Women who agreed to participate were given follow-up appointments at about 20, 28, and 36 weeks' gestation in the National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Clinical Research Facility (Cambridge, UK). All research scans after the dating scan were done with a Voluson i system (GE Healthcare, Fairfield CT, USA) by one of a team of six sonographers, all of whom received standard training. All ultrasound examinations followed the same protocols as those used in the clinical service.13 , 14 (link) At the 20 week research appointment, participants were given a novel questionnaire we created to obtain details about their medical history and demographic characteristics.11 (link) The 20 week scan had both routine (review of fetal anatomy and biometric measurements) and research (uterine and umbilical artery Doppler flow velocimetry) elements. Women were informed about routine elements (any concerns about the fetal anatomy and of the fetal measurements at the 20 week scan), but women and clinicians were masked to the research elements (results of the uterine and umbilical Dopplers). At the 28 and 36 week research appointments, umbilical and uterine artery Doppler flow velocimetry were repeated, and ultrasonographic measurement of fetal biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference, and femur length were also done using standard techniques. An estimated fetal weight (EFW) percentile was calculated by use of the Hadlock equations and reference standard.15 (link), 16 (link) Uteroplacental Dopplers, biometry, and EFW results from the research ultrasound scans at 28 and 36 weeks were not reported to the participant or the clinician. However, both were informed about incidental findings, specifically previously undiagnosed placenta praevia, severe oligohydramnios (amniotic fluid index <5), a previously undiagnosed fetal abnormality, or non-cephalic presentation at the time of the 36 week scan.
Gestational age was defined on the basis of ultrasonographic estimation at the time of the first scan, as recommended.3 Distributions of all measurements in the research scans were similar to previously reported reference cohorts (appendix ). Summary statistics for reproducibility and reliability of research scans (assessed by two sonographers, scanning the same woman twice at the same appointment, each masked to the results of the other's scan) are tabulated for 45 women at 20 weeks' gestation and 44 women at 36 weeks' gestation (appendix ). Coefficients of variation were less than 5% for fetal biometry and EFW, and between 5% and 10% for uteroplacental Doppler at both timepoints.
Women were selected for additional, clinically indicated scans in the third trimester of pregnancy as per routine clinical care, using local and national guidelines (eg, the NICE Guidelines on low risk women,3 women with diabetes,17 and women with hypertensive disorders18 ). Women were also screened with serial measurement of the symphyseal-fundal height. All women carried their maternity notes, which included a chart of the normal range of measurements for fetuses in relation to gestational age. Referral for an ultrasound scan was made by the midwife or doctor providing clinical care. Results of all clinically indicated scans were reported and paper copies were filed in both the participant's hand-held notes and hospital case records.
Screening status in relation to EFW was classified on the basis of the last scan before birth (which could be the 28 week scan or the 36 week scan for universal ultrasonography, depending on the gestational age at delivery). Screen positive was defined as an EFW less than the 10th percentile, using an externally derived reference range15 (link), 16 (link) (for both selective and universal ultrasonography). Screen negative was defined as an EFW of the 10th percentile or more (both selective and universal ultrasonography), or if no clinically indicated scan had been done at gestational age of 26 weeks or later (only selective ultrasonography).
Gestational age was defined on the basis of ultrasonographic estimation at the time of the first scan, as recommended.3 Distributions of all measurements in the research scans were similar to previously reported reference cohorts (
Women were selected for additional, clinically indicated scans in the third trimester of pregnancy as per routine clinical care, using local and national guidelines (eg, the NICE Guidelines on low risk women,3 women with diabetes,17 and women with hypertensive disorders18 ). Women were also screened with serial measurement of the symphyseal-fundal height. All women carried their maternity notes, which included a chart of the normal range of measurements for fetuses in relation to gestational age. Referral for an ultrasound scan was made by the midwife or doctor providing clinical care. Results of all clinically indicated scans were reported and paper copies were filed in both the participant's hand-held notes and hospital case records.
Screening status in relation to EFW was classified on the basis of the last scan before birth (which could be the 28 week scan or the 36 week scan for universal ultrasonography, depending on the gestational age at delivery). Screen positive was defined as an EFW less than the 10th percentile, using an externally derived reference range15 (link), 16 (link) (for both selective and universal ultrasonography). Screen negative was defined as an EFW of the 10th percentile or more (both selective and universal ultrasonography), or if no clinically indicated scan had been done at gestational age of 26 weeks or later (only selective ultrasonography).
Full text: Click here