The largest database of trusted experimental protocols
> Disorders > Sign or Symptom > Back Pain

Back Pain

Back pain refers to discomfort or pain experienced in the back region, which can range from mild to severe.
It is a common condition that can be caused by a variety of factors, including muscle strain, herniated discs, arthritis, or underlying medical conditions.
Effective management of back pain often involves a combination of treatments, such as physical therapy, pain medication, and lifestyle changes.
Researchers utilize various protocols to study the epidemiology, risk factors, and treatment options for back pain, aiming to develop more effective interventions and improve patient outcomes.
PubCompare.ai can assist researchers by identifying relevant protocols from the literature, preprints, and patents, and providin data-driven insights to enhance back pain studies.

Most cited protocols related to «Back Pain»

We have used a list of various possibly stress, anxiety or somatoform-related symptoms such as irritability, fatigue, hostility, feeling of tension, inability to concentrate, musculoskeletal symptoms (neck or upper back pain or discomfort), gastrointestinal symptoms (abdominal pain or discomfort, nausea, alterations in bowel habits), headaches, sleep disturbances, tachycardia, increased blood pressure, palpitations, chest discomfort, dizziness and substance abuse [27 ]. This checklist is not intended as a psychometric tool. It consists of nonspecific symptoms described as related to stress. Stress symptoms, in general, claim more sensitivity than specificity, as such, we were particularly interested on the number of cardinal stress manifestations and not on the evaluation of a situation or psychological state. Participants were asked about the frequency of experiencing these symptoms during the last year and each symptom was binary categorized as frequent or not. Some of these symptoms may not well be expressed as binary variables and suffered low specificity but our interest was to evaluate the coexistence of these stress-related symptoms with high PSS scores. The total number of frequent symptoms was calculated and each participant was categorized in five groups (symptoms less or equal to three, four, five, six and more than six).
Publication 2011
Abdominal Pain Anxiety Back Pain Blood Pressure Chest Defecation Fatigue Headache Hostility Nausea Neck Psychometrics Sleep Disorders Substance Abuse

Protocol full text hidden due to copyright restrictions

Open the protocol to access the free full text link

Publication 2014
Attention Back Pain Diagnosis Hearing Sound

Protocol full text hidden due to copyright restrictions

Open the protocol to access the free full text link

Publication 2008
Asthma Back Pain Coronary Artery Disease Degenerative Arthritides Diabetes Mellitus Diagnosis Diagnostic Self Evaluation Disease, Chronic Gender Gold Hypersensitivity Inpatient Kidney Diseases Nervous System Disorder Outpatients Pharmaceutical Preparations Prescriptions Self-Management Thyroid Diseases Treatment Protocols
Study 1 participants completed the BPI, Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire (CPG), Roland disability scale, and SF-36 bodily pain scale at baseline; they completed the BPI, CPG, and pain global rating of change at 6 months. Study 2 was cross-sectional; participants completed the BPI, Functional Morbidity Index, and a single-item rating of overall pain-related distress.

The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) includes two scales that assess pain intensity and pain-related functional impairment (physical and emotional).13 ,15 (link) The four items of the BPI severity scale assess the intensity of current pain and pain at its least, worst, and average during the past week on scales from 0 (“no pain”) to 10 (“pain as bad as you can imagine”). The BPI interference scale assesses pain-related functional interference with seven items assessing different domains (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life) rated from 0 (“does not interfere”) to 10 (“interferes completely”).

The Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire (CPG) includes two three-item scales (intensity and disability) that are transformed into 0–100 scores.19 (link) An algorithm classifies pain into four graded categories: 1) low disability-low intensity, 2) low disability-high intensity, 3) high disability-moderately limiting, and 4) high disability-severely limiting. The CPG has been validated in primary care, chronic pain, and general populations.20 (link)–22 (link)

The Roland Disability questionnaire is a pain-specific measure of physical disability validated in patients with back pain and other chronic pain conditions.23 (link),24 (link) It includes a checklist of 24 statements about pain effects on function; the score is the number of items endorsed.

The Short-Form 36-item questionnaire (SF-36) Bodily Pain Scale is a two item scale assessing pain severity and interference.25 (link),26 Responses are transformed into a 0–100 score.

The Pain Global Rating of Change is a single item assessing patients’ overall impression of change in their pain. Study 1 participants were asked whether their pain was worse, about the same, or better since the start of the study. Those who reported that pain was better were asked to rate the magnitude of improvement (a little, somewhat, moderately, a lot, or completely better). Global ratings of change may be more sensitive to improvement and better correlated with patient satisfaction than serial measures.27 (link)

The Functional Morbidity Index was developed to assess general functional status in older adults.28 (link) Patients indicate whether they are able perform four different activities independently, and if not, whether the impairment is due to a health problem.

Overall Pain Distress is a single item: “How much did overall pain distress or bother you during the past week?” Response options are not at all, a little bit, somewhat, quite a bit, and very much.

Publication 2009
Aged Back Pain BAD protein, human Chronic Pain Disabled Persons Emotions Mood Pain Pain Disorder Patients Physical Examination Pleasure Population Group Primary Health Care Severity, Pain Sleep
The COSMIN initiative83 (link) previously identified 9 measurement properties relevant for PROMs: internal consistency, test-retest reliability, measurement error, construct validity, structural validity, criterion validity, cross-cultural validity, and responsiveness.85 (link) Three systematic reviews (for physical functioning, pain intensity and HRQoL) summarized and appraised the evidence on these measurement properties in patients with nsLBP (Chiarotto et al., 2018. Measurement properties of Numeric Rating Scale, Visual Analogue Scale and Pain Severity subscale of Brief Pain Inventory in patients with low back pain: a systematic review: Unpublished data; Chiarotto et al., 2018. Evidence on the measurement properties of health-related quality of life instruments is largely missing in patients with low back pain, a systematic review: Unpublished data; and Ref. 18). These reviews were conducted according to the recently updated COSMIN methodology for this type of reviews (Prinsen et al., 2018. COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures: Unpublished data); a more detailed description of their methodology is presented elsewhere (Chiarotto et al., 2018. Measurement properties of Numeric Rating Scale, Visual Analogue Scale and Pain Severity subscale of Brief Pain Inventory in patients with low back pain: a systematic review: Unpublished data; Chiarotto et al., 2018. Evidence on the measurement properties of health-related quality of life instruments is largely missing in patients with low back pain, a systematic review: Unpublished data; and Ref. 18).
Publication 2018
Back Pain Low Back Pain Patients Physical Examination Severity, Pain Visual Analog Pain Scale

Most recents protocols related to «Back Pain»

An electronic survey was used to gather information on weight and height in order to calculate each participant’s Body Mass Index (BMI). Climbing level for the last 12 months was collected and classified according to the recommendations of the IRCRA [18 (link)]. The prevalence of jumping descent in bouldering was recorded through questions designed by the authors.
The Nordic questionnaire of back pain [19 (link)], adjusted for sport specific settings [20 (link)], was used to examine the lifetime and one-year prevalence of thoracolumbar back pain as well as training volume of the participants. The Nordic questionnaire of back pain has shown acceptable test–retest reliability and validity to clinical examination [19 (link), 20 (link)]. Based on the sport adjusted Nordic questionnaire, questions focusing on training volume between 10 and 20 years of age were computed, since athletes are plausibly more susceptible to develop radiographic spinal changes of the spine during the growth spurt [13 (link), 21 (link)]. The Oswestry back pain disability index [22 (link)] was used to examine disability associated to thoracic and lumbar back pain.
Publication 2023
Athletes Back Pain Disabled Persons Index, Body Mass Low Back Pain Physical Examination Vertebral Column X-Rays, Diagnostic
All climbers (bouldering and sport climbing) of the Swedish senior national sport climbing team were prospectively invited to participate (n = 8). In addition, due to the limited sample size of the national team, the head manager of the Swedish national climbing team invited additional climbers, meeting the inclusion criteria of high-level performance (n = 11). The participants were either currently training to participate in the national team or had previously been training to participate in the team.
Since high cumulative training load and pre-growth spurt training debut are plausible risk factors for developing spinal changes, inclusion criteria were based on a combination of criteria where climbers had been exposed to these plausible risks. Inclusion criteria of all climbing participants were: a minimum climbing level of elite during last 12 months, as classified by the International Rock Climbing Research Association (IRCRA) [18 (link)], age over 18 years, having a minimum of five years of climbing experience, current or previous participation in national or international climbing competitions and frequent use of bouldering as a training method. Since elite-level climbers already constitute a limited study sample, the inclusion was not limited by an upper age limit, nor was back pain included as a parameter in the inclusion criteria.
A control group was recruited, matched in terms of age and sex, through advertisement on social media. Participants voluntarily reported their interest to participate in the study. For the control group, any experience of regular climbing, as well as previous or present participation on elite level, in any sport, led to exclusion. Individuals that had tried climbing on a few occasions were allowed to participate. Exclusion criteria for all participants were prior spinal surgery, and contraindications to undergo MRI.
Publication 2023
Back Pain Head Operative Surgical Procedures
Thoracolumbar spinal MRI examinations were performed at the Department of Radiology, Carlanderska Hospital using a 1.5 T scanner (Signa, GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA). The MRI protocol included sagittal T1-and T2-weighted sequences (Th1-S1). In the thoracic spine, a field of view of 360 × 360mm2 and slice thickness of 3 mm was used. In the lumbar spine a field of view of 320 × 320mm2 and slice thickness of 3.5 mm was utilized.
The MRI images were classified by a senior radiologist (> 15 years of experience) according to a predetermined standardized protocol. Disc degeneration was classified according to the Pfirrmann classification [23 (link)]. In the thoracic spine, no distinction between Pfirrmann grade 1 and grade 2 was made since the resolution of the images was not considered adequate for reliable differentiation between these grades. Vertebral and endplate changes were classified according to the Modic classification [24 (link)] and a modified Endplate defect score, adapted to our MRI protocol. The Endplate defect score [25 (link)] was modified where Type I-III (representing no degeneration) were pooled (Table 1). Schmorl’s nodes were classified as present or not present and defined as a vertebral endplate irregularity associated with intraspongious disc herniation, irrespective of the size, at either the cranial or caudal endplate, or at both endplates relative to the lumbar disc level. Spondylolisthesis was assessed as either present or not [26 , 27 (link)]. Similarly, vertebral apophyseal injury, defined as any irregularity or signal changes in the apophyseal region, was categorized as either present or not.

Modified endplate score, based on the original endplate defect score [25 (link)]

Modified endplate defect scoreOriginal endplate defect score
1Type I—Normal endplate with no interruption
Type II—Thinning of the endplate, no obvious break
Type III—Focal endplate defect with established disc marrow contact but with maintained endplate contour
2Type IV—Endplate defects < 25% of the endplate area
3Type V—Endplate defects up to 50% of the endplate area
4Type VI—Extensive damaged endplates up to total destruction
Intra-observer and inter-observer reliability measures were carried out on a set of 15 individuals (5 of the climbers and 10 back pain patients not included in the current study) by the senior radiologist and an additional radiologist (5 years of experience). The latter repeated the evaluation after one month, blinded to previous result.
Publication 2023
Back Pain Cranium Focal Adhesions Intervertebral Disc Degeneration Intervertebral Disk Displacement Lumbar Region Marrow Patients Physical Examination Radiologist Spinal Injuries Spondylolisthesis Vertebra Vertebrae, Lumbar Vertebral Column X-Rays, Diagnostic
The IBM SPSS Statistics for MAC, version 24 (IBM Corp., Armonk, N.Y., USA) was used for demographic description of the data and statistical tests were performed using the statistical analysis software SAS 9.4 for Windows (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The level of significance was set at p < 0.05.
For inference testing of spinal parameters, all non-dichotomous spinal parameters were dichotomized according to the established cut off for degenerative findings for each classification system (Pfirrmann ≥ 3, Endplate defect score ≥ 2, Modic ≥ 1).
For comparison of training amount, thoracolumbar back pain, and spinal changes between groups; Fisher ´s Exact test (lowest 1-sided p-value multiplied by 2) was used for dichotomous variables and the Mantel–Haenszel Chi Square Exact test was used for ordered categorical variables. The Fisher ´s Non-Parametric Permutation Test was used for continuous variables. The cumulative number of IVDs/levels/vertebrae per participant were compared between the climbing and control group.
Intra-observer and inter-observer reliability measures were analyzed with Gwent’s agreement coefficient with type 1 utilized for nominal and dichotomous variables and type 2 for ordinal variables.
Publication 2023
Back Pain Vertebra
The EMRMS was established in November, 2016 to assist rheumatologists in conducting ASDAS assessments and comprehensively evaluating clinical outcomes in all patients with AS attending TCVGH. The EMRMS database contains information necessary to determite ASDAS, including CRP, level and erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR], patient comorbidities, patient history, and family history. The reliability and validity of the data have been verified14 (link).Patients with AS were consecutively enrolled in the TCVGH-AS cohort after they received a confirmed AS diagnosis from a TCVGH rheumatologist according to the 1984 modified New York criteria10 (link). The CRP and ESR data were automatically uploaded to the TCVGH healthcare information system (HIS) to reduce human error. The baseline information, which was collected by trained nurses during the initial visit, including clinical characteristics, onset age, comorbidities at presentation (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, renal insufficiency, gout, coronary artery disease, stroke, periodontal disease, osteoporosis, and tuberculosis history), periarticular extraspinal features (synovitis, enthesitis, and dactylitis) and nonarticular manifestations (psoriasis, uveitis, and IBD), family history of autoimmune disease, and patient history of arthropathy, obtained through standardized questionnaires and worksheets to ensure reproducibility and adherence to good laboratory practice. The rheumatologist in charge then confirmed patients’ clinical characteristics, and nurses assisted the patients with AS to complete the self-assessment questionnaires for disease evaluation. The following measures were used: global assessment of disease activity on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0–10, back pain on an NRS of 0–10, duration of morning stiffness on an NRS of 0–10, and peripheral pain or swelling on an NRS of 0–10. Before every 3-month visiting clinic, the patient would first to have blood examination. Blood reports can be uploaded to EMRMS through the HIS system, trained nurses assist patient fills out the questionnaire on EMRMS, the assessment of disease activity completed before visiting the doctor. All laboratory data, including CRP and ESR, have been uploaded to the HIS. The IT at TCVGH help "feed-forward" the patient reported outcomes to HIS, and do the auto-calculation of ASDAS-ESR, ASDAS-CRP using the ESR, CRP data in HIS, then "feed-back" these data to both HIS and EMRMS, showing the data on the summary overview "dashboard" in the EMRMS, which was shown both in HIS and the devices (iPAD handled by a nurse in charge and smartphones of patients with AS).
Publication 2023
Arthropathy Autoimmune Diseases Back Pain BLOOD Cerebrovascular Accident Charge Nurses Coronary Artery Disease Diabetes Mellitus Diagnosis Gout Hepatitis B Hepatitis C virus High Blood Pressures Homo sapiens Hyperlipidemia Medical Devices Nurses Osteoporosis Pain Patients Periodontal Diseases Physicians Psoriasis Renal Insufficiency Rheumatologist Sedimentation Rates, Erythrocyte Self-Assessment Synovitis Tuberculosis Uveitis

Top products related to «Back Pain»

Sourced in United States, Austria, Japan, Cameroon, Germany, United Kingdom, Canada, Belgium, Israel, Denmark, Australia, New Caledonia, France, Argentina, Sweden, Ireland, India
SAS version 9.4 is a statistical software package. It provides tools for data management, analysis, and reporting. The software is designed to help users extract insights from data and make informed decisions.
Sourced in United States, Japan, United Kingdom, Germany, Belgium, Austria, Spain, France, Denmark, Switzerland, Ireland
SPSS version 20 is a statistical software package developed by IBM. It provides a range of data analysis and management tools. The core function of SPSS version 20 is to assist users in conducting statistical analysis on data.
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom, Belgium, Japan, Austria, Germany, Denmark
SPSS Statistics for Windows is an analytical software package designed for data management, analysis, and reporting. It provides a comprehensive suite of tools for statistical analysis, including regression, correlation, and hypothesis testing. The software is intended to assist users in gaining insights from their data through advanced analytical techniques.
Sourced in United States, Austria, Japan, Belgium, New Zealand, United Kingdom, Germany, Denmark, Australia, France
R version 3.6.1 is a statistical computing and graphics software package. It is an open-source implementation of the S programming language and environment. R version 3.6.1 provides a wide range of statistical and graphical techniques, including linear and nonlinear modeling, classical statistical tests, time-series analysis, classification, clustering, and more.
The Philips MP50 patient monitor is a compact and portable device designed for continuous monitoring of patient vital signs. It provides real-time monitoring of key parameters such as heart rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation, and respiratory rate. The MP50 is equipped with a clear display and intuitive user interface, enabling healthcare professionals to easily access and interpret patient data.
Sourced in United States, Netherlands, Germany, Japan, United Kingdom
The Philips Brilliance 64 is a computed tomography (CT) imaging system designed for medical diagnostic purposes. It features a 64-slice detector configuration, enabling rapid data acquisition and high-resolution imaging. The Brilliance 64 provides detailed anatomical information to support clinical decision-making for a variety of medical applications.
Sourced in United States, Poland
Stata/IC 12.1 is a general-purpose statistical software package developed by StataCorp. It is designed for data analysis, management, and visualization. The software provides a comprehensive set of tools for researchers, analysts, and statisticians to perform a wide range of statistical analyses, including regression, time series, and survey data analysis.
Sourced in United States, Denmark, Austria, United Kingdom, Japan, Canada
Stata version 14 is a software package for data analysis, statistical modeling, and graphics. It provides a comprehensive set of tools for data management, analysis, and reporting. Stata version 14 includes a wide range of statistical techniques, including linear regression, logistic regression, time series analysis, and more. The software is designed to be user-friendly and offers a variety of data visualization options.
Sourced in United States, Japan, United Kingdom, Germany, Belgium, Austria, Italy, Poland, India, Canada, Switzerland, Spain, China, Sweden, Brazil, Australia, Hong Kong
SPSS Statistics is a software package used for interactive or batched statistical analysis. It provides data access and management, analytical reporting, graphics, and modeling capabilities.
Sourced in France
Female Swiss nude mice are a laboratory animal model used for research purposes. They are immunodeficient mice that lack the thymus gland, resulting in an absence of T cells. This characteristic makes them useful for studying various aspects of immunology and disease research.

More about "Back Pain"

Back discomfort, spinal pain, lumbago, vertebral pain, and dorsal ache are all terms used to describe the experience of pain or discomfort in the back region.
This common condition can arise from a variety of factors, such as muscle strain, herniated intervertebral discs, joint arthritis, or underlying medical issues.
Effective management often entails a combination of treatments, including physical therapy, pain medication, and lifestyle modifications.
Researchers utilize various protocols, such as those found in SAS 9.4, SPSS 20, R 3.6.1, and Stata 14, to study the epidemiology, risk factors, and treatment options for back pain, with the ultimate goal of developing more effective interventions and improving patient outcomes.
PubCompare.ai can assist researchers by identifying relevant protocols from the literature, preprints, and patents, and providing data-driven insights to enhance back pain studies and unlock more reproducible and accurate findings.