These nine biomarkers and chronological age were then included in a parametric proportional hazards model based on the Gompertz distribution. Based on this model, we estimated the 10-year (120 months) mortality risk of the j-the individual. Next, the mortality score was converted into units of years (
Heart Diseases
This includes coronary artery disease, heart failure, arrhythmias, and congenital heart defects.
Accurate identification and optimization of research protocols are crucial for advancing our understanding and treatment of these complex disorders.
PubComapre.ai leverages AI-driven tools to streamline the process, helping researchers access the most effective heart disease protocols from published literature, preprints, and patents.
By enhancing protocol selection, this innovative approach can improve the accuracy and outcomes of heart disease research, ultimately leading to better patient care.
Most cited protocols related to «Heart Diseases»
These nine biomarkers and chronological age were then included in a parametric proportional hazards model based on the Gompertz distribution. Based on this model, we estimated the 10-year (120 months) mortality risk of the j-the individual. Next, the mortality score was converted into units of years (
Clinician defined obesity was also included as a comorbidity owing to its probable association with adverse outcomes in patients with covid-19.11 (link)
12 (link) The clinical information used to calculate prognostic scores was taken from the day of admission to hospital.13 (link) A practical approach was taken to sample size requirements.14 We used all available data to maximise the power and generalisability of our results. Model reliability was assessed by using a temporally distinct validation cohort with geographical subsetting, together with sensitivity analyses.
Most recents protocols related to «Heart Diseases»
Example 1
The MCA-miner method disclosed herein in
The performance and computational efficiency of the new MCA-miner is benchmarked against the “Titanic” dataset, as well as the following five (5) datasets available in the UCI Machine Learning Repository: “Adult,” “Autism Screening Adult,” “Breast Cancer Wisconsin (Diagnostic),” “Heart Disease,” and “HIV-1 protease cleavage,” which are designated as Adult, ASD, Cancer, Heart, and HIV, respectively. These datasets represent a wide variety of real-world experiments and observations, thus enabling the improvements described herein to be compared against the original BRL implementation using the FP-Growth miner.
All six benchmark datasets correspond to binary classification tasks. The experiments were conducted using the same set up in each of the benchmarks. First, the dataset is transformed into a format that is compatible with the disclosed BRL implementation. Second, all continuous attributes are quantized into either two (2) or three (3) categories, while keeping the original categories of all other variables. It is worth noting that depending on the dataset and how its data was originally collected, the existing taxonomy and expert domain knowledge are prioritized in some instances to generate the continuous variable quantization. A balanced quantization is generated when no other information was available. Third, a model is trained and tested using 5-fold cross-validations, reporting the average accuracy and Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) as model performance measurements.
Table 1 presents the empirical result of comparing both implementations. The notation in the table follows the definitions above. To strive for a fair comparison between both implementations, the parameters rmax=2 and smin=0:3 are fixed for both methods, and in particular for MCA-miner μmin=0:5 and M=70 are also set. The multi-core implementations for both the new MCA-miner and BRL were executed on six parallel processes, and stopped when the Gelman & Rubin parameter satisfied {circumflex over (R)}≤1.05. All the experiments were run using a single AWS EC2 c5.18×large instance with 72 cores.
It is clear from the experiments in Table 1 that the new MCA-miner matches the performance of FP-Growth in each case, while significantly reducing the computation time required to mine rules and train a BRL model.
The following data were also collected: History and physical examination findings, chest radiographs, computed tomographic examinations of the chest (CT), electrocardiography (ECG) and echocardiography (if required), pulmonary function test results (forced expiratory volume (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and FEV1/FVC ratio), and arterial blood gases. In patients with lung cancer, the type and stage of malignancy were determined, and flexible bronchoscopy was performed.
During the intraoperative process, the type of endotracheal tube, the duration of anesthesia and surgery, the surgical procedure (VATS, thoracotomy, mediastinoscopy, and others) performed, and complications that required intraoperative treatment were also noted.
PPCs have been defined as complications that occur in the postoperative period and cause clinical conditions.
The following patients were excluded from analysis: (1) Severe heart disease; (2) Severe spinal deformity; (3) Hypersensitivity to local anesthetics or hormones; (4) Coagulation dysfunction; (5) Systemic infection or skin infection at the puncture site; (6) Patients with abnormal mental behavior, severe anxiety, or depression; (7) Lactating and pregnant women; (8) History of cervical surgery; (9) Cervical spondylotic myelopathy; (10) Moderate and severe foraminal stenosis.
Despite being identified as a risk factor for loss of USOC, experiencing transportation barriers (reporting that a transportation problem restricted any activity participation in the month before the interview) was not included in the main analyses due to data availability, as a total of N = 1 804 participants had missing information.
Top products related to «Heart Diseases»
More about "Heart Diseases"
These complex disorders can have significant impacts on an individual's health and well-being.
Accurate identification and optimization of research protocols are crucial for advancing our understanding and treatment of heart diseases.
PubCompare.ai, an innovative AI-driven tool, can help researchers streamline the process of accessing the most effective heart disease protocols from published literature, preprints, and patents.
By enhancing protocol selection, this approach can improve the accuracy and outcomes of heart disease research, ultimately leading to better patient care.
Researchers can leverage PubCompare.ai's powerful comparison tools to locate the best protocols for their studies, whether they are working with SAS version 9.4, Stata version 14, SPSS version 25, or other statistical software.
This can help ensure that their research methods are aligned with the latest advancements in the field, ultimately leading to more robust and reliable findings.
Moreover, the AI-powered approach of PubCompare.ai can help researchers identify and address potential typos or errors in research protocols, ensuring that their work is as accurate and efficient as possible.
This can be particularly important when working with large datasets or complex statistical analyses, such as those involved in the study of heart diseases.
In summary, PubCompare.ai's innovative tools can help researchers enhance the accuracy and outcomes of their heart disease research, leading to improved patient care and a better understanding of these complex cardiovascular conditions.
By streamlining the protocol selection process and leveraging AI-driven insights, researchers can focus on the most effective and impactful areas of their work.