The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Emtricitabine

Emtricitabine: An antiviral medication used in the treatment of HIV infection.
This AI-powered tool, PubCompare.ai, helps researchers optimize Emtricitabine research by identifying the best protocols from literature, preprints, and patents.
It provides intelligent comparisons to ensure reproducible and effective science, while also uncovering the latest advancements in Emtricitabine research to streamline your workflow.
Discover the cutting-edge technology of PubCompare.ai and take your Emtricitabine studies to the next level.

Most cited protocols related to «Emtricitabine»

The AIDS Clinical Trials Group Study A5202 is an ongoing phase 3B, randomized, partially blinded study comparing four antiretroviral regimens for the initial treatment of HIV-1 infection. The planned study duration was 96 weeks after enrollment of the last patient. Baseline evaluations included a medical history, physical examination, CD4 cell count, and HIV-1 RNA level. At screening, a genotypic resistance test was required in patients with recent HIV-1 acquisition. Testing for the HLA-B*5701 allele was permitted but not required. Patients were randomly assigned to receive one of four oral once-daily regimens: 600 mg of efavirenz (Sustiva, Bristol-Myers Squibb) or 300 mg of atazanavir (Reyataz, Bristol-Myers Squibb) plus 100 mg of ritonavir (Norvir, Abbott Laboratories) given with either 600 mg of abacavir plus 300 mg of lamivudine (Epzicom, GlaxoSmithKline) or 300 mg of tenofovir DF plus 200 mg of emtricitabine (Truvada, Gilead Sciences). The study was double-blinded with regard to the NRTIs.
Randomization was stratified according to the screening HIV-1 RNA level obtained before study entry (≥100,000 vs. <100,000 copies per milliliter), with the use of a permuted-block design with dynamic balancing according to the main institution. Screening of HIV-1 RNA levels was performed at any laboratory certified under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments. Study evaluations were completed before entry, at entry, at weeks 4, 8, 16, and 24, and every 12 weeks thereafter for the duration of the study in all patients, regardless of any treatment modification. After screening, the level of HIV-1 RNA was measured (Roche Amplicor Monitor assay, version 1.5) at Johns Hopkins University. At the time of protocol-defined virologic failure, geno-typing for drug resistance was performed at Stanford University; the baseline samples obtained from the patients were genotyped retrospectively.
Abbott Pharmaceuticals, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, and GlaxoSmithKline provided the study medications and had input into the protocol development and review of the manuscript. All the authors participated in the trial design, data analysis, and preparation of the manuscript, and all the authors vouch for the completeness and accuracy of the reported data.
Publication 2009
abacavir - lamivudine Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome Alleles Atazanavir AT protocol Biological Assay CD4+ Cell Counts Clinical Laboratory Services efavirenz Emtricitabine Epzicom HIV-1 HIV Infections Norvir Patients Pharmaceutical Preparations Physical Examination Resistance, Drug Reyataz Ritonavir Sustiva Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Testing, AIDS Treatment Protocols Truvada
Data for this analysis were taken from the LifeLink database (formerly the PharMetrics Integrated Outcomes database), a national insurance claims database encompassing 95 United States managed care organizations covering over 61 million lives between 1997 and 2008. This database contains patient-level demographics, periods of health plan enrollment, primary and secondary diagnoses, and detailed information about hospitalizations and therapeutic procedures, inpatient and outpatient physician services, and prescription drug use. In compliance with the Health Insurance and Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, all data were de-identified to protect the privacy of individual patients, physicians, and hospitals. Because the data were retrospective, preexisting, and de-identified, RTI International's institutional review board determined that this study met all criteria for exemption.
Patients were selected for inclusion if they received at least one HIV or AIDS diagnosis (International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification [ICD-9-CM] code 042.xx) between June 1, 2006, and December 31, 2008. Patients also were required to have evidence of receipt of a complete ART regimen, defined as two nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors plus a third agent (i.e., another nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor, a nonnucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor, a protease inhibitor [PI], a chemokine receipt 5 antagonist, or an integrase inhibitor). ART agents were identified in the claims database by using National Drug Codes associated with relevant generic and brand names. Further, patients were required to remain on the complete regimen for at least 60 days following first observed uptake and to have evidence of continuous enrollment in their health plan during this period.
Patients were grouped into three mutually exclusive cohorts according to the daily pill count of their complete ART regimen. Patients were assigned to the single-pill-per-day cohort if they received an ART regimen consisting of a single pill at any point during the selection window, regardless of prior or subsequent use of other regimens. At the time of this study, only coformulated tenofovir/emtricitabine/efavirenz was available as a single pill per day. Patients were assigned to the two-pills-per-day cohort if they received a regimen consisting of two pills per day at any point during the selection window and if they did not receive a regimen consisting of a single pill per day at any point during the selection window. Finally, patients were assigned to the three-or-more-pills-per-day cohort if they received a regimen consisting of three or more pills per day at any point during the selection window and if they did not receive a regimen consisting of either a single pill per day or two pills per day at any point during the selection window.
Patients were followed from the start of their complete ART regimen (which defined the study index date) until the earliest date of regimen discontinuation, disenrollment from the health plan, or the end of the database (i.e., March 31, 2009). Discontinuation was defined as 90 consecutive days in which no refills were observed for any component of the regimen.
Patient characteristics measured at the index date included age, sex, geographic region, health insurance coverage, and ART classes received (i.e., nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors, nonnucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors, PIs, ritonavir boosting, and other therapies). The presence of comorbid medical conditions other than HIV or AIDS was assessed during the 6-month pre-index period using an established algorithm, the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score [12] (link). This score is made up of 17 comorbidities (defined by ICD-9-CM diagnosis and procedure codes), such as myocardial infarction and chronic pulmonary disease, which are weighted to correspond to the severity of the comorbid condition of interest. A higher comorbidity score represents a higher overall comorbidity burden during the pre-index period. Additionally, the incidence of other concomitant mental disorders (ICD-9-CM codes 306.xx to 319.xx) and drug and alcohol abuse (ICD-9-CM codes 292.xx and 303.xx to 305.xx) during the 6-month pre-index period also were assessed.
Medication adherence was assessed using the medication possession ratio (MPR), which has been shown to be the most widely adopted measure in published claims-based analyses (57% of all studies) of medication adherence [13] (link) and has been used in studies of ART adherence among individuals with HIV [14] (link). For each patient, the MPR was calculated over the period in which the patient remained exposed to his or her ART regimen. The MPR, which is a proxy for refill compliance, generally measures the proportion of the ART exposure period in which supply was maintained for all ART components comprising the regimen. Specifically, MPR was calculated as the number of filled prescription days for all ART regimen components (using the days supplied in the pharmacy claims) divided by the number of days from the first observed prescription in the regimen through the earliest of either the exhaustion of the days supplied of the last observed prescription or the end of follow-up. For patients in either of the two- or three-or-more-pill-per-day cohorts, late refills and resulting days of missing supply for only one ART component were factored against their adherence measurement. Patients in the three-or-more pills-per-day cohort with a supply for only two of their ART components on a given day, for example, were considered to have zero adherence for that day. In addition to reporting the mean (standard deviation) MPR achieved, we also reported the numbers and percentages of patients achieving various adherence thresholds (i.e., MPRs of 0.95, 0.90, 0.85, and 0.80, corresponding to 95%, 90%, 85%, and 80% adherence, respectively).
Hospitalizations were identified from the claims database using relevant place of service codes. Hospitalizations were observed from the index date until the earliest date of regimen discontinuation, end of enrollment in the health plan, or end of the database. The number and percentage of patients with at least one hospitalization were reported, along with the mean (standard deviation) number of hospitalizations.
All analyses were carried out using SAS (Version 9; Cary, North Carolina) statistical software. Descriptive analyses were conducted for all outcome measures and included means and standard deviations for continuous variables of interest (e.g., MPR) and frequency distributions of categorical variables of interest (e.g., geographic region). All descriptive analyses were stratified by each pill-count cohort.
Multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess the relationship between the number of pills per day, adherence, and hospitalization. The dependent variables included binary indicators for achieving an MPR threshold of 0.95 (i.e., 95% adherence) and whether the patient was hospitalized during exposure to the ART regimen. Independent variables included in each logistic model were as follows: treatment regimen received (i.e., single pill per day and two pills per day vs. the reference category of three or more pills per day), age, sex, geographic region, health plan type, payer type, CCI score, treatment-naïve status, pre-index presence of mental health disorders, and pre-index presence of alcohol or drug abuse disorders. Since the number of pills received per day and achieving a 95% adherence threshold were likely proxies for each other, two separate models assessing hospitalization risk were estimated. Odds ratios (ORs) were reported for all covariates.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2012
Abuse, Alcohol Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome Chemokine Contraceptives, Oral Diagnosis Disease, Chronic Drug Abuse efavirenz Emtricitabine Ethanol Ethics Committees, Research Generic Drugs Health Insurance Health Planning Health Services, Outpatient Hospitalization Inpatient Insurance Claim Review Integrase Inhibitors Lung Lung Diseases Managed Care Mental Disorders Myocardial Infarction Nucleosides Nucleotides Patients PGRMC1 protein, human Pharmaceutical Preparations Physicians Prescription Drugs Protease Inhibitors Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors Ritonavir Tenofovir Treatment Protocols

Protocol full text hidden due to copyright restrictions

Open the protocol to access the free full text link

Publication 2019
Albumins Alleles Animals BLOOD Body Weight Cholesterol Clone Cells Corn oil efavirenz Emtricitabine Fat-Restricted Diet Hepatocyte Heterozygote Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees Lipid Metabolism Males Mice, Inbred C57BL Mice, Knockout Mice, Laboratory Mice, Transgenic Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells pathogenesis Therapy, Diet Tissues Tissue Specificity Tube Feeding Xenobiotics
We used the Cost-Effectiveness of Preventing AIDS Complications (CEPAC) model, a widely published simulation state transition model of HIV disease [7 (link), 8 (link)], along with data reported in the literature, to evaluate the clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of HLA-B*5701 testing to guide selection of first-line HIV treatment regimens in patients in the United States.
Upon entering the model, simulated patients initiated a first-line ART regimen consisting of a fixed-dose combination of abacavir and lamivudine with efavirenz or a fixed-dose combination of tenofovir, emtricitabine, and efavirenz. For patients initiating treatment that included abacavir, we compared “universal testing” versus “no testing.” In the universal testing strategy, all patients were tested for HLA-B*5701 prior to ART initiation. Abacavir-based treatment was selected for patients testing HLA-B*5701 negative and tenofovir-based treatment was selected for patients testing HLA-B*5701 positive. In the no testing strategy, all patients were initiated on abacavir-based treatment. In either strategy, patients taking abacavir who developed a suspected HSR were treated in office-based or inpatient settings according to the severity of their symptoms, and were then switched to tenofovir-based treatment. Patients switched to tenofovir-based treatment who subsequently developed treatment-limiting tenofovir-associated nephrotoxicity were switched to a fixed-dose combination of zidovudine and lamivudine with efavirenz.
In the comparison strategy, all patients in the model initiated tenofovir-based treatment without initial HLA-B*5701 testing. For patients who developed treatment-limiting tenofovir-associated nephrotoxicity, we considered three alternatives to guide drug substitution: 1) “substitution HLA-B*5701 testing,” where those testing HLA-B*5701 negative were switched to abacavir-based treatment and those testing HLA-B*5701 positive were switched to zidovudine-based treatment, 2) substituting abacavir-based treatment without testing, and 3) substituting zidovudine-based treatment without testing.
Publication 2008
abacavir Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome Drug Substitution efavirenz Emtricitabine HLA-B Antigens Inpatient Lamivudine Patients Selection for Treatment Tenofovir Treatment Protocols Zidovudine
Data were retrospectively collected on consecutive patients admitted to Princess Marina Hospital with laboratory-confirmed CM between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2014. Princess Marina Hospital is a 530-bed public hospital in Gaborone that serves as 1 of 2 national referral centers for Botswana, providing free treatment to all citizens. The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the Helsinki Declaration (amended in 2008) and approved by institutional review boards at the University of Pennsylvania, University of Botswana, and Princess Marina Hospital, as well as the Botswana Ministry of Health’s Health Research and Development Committee. A waiver of informed consent was obtained as we collected routine retrospective data and as individual-level patient data were anonymized for the analysis. We included all patients who had laboratory-confirmed CM by either cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) India ink stain, cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) latex agglutination test, or fungal culture, with no exclusion criteria. Patients re-admitted with a recurrence of CM symptoms and laboratory-confirmed CM at any time point after their initial admission were classified as relapse episodes. During the study period, the recommended treatment for CM was amphotericin B deoxycholate 1 mg/kg/d IV plus fluconazole 800 mg/d orally for 14 days, followed by standard fluconazole consolidation and maintenance therapy. Electrolyte supplementation was given at the responsible physician’s dicretion. Antiretroviral therapy (ART) was freely available in the hospital and at public sector clinics, with tenofovir, emtricitabine, and efavirenz as firstline.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2018
amphotericin B, deoxycholate drug combination Antigens Cerebrospinal Fluid Cryptococcus efavirenz Electrolytes Emtricitabine Ethics Committees, Research Fluconazole India ink Latex Fixation Tests Patients Physicians Public Sector Recurrence Relapse Tenofovir Therapeutics

Most recents protocols related to «Emtricitabine»

All samples were from archives of studies approved by the Johns Hopkins University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and conducted in accordance with the Weatherall Report, the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, and the USDA Animal Welfare Act. For initial studies and verification of extracellular vesicle separations, plasma samples were obtained from pigtailed macaques that were not infected (n = 2) or dual-inoculated with SIV swarm B670 and clone SIV/17E-Fr and untreated (n = 3) or treated then treatment interruption (“rebound,” n = 3); (Supplemental Table 1). Longitudinal verification samples were from two cohorts of six pigtailed macaques dual-inoculated as above [28 (link),29 (link)] and treated with ART (consisting of once daily subcutaneous 2.5 mg/kg dolutegravir, 20 mg/kg tenofovir, and 30 mg/kg emtricitabine) boosted or not with maraviroc, and a cohort of six rhesus macaques infected with SIVmac251 [30 ,31 (link)] and treated with ART (Supplemental Table 2). For pigtails, ART started at 12 days postinoculation (dpi), and for rhesus, at 14 dpi. Time points were preinfection (two draws), acute infection (7, 14 dpi), latent infection (ART-suppressed) (86, 154 dpi), rebound [12 days ART treatment interruption (postrelease (dpr)], and necropsy. Additional pigtailed samples (uninfected, n = 3 and acute infected 7 dpi, n = 3) were used for density separations (Supplemental Table 3).
Publication 2023
Animals, Laboratory Autopsy Clone Cells dolutegravir Emtricitabine Extracellular Vesicles Infection Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees Latent Infection Macaca mulatta Macaca nemestrina Maraviroc Plasma Tenofovir
Tumor samples were obtained from the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) and Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. This study included archived Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded (FFPE) samples from 20 non-neoplastic thyroids, 8 adenomatous nodules and 60 sporadic well-differentiated follicular derived thyroid cancers (DTC): 47 PTCs and 13 FTCs. Demographic information including age and sex was collected from each patient in addition to histopathologic results and tumor staging. Ethics approvals for collection and use of the patient samples were obtained from the CHOP Institutional Review Board as part of the Child and Adolescent Thyroid Consortium (CATC) Biorepository study (IRB# 20-018240).
Full text: Click here
Publication 2023
Adenoma Adolescent Child Emtricitabine Factor IX Complex Follicular Thyroid Carcinoma Formalin Neoplasms Paraffin Embedding Patients Thyroid Gland Thyroid Neoplasm
At 4 weeks of age, male wild type (WT; n = 17) and IL-10−/− mice (n = 40) were randomly assigned to either a placebo or combined antiretroviral therapy (cART) for 12 weeks ± 1 week. The chosen cART regimen using repurposed HIV nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors and protease inhibitors had been evaluated for activity in antagonizing MMTV in vitro and demonstrated antiviral activity in vivo corresponding with improvement of inflammatory disease in prior studies [21 (link)]. Animals were fed ad libitum with cART added to the drinking water, freshly prepared every second day for 12 weeks, to achieve a daily dose of 1 mg emtricitabine and 1.5 mg tenofovir disoproxil fumarate nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors as well as 4 mg lopinavir boosted with 1 mg ritonavir protease inhibitors, as described previously [21 (link)]. Control treatment group mice received ground placebo tablets in their drinking water. Water consumption was monitored daily and mouse weights measured weekly.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2023
Animals Antiviral Agents Emtricitabine HIV Reverse Transcriptase IL10 protein, human Inflammation inhibitors Lopinavir Males Mouse mammary tumor virus Mus Nucleosides Nucleotides Placebos Protease Inhibitors Psychotherapy, Multiple Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors Ritonavir SERPINA1 protein, human Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Treatment Protocols Water Consumption

Protocol full text hidden due to copyright restrictions

Open the protocol to access the free full text link

Publication 2023
Emtricitabine Infection Mice, House Raltegravir Tenofovir
Susceptible mice received daily gastric administration of entecavir (0.3 mg/kg in a volume of 0.2 ml; TopScience Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China) for a 2-w antiretroviral therapy. Susceptible mice received daily gastric administration of tenofovir (30 mg/kg in a volume of 0.2 ml; TopScience Co. Ltd.), emtricitabine (200 mg/kg in a volume of 0.2 ml; TopScience Co. Ltd.), lamivudine (100 mg/kg in a volume of 0.2 ml; TopScience Co. Ltd.), or rilpivirine (5 mg/kg in a volume of 0.2 ml; TopScience Co. Ltd.) for a 2-w pharmacologically inhibiting reverse transcriptases.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2023
Emtricitabine entecavir Lamivudine Mice, House Rilpivirine RNA-Directed DNA Polymerase Stomach Tenofovir Therapeutics

Top products related to «Emtricitabine»

Sourced in United States
Emtricitabine is a nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) used as part of combination antiretroviral therapy for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. It works by inhibiting the reverse transcriptase enzyme, which is essential for the replication of the HIV virus.
Sourced in United States
Truvada is a lab equipment product manufactured by Gilead Sciences. It is a medication that contains two active ingredients: emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. The core function of Truvada is to serve as an antiretroviral medication used in the treatment of HIV infection.
Sourced in United States
Raltegravir is a laboratory product manufactured by Merck Group. It is an integrase inhibitor, a class of antiretroviral drugs used in the treatment of HIV infection.
Sourced in United States
Tenofovir is a laboratory product manufactured by Gilead Sciences. It is a nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) used in research applications. Tenofovir functions by inhibiting the activity of the reverse transcriptase enzyme, which is essential for the replication of certain viruses.
Sourced in United States, Germany, United Kingdom, China, Belgium
Anti-CD28 is a monoclonal antibody that binds to the CD28 receptor on T cells. CD28 is a costimulatory molecule that plays a crucial role in T cell activation and proliferation. The primary function of Anti-CD28 is to provide a signal that enhances T cell activation and response.
Sourced in United States, China
Emtricitabine is a laboratory reagent used in scientific research and analysis. It is a nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) that can be utilized in various biochemical and molecular biology applications. The core function of Emtricitabine is to serve as a chemical compound for research purposes.
Sourced in Germany
Tenofovir is a chemical compound used in the manufacturing of various laboratory equipment. It serves as a key component in the production of specific lab instruments and devices. The core function of Tenofovir is to enable the creation of these specialized laboratory tools, without interpretation or extrapolation on its intended use.
Sourced in United States, Germany, United Kingdom, China, Belgium, Japan, Denmark, Australia
Anti-CD3 is a monoclonal antibody that binds to the CD3 complex on the surface of T cells. The CD3 complex is essential for T cell activation and signal transduction. Anti-CD3 can be used in various applications, such as flow cytometry and cell culture experiments, to identify and study T cell populations.
Sourced in Switzerland, United Kingdom, Germany, United States, Canada
IL-2 is a laboratory equipment product that functions as an interleukin-2 protein. Interleukin-2 is a cytokine that plays a crucial role in the regulation of the immune system.
Sourced in Germany, United States, United Kingdom, Japan, France, Canada
The Viral RNA Mini Kit is a laboratory product designed for the rapid and efficient extraction of viral RNA from various sample types. It utilizes a silica-membrane-based technology to selectively bind and purify viral RNA, which can then be used for downstream applications such as RT-PCR analysis.

More about "Emtricitabine"

Emtricitabine, also known as FTC, is a nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) used in the treatment of HIV infection.
It is often prescribed in combination with other antiretroviral medications, such as Truvada (emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate) and Raltegravir, to effectively manage HIV.
Emtricitabine works by inhibiting the reverse transcriptase enzyme, which is essential for the replication of HIV.
This helps to reduce the viral load and slow the progression of the disease.
In addition to its use in HIV treatment, emtricitabine has also been explored for its potential in the management of hepatitis B.
When conducting research on emtricitabine, it is important to consider related topics and techniques, such as the use of anti-CD28 and anti-CD3 antibodies, which can modulate T-cell activation, and the use of IL-2 to support immune function.
The Viral RNA Mini Kit is also a valuable tool for isolating and analyzing viral RNA samples in emtricitabine-related studies.
PubCompare.ai is an AI-powered tool that can help researchers optimize their emtricitabine research by identifying the best protocols from literature, preprints, and patents.
The platform provides intelligent comparisons to ensure reproducible and effective science, while also uncovering the latest advancements in emtricitabine research to streamline your workflow.
Leveraging the power of PubCompare.ai can help researchers take their emtricitabine studies to the next level.