Enterococcus faecalis
It is a leading cause of nosocomial infections and has developed resistance to many antibiotics, making it a significant public health concern.
Researching E. faecalis is crucial for understanding its virulence factors, pathogenesis, and potential treatment strategies.
PubCompare.ai's innovative tools can help optimize this research by locating reproducible, accurate findings from literature, preprints, and patents, and identifying the best protocols and products using AI-driven analysis.
Improve your E. faecalis studies with PubCompare.ai's powerful research tools.
Most cited protocols related to «Enterococcus faecalis»
The EasyClone‐MarkerFree vectors were created by amplifying the EasyClone 2.0 vectors
gRNA cassettes targeting particular integration loci (chromosomal coordinates can be found in Supporting information, Table S4) were ordered as double‐stranded gene blocks from IDT DNA. These cassettes were amplified using primers 10525(TJOS‐62 [P1F]) and 10529(TJOS‐65 [P1R]) and USER‐cloned into pCfB2926 (pTAJAK‐71)
For expression of the Cas9 gene we used an episomal vector pCfB2312 with CEN‐ARS replicon and KanMX resistance marker
The EasyClone‐MarkerFree vectors for expression of fluorescent protein or 3HP pathway genes were cloned as described in
Confocal scanning laser microscopy (CSLM) was employed to confirm the 24-hour biofilm formation ability of each strain. 8 study groups were examined (
To remove non-adherent bacteria, the discs were rinsed 6 times in sterile saline. First, the discs for each study group were placed in a sterile plastic tube (Sarstedt, Norway) containing 25 mL saline and gently vortex mixed (MS2 Minishaker; IKA Works Inc., Wilmington, NC) at 100 rpm for 10 seconds. The discs were then transferred to another tube, and the procedure was repeated twice. Each single disc was then transferred to a sterile glass test tube containing 5 mL saline and subjected to vortex mixing at 100 rpm. The single disc rinsing was also repeated 3 times.
Aliquots of 50 µL saline were incubated on agar (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) with 5% ox blood at 35ºC for 3 days. For culture of P. acnes, FAA agar (Merck) was incubated in an anaerobic cabinet for 7 days. The bacteria cultured were enumerated by colony counting. The number of CFU after final rinsing was recorded as a quantitative baseline, facilitating evaluation of the different detachment methods.
Each experimental group (10 discs) was subjected to 1 of 4 methods for biofilm detachment and bacterial recovery. The experimental design is summarized in
Most recents protocols related to «Enterococcus faecalis»
Example 3
The ability of different bacterial species to take up [18F]F-PABA was studied. The radiotracer accumulated in both methicillin sensitive S. aureus (MSSA, Newman) and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), as well as the Gram negative bacteria E. coli and Klebsiela pneumoniae.
In the case of MSSA we also demonstrated that heat-killed cells were unable to take up [18F]F-PABA (
SERS spectra, we used the common machine learning algorithms from
the open-source Python (3.8) library, Scikit-learn. To read, process,
and visualize the spectral data, we used python packages: NumPy, SciPy,
Matplotlib, and Seaborn.
To classify the five different bacteria
species, 1114 SERS spectra were recorded on the Ag–CuxO nanostructures. These include 157 for Bacillus subtilis (B. subtilis), 309 for Escherichia coli (E. coli), 155 for Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis), 343 for Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), and 150 for Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans). Specifically, the data
were first normalized using StandardScaler and then principal component
analysis (PCA) was applied on the transformed data. Machine learning
methods were used to distinguish bacteria. To facilitate the machine
learning-based identification for real-life adaptation, the spectral
data obtained from bacteria were used directly, without any pre-processing
such as background subtraction or smoothing. For each bacterial species,
approximately 66.7% of the spectral data were used as training data,
which was obtained by parsing it using the randomization parameter
(randomization coefficient = 40) of the split function from the Scikit-learn
library. These data were used to train classification algorithms like
support vector machines (SVM), k-nearest neighbors (KNN), and decision
tree. Finally, the remaining approximately 33.3% of the bacterial
spectra were used to test the accuracy of the system.
Escherichia coli DSM1900, E. coli DSM18039 and Staphylococcus aureus DSM2569 were purchased from the German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures GmbH (DSMZ, Braunschweig, Germany). Staphylococcus lugdunensis BC102, Enterococcus faecalis BC101 and Enterococcus faecium BC105 belong to the Department of Pharmacy and Biotechnology of the University of Bologna (Italy). Staphylococcus aureus SO88, Streptococcus agalactiae SO104, Candida albicans SO1 and Candida glabrata SO17 were isolated at Sant’Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital of Bologna during routine diagnostic procedures. The microbial identification was obtained by means of a matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), using a Bruker Microflex MALDI-TOF MS instrument (Bruker Daltonics) [49 (link)]. Staphylococcus spp., E. coli, Enterococcus spp. and S. agalactiae were aerobically grown at 37 °C in Brain Heart Infusion medium (BHI) (Difco, Detroit, MI, USA), while Candida spp. were aerobically cultured at 35 °C in Sabouraud dextrose medium (SD) (Difco, Detroit, MI, USA).
Top products related to «Enterococcus faecalis»
More about "Enterococcus faecalis"
It is a leading cause of nosocomial (hospital-acquired) infections and has developed resistance to many antibiotics, making it a significant public health concern.
Researching E. faecalis is crucial for understanding its virulence factors, pathogenesis, and potential treatment strategies.
Enterococcus species, including E. faecalis, are known to cause a variety of infections, such as urinary tract infections (UTIs), bacteremia (bloodstream infections), endocarditis (heart valve infections), and surgical site infections.
These bacteria are also associated with the development of antibiotic-resistant strains, posing a challenge for effective treatment.
In addition to E. faecalis, other notable bacteria that can cause nosocomial infections include Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Candida albicans.
These pathogens can also develop antimicrobial resistance, leading to increased morbidity and mortality.
Researching E. faecalis and other resistant bacteria is essential for developing new treatment strategies, improving infection control measures, and ultimately enhancing patient outcomes.
PubCompare.ai's innovative tools can assist researchers in this endeavor by locating reproducible, accurate findings from literature, preprints, and patents, and identifying the best protocols and products using AI-driven analysis.
This can help optimize research on E. faecalis and other clinically relevant microorganisms, such as Staphylococcus epidermidis, Bacillus cereus, Bacillus subtilis, and Proteus mirabilis.
By leveraging PubCompare.ai's advanced research tools, researchers can improve their understanding of E. faecalis and other problematic bacteria, leading to more effective prevention and treatment strategies, and ultimately, better patient outcomes.