The performance of the overall workflow or of its individual modules was assessed using a spectrum of different matrices that can be grouped into the five categories liquids, faeces, tissue, vectors, and food. The processed samples were mostly diagnostic specimens representating liquids (serum, cell-culture supernatant, bacterial suspensions, swab samples, tap water, and rumen); faeces (pig, bird and human) as example of a complex inhibitor-rich matrix; organs like brain, heart, liver, lymph nodes, kidney, lung, and intestine to test the efficiency of the protocol on tissue; pools of midges and ticks, respectively, representing arthropod vectors; rocket, mushrooms, ham, meat loaf, pizza, strawberries as examples for different foods. In addition, TissueLyser and cryoPREP disintegrations were compared using goat lymph nodes and intestine from animals infected with
Mycobacterium avium paratuberculosis (MAP; lymph nodes and intestine) that was available from an approved (Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments and the Protection of Animals of the State of Thuringia, Germany; Permit Number: 04-002/12) and previously published animal trial carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations
49 (link).
We used samples containing a pre-diagnosed pathogen (see Table
2) and samples with unrecognized pathogen content (see Table
3). The known pathogens comprised in the samples represented the groups eukaryotic parasites, bacterial pathogens, and viruses. In addition, bacterial suspensions of exponentially growing
Bacillus subtilis,
Staphylococcus aureus, and
Escherichia coli, representing Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, respectively, and an endospore suspension of
B.
subtilis as example of nucleic acids protected by highly resistant envelopes were processed. For selected samples, a sequencing library was generated according to the Supplementary File
1 (Procedure, steps 48–120) and sequenced following the respective manufacturer’s instructions.
In addition, we sequenced selected consumables used in our workflow to investigate their impact on the final sequencing outcome. The samples are an RNeasy column taken from the RNeasy Kit (Qiagen), the DNase (Qiagen) as used for the workflow, and the enzymes from the cDNA synthesis kit (Roche). The latter are the components “vial 2” (AMV RT), “vial 4” (Protector RNase Inhibitor), “vial 10” (2
nd strand enzyme) and “vial 11” (T4 DNA Polymerase). For all samples, we extracted RNA as described and DNA using the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen) and prepared libraries as described in the Supplementary File
1. In addition, as a blank control, an 800-µl water sample (Roth) was processed with the present workflow.
Wylezich C., Papa A., Beer M, & Höper D. (2018). A Versatile Sample Processing Workflow for Metagenomic Pathogen Detection. Scientific Reports, 8, 13108.