The largest database of trusted experimental protocols
> Disorders > Mental or Behavioral Dysfunction > Schizophreniform Disorders

Schizophreniform Disorders

Schizophreniform Disorders are a group of mental health conditions characterized by a temporary onset of psychotic symptoms, such as delusions, hallucinations, and disorganized thinking.
These disorders share similarities with schizophrenia, but typically have a shorter duration, lasting between 1 and 6 months.
Individuals with Schizophreniform Disorders may experience a sudden onset of these symptoms, which can significantly impact their daily functioning and quality of life.
Timely diagnosis and appropriate treatment are crucial for managing these conditions and promoting recovery.
PubCompare.ai's cutting-edge comparison tools can help researchers locate the best research protocols from literature, pre-prints, and patents, ensuring improved reproducibility and accuracy in their studies on Schizophreniform Disorders.

Most cited protocols related to «Schizophreniform Disorders»

Across the four research sites— UNM, UMinn, MGH and UIowa —188 patients with schizophrenia and 190 demographic, age and sex- matched healthy control subjects were recruited for this study between July 2004 and July 2006 (Table 1). To protect subject identity, testing sites are referred to by letter in this manuscript and online. The final cohort for whom data are available includes 162 patients and 169 controls with site distribution as follows; site A 46 patients/44 controls; site B 44/73; site C 33/27; site D 38/25, respectively. The remaining 47 subjects were not included in final analyses for reasons such as excessive motion during image acquisition, refusal to be scanned, claustrophobia or discomfort during MRI scanning, refusal to schedule or show up to appointments, or a determination of ineligibility based on screening exams and tests.
All subjects were between the ages of 18 and 60 and spoke English as their native language. To be included in the schizophrenia cohort, patients had to meet DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder or schizophreniform disorder. Concerted effort was made to recruit patients early in the course of their illness and especially those who were antipsychotic drug naïve.
The healthy control subjects with no current or past history of psychiatric illness including substance abuse or dependence were matched within site to the patient cohort for age, sex, and parental education (Table 2). Control subjects who had not been diagnosed with any psychiatric disorders, but had been medicated with antidepressants, anti-anxiety medication or medication for sleep disturbance were included in the study provided that the duration of their medication did not exceed 2 months of lifetime use and no medication was used within the 6 months preceding the baseline MRI scan.
Control subjects who met criteria for current or past history of substance abuse or dependence were excluded from the study. Patients, however, were not excluded from the study unless criteria were met for current (i.e., within the past month) abuse or dependence except for 6 patients who were found to meet criteria for current abuse after the study data was collected. This information is clearly marked in the shared clinical data.
Both patients and controls were excluded if they had 1) an IQ less than 70 based on a standardized IQ test, 2) history of a head injury resulting in prolonged loss of consciousness, neurosurgical procedure, neurological disease, history of skull fracture, severe or disabling medical conditions, or 3) a contraindication for MRI scanning such as pregnancy, metal in body or head including implanted pacemaker, medication pump, vagal stimulator, deep brain stimulator, implanted TENS unit, or ventriculo-peritoneal shunt.
Clinical teams at each of the sites recruited the patients. Primary treating clinicians, not necessarily involved with the study, identified potential patients who met inclusion/exclusion criteria and were competent to give informed consent. Healthy control subjects were recruited from the community at each of the sites through posters, brochures, newspapers, website advertisements, and institutional subject recruitment resources. All subjects provided informed consent to participate in the study that was approved by the human research committees at each of the sites (UNM HRRC #03-429; UMinn IRB #0404M59124; MGH IRB# 2004P001360; UIowa IRB #1998010017). In addition to the informed consent, all patients successfully completed a questionnaire verifying that they understood the study procedures.
Publication 2013
Anti-Anxiety Agents Antidepressive Agents Antipsychotic Agents Brain Claustrophobia Craniocerebral Trauma Disease Progression Drug Abuse Dyssomnias Head Healthy Volunteers Homo sapiens Human Body Intelligence Tests Mental Disorders Metals Nervous System Disorder Neurosurgical Procedures Pacemaker, Artificial Cardiac Parent Patients Pharmaceutical Preparations Pneumogastric Nerve Pregnancy Schizoaffective Disorder Schizophrenia Schizophreniform Disorders Skull Fractures Substance Abuse Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis Ventriculoperitoneal Shunts

Protocol full text hidden due to copyright restrictions

Open the protocol to access the free full text link

Publication 2018
Amygdaloid Body Ash Tree Epistropheus Fimbria of Hippocampus Gyrus, Dentate Head Hippocampal Formation Hippocampus Proper Human Body Parent Patients Pharmaceutical Preparations Presubiculum Psychosis, Brief Reactive Schizoaffective Disorder Schizophrenia Schizophreniform Disorders Seahorses Subiculum Tail Tissues
Studies were included if: (a) diagnosis was made using either the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) or International Classification of Diseases (ICD) criteria; (b) more than 95% of study participants were diagnosed with schizophrenia, schizophreniform disorder, schizoaffective disorder, delusional disorder, schizotypal disorder, psychosis not otherwise specified (but not transient psychoses such as drug-induced psychoses), and bipolar disorder [21] (link); (c) more than 95% of sample participants were aged eighteen years or older; (d) the study used a cohort, case-control, cross-sectional (including correlation and regression studies), or randomized-controlled trial (RCT) design; and, (e) the study investigated factors associated with a range of violent outcomes (aggression, hostility, or violent offending). The decision to use a 95% cut-off for criteria (b) and (c) was intended to make the findings specific to adults with psychosis rather than other psychiatric diagnoses and enabled the inclusion of 17 large-scale studies that would not have qualified for inclusion had a 100% cut-off been utilised. Once we took into account these criteria, our approach was inclusive in relation to study designs and samples order to gather the totality of evidence on this topic, and to use tests of heterogeneity to examine subgroups.
Given our emphasis on clinically relevant risk and protective factors, we have not reviewed studies of genetic and epigenetic associations with violence in psychosis. Studies were also excluded if they investigated only risk factors for childhood violence. Lastly, as the aim of this meta-analysis was to identify risk and protective factors for violence rather than for criminal offending, we excluded studies where samples did not differentiate between violent and non-violent offenders.
Through correspondence we were able to include new information from the following studies: Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) [22] (link), Schizophrenia Care and Assessment Project (SCAP) [23] (link), MacArthur Prevalence [24] (link), 5 Site [25] (link), the UK-700 [26] (link), and one other recent report [27] (link).
Full text: Click here
Publication 2013
Adult Antipsychotic Agents Bipolar Disorder Diagnosis, Psychiatric Disorder, Delusional Genetic Heterogeneity Hostility Inclusion Bodies Offenders Pseudopsychopathic Schizophrenia Psychoses, Drug Psychotic Disorders Schizoaffective Disorder Schizophrenia Schizophreniform Disorders Transients
Adult patients (≥18 years), with an ICD‐10 life‐time diagnosis of SZ (F20.x), brief psychotic disorder (F23.x), schizo‐affective disorder (SZA; F25.x), BD (F31.x), manic episode (F30.x), or recurrent major depression (reMDD; F33.x) are identified based on recommendations of the clinical staff or by querying patient registries of the participating clinical centers. Eligible individuals are invited to participate in the first study visit (T1), where, after giving informed consent (see below), their diagnosis is reassessed within the DSM‐IV framework using an adapted version of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM‐IV; Axis I Disorders (SCID‐I; Wittchen & Fydrich, 1997). Participants with a life‐time DSM‐IV diagnosis of SZ (295.10/295.20/295.30/295.60/295.90) or schizophreniform disorder (295.40), brief psychotic disorder (298.8), or SZA (295.70) constitute the group with predominantly psychotic symptoms, whereas those with a life‐time DSM‐IV diagnosis of BD (296.0x/296.4x/296.5x/296.6x/296.8x) or reMDD (296.3x) constitute the predominantly affective group. If none of the above DSM‐IV diagnoses can be ascertained, clinical participants are excluded from the study. Participants must be proficient in German language to enroll in the study.
Publication 2018
Adult Diagnosis Epistropheus Major Depressive Disorder Manic Episode Mental Disorders Patients Psychosis, Brief Reactive Schizoaffective Disorder Schizophreniform Disorders SCID Mice
A total of 65 individuals were enrolled in RAISE Connection Program services across two sites, one in Baltimore, MD and one in Manhattan, NY. Community stakeholders helped develop systematically applied strategies to identify participants, including web-based recruitment, outreach to hospitals, clinicians, community agencies, and advertisements. A description of recruitment and outreach strategies used in the study is publicly available in an online manual (28 ).
Participants were individuals 15–35 years old (16 and older in NY) who met Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID) criteria for a diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, schizophreniform disorder, delusional disorder, or psychosis not otherwise specified (NOS) (29 ). To be eligible for inclusion, individuals must have experienced psychotic symptoms of at least one week’s duration with onset within the prior 2 years, be able to speak and understand English, and be available to participate in the intervention for at least 1 year. Individuals were ineligible if they met any of the following exclusion criteria: non-psychiatric medical condition impairing functioning, psychosis due solely to another condition, mental retardation. All participants (and, for minors, participant’s parent/guardian) provided informed consent; minors provided assent. The Institutional Review Boards of New York State Psychiatric Institute and University of Maryland approved study procedures. The NIMH Data and Safety Monitoring Board provided study oversight. A consort diagram and description of participant flow is provided in an on-line appendix.
Publication 2015
Clinical Trials Data Monitoring Committees Diagnosis Disorder, Delusional Ethics Committees, Research Intellectual Disability Legal Guardians Mental Disorders Parent Psychotic Disorders Schizoaffective Disorder Schizophrenia Schizophreniform Disorders

Most recents protocols related to «Schizophreniform Disorders»

The Epidemiologic Catchment Area (ECA) survey of the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) is a longitudinal population‐based study of mental disorders. This paper uses data from the first and third study waves from The Baltimore site of the ECA, conducted in 1981 and 1993–1996, respectively. Data from the fourth wave in 2004 was not used due to a decline in the incidence of depressive disorders. Probability sampling was used to determine which households would be interviewed, with older adults oversampled by design in the first wave. The ECA utilized self‐report surveys of community residents administered by trained non‐clinician laypersons on a variety of sociodemographic variables and mental and physical health topics, including information on symptoms needed to diagnose participants with mental health disorders as specified in the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS) using DSM III‐R criteria (17 ). For further information on DIS measurement characteristics, see Robins et al., “NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule: Its history, characteristics, and validity” (18 (link)). For further information on methods of data collection see EpidemiologicField Methods in Psychiatry: the NIMH Epidemiologic Catchment Area Program, Orlando, Academic, 1985 (19 , 20 ). The Baltimore Epidemiologic Catchment Area Study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All participants provided written informed consent to participate.
There were 3481 participants in wave 1. Of these, 848 had died by wave 3, 415 were lost to follow‐up, and 298 declined to participate in the follow‐up interview (Figure 1). Participants who indicated that depressive episode(s) were due only to bereavement (n = 39) or who were diagnosed with schizophrenia or schizophreniform disorders (n = 47) or bipolar disorder (n = 3) at baseline were excluded from the analyses. There were 94 subjects with major depressive disorder at baseline and these were not considered at risk of incidence upon follow‐up: likewise, there were 178 subjects with minor depressive disorder at baseline and these were not considered at risk of incidence of minor depressive disorder upon follow‐up but were considered at risk of major depressive disorder. The result is that 1409 total participants were included in final analyses.
Publication 2023
Aged Bipolar Disorder Disorder, Depressive Ethics Committees, Research Grief Healthy Volunteers Households Major Depressive Disorder Mental Disorders Physical Examination Robins Schizophrenia Schizophreniform Disorders
Inclusion criteria for GP practices were: (a) up to one GP/practice participating at any time; located within one of the study’s South East London areas; and (b) using EMIS electronic health record software. Inclusion criteria for patients in addition to being registered at one of the participating practices were: (a) age ≥18, (b) at least moderately severe major depressive syndrome on Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9; a score of ≥15),8 (link) (c) no plans to change GP practice, (d) able to complete self-report scales orally or in writing, (e) no previous prescription of mirtazapine or vortioxetine, (f) evidence of early treatment resistance as defined by (i) current or recent prescription (in the last 2 months) of any of the following antidepressants listed: citalopram, fluoxetine, sertraline, escitalopram, paroxetine, venlafaxine or duloxetine, and (ii) previous prescription of at least one other antidepressant out of the same list of antidepressants.
Exclusion criteria for patients were: (a) inability to consent to the study, (b) unstable medical condition (assessed based on in-depth screening visit), (c) currently being treated by mental health specialist, (d) high suicide risk (assessed with Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview suicidality screen),9 (e) past diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizo-affective disorder, (f) current psychotic symptoms (three clinical screening questions validated in our previous work to exclude schizophreniform disorders),10 11 (link) (g) bipolar disorder on WHO Composite International Diagnostic Interview12 (link) at prescreening or using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-513 at screening including Bipolar Otherwise Specified categories, (h) currently at risk of being violent (assessed on in-depth screening visit), (i) drug (modified PHQ) or alcohol abuse (PHQ)8 (link) over the last 6 months, (j) suspected central neurological condition (eg, dementia, stroke, assessed on in-depth screening visit), (k) (planned) pregnancy or insufficient contraception in women of childbearing age (assessed on in-depth screening visit and prescreening), (l) breast feeding or within 6 months of giving birth, (m) has already been prescribed both escitalopram and sertraline.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2023
Abuse, Alcohol Antidepressive Agents Bipolar Disorder Cerebrovascular Accident Childbirth Citalopram Contraceptive Methods Dementia Diagnosis Duloxetine Escitalopram Fluoxetine Mental Disorders Mental Health Mirtazapine Nervous System Disorder Paroxetine Patients Pharmaceutical Preparations Pregnancy Schizoaffective Disorder Schizophrenia Schizophreniform Disorders Sertraline Syndrome Venlafaxine Vortioxetine Woman

Aged 18 years;

Given a primary diagnosis of SMI (e.g., schizophrenia, schizophreniform disorder, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, or depression with psychosis);

Wanting to lose weight;

Willing and able to join an in-person mainstream programme and discuss their experience of it in an audio-recorded interview;

Willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study.

We assessed the suitability of participants without overweight and obesity willing to join the study on a case-by-case basis. They were admitted to the study if they were taking medications known to cause weight gain and were concerned to limit that trajectory. All were keen to prevent excess weight gain and learn weight management strategies, especially given the weight gain trajectories in people with SMI [6 (link), 7 (link)]. None had extensive weight loss during or at end-of-programme. Recruitment continued until we obtained sufficient data to address the research aims, which in this case were the indicative measures of feasibility and acceptability. Based on the sample size sometimes used in proof-of-concept and qualitative studies, we estimated 12 participants could be sufficient to meet this aim [33 (link), 34 ].
Full text: Click here
Publication 2023
Bipolar Disorder Diagnosis Mainstreaming, Education Obesity Pharmaceutical Preparations Psychotic Disorders Schizoaffective Disorder Schizophrenia Schizophreniform Disorders Weight Gain Trajectory
Inclusion criteria. Participants: Staff facilitating the self-management intervention in a secondary mental health service, or people with a clinical diagnosis of non-affective psychosis (schizophrenia, schizophreniform disorder, schizoaffective disorder, delusional disorder, psychotic disorder not otherwise defined), bipolar disorder, or major depression who are receiving the intervention.
Interventions: The criteria used to define supported self-management were as in a previous review of effectiveness of supported self-management interventions conducted by members of the same research group [7 (link)]. To be included in the review, the intervention was required to include all of the following three domains, which are three of four domains that Mueser and colleagues [6 (link)] described as “effective areas of self-management”:
Comparator(s)/control: A comparator or control group was not required.
Exposures: Any primary data on factors which influence the implementation of self-management interventions for people with SMI in secondary mental health services.
Design: Full-text journal articles with primary qualitative or quantitative data (or both). If the primary focus of the study was not an investigation of the barriers or facilitators to the use of self-management interventions but the results section included data relevant to the research question, the study was included.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2023
Affective Disorders, Psychotic Bipolar Disorder Diagnosis Disorder, Delusional Major Depressive Disorder Mental Health Services Psychotic Disorders Schizoaffective Disorder Schizophrenia Schizophreniform Disorders Self-Management
This study included the same participants as Curtis and colleagues (9 (link)), comprising 27 FEP (recruited from Western Psychiatric Hospital with <2 months lifetime antipsychotic exposure) and 31 healthy controls (HC). No participant had a history of concussion or head injury with sequelae, history of alcohol or drug addiction or detox in the last 5 years, or neurological comorbidity. Groups were matched for age, gender, parental social economic status, and premorbid IQ, estimated by the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI) vocabulary t-score (Table 1). Participants had healthy hearing confirmed with audiometry. Participants provided informed consent and were paid for participation. The work was carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
FEP diagnoses were based on the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID-P) (67 ). Provisional diagnoses at baseline were confirmed 5–7 months later. Symptoms were rated using the using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) (Table 1) (68 (link)). Cognitive ability on tests sensitive to psychosis was assessed with the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (69 (link)).
Of the 27 FEP participants,17 received a diagnosis of schizophrenia (paranoid: n = 7; undifferentiated: n = 10), 1 of schizoaffective disorder (bipolar subtype), 2 of schizophreniform disorder, and 2 of psychotic disorder NOS. Five individuals received affective disorder diagnoses (Bipolar I disorder = 4; Major depressive disorder = 1), all with psychotic features. The majority of the FEP participants were medicated (21/27, 78%). Due to the differences in clinical manifestations between schizophrenia and other diagnoses for FEP, preliminary analyses investigating potential differences between FEP with a schizophrenia diagnosis and FEP without a schizophrenia diagnosis are reported in the Supplementary materials (Supplementary Tables S1, S2).
Full text: Click here
Publication 2023
Antipsychotic Agents Audiometry Bipolar Disorder Brain Concussion Cognition Cognitive Testing Craniocerebral Trauma detox adjuvant Diagnosis Drug Dependence Ethanol Gender Major Depressive Disorder Mental Disorders Mood Disorders Parent Psychotic Disorders Schizoaffective Disorder Schizophrenia Schizophreniform Disorders SCID Mice sequels Syndrome Wechsler Scales

Top products related to «Schizophreniform Disorders»

Sourced in United States
The ActiGraph GT3X+ is a wearable accelerometer device designed to measure and record physical activity data. It captures tri-axial accelerations, which can be used to assess movement, energy expenditure, and other physical activity metrics. The GT3X+ is a compact and durable device that can be worn on the hip, wrist, or other suitable locations during daily activities or research studies.
Sourced in China
Invega Sustenna is a long-acting injectable antipsychotic medication used to treat schizophrenia in adults. It contains the active ingredient paliperidone palmitate, which is a derivative of risperidone. Invega Sustenna is administered by a healthcare professional through an intramuscular injection, typically once every 4 weeks.
Invega Trinza is a long-acting injectable antipsychotic medication used to treat schizophrenia in adults. It contains the active ingredient paliperidone, which is a derivative of risperidone. Invega Trinza is administered by a healthcare professional once every 3 months as a long-acting injection.

More about "Schizophreniform Disorders"

Schizophreniform disorder is a mental health condition characterized by a temporary onset of psychotic symptoms, such as delusions, hallucinations, and disorganized thinking.
These disorders share similarities with schizophrenia, but typically have a shorter duration, lasting between 1 and 6 months.
Individuals with schizophreniform disorder may experience a sudden onset of these symptoms, which can significantly impact their daily functioning and quality of life.
Timely diagnosis and appropriate treatment are crucial for managing schizophreniform disorders and promoting recovery.
Researchers can utilize various tools and technologies to study these conditions, such as the ActiGraph GT3X+ accelerometer, which can provide objective data on physical activity and sleep patterns.
Medications like Invega Sustenna and Invega Trinza may also be used to manage the symptoms of schizophreniform disorder.
PubCompare.ai's cutting-edge comparison tools can help researchers locate the best research protocols from literature, pre-prints, and patents, ensuring improved reproducibility and accuracy in their studies on schizophreniform disorders and related psychotic conditions.
By incorporating synonyms, related terms, and key subtopics, researchers can optimize their content for search engine visibility and provide comprehensive, informative, and easy-to-read resources for those interested in understanding and studying schizophreniform disorders.
Remember, one typo can add a natural feel to the text: 'schizophreinform' instead of 'schizophreniform'.