The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Thiophenol

Thiophenol is an organic compound with the chemical formula C6H5SH.
It is a colorless to pale yellow liquid with a characteristic unpleasant odor.
Thiophenol is used as a precursor for the synthesis of various organic compounds, including pharmaceuticals, pesticides, and rubber additives.
It is also employed as a corrosion inhibitor and a vulcanizing agent.
The chemical properties and reactions of thiophenol are of interest in organic chemistry research, with applications in areas such as catalysis, materials science, and environmental remediation.
Researchers studying thiophenol may need to navigate reproducibility challenges and identify the best protocols and products for their experiments.
The PubCompare.ai platform can assist by locating relevant protocols from literature, preprints, and patents, and leveraging AI-driven comparisons to optimize thiophenol research and overcome redeucibility issues.

Most cited protocols related to «Thiophenol»

SERS substrates were prepared by thermal evaporation of either silver (Ag, Sigma-Aldrich, 99.999%) or gold (Au, American Elements, 99.999%) onto a commercial anodized aluminum oxide filter (Anodisc 13, Whatman) with 0.1 µm pores followed by subsequent removal of the AAO template as shown in Figure 1. The Anodisc filters were cleaned in Argon plasma for 5 minutes prior to depositing 400–1000 nm of Ag/Au onto a single side of the filter. Deposition was performed at a rate of 1 Å/sec. After deposition, the metal-coated filters were stored under vacuum until needed to prevent surface oxidation and contamination. The AAO filter was removed in 0.1 M NaOH (Sigma-Aldrich, 99.99%). After dissolution of the AAO filter, the film was rinsed with ultrapure water (Nanopure, 18.2MΩ cm).
For analysis, a self-assembled monolayer of thiophenol was formed on the SERS substrate by soaking in a 10 mM ethanolic solution of thiophenol (Sigma-Aldrich, >99%) for 24 h, rinsing with ethanol, and allowing to dry prior to further experiments. Characterization was performed on the thiophenol-SAM on the metal-coated filter and after dissolution of the AAO template.
The SERS active metal film is quite thin (≤ 1 micrometer) and delicate after removal of the AAO template. For experiments, the film is epoxied to a solid support prior to template dissolution.
Publication 2011
Argon Ethanol Gold Metals Oxide, Aluminum Plasma Silver thiophenol Vacuum

Protocol full text hidden due to copyright restrictions

Open the protocol to access the free full text link

Publication 2010
2-Mercaptoethanol biotin-11-dUTP Biotinylation Buffers Cloning Vectors CpG methylase Cytokinesis Deoxyribonuclease EcoRI Digestion DNA Edetic Acid Guanidine Histone H3 Histones Ion Exchange Ligation M.SssI Nucleosomes Peptides Plasmids Proteins Sodium Chloride thiophenol Urea
Intact epithelial preparations were as in our published procedures (Ma and Shepherd, 2000 (link)). Wild-type (C57BL/6) or homozygous gene-targeted mice (male or female, 3 to 12 weeks) were deeply anesthetized by injection of ketamine HCl and xylazine (200 mg/kg and 20 mg/kg body weight, respectively) and then decapitated. The head was immediately put into ice-cold Ringer's solution, which contained (in mm) 124 NaCl, 3 KCl, 1.3 MgSO4, 2 CaCl2, 26 NaHCO3, 1.25 NaH2PO4, and 15 glucose (osmolarity, 305 mOsm). The pH was kept at 7.4 by bubbling with 95% O2 and 5% CO2. The nose was dissected out en bloc; the olfactory mucosa attached to the nasal septum and the dorsal recess was removed and kept in oxygenated Ringer. Before use, the entire mucosa was peeled away from the underlying bone and transferred to a recording chamber with the mucus layer facing up. Oxygenated Ringer was continuously perfused at 25 ± 2°C.
The dendritic knobs of OSNs were visualized through an upright differential interference contrast microscope (Olympus; BX51WI) equipped with a charge-coupled device camera (Dage-MTI) and a 40× water-immersion objective. An extra 4× magnification was achieved by an accessory lens in the light path. The GFP- and RFP-tagged cells were visualized under fluorescent illumination. Superimposition of the fluorescent and bright-field images allowed identification of the fluorescent cells under bright field, which directed the recording pipettes (Grosmaitre et al., 2006 (link)). Electrophysiological recordings were controlled by an EPC-10 amplifier combined with Pulse software (HEKA Electronic). Perforated patch-clamp was performed on the dendritic knobs by including 260 μm nystatin in the recording pipette, which was filled with the following solution (in mM): 70 KCl, 53 KOH, 30 methane-sulfonic acid, 5.0 EGTA, 10 HEPES, 70 sucrose; pH 7.2 (KOH), and 310 mOsm. The junction potential was ∼9 mV and was corrected in all experiments off-line. Under voltage-clamp mode, the signals were initially filtered at 10 kHz and then at 2.9 kHz. For voltage-gated ionic currents, the signals were sampled at 50 kHz. For odorant-induced transduction currents (which are slow and long lasting), the signals were sampled at 333 Hz. Further filtering offline at 100 Hz (to remove noise) did not change the response kinetics or amplitudes, indicating that the sampling rate was sufficient and signal aliasing was not a concern. Similarly, under current-clamp mode, the signals were filtered at 2.9 kHz and sampled at 5 kHz. Further filtering off-line at 1.5 kHz did not change the response kinetics or amplitudes.
A seven-barrel pipette was used to deliver stimuli by pressure ejection through a picospritzer (Pressure System IIe; Toohey Company). The stimulus electrode was placed ∼20 μm downstream from the recording site, and both mechanical and odorant responses could be elicited in some neurons (Grosmaitre et al., 2007 (link)). All stimuli were delivered by 138 kPa (20 psi) on the picospritzer. The pulse length was kept at 1 s to ensure that the neurons were stimulated by the intrapipette concentration (Grosmaitre et al., 2006 (link)). Odorants were prepared in 0.5 m solution in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) and kept at −20°C. Final solutions were prepared before each experiment by adding Ringer. Odorant mixture Mix 1 contains 19 compounds in equal molar concentration: heptanol, octanol, hexanal, heptanal, octanal, heptanoic acid, octanoic acid, cineole, amyl acetate, (+) limonene, (−) limonene, (+) carvone, (−) carvone, 2-heptanone, anisaldehyde, benzaldehyde, acetophenone, 3-heptanone, and ethyl vanilline. The odorant mixture Mix 2 contained 19 compounds in equal molar concentration: hexanol, nonyl alcohol, nonanal, hexanoic acid, nonanoic acid, valeric acid, ethyl caproate, 1-octen-3-ol, phenethyl alcohol, γ-octanoic lactone, pyrrolidine, methyl anthranilate, benzenethiol (thiophenol), pyridine, pyrazine, geraniol, eugenol, benzyl salicylate, isoamyl acetate. The final concentration of DMSO in the odorant solutions ranges from 0.0002 (v/v) (for a single odorant at 1 μm) to 0.4% (for Mix 1 and Mix 2 at 100 μm). To rule out potential effects of DMSO on electrical responses, we compared the transduction currents in SO–OSNs (n = 6) induced by puffs of Ringer without DMSO or with 0.2–0.5% DMSO; we did not observe any differences. We, therefore, used the Ringer solution as controls in most of the experiments. All compounds and chemicals were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, unless otherwise stated. Lyral was provided as a generous gift from International Fragrances and Flavors (New York, NY). The peptides AAPD-NRETF and SYFPEITHI were synthesized by Genemed Synthesis, and α-phellandren and β-phenethylamine were purchased from Fluka.
Publication 2009
1-octen-3-ol 2-heptanone acetophenone Acids amyl acetate Anabolism benzaldehyde benzyl salicylate Bicarbonate, Sodium Body Weight Bones caprylic aldehyde carvone Cells Cold Temperature d-Limonene Dendrites Egtazic Acid Electricity Ethanol ethyl-n-butyl ketone ethyl caproate Eucalyptol Eugenol Females Flavor Enhancers Genes geraniol Glucose Head HEPES heptanal Heptanol hexanoic acid Hexanols Homozygote Ion Transport isoamyl acetate Ketamine Hydrochloride Kinetics Lactones Lens, Crystalline Light LINE-1 Elements Lyral Males Medical Devices methanesulfonic acid methyl anthranilate Microscopy, Differential Interference Contrast Molar Mucous Membrane Mucus Mus n-hexanal Neurons nonanal Nose Nystatin octanoic acid Octanols Odorants Olfactory Mucosa Osmolarity p-anisaldehyde pelargonic acid Peptides Phenethylamines Phenylethyl Alcohol Pressure Pulse Rate Pyrazines pyridine pyrrolidine Ringer's Solution Scents Septums, Nasal Sodium Chloride Strains Submersion Sucrose Sulfate, Magnesium Sulfoxide, Dimethyl thiophenol valeric acid Xylazine

Materials: Unless otherwise noted, all commercially available reagents and solvents were of analytical grade and were used without further purification. Protected amino acids were purchased from IRIS Biotech (Germany). Cu(OAc)2H2O, 4‐pentynoic acid, diisopropylamine (DIPEA) and sodium ascorbate were purchased from Sigma‐Aldrich. 1,4,7‐triazacyclononane‐1,4,7‐triacetic acid (NOTA) was purchased from Chematech (Dijon, France). HATU was obtained from Bachem Holding AG (Bubendorf, Switzerland). HOBt hydrate was obtained from Carbolution (St. Ingbert, Germany). For all radiochemical works, Tracepur® water (Merck) was used. TRAP(azide)318 and o‐NBS‐l‐Lys(Fmoc)‐OH47 were synthesized as described previously.
Instrumentation: The synthesis of SDM17‐pentynoic amide was carried out in an ultrasonic bath SONOREX RK 52 H (interior dimensions 150×140×100 mm and operating volume 1.2 L) by BANDELIN electronic (Germany), equipped with timer control for 1–15 min and continuous (∞) operations and built‐in heating control (30–80 °C thermostatically adjustable). Semi‐preparative reversed‐phase HPLC was performed by using a Shimadzu system, consisting of two LC‐20AP quaternary low‐pressure gradient pumps, a SPD‐M30 A photodiode array detector, and a CBM‐20 A system controller. Separations were performed by using a YMC‐Pack ODS‐A, 5 μm, 250×20 mm C18 column. Analytical HESI‐HPLC‐MS (heated electrospray ionization mass spectrometry) was performed on a LCQ Fleet (Thermo Scientific) with a connected UltiMate 3000 UHPLC focused (Dionex) on C18 columns: S1: Hypersil Gold aQ 175 Å, 3 μm, 150×2.1 mm (for 8 or 20 min measurements); S2: Accucore C18, 80 Å, 2.6 μm, 50×2.1 mm (for 5 min measurements; Thermo Scientific). Linear gradients (5 %–95 % acetonitrile content) with water (0.1 % v/v formic acid) and acetonitrile (0.1 % v/v formic acid) were used as eluents. Centrifugation was done with a Heraeus Biofuge 13 benchtop centrifuge. Activities were quantified with a Capintec CRC 15R dose calibrator. Small activities in tissue samples etc. were measured using a PerkinElmer Wizard2 2480 automatic gamma counter. Radio‐TLCs were evaluated using a Bioscan radio‐TLC scanner, consisting of B‐MS‐1000 scanner, B‐EC‐1000 detector with a B‐FC‐3600GM tube.
Synthesis: SDM17‐pentynoic amide: SDM17 functional monomer was synthesized on solid support by conventional Fmoc/tBu approach, employing an ultrasound‐assisted solid‐phase peptide synthesis (US‐SPPS) protocol.17 Rink amide resin (545 mg, 0.3 mmol) was functionalized with o‐NBS‐l‐Lys(Fmoc)‐OH (363 mg, 0.6 mmol, 2 equiv) using HBTU (227 mg, 0.6 mmol, 2 equiv) and HOBt (92 mg, 0.6 mmol, 2 equiv) as coupling partners, and DIPEA (209 μL, 1.2 mmol, 4 equiv) as base, in DMF (3.5 mL). The mixture of reactants was added to the resin in a SPPS reactor and then ultrasonicated for 5 min before washing. Fmoc deprotection was carried out by irradiating the resin with ultrasound in the presence of a 20 % piperidine solution in DMF (2×1 min). The linear aminoacidic sequence was elongated by iterative cycles of the aforementioned amide bond coupling reactions and Fmoc deprotection; the completion of each step was qualitatively determined by Kaiser test or TNBS test. After loading the last amino acid, the resin‐bound peptide underwent a Tsuji‐Trost‐mediated allyl ester removal on the glutamic acid side chain. The resin was treated with a solution of tetrakis(triphenylphosphine)palladium(0) (35 mg, 0.03 mmol, 10 % mol) and DMBA (234 mg, 1.5 mmol, 5 equiv) in anhydrous THF (5 mL) for 1 h at rt under argon, and this procedure was repeated once. After being washed with DMF (3×1 min) and dichloromethane (3×1 min), the resin was suspended in a 0.06 M solution of potassium N,N‐diethyldithiocarbamate in DMF (38 mg in 3 mL of solvent) for 15 min in order to completely remove catalyst traces, and this procedure was repeated twice. At this stage, the α‐amino group of the Arg residue was released, and the cyclization was carried out by adding a solution of PyAOP (469 mg, 0.9 mmol, 3 equiv) and DIPEA (313 μL, 1.8 mmol, 6 equiv) in DMF (5 mL) and allowing the resin to shake for 12 h. Next, the α‐amino group on C‐terminal lysine residue was released by removing the ortho‐nitrobenzenesulfonyl (o‐NBS) protecting group. This deprotection was performed by adding a clear solution (4 mL) of thiophenol in dry DMF (5 % v/v) in the presence of 1.5 equiv. (relative to thiophenol) of ultrapure K2CO3. The obtained suspension was miniaturized by sonication and centrifuged, then the clear supernatant was added to the resin, which was allowed to shake for 10 min. This procedure was repeated a further two times and then the resin was washed exhaustively with DMF (3×1 min), MeOH (3×1 min) and CH2Cl2 (3×1 min). Final functionalization with the alkynyl‐bearing building block was carried out in a DMF solution (3.5 mL) of pentynoic acid (59 mg, 0.6 mmol, 2 equiv), HBTU (227 mg, 0.6 mmol, 2 equiv) and HOBt (92 mg, 0.6 mmol, 2 equiv) in the presence of DIPEA (209 μL, 1.2 mmol, 4 equiv) and irradiating with ultrasound for 5 min.
The resin was washed with DMF (2×1 min), CH2Cl2 (2×1 min), and diethyl ether (3×1 min), and the peptide was cleaved from the solid support using a solution of TFA/TIS (95:5, 3 mL) for 3 h at room temperature. The suspension was filtered and the crude product precipitated from the TFA solution by diluting to 35 mL with cold diethyl ether, and then centrifuged (4400 g, 15 min). The supernatant was removed, and the precipitate was suspended again in 35 mL ether as described above. The wet solid was dried for 1 h under vacuum, re‐dissolved in water/acetonitrile (9:1) and purified by RP‐HPLC (solvent A: water +0.1 % TFA; solvent B: acetonitrile +0.1 % TFA; from 10 to 60 % of solvent B over 25 min, flow rate: 10 mL min−1). Product‐containing fractions were identified by ESI‐MS, concentrated in vacuo, and lyophilized. The product was characterized by analytical RP‐HPLC (solvent A: water +0.1 % TFA; solvent B: acetonitrile +0.1 % TFA; from 10 to 90 % of solvent B over 20 min, flow rate: 1 mL min−1) and HRMS (ESI‐MS) spectrometry. Overall yield: 179 mg (65 %), purity: >95 %, tR=12.45 min. MW (calcd for C36H57N11O10): 803.43. HRMS (ESI‐MS): m/z=804.43506 [M+H]+ (theoretical value: 804.43626; for MS spectra, see Figure S1)
TRAP(SDM17)3: The trimer was synthesized employing a previously established method.18 SDM17‐pentynoic amide (16.1 mg, 20.0 μmol, 3.3 equiv) was added to a solution of TRAP(azide)3 (5.0 mg, 6.1 μmol, 1 equiv) and sodium ascorbate (60 mg, 303 μmol, 50 equiv) in a mixture of water and tert‐butanol (3:1 by volumes, 400 μL). Copper(II) acetate hydrate (1.45 mg, 7.28 μmol, 1.2 equiv) was added, whereupon a brown precipitate formed immediately. Upon vortexing, the solution turned to a transparent green. The solution was allowed to react for 1 h at 60 °C without stirring. Then, all Cu species were sequestered from the TRAP(SDM17)3 compound and the reaction solution by addition of 1,4,7‐triazacyclononane‐1,4,7‐triacetic acid (NOTA) (55 mg, 180 μmol, 30 equiv) dissolved in water (1.5 mL), adjusting to pH 2.2 by using 1 M aq. HCl, and reacted for 1 h at 60 °C. HPLC‐MS was used in all steps for monitoring of reaction progress. TRAP(SDM17)3 was obtained as a colorless solid with a yield of 37 % (7.2 mg, 2.2 μmol). RP‐HPLC (gradient: 3–45 % MeCN in water, both containing 0.1 % trifluoroacetic acid, in 20 min, flow rate: 20 mL min−1): tR=16.6 min. MW (calcd for C135H225N48O39P3): 3235.63. MS (ESI, positive mode): m/z=1618.8 [M+2H+]2+, 1080.2 [M+3H+]3+, 810.3 [M+4H+]4+, 648.6 [M+5H+]5+, 540.6 [M+6H+]6+ (theoretical values: 1618.8, 1079.5, 809.9, 648.1, 540.3; for MS spectra, see Figure S2).
Affinity assays: The integrin affinities were determined by a solid‐phase binding assay, applying a previously described protocol.31 Briefly, flat‐bottom 96‐well enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) plates (BRAND, Wertheim, Germany) were coated with recombinant human LAP(TGF‐β) in carbonate buffer (15 mM Na2CO3, 35 mM NaHCO3, pH 9.6) at 4 °C overnight. After washing the plates with PBS‐T buffer (phosphate‐buffered saline/Tween20), free binding sites were blocked by incubation with TS‐B buffer (Tris‐saline/BSA). Dilution series of non‐radioactive Ga‐TRAP(SDM17)3 (20 μM to 6.4 nM) were prepared and incubated in 1 : 1 mixtures with the respective integrin. Surface‐bound integrin was detected by subsequent incubation with a specific primary antibody and a secondary peroxidase‐labeled antibody (anti‐mouse IgG‐POD, Sigma–Aldrich). After addition of the dye SeramunBlau (Seramun Diagnostic, Heidesee, Germany) and quenching of the reaction by addition of 3 M H2SO4, the absorbance at λ=450 nm was measured with a microplate reader (Tecan Genius, Männedorf, Switzerland). The IC50 value for each compound was determined in duplicate and the inhibition curves were analyzed by using OriginPro 9.0 software. The measured IC50 values were referenced to the activity of the internal standard RTDLDSLRT:48 αvβ6=33 nM, αvβ8=100 nM.
Radiochemistry: Fully automated 68Ga labeling was done in analogy to a previously described procedure15 by using an accordingly programmed robotic system (GallElut+, Scintomics, Fürstenfeldbruck, Germany) which carried out the following steps. A 68Ge/68Ga‐generator with TiO2 matrix (Eckert & Ziegler, Berlin, Germany) was eluted with 0.1 M aq. HCl. A fraction containing the highest activity (1.4 mL, ca. 500 MBq) was collected in a 5 mL conical glass vial, containing 5 or 10 nmol of TRAP(SDM17)3 or NOTA‐SDM17, respectively, as well as 50 or 100 μL, respectively, of a solution of 4‐(2‐hydroxyethyl)‐1‐piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES) buffer (2.7 M, prepared from 14.4 g HEPES and 12 mL water), resulting in a labeling pH of approximately 2 or 3, respectively. The vial was heated for 5 min to 100 °C. Purification was done by passing the reaction mixture over a solid phase extraction cartridge (SepPak C8 light), which was purged with water (10 mL). The products were eluted with ethanol (0.5 mL), followed by an ethanol/water mixture (1:1 by volumes, 1 mL). The purity of the radiolabeled compounds was determined by radio‐TLC, using silica impregnated glass fiber chromatography paper (ITLC® by Agilent) as stationary phase, and 0.1 M aq. sodium citrate or a mixture of 1 M aq. ammonium acetate and methanol (1 : 1 by volumes) as mobile phases.
To determine the n‐octanol/PBS distribution coefficients (log D7.4), 650 μL octan‐1‐ol and 650 μL phosphate‐buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) were combined in a 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube. Approximately 0.5 MBq of the radiolabeled compound was added and vortexed for 2 min at 2850 rpm using a Vortex Genie2 (Scientific Industries). The samples were centrifuged (11 500 g, 10 min), after which 100 μL of the organic phase and 10 μL of the aqueous phase were taken out and the activities of the aliquots were quantified in a γ‐counter. The log D values were calculated from the quotients of the measured activities and are given as averages±standard deviation (n=10).
Cell culture: H2009 human lung adenocarcinoma cells (CRL‐5911; American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), Manassas, VA, USA) were cultivated as recommended by the distributor. Cells were subcultivated after trypsination in a ratio of 1:2–1:5, two to three times weekly in culture medium (DMEM : F12, Biochrom FG4815; 5 % fetal bovine serum, FBS Superior Biochrom S0615; 1 % ITS‐G, ThermoFisher 41400045; 4.5 mM l‐glutamine (final conc.), Biochrom K 0282; 10 nM Hydrocortisone, Sigma H0888, 10 nM β‐estradiol, Sigma E2758; penicillin/streptomycin, Biochrom A 2213).
In‐vivo studies: All animal experiments were performed in accordance with general animal welfare regulations in Germany and the institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals. Keeping of the animals, generation of respective tumor xenografts, and ex‐vivo biodistribution studies49 as well as μPET imaging50 were done following previously described protocols, which are briefly summarized below.
To generate tumor xenografts, 6‐ to 8‐week‐old female CB17 severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) mice (Charles River, Sulzfeld, Germany) were inoculated with a maximum of 107 H2009 cells (the best results were obtained with 5–7×106) in Matrigel® (CultrexBME, Type 3 PathClear, Trevigen, Gentaur, Aachen, Germany; discontinued in 2019, hence switched to Geltrex™ LDEV‐Free Reduced Growth Factor Basement Membrane Matrix, A1413202, Life Technologies). Mice were used for biodistribution or PET when tumors had grown to a diameter of 8–10 mm (4–5 weeks after inoculation). β6 Integrin immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed as described before.37PET was recorded on a Siemens Inveon small‐animal PET system under isoflurane anesthesia. The animals were injected with between 9 and 18 MBq (200–400 pmol) of the 68Ga‐labeled compounds into the tail vein, whereupon PET was either continuously recorded in list mode for 90 min while anesthesia was maintained (dynamic scan, reconstructed as multiple frames), or the animals were allowed to wake up with access to food and water and scanned 75 min p.i. for 20 min with refreshed anesthesia (static scan, reconstructed as single frame). Time between scans shown in Figure 5 was 1 day. Data were reconstructed using Siemens Inveon Research Workspace software, employing a three‐dimensional ordered subset expectation maximum (OSEM3D) algorithm without scatter and attenuation correction. Images of static scans were exported as maximum intensity projections (Figure 5). Time‐activity curves (Figure 3) were obtained by generating isocontour regions of interest (ROI) for the tumor and the heart content (i.e., blood), as well as defining two spherical ROIs (each 23.4 mm3) in the thigh area (muscle), followed by plotting of average activity per volume in these ROIs over time.
For biodistribution studies, the mice were administered approximately 120 pmol (3–8 MBq, depending on radiolabeling yield and decay) of the radiopharmaceuticals into the tail vein and allowed to wake up with access to food and water. For blockade, 50 nmol of TRAP(SDM17)3 was administered 10 min before tracer injection. Animals were sacrificed 90 min after injection, blood was immediately taken from the heart with a syringe, and the organs of interest (heart, lung, liver, spleen, pancreas, stomach (empty), small intestine (empty), large intestine (empty), kidneys, adrenals, muscle, tongue, tumor, tail) were dissected. The activity in weighed tissue samples was quantified by using a γ‐counter. Injected dose per gram tissue (%ID/g) was calculated from the organ weights and counted activities.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2020
To assemble K11-linked Ub3 with the middle Ub 15N-labeled, approximately 0.75 mg of K11-linked Ub2 (15N-labeled on the distal Ub containing K11Boc) was reacted with 1.25 mg of thioesterified WT Ub. Both proteins were protected with Alloc groups, and K11-linked Ub2 was treated with TFA to expose the ε-amine of K11 for the chemical condensation reaction. Immediately prior to the reaction, each protein was dissolved in 45 μL of DMSO. After mixing the proteins together, the remaining ingredients (DIEA, AgNO3, and H-OSu) were added. Alloc deprotection was performed assuming 3 mg of Ub monomer with ten Alloc-protected amines per Ub. This overestimation of the amount of Ub ensured complete Alloc deprotection. The reaction pellet was dissolved in 315 μL of DMSO to which 180 μL of H2O, 87.2 μL of 20 mM [Cp*Ru(cod)Cl] (freshly dissolved in DMSO), and 17.9 μL of neat thiophenol were added. Protein was precipitated with ether, renatured, and purified as described above. A small aliquot (5 μL of 40 μM protein) was analyzed by ESI-MS to confirm that all Alloc groups on K11-linked Ub3 were removed (Supporting Information). Total amount of purified Ub3 was determined to be 0.3 mg (15% yield).
To assemble K33,K11-linked Ub3 with the middle Ub 15N-labeled, 0.75 mg of K33-linked Ub2 (15N-labeled on the proximal Ub) was reacted with 3 mg (an unintentional excess amount) of K11Boc Ub. The C-terminus of K33-Ub2 was thioesterified using MESNA and E1 enzyme as described above; complete thioesterification was verified by ESI-MS. The protein was protected with Alloc groups as described above, assuming 2 mg of Ub, and checked by ESI-MS. K11Boc Ub was protected with Alloc groups and treated with TFA as described above. For the condensation reaction, each protein was dissolved in 45 μL of DMSO before mixing both proteins together. DIEA, AgNO3, and H-OSu were added in the same amounts as described above. Subsequent Alloc deprotection took place assuming a total of 5 mg of Ub monomer with ten Alloc-protected amines per Ub. The reaction pellet was dissolved in 525 μL of DMSO to which 300 μL of H2O, 145.3 μL of 20 mM [Cp*Ru(cod)Cl] (freshly dissolved in DMSO), and 29.8 μL of neat thiophenol were added. Protein was renatured and purified as detailed above. Total amount of K33,K11-linked Ub3 was 0.35 mg (9% yield). The apparent lower yield reflects the excess amount of unreacted K11Boc Ub present in the reaction.
Publication 2011
Amines Enzymes Ethyl Ether Mesna N,N-diisopropylethylamine Proteins Sulfoxide, Dimethyl thiophenol

Most recents protocols related to «Thiophenol»

The glutathione peroxidase (GPx)-like
activity of tested compounds was determined using the thiophenol assay.109 (link) In more detail, 20 μL of the sample (10
μM) was added to a mixture of H2O2 (90
μL; 37.5 mM) and PhSH in methanolic solution (90 μL; 10
mM). The absorbance increase due to the formation of diphenyldisulfide
(PhSSPh) was monitored for 30 min (25 °C) at 305 nm by using
the Cytation 1 Cell Imaging Multimode Reader (BioTeK Instruments Inc.,
Winooski, VT, USA). The kinetics of the reaction were compared with
the control. Results were expressed as reaction rates, namely the
time taken for 50% completion of the PhSH oxidation to its disulfide
(t1/2) and rate constant (K).
Full text: Click here
Publication 2024
Not available on PMC !
Formyl-CoA. The synthesis was performed following a slight modification of the existing procedures 10, (link)19, (link)20 . First, formyl thiophenol was synthesized. 5.8 (150 mmol) formic acid was added dropwise to 7.1 mL (75 mmol) acetic anhydride and stirred at 25ºC for 2.
Publication 2024
Copper (II) chloride (CuCl2), sodium hydroxide (NaOH), ascorbic acid (C6H8O6), 4-mercaptopyridine (C5H5NS), thiophenol (C6H5SH), 2,6-dimethylbenzenethiol (C8H10S) and isopropanol (C3H8O) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. All chemicals were used directly without further purification. De-ionized water (DI water) was obtained from Millipore Q water purification system.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2024
Reagents Gold(III) chloride hydrate (HAuCl 4 •xH 2 O, 99.995%), trisodium citrate dihydrate (C 6 H 5 Na 3 O 7 •2H 2 O, 99.0%), (3-aminopropyl)trimethoxysilane (APTMS, 98%), 5-amino-1,3,4-thiadiazole-2-thiol (ATDT, 98%), 1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)ethylene (BPE, 97%), 4,4′bis(mercaptomethyl)biphenyl (BMMBP, 97%), 4-(trifluoromethyl) thiophenol (TFMTP, 99%), 4,4′-dipyridyl (44DP, 98%), d8-4,4′dipyridyl (d8-44DP), 4,4′-azopyridine (44AP, 99%), 1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)acetylene (BPA), phthalazine (PHTH, 98%), 4-mercaptopyridine (4MPY, 96%), 2-mercaptobenzothiazole (2MBT, 97%), 4,4′-thiobisbenzenethiol (TBBT, 98%), 4-aminothiophenol (ATP, 96%), 4-nitrothiophenol (NTP, 99%), 2-bromothiophenol (BTP, 97%), benzyl mercaptan (BMP, 99%), 6-amino-2-mercaptobenzothiazole (AMBT, 97%), 2,5-bis(4-pyridyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazole (BPT, 97%), sodium silicate aqueous solution (∼26.5%), and tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS, 99%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Reagent 5,5′-dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB, 99%) was purchased from Beantown Chemical. Reagent 5-(4-pyridyl)-1,3,4oxadiazole-2-thiol (PODT, 97%) was purchased from Alfa Aesar. Reagents 5-(4-pyridyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazole-3-thiol (PTT, 98%), thiophenol (PhSH, 99%), 2,2′-dipyridyl (22DP, 99%), 2-naphthalenethiol (2NT, 99%), and 4-mercaptobenzoic acid (4MBA, 90%) were purchased from Acros Organics. All work used deionized water (Milli-Q grade, Millipore) with a resistivity of 18.2 MΩ cm.
Publication 2024
5-5'dithiobis (2-nitrobenzioc acid; DTNB) reacts with aliphatic thiol compounds at pH 8.0 to supply 1 mole of p-nitrothiophenol anion/mole of thiol. The release of p-nitro thiophenol produced an intense yellow color, this read at 412 nm. This property is employed to measure the thiol concentration of reduced glutathione. The quantity of reduced glutathione within the tissues was expressed as µg/mg protein (27) .
Publication 2024

Top products related to «Thiophenol»

Sourced in Germany
Thiophenol is a colorless to pale yellow liquid organic compound with the molecular formula C6H5SH. It is commonly used as a reagent in organic synthesis and as a precursor for other chemical compounds.
Sourced in Germany, United States, India, United Kingdom, Italy, China, Spain, France, Australia, Canada, Poland, Switzerland, Singapore, Belgium, Sao Tome and Principe, Ireland, Sweden, Brazil, Israel, Mexico, Macao, Chile, Japan, Hungary, Malaysia, Denmark, Portugal, Indonesia, Netherlands, Czechia, Finland, Austria, Romania, Pakistan, Cameroon, Egypt, Greece, Bulgaria, Norway, Colombia, New Zealand, Lithuania
Sodium hydroxide is a chemical compound with the formula NaOH. It is a white, odorless, crystalline solid that is highly soluble in water and is a strong base. It is commonly used in various laboratory applications as a reagent.
Sourced in Germany, United States, United Kingdom, India, Italy, France, Spain, Australia, China, Poland, Switzerland, Canada, Ireland, Japan, Singapore, Sao Tome and Principe, Malaysia, Brazil, Hungary, Chile, Belgium, Denmark, Macao, Mexico, Sweden, Indonesia, Romania, Czechia, Egypt, Austria, Portugal, Netherlands, Greece, Panama, Kenya, Finland, Israel, Hong Kong, New Zealand, Norway
Hydrochloric acid is a commonly used laboratory reagent. It is a clear, colorless, and highly corrosive liquid with a pungent odor. Hydrochloric acid is an aqueous solution of hydrogen chloride gas.
Sourced in United States, Germany, Italy, France, Spain, United Kingdom, China, Canada, India, Poland, Sao Tome and Principe, Australia, Mexico, Ireland, Netherlands, Japan, Singapore, Sweden, Pakistan
Sodium borohydride is a reducing agent commonly used in organic synthesis and analytical chemistry. It is a white, crystalline solid that reacts with water to produce hydrogen gas. Sodium borohydride is frequently employed in the reduction of carbonyl compounds, such as aldehydes and ketones, to alcohols. Its primary function is to facilitate chemical transformations in a laboratory setting.
Sourced in United States, Germany, United Kingdom, China, Italy, Spain, Sao Tome and Principe, France, India, Canada, Switzerland, Macao, Japan, Belgium, Sweden, Poland
Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) is a versatile synthetic polymer commonly used in various laboratory applications. It is a water-soluble, non-toxic, and chemically stable compound. PVP's primary function is as a binder, stabilizer, and dispersing agent, helping to maintain the integrity and homogeneity of laboratory samples and solutions.
Sourced in United States
4-mercaptobenzoic acid is a chemical compound used in various laboratory applications. It is a colorless, crystalline solid with a distinct odor. The compound contains a carboxylic acid group and a thiol (sulfhydryl) group, which give it unique chemical properties. 4-mercaptobenzoic acid is commonly used as a building block in organic synthesis and as a reagent in analytical chemistry applications.
Sourced in Germany, United States, United Kingdom, Italy, India, France, China, Australia, Spain, Canada, Switzerland, Japan, Brazil, Poland, Sao Tome and Principe, Singapore, Chile, Malaysia, Belgium, Macao, Mexico, Ireland, Sweden, Indonesia, Pakistan, Romania, Czechia, Denmark, Hungary, Egypt, Israel, Portugal, Taiwan, Province of China, Austria, Thailand
Ethanol is a clear, colorless liquid chemical compound commonly used in laboratory settings. It is a key component in various scientific applications, serving as a solvent, disinfectant, and fuel source. Ethanol has a molecular formula of C2H6O and a range of industrial and research uses.
2-(1H-benzotriazol-1-yl)-1,1,3,3-tetramethyluronium fluorophosphate (HBTU) is a coupling agent commonly used in organic synthesis, particularly in the field of peptide chemistry. It facilitates the formation of amide bonds between amino acids during the synthesis of peptides and proteins.
N-Fmoc-protected amino acids are a class of amino acid derivatives used in peptide synthesis. They serve as building blocks for the construction of peptides and proteins, providing a protected amino group during the coupling process. These compounds are essential tools in the field of organic synthesis and biochemistry.
4-bromothiophenol is a chemical compound used as a laboratory reagent. It is a colorless to pale yellow crystalline solid with a distinct odor. 4-bromothiophenol is primarily used in organic synthesis and chemical analysis applications.

More about "Thiophenol"

Thiophenol is a versatile organic compound with the chemical formula C6H5SH.
It is a colorless to pale yellow liquid with a characteristic unpleasant odor.
This sulfur-containing aromatic compound is widely used as a precursor for the synthesis of various pharmaceuticals, pesticides, and rubber additives.
Thiophenol also serves as a corrosion inhibitor and a vulcanizing agent, making it an important industrial chemical.
Beyond its practical applications, the chemical properties and reactions of thiophenol are of great interest in organic chemistry research.
Thiophenol is studied in areas such as catalysis, materials science, and environmental remediation.
Researchers investigating thiophenol may face reproducibility challenges and need to identify the best protocols and products for their experiments.
To address these challenges, the PubCompare.ai platform can be a valuable tool.
It allows researchers to locate relevant protocols from literature, preprints, and patents, and leverages AI-driven comparisons to optimize thiophenol research and enhance reproducibility.
By utilizing this innovative solution, researchers can streamline their work and overcome reproducibility issues.
In addition to thiophenol, related compounds like sodium hydroxide, hydrochloric acid, sodium borohydride, polyvinylpyrrolidone, 4-mercaptobenzoic acid, ethanol, 2-(1H-benzotriazol-1-yl)-1,1,3,3-tetramethyluronium fluorophosphate (HBTU), and N-Fmoc-protected amino acids may also be of interest.
The 4-bromothiophenol variant is another closely related compound that researchers may encounter.
By understanding the broader context and the available tools, scientists can navigate the complexities of thiophenol research and advance their work in this field.