The largest database of trusted experimental protocols
> Chemicals & Drugs > Pharmacologic Substance > Dopamine Agonists

Dopamine Agonists

Dopamine Agonists are a class of pharmaceutical agents that stimulate dopamine receptors in the brain, mimicking the effects of the neurotransmitter dopamine.
These compounds are used to treat various neurological and psychiatric disorders, such as Parkinson's disease, restless leg syndrome, and hyperprolactinemia.
Dopamine agonists work by binding to and activating dopamine receptors, leading to downstream signaling cascades that can alleviate symptoms and improve patient outcomes.
Researchers can optimize dopamine agonist protocols using PubCompare.ai, which helps locate the best published, pre-print, and patent-based procedures to ensure reproducibility and accuracy.
This AI-driven tool allows researchers to identify the most effective dopamine agonist protocols and products, supporting their work in this important area of pharmacology and neuroscience.

Most cited protocols related to «Dopamine Agonists»

PD and HC subjects of similar age and gender from 24 study sites in the US (18), Europe (5) and Australia (1) were enrolled after obtaining informed consent. We acknowledge that the early PD cohort likely includes a small number of subjects with other DAT deficit parkinsonian syndromes such as progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), multiple system atrophy (MSA) and cortical basal syndrome (CBS), which may be indistinguishable from PD at the earliest stages of disease. At each study visit, the investigators reassess the subject diagnosis to identify any non‐PD subjects.
This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the Good Clinical Practice (GCP) guidelines after approval of the local ethics committees of the participating sites. At enrollment, PD subjects were required to be age 30 years or older, untreated with PD medications (levodopa, dopamine agonists, MAO‐B inhibitors, or amantadine), within 2 years of diagnosis, Hoehn and Yahr <3, and to have either at least two of resting tremor, bradykinesia, or rigidity (must have either resting tremor or bradykinesia) or a single asymmetric resting tremor or asymmetric bradykinesia. All PD subjects underwent dopamine transporter (DAT) imaging with 123I Ioflupane or vesicular monoamine transporter (VMAT‐2) imaging with 18F AV133 (Australia only) and were only eligible if DAT or VMAT‐2 imaging demonstrated dopaminergic deficit consistent with PD in addition to clinical features of the disease. Study investigators evaluated enrolled PD subjects to assess absence of current or imminent (6 months) disability requiring PD medications, though subjects could initiate PD medications at any time after enrollment if the subject or investigator deemed it clinically necessary. Those subjects screened as potential PD subjects who were ineligible due to DAT or VMAT‐2 scans without evidence of dopaminergic deficit (SWEDD) were eligible to be enrolled in a SWEDD cohort.4 HC subjects were required to be age 30 years or older without an active, clinically significant neurological disorder or a first‐degree relative with PD. All enrolled subjects agreed to complete all study evaluations, including lumbar puncture.
PD and SWEDD subjects were excluded if they had a clinical diagnosis of dementia or had taken PD medications within 60 days of baseline or for longer than 60 days in total. HC subjects were excluded if they had a Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) total score ≤26. All subjects were excluded if they were treated with neuroleptics, metoclopramide, alpha methyldopa, methylphenidate, reserpine, or amphetamine derivative within 6 months or were currently treated with anticoagulants that might preclude safe completion of the lumbar puncture.
Publication 2018
123I-ioflupane Amantadine Amphetamine Anticoagulants Antipsychotic Agents Bradykinesia Cortex, Cerebral Dementia Diagnosis Disabled Persons Dopamine Agonists Gender Hydrochloride, Dopamine Levodopa Methyldopa Methylphenidate Metoclopramide Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors Multiple System Atrophy Muscle Rigidity Nervous System Disorder Parkinsonian Disorders Pharmaceutical Preparations Progressive Supranuclear Palsy Punctures, Lumbar Radionuclide Imaging Regional Ethics Committees Reserpine Resting Tremor SLC6A3 protein, human Syndrome Vesicular Monoamine Transport Proteins Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy
A convenience sample of 104 participants (see Table 1 for demographic and clinical characteristics) with idiopathic PD were assessed either as part of participation in an ICD clinical trial or through convenience sampling at the Parkinson’s Disease and Movement Disorders Center at the University of Pennsylvania between January 2010 and April 2011. The Institutional Review Board (IRB) at Penn approved the study, and written consent was obtained from participants prior to study participation. Disease severity was assessed with the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) and Hoehn and Yahr stage,13 and levodopa and dopamine agonist dosages were converted to levodopa equivalent daily dosages (LEDDs).14 (link)
Publication 2011
Dopamine Agonists Ethics Committees, Research Levodopa Movement Disorders Parkinson Disease
Summary statistics for baseline demographics and PD characteristics were reported for all PD patients. Repeated‐measures linear mixed models were used to examine the changes in MDS‐UPDRS total and part III scores, separately for the whole cohort, and for the following subsets of participants: (1) untreated, (2) treated with DT (defined as levodopa and/or dopamine agonists), (3) treated only with levodopa, and (4) treated with other PD medications. Repeated‐measures linear mixed models were also used to examine the changes in clinical characteristics and DAT binding over time for the whole cohort.
Spearman correlations were calculated between MDS‐UPDRS and DAT binding ratios at each time point for the whole cohort and for the subset treated only with levodopa (using OFF scores in treated patients) and also between the change in MDS‐UPDRS and percent change in DAT binding ratios for the whole cohort. The t‐tests were used in pairwise comparisons of the 1‐year change in MDS‐UPDRS total score for patients who were untreated, treated with DT, and treated with other PD medications at year 1.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2018
Dopamine Agonists Levodopa Patients Pharmaceutical Preparations
Enrollment occurred from March 13, 2007, to May 28, 2010. Eligible participants were fewer than 5 years from Parkinson disease diagnosis (defined as asymmetric features including bradykinesia plus resting tremor, rigidity, or both) and had taken levodopa or a dopamine agonist for at least 90 days but not longer than 2 years. Continuation of other prescribed Parkinson disease therapy was allowed. Participants were to be followed up for a minimum of 5 years or until the end of the trial (a maximum of 8 years for the first enrolled participants) and encouraged to remain in the study even if they discontinued study drug. Adjustments of Parkinson disease medication were permitted during the trial. The institutional review board(s) approved the study, the study protocol, and the informed consent process and documentation. All patients provided written informed consent.
Publication 2015
Bradykinesia Diagnosis Dopamine Agonists Ethics Committees, Research Levodopa Muscle Rigidity Parkinson Disease Patients Pharmaceutical Preparations Resting Tremor Therapeutics
Patients who met the consensus diagnostic criteria2 for probable DLB were recruited from 48 psychiatric or neurological specialty centers throughout Japan from October 2007 to February 2010. Diagnosis of each patient was validated after discussion by the central committee. Outpatients (≥50 years old) with mild to moderate-severe dementia (10-26 on the Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE]18 and Clinical Dementia Rating19 ≥0.5) and with behavioral symptoms (Neuropsychiatric Inventory-plus [NPI-plus] ≥8) were eligible. NPI-plus is a 12-item version of the NPI, with the original 10 items supplemented by 2 DLB-relevant domains of sleep and cognitive fluctuation.11 , 20 , 21 Patients had caregivers who routinely stayed with them at least 3 days per week and 4 hours per day, provided information for this study, assisted compliance with treatment, and escorted patients to required visits.
Exclusion criteria included Parkinson disease diagnosed at least 1 year prior to the onset of dementia; focal vascular lesions on magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography that might cause cognitive impairment; other neurological or psychiatric diseases; clinically significant systemic disease; complications or history of severe gastrointestinal ulcer, severe asthma, or obstructive pulmonary disease; systolic hypotension (<90mmHg); bradycardia (<50m−1); sick sinus syndrome; atrial or atrioventricular conduction block; QT interval prolongation (≥450 milliseconds); hypersensitivity to donepezil or piperidine derivatives; severe parkinsonism (Hoehn and Yahr score ≥ IV)22 ; and treatment with ChEIs or any investigational drug within 3 months prior to screening. ChEIs, antipsychotic agents, and antiparkinson drugs other than L-dopa or dopamine agonists were not allowed during the study.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient (if at all possible) and his/her caregiver before initiating the study procedures. The study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The protocol was approved by the institutional review board at each center.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2012
Antiparkinson Agents Antipsychotic Agents Asthma Atrioventricular Block Behavioral Symptoms Blood Vessel Cognition derivatives Disorders, Cognitive Donepezil Dopamine Agonists Ethics Committees, Research Heart Atrium Hypersensitivity Investigational New Drugs Levodopa Lung Diseases, Obstructive Mental Disorders Mini Mental State Examination Outpatients Parkinson Disease Parkinsonian Disorders Patients piperidine Presenile Dementia Sick Sinus Syndrome Sleep Systole Ulcer X-Ray Computed Tomography

Most recents protocols related to «Dopamine Agonists»

Chi-square for categorical variables and Mann–Whitney U test for continuous variables due to non-normality were used to compare the baseline characteristics between patients with RLS and RLS-free controls. Cox proportional hazards regression models were applied to explore the association between RLS and the risk of dementia after adjusting for age, sex, income, residence, CCI, and history of other comorbidities. Among the Cox regression models, we used the Fine–Gray subdistribution hazard model with mortality as a competing risk given the old age of the study population. The proportional hazard assumption was satisfied in our Cox model (Schoenfeld individual test p-value > 0.05).
Sensitivity analyses were performed using four different models. In model 1, dementia was defined as the prescription of anti-dementia medications (donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine, and memantine) at least twice and a diagnosis of the ICD-code of dementia. Although these medications were approved for only AD (rivastigmine additionally for Parkinson’s disease dementia), they can be used for cognitive symptoms in other types of dementia based on recommendations from multiple guidelines [31 (link)–33 (link)]. The previous study revealed that the definition of all-cause dementia by ICD-10 code plus anti-dementia medications had a positive predictive value of 94.7% when reviewing the medical records of 972 patients in two hospitals [34 (link)]. In model 2, medication history was added to the ICD code to define RLS. Patients with RLS ICD-code (G25.8) who had taken dopamine agonists (ropinirole or pramipexole) twice or more were regarded as patients with RLS (n = 1458). In this sensitivity model, we excluded patients with Parkinson’s disease because they could also take dopamine agonists. In model 3, patients taking antipsychotic agents were excluded because the antidopaminergic property of antipsychotic agents could lead to a misdiagnosis of RLS (n = 2482). The following antipsychotic agents approved in South Korea were used in this study: haloperidol, sulpiride, chlorpromazine, perphenazine, pimozide, risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, paliperidone, amisulpride, aripiprazole, ziprasidone, clozapine, blonanserin, and zotepine. In model 4, patients with RLS only diagnosed by psychiatrists or neurologists were included (n = 1154) to preclude the possible misdiagnosis by non-expert physicians.
To evaluate the effect of dopamine agonists (pramipexole and ropinirole) on the development of dementia, the risk of dementia was compared after dividing RLS patients by dopamine agonist use. Patients with RLS who were prescribed pramipexole or ropinirole at least once were considered dopamine agonist users. All missing data were addressed using listwise deletion. Data processing and statistical analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Statistical significance was set at a two-tailed p-value of < 0.05.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2023
Age Groups agonists Amisulpride Antipsychotic Agents Aripiprazole blonanserin Chlorpromazine Clozapine Deletion Mutation Donepezil Dopamine Agonists Dopamine Effect Galantamine Haloperidol Hypersensitivity Memantine Neurobehavioral Manifestations Neurologists Olanzapine Paliperidone Parkinson Disease Patients Perphenazine Pharmaceutical Preparations Physicians Pimozide Pramipexole Prescription Drugs Presenile Dementia Psychiatrist Quetiapine Risperidone Rivastigmine ropinirole Sulpiride ziprasidone zotepine
HAL (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) was diluted with 0.05% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; Dojindo Laboratories, Japan) in sterile saline (vehicle). The drug is a traditional antipsychotic agent used primarily to treat schizophrenia and other psychoses (Gomes et al. 2013 (link); Vaz et al. 2018 (link); Magno et al. 2015 (link); Bruni et al. 2016 (link)) by relieving the symptoms of delusions and hallucinations commonly associated with schizophrenia. Haloperidol competitively blocks post-synaptic dopamine D2 receptors, eliminating dopamine neurotransmission while partially inhibiting 5-hydroxy-tryptamine (5-HT2) and α1-receptors. However, there is negligible activation of dopamine D1-receptors (Seibt et al. 2010 (link)).
CBD (Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI) was diluted with 0.05% methanol and sterile saline. CBD, one of the major compounds present in the marijuana (C. sativa) plant, has some medicinal properties; however, its mechanism is not well known (Andreza et al. 2016 (link); Jeong et al. 2019 (link)).
Ropinirole hydrochloride (ROP; KYOWA Pharmaceutical Industry Co., Ltd, Osaka, Japan) was diluted with 0.05% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; Dojindo Laboratories, Kumamoto, Japan) and sterile saline. The drug is a novel non-ergoline dopamine agonist, has selective affinity for dopamine D2 receptors, and is indicated for the treatment of early and advanced Parkinson’s disease (Pahwa et al. 2004 (link)).
Full text: Click here
Publication 2023
Antipsychotic Agents Caimans Cannabis Delusions Dopamine Dopamine Agonists Dopamine D1 Receptor Dopamine D2 Receptor Ergoline Hallucinations Haloperidol Methanol Pharmaceutical Preparations Plants Psychotic Disorders ropinirole hydrochloride Saline Solution Schizophrenia Serotonin Sterility, Reproductive Sulfoxide, Dimethyl Synaptic Transmission
The included patients were on stable medication before undergoing LCT (68 patients received L-dopa, 28 received amantadine, 29 received dopamine agonists, 9 were treated with monoamine oxidase B [MAO-B] inhibitors, and 5 used a catechol-o-methyltransferase inhibitor). Their demographic data, history of hypertension, use of antihypertensive drugs, age of onset, Hoehn and Yahr stage, disease duration, and use of anti-PD drugs were recorded. The L-dopa equivalent daily dose was calculated using a formula described previously.[14 (link)] Clinical features were assessed using the Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale. Motor phenotypes were divided into postural instability and gait difficulty-dominant and non-postural instability and gait difficulty-dominant based on the Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale scores.[15 (link)] Validated scales, including cognitive functions by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)-Beijing version,[16 (link)] anxiety by the Hamilton Anxiety Scale,[17 (link)] depression by the Hamilton Depression Scale,[18 (link)] quality of life by the 39-item Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire,[19 (link)] autonomic functions by the Non-Motor Symptoms Questionnaire,[20 (link)] and sleep problems by the Parkinson’s Disease Sleep Scale,[21 (link)] were applied to evaluate patients’ non-motor symptoms.
Publication 2023
Amantadine Antihypertensive Agents Anxiety Cognition Dopamine Agonists Dyssomnias High Blood Pressures Levodopa Melancholia Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors Movement Movement Disorders Nervous System, Autonomic O-Methyltransferase Inhibitors, Catechol Parkinson Disease Patients Pharmaceutical Preparations Phenotype
The LCT was implemented at the hospital in the morning after discontinuing all anti-PD drugs (L-dopa for at least 12 hours and dopamine agonists for at least 36 hours before the test) in a state of fasting. Antihypertensive drugs were discontinued simultaneously. The dose required for the trial was converted to 150% of conventional morning L-dopa equivalents.[22 (link)] Patients received L-dopa/benserazide equivalent to the calculated dose. Symptoms of discomfort, including dizziness, lethargy, fatigue, and nausea experienced by the participants were recorded during LCT.
All participants were assessed using the UPDRS-III at various time intervals: baseline and 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 hours after the initiation of LCT. In this study, 70 (89.7%) patients demonstrated the highest rate of improvement in motor symptoms, and highest subjective improvement score was observed 2 hours after receiving L-dopa/benserazide tablets (200 mg levodopa/50 mg benserazide, Shanghai Roche Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Shanghai, China). Therefore, the baseline UPDRS-III, LCT 2 hours UPDRS-III, and maximum improvement rate were used as observation indicators for this study.
Publication 2023
Antihypertensive Agents benserazide - levodopa Dopamine Agonists Fatigue Lethargy Levodopa Nausea Patients Pharmaceutical Preparations

Protocol full text hidden due to copyright restrictions

Open the protocol to access the free full text link

Publication 2023
Cesium-137 Dopamine Agonists Levodopa Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors OP 10 Pharmaceutical Preparations Radionuclide Imaging Reading Frames Reconstructive Surgical Procedures Transmission, Communicable Disease

Top products related to «Dopamine Agonists»

Sourced in United Kingdom, United States
SCH23390 is a selective dopamine D1 receptor antagonist. It binds to the D1 dopamine receptor with high affinity and selectivity, making it a useful tool for studying the function and distribution of this receptor subtype.
Sourced in United States, Germany
Apomorphine is a laboratory equipment product manufactured by Merck Group. It is a chemical compound used in various research and analytical applications. Apomorphine serves as a core function in specific laboratory procedures and experiments.
Sourced in United States, Sao Tome and Principe, Germany
Quinpirole is a chemical compound used in research laboratories. It functions as a selective agonist for the D2 and D3 dopamine receptors. Quinpirole is commonly utilized in experimental studies to investigate the effects of dopamine receptor activation on various biological processes.
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom
SCH23390 is a laboratory reagent used for scientific research. It is a specific antagonist of the D1 dopamine receptor, and is commonly used as a tool compound in neuroscience and biochemistry studies. The core function of SCH23390 is to selectively bind to and block the activity of the D1 dopamine receptor in in vitro and in vivo experimental settings.
Sourced in United States, Germany
Apomorphine hydrochloride is a chemical compound used as a laboratory reagent. It is a dopamine receptor agonist with a core function of binding to and activating dopamine receptors in biological systems.
Sourced in United Kingdom
SKF38393 is a dopamine D1 receptor agonist. It is used in pharmacological research to study the function and regulation of dopamine D1 receptors.
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom
SKF38393 is a laboratory reagent produced by Merck Group. It is a selective dopamine D1 receptor agonist. The core function of this product is to stimulate the D1 receptor subtype of the dopamine receptor family in in vitro and in vivo research applications.
Sourced in United Kingdom, United States
L-741,626 is a selective dopamine D2 receptor antagonist used in scientific research. It functions by binding to and inhibiting the activity of the dopamine D2 receptor, which is involved in various physiological and behavioral processes.
Sourced in United Kingdom
SKF38393 is a selective dopamine D1 receptor agonist. It is a laboratory research tool used to investigate the role of dopamine D1 receptors in various biological processes.
Sourced in United States
SKF-81297 is a selective agonist for the D1 dopamine receptor. It is commonly used as a research tool in the study of dopaminergic signaling pathways.

More about "Dopamine Agonists"

Dopamine agonists are a class of pharmaceutical agents that mimic the effects of the neurotransmitter dopamine in the brain.
These compounds are used to treat various neurological and psychiatric disorders, including Parkinson's disease, restless leg syndrome, and hyperprolactinemia.
Dopamine agonists work by binding to and activating dopamine receptors, leading to downstream signaling cascades that can alleviate symptoms and improve patient outcomes.
Some common examples of dopamine agonists include apomorphine, quinpirole, SKF38393, and L-741,626.
Apomorphine is a non-selective dopamine agonist used to treat Parkinson's disease and reduce motor symptoms, while quinpirole is a selective D2/D3 receptor agonist used in animal models to study the effects of dopamine receptor stimulation.
SKF38393 is a D1-selective agonist, and L-741,626 is a D2-selective antagonist, both of which are used in research to investigate the specific roles of dopamine receptor subtypes.
Researchers can optimize dopamine agonist protocols using PubCompare.ai, an AI-driven tool that helps locate the best published, pre-print, and patent-based procedures to ensure reproducibility and accuracy.
This tool allows researchers to identify the most effective dopamine agonist protocols and products, supporting their work in this important area of pharmacology and neuroscience.
By utilizing the insights gained from MeSH term descriptions and incorporating relevant synonyms, abbreviations, and key subtopics, researchers can deepen their understanding of dopamine agonists and leverage the latest advancements in this field to advance their work.
Ths AI-driven comparisons provided by PubCompare.ai can help ensure that dopamine agonist protocols are both effective and reproducible, leading to more reliable and impactful research outcomes.