Breech Presentation
This can lead to challenges during delivery and increased risks for the baby.
Researchers can use PubCompare.ai's AI-driven platform to optimize their research protocols, uncover the best practices, and make informed decisions about managing breech presentations.
The platform allows users to compare literature, pre-prints, and patents to streamline their research and find the most effective approaches.
Most cited protocols related to «Breech Presentation»
The study was approved by the Danish Registry Board. An informed consent was not required for this study of routine records.
Based on the outcome of last pregnancy, women were divided into two groups, those with a live birth and those with a stillbirth. The outcome data are from the Women schedule (Section 1) that was implemented during the baseline round of the AHS in 2010–2011. Ever married women in the age group 15–49 years were asked about the outcome of their last pregnancy during the reference period 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2009, which was reported as either live birth, stillbirth or abortion. Information on gestational age at stillbirth or type of stillbirth (antepartum or intrapartum) was not available. The numerator ‘stillbirth’ and denominator ‘total birth’=stillbirth+live birth) is from the same reference period of the survey data. Potential risk factors for stillbirth were grouped as: socioeconomic, behavioural and biodemographic based on a review of published literature. The description of variables included in each group is provided in
Women with breech presentation register for birth and delivery planning at the outpatient clinic at 34 to 36 weeks of gestation Vaginal delivery approach from breech position was offered in case of a successful previous vaginal birth or an obstetrical conjugate above 12 cm (measured by MRI) and an estimated birth weight of 2.5 kg or more of a proportional grown fetus. Weight of the fetus of ≥3.8kg, previous cesarean delivery or head flexion did not lead to exclusion.
Louwen et al. showed a superior maternal and fetal outcome from birth position on knees and arms or in upright position [5 (link)] The preferred birth position in all vaginal deliveries was on knees and arms or in upright position. In some cases, dorsal position was used to perform manual assisted delivery. In this study all birth positions were included.
The primary outcome was perineal injuries, classified as second‐degree tears according to international standards
Second‐degree tears are not registered in the national birth register in Sweden but examination of the local database of births for one of the maternity wards in this project revealed that 77 percent of the primiparous women had a vaginal and/or perineal injury, which is in line with previously reported prevalence
The study included nulliparous Swedish‐speaking women, gestational age ≥ 37 + 0 weeks with spontaneous onset of labor or induction of labor. Cases of nulliparous women with diabetes mellitus (manifest or pregnancy‐induced), preterm birth ≤ 37 + 0, intrauterine growth restriction, female genital mutilation, multiple pregnancy, fetus in breech presentation, and stillbirths were excluded.
During the study period 1,773 nulliparous women fulfilled the study criteria (Fig.
The intervention is based on a theoretical framework of woman‐centered care
Spontaneous pushing: The woman feels a strong urge to push and follows the urge but does not put on any extra abdominal pressure. The midwife will if needed assist the woman to accomplish a controlled and slow birth of the baby by encouraging breathing and resisting the urge to push during the last contractions
Flexible sacrum positions: Birth positions with flexibility in the sacro‐iliac joints, thereby enabling the pelvic outlet to expand (kneeling, standing, all‐fours, lateral position, and giving birth on the birth seat)
Using the two‐step principle of head‐to‐body birthing technique if possible
Most recents protocols related to «Breech Presentation»
Indications for IOL with misoprostol were prolonged pregnancy (gestational age ≥ 41–41 + 6, weeks + days), PROM, diabetes, suspicion of fetal macrosomia, gestational hypertension and preeclampsia, oligohydramnios, antithrombotic therapeutic window, and other indications such as psychological distress.
The exposure lateral or mediolateral episiotomy was defined by a checkbox in the standardized maternal medical record marking a left‐ or right‐sided episiotomy. In total, 13 950 (31.2%) women had a lateral or mediolateral episiotomy and 30 706 (68.8%) had no episiotomy. Women with a midline (n = 209, 0.5%) or undefined type of episiotomy (with the procedure code TMA00 but no indication of side, n = 809, 1.8%) were excluded. The final cohort included 44 656 women with a lateral/mediolateral episiotomy or no episiotomy (Figure
Demographic, maternal, obstetric, and neonatal parameters were compared between OASI cases diagnosed among local Caucasian women versus immigrant women of Asian ethnicity. All data were retrieved from a computerized database using the International Classification of Diseases 9th Revision codes for perineal lacerations. Exclusion criteria composed of age < 18 years, stillbirths, breech presentation, or ethnicity other than Caucasian or Asian. Comorbidities, use of drugs, alcohol, smoking, gestational diabetes status, and weight gain during pregnancy were among the maternal characteristics examined. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated from height and weight measurements prior to pregnancy or during the first trimester. Obstetric-related details included parity, gestational age, intrapartum fever, length of the first and second stages of labor, usage of oxytocin for the induction or augmentation of labor, fetal presentation and position, episiotomy, instrumental-assisted vaginal delivery, and incidence of shoulder dystociaNeonatal characteristics included gender, Apgar scores, and birth weights. Maternal complications included: OASI, blood loss, and the need for blood-product transfusions.
At our institution, midwives handle uncomplicated deliveries. Instrumental-assisted deliveries are performed only by obstetricians using a vacuum device. Vacuum extraction is performed when the fetal head is stationed below the level of the ischial spines (at +1 or more). For nulliparous women, a prolonged second stage is defined as two hours or longer, and for parous women, one hour or longer, with an additional one hour if epidural analgesia is employed. A selective episiotomy policy is employed, and only mediolateral episiotomies are performed. Perineal protection is always undertaken during delivery, either spontaneous or instrumental. Diagnosis of the severity of obstetric tears is performed by obstetricians. According to the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG) guidelines, a third-degree perineal tear involves the anal sphincter muscle, while a fourth-degree perineal tear extends through the anal sphincter and into the rectal mucosa [15 (link)]. Repair of OASI is performed only by senior Obstetricians who have completed a training course for the diagnosis and repair of OASI. Repair of a fourth-degree OASI is performed by colorectal specialists.
Women who endure OASI are evaluated at the urogynecological clinic at 1, 6, and 12 months after delivery. Pelvic floor muscle training is strongly recommended during the puerperium period. Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) and manometry are performed during the first year after delivery in order to assess the integrity and function of the anal sphincter.
Protocol full text hidden due to copyright restrictions
Open the protocol to access the free full text link
Top products related to «Breech Presentation»
More about "Breech Presentation"
This can lead to challenges during delivery and increased risks for the baby, such as birth injuries, respiratory distress, and increased chances of cesarean section.
Researchers can use PubCompare.ai's AI-driven platform to optimize their research protocols, uncover the best practices, and make informed decisions about managing breech presentations.
The platform allows users to compare literature, pre-prints, and patents to streamline their research and find the most effective approaches.
When studying breech presentation, researchers may utilize tools like the Voluson 730 Expert ultrasound system, Vscan Air handheld ultrasound, and statistical software like SPSS Statistics version 23, Stata V.13, and SPSS software version 25.0.
These technologies can help analyze fetal positioning, monitor pregnancies, and assess outcomes.
Additionally, researchers may extract and analyze genetic data using TRIzol reagent or investigate cellular mechanisms related to breech presentation using the VK2/E6E7 cell line.
Sumilon Celltight may also be used for cell culture studies.
By leveraging PubCompare.ai's platform and these various research tools and techniques, researchers can optimize their protocols, uncover best practices, and make informed decisions to improve the management and outcomes of breech presentations.