The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Trametinib

Trametinib is a mitogen-activated protein kinase (MEK) inhibitor used in the treatment of certain types of cancer, including metastatic melanoma.
It works by blocking the activity of the MEK1 and MEK2 proteins, which are involved in the regulation of cell growth and division.
Trametinib has been shown to be effective in treating melanoma that has a specific mutation in the BRAF gene.
It may be used alone or in combination with other cancer medications.
Researchers are continually exploring new ways to optimie the use of trametinib in cancer therapies, and PubCompare.ai's AI-powered platform can help streamline this process by identifying the best research protocols and products.

Most cited protocols related to «Trametinib»

Cell lines expressing dCas9-VP64 and dCas9 were made by transducing cells with the lentiviral vector pXPR_109, which expresses blasticidin resistance from a 2A site and dCas9-VP64 from the EF1α promoter, or pXPR_118, which expresses hygromycin resistance from a 2A site and dCas9 from the EF1α promoter, respectively. Prior to screening-scale transduction, dCas9-VP64 and dCas9 cell lines were selected with blasticidin and hygromycin, respectively.
For the dCas9-VP64 screens, cell lines expressing dCas9-VP64 were transduced with the Calabrese library in two biological replicates at a low MOI (~0.5). Transductions were performed with enough cells to achieve a representation of at least 500 cells per sgRNA per replicate, taking into account a 30–50% transduction efficiency. Throughout the screen, cells were split at a density to maintain a representation of at least 500 cells per sgRNA, and cell counts were taken at each passage to monitor growth. Puromycin selection was added 2 days post-transduction and was maintained for 5–7 days. After puromycin selection was complete, each replicate was split to no drug and drug treatment arms, each at a representation of at least 500 cells per sgRNA. A375 screens were performed with 2 μM vemurafenib; MelJuSo screens were performed with 1.5 μM selumetinib. 14 days after the initiation of drug treatment, cells were pelleted by centrifugation, resuspended in PBS, and frozen promptly for genomic DNA isolation.
For the dCas9-only screens, A375 cells expressing dCas9 were transduced with the Calabrese library in two biological replicates at a low MOI (~0.5) via a low-representation, no-spin method. Transductions were performed to achieve a representation of at least 300 sgRNAs per replicate, taking into account a 30–50% transduction efficiency. Cells were seeded into T175 flasks in a total volume of 20 mL of virus-containing media with polybrene at 0.5 μg mL−1. Flasks were then transferred to an incubator overnight. 16–18 h after seeding, the virus-containing media was replaced with fresh media and cells were expanded to achieve a representation of at least 500 transduced cells per sgRNA. Puromycin selection was added 2 days post-transduction and was maintained for 5–7 days. After puromycin selection was complete, each replicate was split to no drug and drug treatment arms, each at a representation of at least 500 cells per sgRNA. 14 days after the initiation of drug treatment, cells were pelleted by centrifugation, resuspended in PBS, and frozen promptly for genomic DNA isolation.
For secondary screens, cells expressing either dCas9 or dCas9-VP64 were transduced with the secondary pool in three biological replicates at a low MOI (~0.5). Transductions were performed with enough cells to achieve a representation of at least 500 cells per sgRNA per replicate, taking into account a 30–50% transduction efficiency. Throughout the screen, cells were split at a density to maintain a representation of at least 2000 cells per sgRNA, and cell counts were taken at each passage to monitor growth. Puromycin selection was added 2 days post-transduction and was maintained for 5–7 days. After puromycin selection was complete, each replicate was split to no drug and drug treatment arms, each at a representation of at least 2000 cells per sgRNA. A375 secondary screens were performed with 2 μM vemurafenib; MelJuSo secondary screens were performed with 10 nM trametinib or 1.5 μM selumetinib. 14 days after the initiation of drug treatment, cells were pelleted by centrifugation, resuspended in PBS, and frozen promptly for genomic DNA isolation.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2018
A 300 Arm, Upper Biopharmaceuticals cDNA Library Cell Lines Cells Centrifugation Cloning Vectors DNA Replication Freezing Genome hygromycin A isolation Pharmaceutical Preparations Polybrene Puromycin selumetinib trametinib Vemurafenib Virus
AZD9291 and PF02341066 (crizotinib) were purchased from Active Biochemicals (Maplewood, NJ). AZD6244 (selumetinib) and PD0325901 were purchased from Selleckchem (Houston, TX, USA). GSK1120212 (trametinib) was purchased from LC Laboratories (Woburn, MA). All agents were dissolved in DMSO at a concentration of 10 mM and aliquots were stored at −80°C. Stock solutions were diluted to the appropriate concentrations with growth medium immediately before use. Mcl-1, p-Mcl-1 (S159/T163), p-Bim (S69), caspase-8, PARP, p-ERK1/2 (T202/Y204), and ERK1/2 antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. (Beverly, MA). Caspase-3 antibody was purchased from Imgenex (San Diego, CA). Bcl-2 antibody was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc (Santa Cruz, CA). Bax and GAPDH antibodies were purchased from Trevigen (Gaithersburg, MD). Bim antibody was purchased from EMD Millipore (Billerica, MA). Actinomycin D (Act D), cycloheximide (CHX), mouse monoclonal anti-actin and anti-tubulin antibodies were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO).
Publication 2017
Actins Anti-Antibodies Antibodies AZD 6244 AZD9291 BCL2 protein, human Caspase-8 Caspase 3 Crizotinib Culture Media Cycloheximide Dactinomycin GAPDH protein, human GSK 1120212 Immunoglobulins Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 3 Mus PD-0325901 PF-02341066 selumetinib Sulfoxide, Dimethyl trametinib Tubulin
All mouse experiments approved by ethics committee were performed in accordance with institutional regulations governing animal care. Age- and gender-matched NSG (NOD-SCID IL2Rγnull) mice were used for animal experiments with human cell lines and PDXs. For H358 xenografts, tumor cells mixed with Matrigel (356231; Corning) were subcutaneously inoculated in left and right flanks. For the PDX model, tumor tissues were cut into small pieces (5 µm × 5 µm) and inserted into a subcutaneous pocket. Treatment was initiated when tumors were palpable and drugs were prepared in the following solvent: onalespib (2% DMSO + 30% PEG 300 in H2O) and trametinib (4% DMSO in Corn Oil). Trametinib (0.3 mg/kg for H358 xenografts, 0.5 mg/kg for PDX) was administered 5 days/week (p.o.), and onalespib (15 mg/kg for H358 xenografts and 30 mg/kg for PDX) twice/week (i.p.). Tumor size/volume was calculated by the formula: (D × d2)/2, where “D” refers to the long tumor diameter and “d” the short one.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2019
(2,4-dihydroxy-5-isopropylphenyl)-(5-(4-methylpiperazin-1-ylmethyl)-1,3-dihydroisoindol-2-yl)methanone Animals Cell Lines Cells Corn oil Ethics Committees Heterografts Homo sapiens matrigel Mus Neoplasms Pharmaceutical Preparations polyethylene glycol 300 SCID Mice Solvents Sulfoxide, Dimethyl Tissues trametinib
Only direct medical costs, including costs of acquiring drugs, costs attributed to the patient’s health state, costs for the management of adverse events (AEs), and costs for end-of-life care, were analyzed (Table 1). The costs are reported in 2019 US dollars and were inflated to 2019 values using the Medical-Care Inflation data set in Tom’s Inflation Calculator.16 According to the IMbrave150 trial report,5 (link) patients in the atezolizumab plus bevacizumab group received atezolizumab (1200 mg) plus bevacizumab (15 mg/kg body weight) intravenously every 3 weeks. Patients assigned to the sorafenib group received sorafenib (400 mg) orally twice daily. Treatment continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity or, for the immunotherapy regimen group, until 2 years of follow-up. The prices of atezolizumab, bevacizumab, and sorafenib were collected from public databases.12 ,13 In the US, the prices of ipilimumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and dabrafenib plus trametinib were discounted by 17% to account for contract pricing.17 (link) To calculate the dosage of bevacizumab, we assumed that a typical patient in the US weighed 71.4 kg.18 (link) After disease progression, 69 of 197 patients (35.0%) in the atezolizumab plus bevacizumab group and 73 of 109 patients (67.0%) in the sorafenib group received subsequent active therapy. The costs associated with subsequent active salvage therapy and the greatest supportive care were $108 336 and $37 084 per patient, respectively, which were estimated from a cost-effectiveness analysis of second-line treatments of advanced HCC.14 (link) The monitoring costs for patients with PFD and patients with PD were $245 per month and $15 308 per month, respectively, which were collected from an economic evaluation of sorafenib for unresectable HCC.15 (link) The cost associated with terminal care was $7893 per patient with advanced HCC.14 (link) The analysis included the costs associated with managing grade 3 or higher AEs, which were extracted from the literature (eTable 3 in the Supplement).14 (link),19 (link)Each health state was assigned a health utility preference on a scale of 0 (death) to 1 (perfect health). The PFD and PD states associated with HCC were 0.76 and 0.68,10 (link) respectively, which were derived from a cost-effectiveness analysis considering patients with HCC. The disutility values due to grade 1 or 2 and grade 3 or 4 AEs were included in this analysis.11 (link) All AEs were assumed to be incurred during the first cycle. The duration-adjusted disutility was subtracted from the baseline PFD utility.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2021
atezolizumab Bevacizumab Body Weight dabrafenib Dietary Supplements Disease Progression Hospice Care Immunotherapy Ipilimumab Nivolumab Patient Monitoring Patients pembrolizumab Salvage Therapy Sorafenib Terminal Care trametinib Treatment Protocols

Protocol full text hidden due to copyright restrictions

Open the protocol to access the free full text link

Publication 2017
Abdominal Cavity Allografts Aorta Aortas, Abdominal Blood Circulation CD274 protein, human Cells Cell Transplants Corn oil Coronary Vessels Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Antigen 4 Donors Eosin Flow Cytometry Grafts Graft Survival Heart Heart Transplantation IL2RA protein, human interferon regulatory factor 4, human Ligation Males Microscopy Monoclonal Antibodies Mus Palpation Pulmonary Artery Pulse Rate RAG-1 Gene Silk Surgical Anastomoses Sutures T-Lymphocyte trametinib Vena Cavas, Inferior

Most recents protocols related to «Trametinib»

Protocol full text hidden due to copyright restrictions

Open the protocol to access the free full text link

Publication 2024
ESK981 was added to ORA-PLUS and sonicated until completely dissolved. Trametinib was added to corn oil and sonicated until completely dissolved. Aliquots were frozen at −20°C to prevent freeze-thaw cycles. MRTX1133 was added to 10% Captisol in 50mM Citrate (pH = 5.0) and sonicated until completely dissolved as previously described43 (link). Dissolved MRTX1133 was kept at 4°C hidden from light for a maximum for 5 days. ESK981 and trametinib were delivered by oral gavage. MRTX1133 was delivered by intraperitoneal (IP) injection.
Full text: Click here
Publication Preprint 2024

Protocol full text hidden due to copyright restrictions

Open the protocol to access the free full text link

Publication 2024
The MAP of dabrafenib plus trametinib initiated on February 2, 2021, to enable early access to dabrafenib plus trametinib in patients with BRAF V600E -mutated PTC or anaplastic transformation who were unable to participate in clinical studies. We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety of dabrafenib plus trametinib in patients with BRAF V600Emutated PTC or anaplastic transformation enrolled in the MAP of dabrafenib plus trametinib at Samsung Medical Center, Korea. We included patients aged 18 years or older with a symptomatic disease that had progressed less than 12 months before treatment. There were no limitations on the quantity or type of prior systemic treatments. Patients who received dabrafenib plus trametinib before the initiation of MAP were also included.
The patient received an initial dose of dabrafenib 150 mg twice daily and trametinib 2 mg once daily. The patients were treated with dabrafenib plus trametinib for 28 days until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or death. Dose reduction and temporary interruption were permitted based on the physician's judgment.
Baseline neck and chest contrast computed tomography were performed within 4 weeks before starting the first dose of dabrafenib plus trametinib. Disease progression was assessed using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) ver. 1.1. Treatment-related adverse events were graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) ver. 5.0. The baseline characteristics, treatment history, efficacy, and safety outcomes were evaluated.
We evaluated progression-free survival (PFS), the investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and safety profiles.
PFS was defined as the time from the first dose of dabrafenib plus trametinib to the first occurrence of disease progression or death. Patients who had not experienced treatment discontinuation at the analysis cutoff date were censored at the analysis cutoff date. The investigator-assessed ORR per RECIST ver. 1.1. ORR was defined as the proportion of patients with a confirmed complete response and partial response (PR) according to RECIST ver. 1.1. The OS is the time between the start of dabrafenib plus trametinib treatment and the occurrence of death from any cause. We censored patients who were alive at the time of the last data cutoff and the last follow-up.
Publication 2024
Human LUAD cell lines (H1792, H2009, H23, A549, H2030, H1437, H1568, and H2126) and murine LUAD cell line Lewis Lung Carcinoma (LLC) were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection. KLA LUAD cells were derived from KR181fl/fl mice [25 (link)]. 393P cells were derived from KRASLA1/+; p53R172HDG mice, and provided by Dr. J. M. Kurie (The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA). Lacun3 LUAD cell line, which was established from a chemically induced LUAD mice model [26 (link)], was a gift of Prof. L. Montuenga (Cima Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain). CMT167 LUAD cell line was kindly provided by Dr. F. Torres Andon (Center for Research in Molecular Medicine and Chronic Diseases, Santiago de Compostela, Spain). Murine and human cells were cultured at 37 °C and 5% CO2 in DMEM (Gibco, Waltham, MA, USA) or RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco, Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% Penicillin/Streptomycin (Gibco, Waltham, MA, USA). Cells were routinely tested for Mycoplasma with the MycoAlert Mycoplasma Detection Kit (Lonza, Basel, Switzerland).
Trametinib, GSK2126458 and proteasome inhibitor (MG-132) #S2619 were acquired from Selleck chemicals (Houston, TX, USA). Trametinib was resuspended in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA) for in vitro experiments and in corn oil (Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA) for in vivo assays. Hydroxychloroquine sulfate H0915 (CQ) MFCD00078203 was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (MO, USA).
Trametinib-resistant (TR) cell lines were generated by culturing murine (CMT167, LLC and KLA) and human (H1792, H2009, A549 and H2030) parental lines with increasing concentrations of trametinib up to 500 nM, as previously described [27 (link)]. TR cell lines were always cultured in cell media with trametinib (500 nM) which was renewed every 4 days. TR-cell resistance to trametinib was measured by analyzing the proliferation capacity of these cells in the presence of trametinib, and compared with parental cells.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2024

Top products related to «Trametinib»

Sourced in United States, Germany, United Kingdom, France, China, Italy
Trametinib is a selective inhibitor of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) enzymes 1 and 2. It is a white to almost white crystalline powder that is used in various biomedical research applications.
Sourced in United States, Germany, France, Italy
Dabrafenib is a small molecule inhibitor of mutant BRAF kinases. It is used as a research tool in the study of BRAF-mediated signaling pathways.
Sourced in United States, Germany, France, China
Vemurafenib is a laboratory reagent used in research applications. It functions as a kinase inhibitor, specifically targeting the BRAF V600E mutation. This product is intended for research use only and its specific applications may vary depending on the research objectives.
Sourced in United States
Trametinib is a small molecule inhibitor that targets the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway. It inhibits the activity of the enzymes MEK1 and MEK2, which are part of the MAPK/ERK signaling cascade.
Sourced in United States, Italy
Trametinib is a pharmaceutical compound that functions as a selective inhibitor of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) enzymes MEK1 and MEK2. It is used in research applications to study cellular signaling pathways.
Sourced in United States, China, Germany
Selumetinib is a selective inhibitor of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK), a key component in the RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK signaling pathway. It is a powder-form laboratory reagent used in research and development applications.
Sourced in United States, China, Germany, United Kingdom, Switzerland
SCH772984 is a chemical compound used in laboratory research. It functions as a small molecule inhibitor. The core purpose of this product is for use in scientific experimentation and analysis.
Sourced in United States, China, United Kingdom, Germany
MK-2206 is a selective allosteric Akt inhibitor that binds to the pleckstrin homology (PH) domain of Akt and inhibits its phosphorylation and activation. It has been used in research applications to study the role of Akt signaling in various cellular processes.
Sourced in United States, Germany, United Kingdom, China, Canada, France, Japan, Australia, Switzerland, Israel, Italy, Belgium, Austria, Spain, Gabon, Ireland, New Zealand, Sweden, Netherlands, Denmark, Brazil, Macao, India, Singapore, Poland, Argentina, Cameroon, Uruguay, Morocco, Panama, Colombia, Holy See (Vatican City State), Hungary, Norway, Portugal, Mexico, Thailand, Palestine, State of, Finland, Moldova, Republic of, Jamaica, Czechia
Penicillin/streptomycin is a commonly used antibiotic solution for cell culture applications. It contains a combination of penicillin and streptomycin, which are broad-spectrum antibiotics that inhibit the growth of both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom, Germany, France, Switzerland, Italy, Japan, Belgium, Australia, China
CellTiter-Glo is a cell viability assay that quantifies the amount of ATP present in metabolically active cells. It provides a luminescent readout proportional to the amount of ATP, which is an indicator of the presence of viable cells.

More about "Trametinib"

Trametinib is a MEK inhibitor used in the treatment of certain types of cancer, including metastatic melanoma.
It works by blocking the activity of the MEK1 and MEK2 proteins, which are involved in the regulation of cell growth and division.
Trametinib has been shown to be effective in treating melanoma that has a specific mutation in the BRAF gene.
It may be used alone or in combination with other cancer medications, such as Dabrafenib, Vemurafenib, or Selumetinib.
Researchers are continually exploring new ways to optimize the use of trametinib in cancer therapies, and PubCompare.ai's AI-powered platform can help streamline this process.
The platform allows users to identify the best research protocols and products by locating relevant information from literature, pre-prints, and patents, and leveraging AI-driven comparisons.
PubCompare.ai's intuitive tools can help you make data-driven decisions and streamline your research process.
For example, you can use the platform to compare the effectiveness of different trametinib-based therapies, or to identify the best combination of trametinib with other cancer medications, such as SCH772984 or MK-2206.
Additionally, the platform can help you optimize your experimental protocols, such as the use of Penicillin/streptomycin or CellTiter-Glo, to ensure the best possible outcomes.
By utilizing PubCompare.ai's AI-powered platform, researchers can stay ahead of the curve and continually innovate in the field of cancer treatment.
Whether you're working with trametinib or exploring other cancer therapies, PubCompare.ai can help you streamline your research and make informed decisions that drive progress in the fight against cancer.