We recruited 50 patients with idiopathic PD meeting research diagnostic criteria21 (link) (Supporting Information Table 1 ). Subjects were videoed performing UPDRS-directed finger tapping, hand grasping, and pronation–supination tasks in the OFF (12–15 hours after dopaminergic drug withdrawal) and ON states while wearing wireless 6-degree-of-freedom motion sensors (KinetiSense, CleveMed, Cleveland, OH) on the index finger and thumb (Supplementary Fig. 1 ). Patients were asked to perform each of the 3 tasks by the more affected limb for 15 seconds with as large an amplitude and as fast movements as possible.
The videos were randomized for independent evaluation by 4 movement disorders neurologists who used the UPDRS and MBRS to score each task. The MBRS was developed by Kishore et al15 (link) for scoring speed, amplitude, and rhythm separately (Supporting Information Table 2 ). Approximately 4 weeks after scoring the videos, the same clinicians rescored the videos (rerandomized) to examine intrarater reliability. After the second scoring, the clinicians held a group training session using 15 videos containing each of the tasks (not included in the study data) in an attempt to normalize severity ratings across clinicians. Approximately 2 weeks after this training session, the videos were rerandomized and scored a third and final time by all 4 clinicians.
We assessed both agreement between clinicians (interrater reliability) as well as agreement of repetitions of ratings by each individual clinician (intrarater reliability). Scores for each MBRS subtask were correlated with their corresponding UPDRS scores to determine which movement components were given greater subjective weight when assigning a UPDRS score. MBRS scores were compared with several quantitative features extracted from the 2 motion sensors in order to examine their validity (extent to which they measure what they intend to measure).
Further details of the methods are available in the onlineSupporting Material .
The videos were randomized for independent evaluation by 4 movement disorders neurologists who used the UPDRS and MBRS to score each task. The MBRS was developed by Kishore et al15 (link) for scoring speed, amplitude, and rhythm separately (
We assessed both agreement between clinicians (interrater reliability) as well as agreement of repetitions of ratings by each individual clinician (intrarater reliability). Scores for each MBRS subtask were correlated with their corresponding UPDRS scores to determine which movement components were given greater subjective weight when assigning a UPDRS score. MBRS scores were compared with several quantitative features extracted from the 2 motion sensors in order to examine their validity (extent to which they measure what they intend to measure).
Further details of the methods are available in the online