The study was based on tissue samples from subjects affected by various subtypes of human prion disease, including the whole spectrum of currently characterized human prion strains [30 (link)]. All cases were selected from a larger pool of pathological material based on the following essential criteria: (1) availability of all necessary brain structures (see below); (2) inclusion of all known sporadic TSE subtypes according to the updated classification of Parchi et al. [31 (link)] as well as vCJD; and (3) absence of additional significant pathological comorbidity, such as “intermediate” or “high” Alzheimer’s disease neuropathological changes [19 (link)], cerebral haemorrhages or infarcts, or a known history of neurological disorders other than prion disease. PRNP genetics and PrPSc typing had been performed in all selected cases as described previously [10 (link), 31 (link)]. PrPSc typing, in particular, was performed in each case in at least six brain samples (frontal, temporal, parietal, and occipital cortices, thalamus, and cerebellum). Local ethical committee approval (Medical Ethics Committee of the Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich) was obtained for the study of autopsy material, with written informed consent for research use provided by the patients during life or by their next of kin after death.
A total of 21 cases were included. Two “atypical” CJD cases (i.e. not fitting any of the subtypes defined by the current CJD classification) were also added to the series. The total number and anatomical representation of the sections included in the study were chosen by the reference group (PP, AG, and HK). The two major aims were on the one hand to keep the number of slides to a minimum and on the other to select all brain regions that highlight the distinctive features of each TSE subtype [11 (link), 30 (link), 31 (link)].
All selected cases displayed histopathological lesions and PrP-immunoreactive deposits.
Two sets of 4 μm thick sections were produced. Each set contained haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained sections from seven brain areas (frontal and occipital cortices, hippocampus, striatum, thalamus, medulla, and cerebellum) of the 21 cases, as well as sections stained for PrP by immunohistochemistry from the frontal and occipital cortices, hippocampus, and cerebellum of all cases. All sections were stained using the same methodology in one laboratory (LMU, München). Specimens were sent blindly with a combined letter and numerical code together with the operative instructions (see below).
A total of 21 cases were included. Two “atypical” CJD cases (i.e. not fitting any of the subtypes defined by the current CJD classification) were also added to the series. The total number and anatomical representation of the sections included in the study were chosen by the reference group (PP, AG, and HK). The two major aims were on the one hand to keep the number of slides to a minimum and on the other to select all brain regions that highlight the distinctive features of each TSE subtype [11 (link), 30 (link), 31 (link)].
All selected cases displayed histopathological lesions and PrP-immunoreactive deposits.
Two sets of 4 μm thick sections were produced. Each set contained haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained sections from seven brain areas (frontal and occipital cortices, hippocampus, striatum, thalamus, medulla, and cerebellum) of the 21 cases, as well as sections stained for PrP by immunohistochemistry from the frontal and occipital cortices, hippocampus, and cerebellum of all cases. All sections were stained using the same methodology in one laboratory (LMU, München). Specimens were sent blindly with a combined letter and numerical code together with the operative instructions (see below).