientific applications, serving as a solvent, disinfectant, and fuel source. Ethanol has a molecular formula of C2H6O and a range of industrial and research uses.
Sourced in United States, Belgium, United Kingdom, Germany, China
Tetrahydrofuran is a colorless, volatile, and flammable organic solvent used in various laboratory applications. It is miscible with water and many organic solvents. Tetrahydrofuran serves as a versatile solvent and reagent in chemical synthesis and analysis.
Sourced in Germany, United States, Italy, India, China, United Kingdom, France, Poland, Spain, Switzerland, Australia, Canada, Brazil, Sao Tome and Principe, Ireland, Belgium, Macao, Japan, Singapore, Mexico, Austria, Czechia, Bulgaria, Hungary, Egypt, Denmark, Chile, Malaysia, Israel, Croatia, Portugal, New Zealand, Romania, Norway, Sweden, Indonesia
Acetonitrile is a colorless, volatile, flammable liquid. It is a commonly used solvent in various analytical and chemical applications, including liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, and other laboratory procedures. Acetonitrile is known for its high polarity and ability to dissolve a wide range of organic compounds.
Sourced in Germany, United States, United Kingdom, India, Italy, France, Spain, Australia, China, Poland, Switzerland, Canada, Ireland, Japan, Singapore, Sao Tome and Principe, Malaysia, Brazil, Hungary, Chile, Belgium, Denmark, Macao, Mexico, Sweden, Indonesia, Romania, Czechia, Egypt, Austria, Portugal, Netherlands, Greece, Panama, Kenya, Finland, Israel, Hong Kong, New Zealand, Norway
Hydrochloric acid is a commonly used laboratory reagent. It is a clear, colorless, and highly corrosive liquid with a pungent odor. Hydrochloric acid is an aqueous solution of hydrogen chloride gas.
Sourced in United States, Germany, United Kingdom, China, Italy, Sao Tome and Principe, France, Macao, India, Canada, Switzerland, Japan, Australia, Spain, Poland, Belgium, Brazil, Czechia, Portugal, Austria, Denmark, Israel, Sweden, Ireland, Hungary, Mexico, Netherlands, Singapore, Indonesia, Slovakia, Cameroon, Norway, Thailand, Chile, Finland, Malaysia, Latvia, New Zealand, Hong Kong, Pakistan, Uruguay, Bangladesh
DMSO is a versatile organic solvent commonly used in laboratory settings. It has a high boiling point, low viscosity, and the ability to dissolve a wide range of polar and non-polar compounds. DMSO's core function is as a solvent, allowing for the effective dissolution and handling of various chemical substances during research and experimentation.
Sourced in United States, Germany, Italy, United Kingdom, India, Spain, Japan, Poland, France, Switzerland, Belgium, Canada, Portugal, China, Sweden, Singapore, Indonesia, Australia, Mexico, Brazil, Czechia
Toluene is a colorless, flammable liquid with a distinctive aromatic odor. It is a common organic solvent used in various industrial and laboratory applications. Toluene has a chemical formula of C6H5CH3 and is derived from the distillation of petroleum.
Sourced in Germany, United States, India, United Kingdom, Italy, China, Spain, France, Australia, Canada, Poland, Switzerland, Singapore, Belgium, Sao Tome and Principe, Ireland, Sweden, Brazil, Israel, Mexico, Macao, Chile, Japan, Hungary, Malaysia, Denmark, Portugal, Indonesia, Netherlands, Czechia, Finland, Austria, Romania, Pakistan, Cameroon, Egypt, Greece, Bulgaria, Norway, Colombia, New Zealand, Lithuania
Sodium hydroxide is a chemical compound with the formula NaOH. It is a white, odorless, crystalline solid that is highly soluble in water and is a strong base. It is commonly used in various laboratory applications as a reagent.

More about "Tetrahydrofuran"