The largest database of trusted experimental protocols
> Devices > Medical Device > Surgical Instruments

Surgical Instruments

Surgical Instruments are a diverse range of tools and devices used in medical procedures to assist in the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of various health conditions.
These instruments are designed to be precise, durable, and adaptable to a wide range of surgical applications.
From scalpels and forceps to retractors and suturing devices, surgical instruments play a crucial role in modern healthcare, enabling healthcare professionals to perform procedures with accuracy and efficiency.
Researchers and medical professionals can explore the latest advancements in surgical instrument technology through platforms like PubCompare.ai, which simplifies the process of locating relevant protocols and leveraging AI-powered comparisons to identify the most accurate and reproduciblne products.
This cutting-edge tool helps to improve research and drive innovation in the field of surgical instrumentation.

Most cited protocols related to «Surgical Instruments»

Table 1 shows a suggested sequence of the cross-cultural adaptation process. The first stage is to assess if there is the same relationship between the questionnaire and underlying concept in both the original and target setting [2 (link),3 (link)]. In addition it is important to assess that items within the instrument are equally relevant and acceptable in the target population as they are in the original population [2 (link)]. Both conceptual and item equivalence can be assessed through a literature review [2 (link),3 (link)]. Findings from the literature review should be discussed with experts in the field and members of the target population [2 (link),3 (link)].
The original instrument should thereafter be translated from the original language into the language of the target population [2 (link)-5 (link)]. At least two persons should produce the initial translations independently [4 (link)-6 (link)]. The translators should be fluent in the language of the target population with a good understanding of the original language [2 (link)-5 (link)]. The translated versions should be synthesized into one version by a third independent translator [4 (link),5 (link)]. Thereafter the synthesized version should be back-translated independently by at least two different persons [4 (link)-6 (link)]. The back-translators should be fluent in the original language with a good understanding of the language in the target population [2 (link)-5 (link)]. Thereafter the synthesized translated version and the synthesized back-translated version should be reviewed by an expert committee [4 (link),5 (link)].
The expert committee should comprise of methodologists, health professionals, language professionals, and the translators (forward and back-translators) [4 (link)]. The expert committee assesses if a word or several words reflect the same ideas or subjects in both the original and adapted versions of the questionnaire [2 (link)-5 (link)]. This assessment ensures that items are translated correctly and are relevant in the new setting [4 (link)-6 (link)]. If there are uncertainties around the meaning of specific words or items, the developer of the original instrument can be contacted for clarifications [2 (link),4 (link)]. It is also suggested to return to the target population and have experts in the field discuss subtleties brought out by the various translation proposals [3 (link)]. The instrument should be adjusted accordingly after a consensus is reached [4 (link),5 (link)].
Thereafter the instrument should be pretested [4 (link)]. Between 30 and 40 respondents are viewed as appropriate in the pretest [3 (link),4 (link)]. Respondents are probed for their understanding, acceptability and emotional impact of the items in order to detect confusing or misleading items [3 (link),4 (link)]. To ask respondents to rephrase each item is one technique that can identify whether an item is understood or not [3 (link)]. Reichenheim (2007) suggests that interviews are conducted until a pre-established percentage of understanding is achieved for all items (e.g. ≥ 90%) [3 (link)]. A final semantic adjustment should be made by the research group based on the evidence from the pilot study [3 (link)-5 (link)].
The operational equivalence of the instrument should be evaluated after the semantic adjustments [2 (link),3 (link)]. Operational equivalence means that it is possible to use similar questionnaire format, instructions, mode of administration and measurement methods in the target populations as was used in the original setting [2 (link)]. A literature review may give information regarding the use of instruments in the target setting [2 (link)]. It is also possible to contact experts in the field and members of the target population to assess if format, instructions, mode and administration and measurement methods are appropriate [2 (link)]. Once consensus is reached in regards to operational equivalence, the methods are incorporated into the study [3 (link)].
Finally, the instrument should be administered to participants in a formal study. On the basis of the results from this study the psychometric properties of the instrument should be tested using recognized statistical methods [4 (link),5 (link)].
Full text: Click here
Publication 2010
Emotions Health Personnel Psychometrics Surgical Instruments Target Population

Protocol full text hidden due to copyright restrictions

Open the protocol to access the free full text link

Publication 2014
Biopharmaceuticals Childbirth Endometriosis Ethics Committees Eye Hormones Menstruation Muscle Rigidity Nevus Operative Surgical Procedures Patients Pelvic Pain Pharmaceutical Preparations Surgical Instruments Uterus Voluntary Workers
Adult community inhabitants, aged 25–50 years, were probabilistically selected from the residential registry in each of four municipalities (two in the Tokyo metropolitan area and two in neighboring prefectures). We intended to invite inner-sprawl urban and suburban regions, to account for variations in structural and social environments. For each municipality, 60 sample units were selected proportionally to the registered population, and systematic sampling12 was conducted for each unit, with oversampling of those aged in their 20s based on the expected lower response rate in this age stratum.
This sampling scheme, rather than a national representative random sampling, allowed us to collect data on individuals with various socioeconomic backgrounds under a homogeneous health, economic, and social policy environment, since each municipality forms a basic unit of local policy administration in Japan. With a sufficient number of samples, the scheme is expected to capture multilevel impact on health and related behaviors based on municipality characteristics and individual socioeconomic conditions. In addition, receiving endorsement from each municipality provides credibility which will help improve the response rate.
We contracted with independent survey agencies to conduct the surveys. Professional surveyors with more than three years of experience in conducting interview-based social surveys were recruited and underwent training sessions specifically to conduct the J-SHINE. The sessions lasted 6 hours for each wave, and included required lectures on the purpose of the survey, communication skills for home visiting and recruitment, contents of the questionnaire, operation of computer-based instruments and physiological measurement, and ethical consideration for confidentiality protection and safety, following training methods in previously established social surveys.13 We excluded poorly skilled surveyors during this training period. We further set up regular review sessions with surveyors during the survey wave in order to monitor their performance and quality of data collected, as well as to provide advice and consultation for troubleshooting.
The wave 1 survey was conducted between July 2010 and February 2011. The trained surveyors made at least five visits to reach the originally selected sample after sending an invitation letter. If they agreed to participate in the study, the participants were asked to provide written informed consent and then choose a convenient means for completing the survey questionnaire. Owing to the complex and contingent nature of the socioeconomic conditions among participants, we chose to use a computer-aided personal instrument (CAPI) to individually customize questionnaire items. The CAPI program was developed on an open-source platform and was accessible via the internet from the participant’s personal computer or on a left-behind laptop computer.
Surveyors provided participants with an ID and password for CAPI access and instructed participants on how to operate the CAPI session. The session was available around the clock and could freely be suspended and resumed at any point for participants’ convenience. Technical support was available by calling the support center. For those who were unfamiliar with computer use, a personal interview with the CAPI was provided. The collected data on left-behind computers were encrypted and sent via e-mail to our main server in the research laboratory. Each participant received a monetary incentive of ¥4000.
Among the participating households in the wave 1 survey, those with a spouse/partner of any age or child aged less than 18 years were invited to participate in supplemental surveys from August to December 2011. The spouse/partner survey asked the spouse/partner of the wave 1 participants to answer corresponding items to the wave 1 survey questionnaire to allow for pairwise comparisons. The child survey collected data on birth history and current conditions of child through the primary caregivers of the child, as well as through the child themselves if they were of school age. When the number of children was over three, the youngest three children were recruited for the survey.
The wave 2 survey was conducted between July and December 2012. The participant recruitment is summarized in Figures 1 and 2. All of the questionnaires and measurement in the wave 2 survey were responded by the wave 1 participants.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2014
Adult Child Households Menstruation Disturbances physiology Safety Spouse Surgical Instruments

Protocol full text hidden due to copyright restrictions

Open the protocol to access the free full text link

Publication 2013
Bones Ligature Maxilla Molar Mus Osteopenia Periodontium Silk Surgical Instruments Sutures
The SFQ was developed to create a tailor made instrument for the assessment of self-reported surgical fear, suitable for general use among all types of adult surgery patients, and covering a broad range of short-term and long-term surgery-related fears. The composition and phrasing of the SFQ was based on items selected from existing questionnaires [4] (link), [6] (link), [10] (link), [14] (link), [23] and expert consultation. The selection of the initial 10 items took place after a consensus meeting of experts in the field of psychology, anaesthesiology, methodology, or epidemiology. All items are scored on an eleven point numeric rating scale (NRS) ranging from 0 (not at all afraid) to 10 (very afraid). This results in a total score of 0 to 100. Selected items are: afraid of operation, anaesthesia, postoperative pain, side effects, health deterioration, failed operation, hospital stay, (worried) about family members, incomplete recovery, long duration of rehabilitation.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2014
Adult Anesthesia Family Member Fear Pain, Postoperative Patients Rehabilitation Self-Assessment Surgical Instruments

Most recents protocols related to «Surgical Instruments»

Not available on PMC !

Example 18

A non-transitory computer readable medium storing computer readable instructions which, when executed, causes a machine to: control the operation of a plurality of illumination sources of a tissue sample wherein each illumination source is configured to emit light having a specified central wavelength; receive data from the light sensor when the tissue sample is illuminated by each of the plurality of illumination sources; calculate structural data related to a characteristic of a structure within the tissue sample based on the data received by the light sensor when the tissue sample is illuminated by each of the illumination sources; and transmit the structural data related to the characteristic of the structure to be received by a smart surgical device, wherein the characteristic of the structure is a surface characteristic or a structure composition.

While several forms have been illustrated and described, it is not the intention of the applicant to restrict or limit the scope of the appended claims to such detail. Numerous modifications, variations, changes, substitutions, combinations, and equivalents to those forms may be implemented and will occur to those skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the present disclosure. Moreover, the structure of each element associated with the described forms can be alternatively described as a means for providing the function performed by the element. Also, where materials are disclosed for certain components, other materials may be used. It is therefore to be understood that the foregoing description and the appended claims are intended to cover all such modifications, combinations, and variations as falling within the scope of the disclosed forms. The appended claims are intended to cover all such modifications, variations, changes, substitutions, modifications, and equivalents.

The foregoing detailed description has set forth various forms of the devices and/or processes via the use of block diagrams, flowcharts, and/or examples. Insofar as such block diagrams, flowcharts, and/or examples contain one or more functions and/or operations, it will be understood by those within the art that each function and/or operation within such block diagrams, flowcharts, and/or examples can be implemented, individually and/or collectively, by a wide range of hardware, software, firmware, or virtually any combination thereof. Those skilled in the art will recognize that some aspects of the forms disclosed herein, in whole or in part, can be equivalently implemented in integrated circuits, as one or more computer programs running on one or more computers (e.g., as one or more programs running on one or more computer systems), as one or more programs running on one or more processors (e.g., as one or more programs running on one or more microprocessors), as firmware, or as virtually any combination thereof, and that designing the circuitry and/or writing the code for the software and or firmware would be well within the skill of one of skill in the art in light of this disclosure. In addition, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the mechanisms of the subject matter described herein are capable of being distributed as one or more program products in a variety of forms, and that an illustrative form of the subject matter described herein applies regardless of the particular type of signal bearing medium used to actually carry out the distribution.

Instructions used to program logic to perform various disclosed aspects can be stored within a memory in the system, such as dynamic random access memory (DRAM), cache, flash memory, or other storage. Furthermore, the instructions can be distributed via a network or by way of other computer readable media. Thus a machine-readable medium may include any mechanism for storing or transmitting information in a form readable by a machine (e.g., a computer), but is not limited to, floppy diskettes, optical disks, compact disc, read-only memory (CD-ROMs), and magneto-optical disks, read-only memory (ROMs), random access memory (RAM), erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM), electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM), magnetic or optical cards, flash memory, or a tangible, machine-readable storage used in the transmission of information over the Internet via electrical, optical, acoustical or other forms of propagated signals (e.g., carrier waves, infrared signals, digital signals, etc.). Accordingly, the non-transitory computer-readable medium includes any type of tangible machine-readable medium suitable for storing or transmitting electronic instructions or information in a form readable by a machine (e.g., a computer).

As used in any aspect herein, the term “control circuit” may refer to, for example, hardwired circuitry, programmable circuitry (e.g., a computer processor comprising one or more individual instruction processing cores, processing unit, processor, microcontroller, microcontroller unit, controller, digital signal processor (DSP), programmable logic device (PLD), programmable logic array (PLA), or field programmable gate array (FPGA)), state machine circuitry, firmware that stores instructions executed by programmable circuitry, and any combination thereof. The control circuit may, collectively or individually, be embodied as circuitry that forms part of a larger system, for example, an integrated circuit (IC), an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a system on-chip (SoC), desktop computers, laptop computers, tablet computers, servers, smart phones, etc. Accordingly, as used herein “control circuit” includes, but is not limited to, electrical circuitry having at least one discrete electrical circuit, electrical circuitry having at least one integrated circuit, electrical circuitry having at least one application specific integrated circuit, electrical circuitry forming a general purpose computing device configured by a computer program (e.g., a general purpose computer configured by a computer program which at least partially carries out processes and/or devices described herein, or a microprocessor configured by a computer program which at least partially carries out processes and/or devices described herein), electrical circuitry forming a memory device (e.g., forms of random access memory), and/or electrical circuitry forming a communications device (e.g., a modem, communications switch, or optical-electrical equipment). Those having skill in the art will recognize that the subject matter described herein may be implemented in an analog or digital fashion or some combination thereof.

As used in any aspect herein, the term “logic” may refer to an app, software, firmware and/or circuitry configured to perform any of the aforementioned operations. Software may be embodied as a software package, code, instructions, instruction sets and/or data recorded on non-transitory computer readable storage medium. Firmware may be embodied as code, instructions or instruction sets and/or data that are hard-coded (e.g., nonvolatile) in memory devices.

As used in any aspect herein, the terms “component,” “system,” “module” and the like can refer to a computer-related entity, either hardware, a combination of hardware and software, software, or software in execution.

As used in any aspect herein, an “algorithm” refers to a self-consistent sequence of steps leading to a desired result, where a “step” refers to a manipulation of physical quantities and/or logic states which may, though need not necessarily, take the form of electrical or magnetic signals capable of being stored, transferred, combined, compared, and otherwise manipulated. It is common usage to refer to these signals as bits, values, elements, symbols, characters, terms, numbers, or the like. These and similar terms may be associated with the appropriate physical quantities and are merely convenient labels applied to these quantities and/or states.

A network may include a packet switched network. The communication devices may be capable of communicating with each other using a selected packet switched network communications protocol. One example communications protocol may include an Ethernet communications protocol which may be capable permitting communication using a Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol (TCP/IP). The Ethernet protocol may comply or be compatible with the Ethernet standard published by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) titled “IEEE 802.3 Standard”, published in December, 2008 and/or later versions of this standard. Alternatively or additionally, the communication devices may be capable of communicating with each other using an X.25 communications protocol. The X.25 communications protocol may comply or be compatible with a standard promulgated by the International Telecommunication Union-Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T). Alternatively or additionally, the communication devices may be capable of communicating with each other using a frame relay communications protocol. The frame relay communications protocol may comply or be compatible with a standard promulgated by Consultative Committee for International Telegraph and Telephone (CCITT) and/or the American National Standards Institute (ANSI). Alternatively or additionally, the transceivers may be capable of communicating with each other using an Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) communications protocol. The ATM communications protocol may comply or be compatible with an ATM standard published by the ATM Forum titled “ATM-MPLS Network Interworking 2.0” published August 2001, and/or later versions of this standard. Of course, different and/or after-developed connection-oriented network communication protocols are equally contemplated herein.

Unless specifically stated otherwise as apparent from the foregoing disclosure, it is appreciated that, throughout the foregoing disclosure, discussions using terms such as “processing,” “computing,” “calculating,” “determining,” “displaying,” or the like, refer to the action and processes of a computer system, or similar electronic computing device, that manipulates and transforms data represented as physical (electronic) quantities within the computer system's registers and memories into other data similarly represented as physical quantities within the computer system memories or registers or other such information storage, transmission or display devices.

One or more components may be referred to herein as “configured to,” “configurable to,” “operable/operative to,” “adapted/adaptable,” “able to,” “conformable/conformed to,” etc. Those skilled in the art will recognize that “configured to” can generally encompass active-state components and/or inactive-state components and/or standby-state components, unless context requires otherwise.

The terms “proximal” and “distal” are used herein with reference to a clinician manipulating the handle portion of the surgical instrument. The term “proximal” refers to the portion closest to the clinician and the term “distal” refers to the portion located away from the clinician. It will be further appreciated that, for convenience and clarity, spatial terms such as “vertical”, “horizontal”, “up”, and “down” may be used herein with respect to the drawings. However, surgical instruments are used in many orientations and positions, and these terms are not intended to be limiting and/or absolute.

Those skilled in the art will recognize that, in general, terms used herein, and especially in the appended claims (e.g., bodies of the appended claims) are generally intended as “open” terms (e.g., the term “including” should be interpreted as “including but not limited to,” the term “having” should be interpreted as “having at least,” the term “includes” should be interpreted as “includes but is not limited to,” etc.). It will be further understood by those within the art that if a specific number of an introduced claim recitation is intended, such an intent will be explicitly recited in the claim, and in the absence of such recitation no such intent is present. For example, as an aid to understanding, the following appended claims may contain usage of the introductory phrases “at least one” and “one or more” to introduce claim recitations. However, the use of such phrases should not be construed to imply that the introduction of a claim recitation by the indefinite articles “a” or “an” limits any particular claim containing such introduced claim recitation to claims containing only one such recitation, even when the same claim includes the introductory phrases “one or more” or “at least one” and indefinite articles such as “a” or “an” (e.g., “a” and/or “an” should typically be interpreted to mean “at least one” or “one or more”); the same holds true for the use of definite articles used to introduce claim recitations.

In addition, even if a specific number of an introduced claim recitation is explicitly recited, those skilled in the art will recognize that such recitation should typically be interpreted to mean at least the recited number (e.g., the bare recitation of “two recitations,” without other modifiers, typically means at least two recitations, or two or more recitations). Furthermore, in those instances where a convention analogous to “at least one of A, B, and C, etc.” is used, in general such a construction is intended in the sense one having skill in the art would understand the convention (e.g., “a system having at least one of A, B, and C” would include but not be limited to systems that have A alone, B alone, C alone, A and B together, A and C together, B and C together, and/or A, B, and C together, etc.). In those instances where a convention analogous to “at least one of A, B, or C, etc.” is used, in general such a construction is intended in the sense one having skill in the art would understand the convention (e.g., “a system having at least one of A, B, or C” would include but not be limited to systems that have A alone, B alone, C alone, A and B together, A and C together, B and C together, and/or A, B, and C together, etc.). It will be further understood by those within the art that typically a disjunctive word and/or phrase presenting two or more alternative terms, whether in the description, claims, or drawings, should be understood to contemplate the possibilities of including one of the terms, either of the terms, or both terms unless context dictates otherwise. For example, the phrase “A or B” will be typically understood to include the possibilities of “A” or “B” or “A and B.”

With respect to the appended claims, those skilled in the art will appreciate that recited operations therein may generally be performed in any order. Also, although various operational flow diagrams are presented in a sequence(s), it should be understood that the various operations may be performed in other orders than those which are illustrated, or may be performed concurrently. Examples of such alternate orderings may include overlapping, interleaved, interrupted, reordered, incremental, preparatory, supplemental, simultaneous, reverse, or other variant orderings, unless context dictates otherwise. Furthermore, terms like “responsive to,” “related to,” or other past-tense adjectives are generally not intended to exclude such variants, unless context dictates otherwise.

It is worthy to note that any reference to “one aspect,” “an aspect,” “an exemplification,” “one exemplification,” and the like means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the aspect is included in at least one aspect. Thus, appearances of the phrases “in one aspect,” “in an aspect,” “in an exemplification,” and “in one exemplification” in various places throughout the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same aspect. Furthermore, the particular features, structures or characteristics may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more aspects.

Any patent application, patent, non-patent publication, or other disclosure material referred to in this specification and/or listed in any Application Data Sheet is incorporated by reference herein, to the extent that the incorporated materials is not inconsistent herewith. As such, and to the extent necessary, the disclosure as explicitly set forth herein supersedes any conflicting material incorporated herein by reference. Any material, or portion thereof, that is said to be incorporated by reference herein, but which conflicts with existing definitions, statements, or other disclosure material set forth herein will only be incorporated to the extent that no conflict arises between that incorporated material and the existing disclosure material.

In summary, numerous benefits have been described which result from employing the concepts described herein. The foregoing description of the one or more forms has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or limiting to the precise form disclosed. Modifications or variations are possible in light of the above teachings. The one or more forms were chosen and described in order to illustrate principles and practical application to thereby enable one of ordinary skill in the art to utilize the various forms and with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the claims submitted herewith define the overall scope.

Full text: Click here
Patent 2024
Acoustics Character Conferences DNA Chips Electricity Enzyme Multiplied Immunoassay Technique Fingers Human Body Light Medical Devices Memory Mental Orientation Ocular Refraction Physical Examination Reading Frames Surgical Instruments Teaching Tissues Transmission, Communicable Disease Vision
Not available on PMC !

Example 5

The apparatus of any one or more of Examples 1 through 4, wherein the juncture comprises a first thickness, wherein the distal end comprises a second thickness, wherein the first thickness is smaller than the second thickness.

Example 6

The apparatus of Example 5, wherein the proximal end comprises a third thickness, wherein the first thickness is smaller than the third thickness.

Full text: Click here
Patent 2024
Surgical Instruments
Not available on PMC !

Example 7

The apparatus of any one or more of Examples 1 through 6, wherein the first tissue grasping feature comprises an electrode surface, a distal pair of teeth electrically insulated from the electrode surface, and a second pair of teeth.

Example 8

The apparatus of Example 7, wherein the second pair of teeth are proximal relative to the distal pair of teeth.

Example 9

The apparatus of Example 8, wherein the second pair of teeth are configured to contact the distal electrode surface in the closed position.

Example 10

The apparatus of Example 9, wherein the second pair of teeth are configured to be spaced away from the distal electrode surface in the partially closed position.

Full text: Click here
Patent 2024
Dentition, Adult Electricity Surgical Instruments Tissues Tooth
Not available on PMC !

Example 14

The apparatus of any one or more of Examples 10 through 13, wherein the predetermined discharge rate for the capacitor is selected to result in the capacitor charge falling below the activation threshold after the capacitor is coupled with the discharge load feature for between about 4 hours and about 24 hours.

Full text: Click here
Patent 2024
Patient Discharge Surgical Instruments

Example 20

An apparatus comprising: (a) a body; (b) a shaft assembly extending distally from the body; and (c) an end effector configured to grasp tissue and transmit RF energy to the grasped tissue, wherein the end effector comprises: (i) a first jaw member, (ii) a second jaw member, wherein the second jaw member is pivotably coupled to the first jaw member between an open position, a partially closed position, and a closed position, and (iii) a tissue grasping assembly, comprising (A) a first tissue grasping feature associated with the first jaw member, and (B) a second tissue grasping feature associated with the second jaw member, wherein the second tissue grasping feature comprises a compliant electrode surface, wherein the compliant electrode surface is configured to form a double taper while the second jaw is in the open position and the partially closed position, wherein the compliant electrode surface is configured to deform to define a gap distance with the first tissue grasping feature while in the closed position.

Full text: Click here
Patent 2024
Human Body Surgical Instruments Tissues

Top products related to «Surgical Instruments»

Sourced in United States, Germany
The -80°C refrigerator is a laboratory equipment designed to maintain samples, materials, or items at a constant ultra-low temperature of -80°C (-112°F). It provides a stable and controlled environment for long-term storage and preservation of temperature-sensitive specimens or products.
Sourced in Germany, France, United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Italy, Brazil, Belgium, Cameroon, Switzerland, Spain, Australia, Ireland, Sweden, Portugal, Netherlands, Austria, Denmark, New Zealand
Rompun is a veterinary drug used as a sedative and analgesic for animals. It contains the active ingredient xylazine hydrochloride. Rompun is designed to induce a state of sedation and pain relief in animals during medical procedures or transportation.
Sourced in United States, Ireland, Germany, United Kingdom
RNaseZap is a laboratory product designed to effectively remove RNase contamination from surfaces and equipment. It is a ready-to-use solution that can be applied to various laboratory surfaces to degrade and eliminate RNase, thereby preventing RNA degradation during experimental procedures.
Sourced in United States, Germany, China, Sao Tome and Principe, United Kingdom, Japan, Italy, Canada, Hungary, Macao
Pentobarbital sodium is a laboratory chemical compound. It is a barbiturate drug that acts as a central nervous system depressant. Pentobarbital sodium is commonly used in research and scientific applications.
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom, Germany, China, France, Japan, Canada, Australia, Italy, Switzerland, Belgium, New Zealand, Spain, Denmark, Israel, Macao, Ireland, Netherlands, Austria, Hungary, Holy See (Vatican City State), Sweden, Brazil, Argentina, India, Poland, Morocco, Czechia
DMEM/F12 is a cell culture medium developed by Thermo Fisher Scientific. It is a balanced salt solution that provides nutrients and growth factors essential for the cultivation of a variety of cell types, including adherent and suspension cells. The medium is formulated to support the proliferation and maintenance of cells in vitro.
Sourced in United States, Germany, China, United Kingdom, Japan, Canada, France, Italy, Australia, Spain, Denmark, Switzerland, Singapore, Poland, Ireland, Belgium, Netherlands, Lithuania, Austria, Brazil
The NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer is an instrument designed to measure the concentration and purity of a wide range of biomolecular samples, including nucleic acids and proteins. It utilizes a unique sample retention system that requires only 1-2 microliters of sample to perform the analysis.
Sourced in United States
5-0 vicryl sutures are a medical device used for wound closure. They are composed of braided polyglactin 910, a synthetic absorbable material. The sutures are designed to provide temporary wound support during the healing process.
Sourced in United States, China, United Kingdom, Germany, Australia, Japan, Canada, Italy, France, Switzerland, New Zealand, Brazil, Belgium, India, Spain, Israel, Austria, Poland, Ireland, Sweden, Macao, Netherlands, Denmark, Cameroon, Singapore, Portugal, Argentina, Holy See (Vatican City State), Morocco, Uruguay, Mexico, Thailand, Sao Tome and Principe, Hungary, Panama, Hong Kong, Norway, United Arab Emirates, Czechia, Russian Federation, Chile, Moldova, Republic of, Gabon, Palestine, State of, Saudi Arabia, Senegal
Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) is a cell culture supplement derived from the blood of bovine fetuses. FBS provides a source of proteins, growth factors, and other components that support the growth and maintenance of various cell types in in vitro cell culture applications.
Sourced in China, Germany
The EP) tube is a laboratory centrifuge tube designed for a variety of applications. It is a small, conical-shaped tube used to hold and transport liquid samples during various laboratory procedures.
Autoclaved surgical instruments are medical equipment designed for sterilization. They are subjected to high-pressure steam at specific temperatures to eliminate microorganisms, ensuring the instruments are safe for medical use.

More about "Surgical Instruments"

Surgical tools and devices are a diverse range of medical instruments used to assist healthcare professionals in the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of various health conditions.
These specialized instruments, including scalpels, forceps, retractors, and suturing devices, are designed to be precise, durable, and adaptable to a wide variety of surgical applications.
Advancements in surgical instrument technology, such as the development of −80°C refrigerators, Rompun anesthetic, RNaseZap for decontamination, Pentobarbital sodium sedatives, DMEM/F12 cell culture media, and NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometers, have helped to improve the accuracy, efficiency, and safety of modern surgical procedures.
The use of 5-0 vicryl sutures, FBS (fetal bovine serum), and EP tubes further enhances the precision and reliability of surgical interventions.
Autoclaved surgical instruments, which have been sterilized under high temperature and pressure, play a crucial role in preventing post-operative infections and ensuring patient safety.
Researchers and medical professionals can explore the latest innovations in surgical instrumentation through platforms like PubComprae.ai, which simplifies the process of locating relevant protocols and leveraging AI-powered comparisons to identify the most accurate and reproducilbe products.
This cutting-edge tool helps to improve research, drive innovation, and ultimately enhance the quality of patient care in the field of surgical instrumentation.