The largest database of trusted experimental protocols
> Living Beings > Bacterium > Wolbachia

Wolbachia

Wolbachia is a genus of intracellular bacteria that infect a wide range of arthropod and nematode species.
These bacteria are known for their ability to manipulate the reproductive biology of their hosts, often leading to increased fitness and spread within host populations.
Wolbachia bacteria have drawn significant interest from researchers due to their potential applications in areas such as mosquito-borne disease control and the management of parasitic nematode infections.
PubCompare.ai offers a powerful AI-driven analysis tool to help researchers locate the best protocols and products from literature, preprints, and patents, optimizing Wolbachia research and enhancing reproducibility and accuracy.

Most cited protocols related to «Wolbachia»

Quantitative PCR (qPCR) was performed to characterize the relative Wolbachia infection level in the S2 cell lines and flies. The protocol was similar to prior qPCR amplification using the single-copy wsp and su(fk)C genes of bacterial and host origin, respectively [65 (link)]. S2 cells were quantified using a hemocytometer to obtain 106 cells. The S2 cells or DSR females were homogenized in 100 μl STE with 0.4 mg/ml proteinase K to extract DNA as previously described [66 (link)].
For qRT-PCR, RNA extractions were performed on groups of 10 ovaries or 10 testes dissected from one-day post eclosion infected and uninfected Drosophila adults using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen). DNA contamination was removed with RNase-Free DNase Set (Qiagen). RNA quality and quantity was checked with NanoDrop ND-100 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Inc.). Synthesis of cDNA was performed with Superscript II Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen) using specific primer for Ance (AnceQ F 5'-CGGTCACGTTCGATTGGTTG-3' and AnceQ R 5'-CTTCGGTTTCCACGTTGGTTC-3') and Actin gene (ActinQ F 5'-GCTGACCGTATGCAAAAGG-3' and ActinQ R 5'-GCTTGGAGATCCACATCTG-3'). Primers were designed based upon D. simulans genbank sequences for Ance and Actin (genbank accession number: NM_057696 and NM_079486, respectively]. qRT-PCR was performed separately with the AnceQ F/R and ActinQ F/R primer pairs using a Miniopticon system (BioRad) with a Platinum SYBR Green qPCR superMix (Invitrogen). qRT-PCR reactions were conducted using a 2 minute step at 50°C, 2 minute step at 95°C and 40 cycles of 15 seconds at 95°C and 30 seconds at 56°C. A fluorescence measurement was made at the end of each cycle. A melting curve analysis was performed at the end of the amplification program to examine for primer-dimers or nonspecific amplification. Assays were performed on two (D. simulans and D. melanogaster wild type) or three (D. melanogaster Ance mutants) independent experiment replicates for each sex and infection type. As an examination for variability, duplicate qRT-PCR reactions were performed for each set of ovaries or testes with both the Ance and Actin primers. Relative expression of Ance gene was calibrated against Actin using the ΔΔCT calculation method [67 (link)] with:

Expression variation=2ΔΔCT
For comparisons of males and females, the above was modified as follows:

Publication 2008
A(2)C Actins Adult Anabolism Base Sequence Biological Assay Cells Deoxyribonucleases Diptera DNA, Complementary DNA Contamination Drosophila Drosophila melanogaster Endopeptidase K Endoribonucleases Females Fluorescence Gene Expression Genes Genes, Bacterial Infection Males Neoplasm Metastasis Oligonucleotide Primers Ovary Platinum RNA-Directed DNA Polymerase SYBR Green I Testis Wolbachia
Large volume serum samples were available from six (3 male and 3 female) domestic short-haired cats experimentally infected at 10 months of age with Dirofilaria immitis by subcutaneous inoculation of third-stage larvae (L3) and confirmed to be infected by recovery of adult worms at necropsy or confirmation of histological lesions. Briefly, trickle infection of a total of 100 L3 of D. immitis was performed by subcutaneous inguinal inoculation of each cat a total of four times, on study days 7, 14, 21, and 28, with 25 L3 (Missouri strain) harvested shortly prior to inoculation from infected Aedes aegypti mosquitoes (Liverpool strain). Whole blood samples were collected from the jugular vein or, rarely, the cephalic vein, of each cat on days 84, 112, 140, 168, 196, and 224 directly into vacuum tubes containing either EDTA or no additive. Cats were cared for through Oklahoma State University’s Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care-accredited animal resources program throughout the study; all research procedures followed a detailed animal care and use protocol approved by Oklahoma State University’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Anti-coagulated whole blood was assayed for microfilaria by modified Knott’s test and by real-time PCR for Wolbachia spp. as previously described [11 ,12 (link)]. For tubes without additive, blood was allowed to clot, the serum separated by centrifugation, placed into aliquots, and stored at −80°C until further use.
Publication 2014
Adult Aedes Animals Animals, Laboratory Autopsy BLOOD Centrifugation Clotrimazole Culicidae Dirofilaria immitis Edetic Acid Felis catus Females Groin Helminths Infection Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees Jugular Vein Larva Males Microfilaria Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Serum Strains Vaccination Vacuum Veins Wolbachia
Each new sequence is first filtered for quality, a process that excludes any record with less than 500 bp coverage for the barcode region of COI or with more than 1% ambiguous bases. If a sequence meets these quality requirements, it is then checked for reading frame shifts as indicated by stop codons or improbable peptides given the COI profile [44] (link). Because sequences showing these attributes are likely to derive from pseudogenes, they are excluded. Sequences are then screened to ensure that they do not derive from bacterial (e.g. Wolbachia) or certain external (e.g. human, mouse) contaminants by matching the sequence recovered from each specimen against a reference library of bacterial and selected vertebrate sequences. Finally, when a sequence record originates from the assembly of two or more shorter sequences, the Bellerophon package [47] (link) is utilized to check for possible chimeras that would arise if the component sequences inadvertently (e.g. contamination, laboratory error) derived from two different taxa.
Publication 2013
Bacteria Chimera Codon, Terminator DNA Library Homo sapiens Mice, House Peptides Pseudogenes Reading Frames Vertebrates Wolbachia
We performed a burden test and a nonburden sequence kernel association test (SKAT) to assess the cumulative effect of all variants within one kilobase of each annotated gene. The weighted burden test weights the contribution of each variant in a gene by the reciprocal of the standard deviation of its estimated minor allele frequency and uses the weighted averages to estimate a score statistic (Madsen and Browning 2009 (link); Han and Pan 2010 (link)). The SKAT kernel function builds a relationship matrix detailing relatedness of individuals based upon all variants within a gene. This relationship matrix is fit as the covariance matrix of a random effect in a linear mixed model framework and used to estimate a variance component score to discern the significance of a trait association (Wu et al. 2011 (link)). The SKAT kernel function used was linear and did not up-weight the relative contribution of minor alleles.
We performed both the weighted burden test and SKAT using the SKAT package (Wu et al. 2011 (link)) in R v3.0.1 (R Development Core Team 2013 ). For both methods, male and female starvation resistance and genome size were fit with an identity link function and fixed effect covariates for Wolbachia infection status, major inversions, and the 11 principal components explaining the most genetic variation in the DGRP (Tracy-Winom P-value < 0.01). Wolbachia infection status was fit with a logit link function in a likewise manner, excluding the fixed effect of Wolbachia infection status. We performed gene-based tests for all variants, and for common (MAF ≥ 0.05) and rare (MAF < 0.05) variants separately.
Publication 2014
Alleles Females Genes Genetic Diversity Genetic Testing Infection Inversion, Chromosome Males Wolbachia

D. melanogaster lines with Wolbachia are described in Table 1. Lines with Wolbachia variants described in Riegler et al.[40] (link) were kindly provided by Markus Riegler and Scott O'Neill. wMelCS_b source and DrosDel w1118 isogenic background were described elsewhere [12] , [59] (link). wMel variants were introduced in the DrosDel w1118 iso isogenic background by chromosomes replacement using a first and third double balancer line and a second chromosome balancer line. The crosses were performed with Wolbachia-infected females, ensuring endosymbiont transmission through the germline. The fourth chromosome was not isogenized. All the Wolbachia genotypes were confirmed by PCR, as described in Riegler et al.[40] (link) (data not shown).
The lines were cleaned of possible chronic viral infections as described elsewhere [12] , [60] .
In order to homogenize the gut microbiota, embryos from each line were sterilized with 2% sodium hypochlorite, followed by 70% ethanol and washed with sterile water. Embryos were placed in new food vials and 150 µl of a bacterial inoculum from a reference stock was added. The inoculum was produced by mixing 5 ml of sterile water with 2 g of food from 10 days old vials containing VF-0058–3 flies [12] , and filtering it to remove eggs and larvae.
Tetracycline-treated lines were cleaned of Wolbachia infection by raising them for two generations in ready-mix dried food (Philip Harris) with 0.05 mg/ml of tetracycline hydrochloride (Sigma). Experiments were performed on lines that were raised without antibiotics for at least 6 generations.
Drosophila lines were maintained on standard cornmeal diet at a constant temperature of 25°C. We focused the analysis on males in the assumption that Wolbachia levels would be more stable in these. Wolbachia is present in ovaries and the sizes of these vary greatly with mating status and physiology of the female.
Publication 2013
Antibiotics Bacteria Chromosomes Diet Diptera Drosophila Drosophila melanogaster Eggs Embryo Ethanol Females Food Food, Dried Gastrointestinal Microbiome Genotype Germ Line Infection Larva Males Ovary physiology Sodium Hypochlorite Sterility, Reproductive Tetracycline Tetracycline Hydrochloride Transmission, Communicable Disease Virus Diseases Wolbachia

Most recents protocols related to «Wolbachia»

To estimate the abundance of the different endosymbionts in O. gibbosus individuals we used a dataset consisting of 16 short-read (Illumina) sequencing libraries obtained from male O. gibbosus individuals from six different sampling locations (Damvallei, n=4; Sevendonck, n=2; Pollismolen, n=2; Honegem, n=2; Overmeren, n=2; Walenbos, n=4) described previously [37 (link)]. Detailed information about the sequencing libraries is provided in Table S1. Illumina reads were right-tail clipped using a minimum quality of 20, and all reads shorter than 75 after this treatment were discarded using FASTX-Toolkit (http://hannonlab.cshl.edu/fastx_toolkit/). Reads with undefined nucleotides or left without a pair were removed using PRINSEQ [48 (link)]. Afterwards, the reads were mapped to the genome of O. gibbosus (GCA_019343175.1) using bbmap (v37.61; ‘-minid=99’) (sourceforge.net/projects/bbmap/). The unmapped reads were then mapped to the endosymbiont genomes, and the mapped reads to the single-copy gene elongation-factor alpha (EF1alpha) from O. gibbosus [37 (link)] (JTE90_028130) using Bowtie2 (v2.3.5.1) [44 (link)]. The median coverage for each endosymbiont genome and the mean coverage for EF1alpha was calculated per sample using samtools (v1.12) [49 (link)]. For ‘Ca. Tisiphia’, Cardinium and Rhabdochlamydia the coverage across the whole genome was used, while for Wolbachia A and Wolbachia B only the coverage of the respective accessory genes (n=319 Wolbachia A, n=353 Wolbachia B) was used. We used the coverage of the accessory genes for Wolbachia as the two genomes share several genes which would bias the abundance estimations as short reads from Wolbachia A would also map to Wolbachia B and vice versa. To calculate the abundance of each endosymbiont per sample, we normalized the median coverage of the endosymbionts by the mean coverage of EF1alpha. To get the number of endosymbionts by host cell we divided the abundance by the number of host chromosomes (n=2).
Publication 2023
Cells Chromosomes Elongation Factor Genes Genome Males Multiple Birth Offspring Nucleotides Rhabdochlamydia Tail Wolbachia
For the phylogenetic reconstructions of Wolbachia and Cardinium we downloaded representative genomes belonging to different groups from NCBI (Table S8). In the case of Wolbachia, Anaplasma phagocytophilum strain HZ and Ehrlichia canis strain Jake were used as outgroups, and for Cardinium, Amoebophilus asiaticus strain 5a2 was used. rRNA proteins were extracted, and universally conserved ones selected. The protein sequences were individually aligned using MAFFT (v7.453; ‘--localpair’ ‘--maxiterate 1000’) [50 (link)]. Divergent and ambiguously aligned blocks were removed using Gblocks (v0.91b) [51 (link)]. The alignments were then concatenated using custom perl scripts and Bayesian inference was performed using MrBayes (v3.2.7) [52 (link)], using the JTT+I+G4 substitution model. We ran two independent analyses with four chains each for 300 000 generations and checked for convergence (convergence diagnostic≤0.01).
For Rickettsiaceae we also downloaded representative genomes from NCBI and used Megaira sp. strain MegNEIS296, Megaira sp. strain MegCarteria, Occidentia massiliensis strain Os18, Orientia tsutsugamushi strain Boryong and Orientia chuto strain Dubai as outgroups (Table S8). We extracted rRNA proteins and selected universally conserved ones. The protein sequences were individually aligned using muscle (v3.8.31) [53 (link)] and the alignments were concatenated using AMAS [54 (link)]. The phylogeny was calculated with IQ-TREE 2 (v2.1.2; ‘-bnni’ ‘-alrt 1000’ ‘-m TESTNEW’ ‘--madd LG4X’ ‘-bb 1000’) using the JTTDCMut+F+R3 substitution model [55 (link)]. In order to verify if the endosymbionts belong to an existing clade or represent a new one, we calculated the average amino acid (AAI) and average nucleotide identity (ANI) for the endosymbiont and selected representative genomes using the method and thresholds described previously [56 (link)]. We did not exclude transposase genes for the ANI and AAI calculations. While a large amount of transposase genes might influence the ANI value, the AAI is regarded to be unbiased as only homologous genes are used for the calculation.
Publication 2023
Amino Acids Amino Acid Sequence Anaplasma phagocytophilum Diagnosis Ehrlichia canis Genes Genes, vif Genome MADD protein, human Muscle Tissue Nucleotides Occidentia massiliensis Orientia chuto Orientia tsutsugamushi Proteins Ribosomal RNA Rickettsiaceae Strains Transposase Trees Wolbachia
To reconstruct the endosymbiont genomes, we used long-read (PacBio; W744xW766) and short-read (Illumina; W791, W815) sequencing libraries from the host O. gibbosus described previously [37 (link)]. Detailed information on the sequencing libraries is provided in Table S1. As references for the long-read alignments, we used metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) from the endosymbionts that were reconstructed from the short-read libraries. In addition, we used the contigs from the host-assembly that were classified as endosymbiont contigs using a custom Kraken database as described previously [37 (link)].
For Cardinium sp. cOegibbosus-W744×776, Wolbachia sp. wOegibbosus-W744×776A and Wolbachia sp. wOegibbosus-W744×776B we mapped long reads to the respective MAGs and contigs using minimap2 (v2.17) [38 (link)]. Finally, all mapped reads were merged, and duplicates were removed. As the coverage was too high for Wolbachia, the mapped reads were subsampled to a coverage of 70×. The final set of reads was then assembled using Unicycler (v0.4.6) [39 (link)]. The quality of the assemblies was checked by checkM (v1.0.18) [40 (link)] and visually inspecting the assembly graph [41 (link)]. The Wolbachia genomes were closed manually, and the assembly of Wolbachia sp. wOegibbosus-W744×776B was manually curated to remove misassembled regions.
For Candidatus Tisiphia sp. Oegibbosus-W744×776 we mapped long reads to the respective MAG and contigs using minimap2 (v2.17) [38 (link)] and short reads using bbmap (v37.61) (sourceforge.net/projects/bbmap/). Both long and short reads were merged and deduplicated afterwards. The final set of long and short reads was then used for a hybrid assembly using Unicycler (v0.4.6) [39 (link)]. The quality of the assembly was checked by checkM (v1.0.18) [40 (link)] and visually inspecting the assembly graph [41 (link)].
Rhabdochlamydia oedothoracis MAG OV001 was assembled using the paired-end (2×150 bp) short-read library ‘OV001_G’ (SRX9657682, see details of sequencing libraries used in this study in Table S1). ‘OV001_G’ is the ID of the individual used for sequencing, with ‘OV001’ being unique to the sequencing library, and thus used for strain designation. We first carried out a de novo assembly using MEGAHIT (v1.1.2) [42 (link)]. Afterwards, the contigs were binned using MetaBAT 2 (v2.15) [43 (link)]. The required bam file for binning was created using bowtie2 (v2.3.5.1) [44 (link)]. Finally, the qualities of all bins were checked with checkM (v1.0.18) [40 (link)]. The bin belonging to Rhabdochlamydia was used for a reassembly. For that purpose, we mapped the short-read library from Overmere_OV001 to the Rhabdochlamydia bin and the reference genome R. oedothoracis W744xW776 (GenBank accession number: CP075587-CP075588) using bbmap (v37.61) (sourceforge.net/projects/bbmap/). Afterwards all mapped reads were merged, and duplicates were removed. This set of reads was then used for a second round of de novo assembly and binning as described before. The quality of the final MAG was again checked with (v1.0.18) [40 (link)].
Origins of replication were detected using originx [45 (link)] and Ori-Finder [46 (link)]. The orientation of genome sequences was adjusted to previously sequenced Wolbachia and Rickettsia genomes [47 (link)].
Publication 2023
DNA Library Genome Hybrids Metagenome Replication Origin Rhabdochlamydia Rickettsia Strains Wolbachia
Genomic DNA was extracted from the EDTA-blood samples, conjunctival swabs and sand flies using the DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany), according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Blood samples, conjunctival swabs and sand fly DNA samples were tested for L. infantum DNA using a TaqMan real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay that targeted a 120-bp fragment of the kinetoplast minicircle DNA, as previously reported [13 (link)]. A positive (reference DNA sample from blood, conjunctival swab and sand fly DNA, respectively) and a negative (PCR grade water) control were included in each qPCR run.
The qPCR was performed only on samples collected on SDs 0 and 630 and, in addition, on DNA blood samples at all time points from: (i) all dogs that tested positive at the beginning of the study and became negative during the study; (ii) all dogs that tested positive by ELISA only; and (iii) all dogs that tested only as low positive on qPCRs performed on swab DNA samples on SD 630.
For E. canis, Anaplasma platys and A. phagocytophilum, specific PCR tests were performed on all DNA from blood samples on SD 0 and SD 630 collected from dogs with at least 1 year follow-up. To determine the presence of E. canis, a PCR targeting a 345-bp fragment of the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene [14 (link)] of various species, including E. canis, Ehrlichia chaffeensis, Ehrlichia muris, Ehrlichia ruminantium, A. phagocytophilum, A. platys, Anaplasma marginale, Anaplasma centrale, Wolbachia pipentis, Neorickettsia sennetsu, Neorickettsia risticii and Neorickettsia helminthoeca, was performed according to previously described thermal-cycling conditions [15 (link)].
To identify the presence of Anaplasma DNA, we performed species-specific nested PCRs for A. platys and A. phagocytophilum DNA targeting a 678-bp and a 546-bp fragment of the 16S rRNA gene, respectively, according to previously described protocols [16 (link)].
A positive (E. canis and A. platys or A. phagocytophilum reference DNA sample) and a negative (PCR grade water) control were included in each PCR run. Amplification products were visualised on 1.5% agarose gels stained with ethidium bromide.
PCR products (from samples positive for E. canis and A. platys/phagocytophilum) were sent to a commercial service (CeMIA SA, Larissa, Greece) for purification and sequencing on both strands (Sanger sequencing). The results were assembled with Seqman 8.1 software (DNASTAR, Madison, WI, USA). Assembled sequences were aligned using the Basic Local Alignment Tool (BLAST) and compared with reference sequences using the MegAlign application of the Lasergene software package (DNASTAR).
Publication 2023
Anaplasma Anaplasma centrale Anaplasma marginale Anaplasma platys Biological Assay BLOOD Canis familiaris Conjunctiva DNA, A-Form DNA, Kinetoplast Edetic Acid Ehrlichia chaffeensis Ehrlichia muris Ehrlichia ruminantium Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Ethidium Bromide Gels Genome Neorickettsia helminthoeca Neorickettsia risticii Neorickettsia sennetsu Nested Polymerase Chain Reaction Phlebotominae Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Ribosomal RNA Genes Sepharose Tissues Wolbachia
To assess genetic variation in resistance and tolerance to DCV, we chose 10 lines from the DGRP [45 (link)] spanning the range of variation in fly survival within the DGRP when infected systemically with DCV [30 (link),44 (link)]. Because the viral restriction factor, pst is known to affect survival to DCV infection, we specifically selected five susceptible (S) lines (RAL-138, RAL-373, RAL-380, RAL-765, RAL-818) and five resistant (R) lines (RAL-59, RAL-75, RAL-379, RAL-502, RAL-738) [44 (link),49 (link),50 (link)]. The resistant pst allele results from a non-synonymous substitution (A/G; Threonine → Alanine) in the coding region of the gene [29 (link)]. All lines were previously cleared of Wolbachia infection, as it is known to confer protection against DCV [51 (link)–53 (link)]. All fly stocks in the laboratory, including the DGRP panel, are routinely checked for several viral pathogens using PCR as described in [54 (link)]; here we tested for the presence of the common laboratory contaminants DCV, DAV, Nora virus and sigma virus, and no viral contamination was detected (see electronic supplementary material, table S1 for PCR primers). All lines were maintained on standard cornmeal medium [55 (link)] at 25°C on a 12 h : 12h light : dark cycle.
Publication 2023
Alanine Alleles Genes Genetic Diversity Immune Tolerance Infection Light Oligonucleotide Primers Pathogenicity Threonine Virus Wolbachia

Top products related to «Wolbachia»

Sourced in Germany, United States, United Kingdom, Spain, Canada, Netherlands, Japan, China, France, Australia, Denmark, Switzerland, Italy, Sweden, Belgium, Austria, Hungary
The DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit is a DNA extraction and purification product designed for the isolation of genomic DNA from a variety of sample types, including blood, tissues, and cultured cells. The kit utilizes a silica-based membrane technology to efficiently capture and purify DNA, providing high-quality samples suitable for use in various downstream applications.
Sourced in Germany, United States, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Spain, Japan, China, Canada, France, Australia, Switzerland, Italy, Belgium, Denmark, Sweden
The DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit is a DNA extraction and purification kit designed for the efficient isolation of high-quality genomic DNA from a variety of sample types, including whole blood, tissue, and cultured cells. The kit utilizes a silica-based membrane technology to capture and purify DNA, providing a reliable and consistent method for DNA extraction.
Sourced in Switzerland, Germany, United States, China, Japan, United Kingdom, France, Belgium, Canada, Australia, Sweden, Austria, Denmark, Italy, Norway, Estonia, Spain, Morocco, New Zealand, Netherlands, Czechia
The LightCycler 480 is a real-time PCR instrument designed for quantitative nucleic acid analysis. It features a 96-well format and uses high-performance optics and detection technology to provide accurate and reliable results. The core function of the LightCycler 480 is to facilitate real-time PCR experiments through thermal cycling, fluorescence detection, and data analysis.
Sourced in United States, Germany, Australia, United Kingdom, Canada, France, Israel
Chelex 100 resin is a polymeric ion exchange resin used for the removal of heavy metal ions from aqueous solutions. It is a styrene divinylbenzene copolymer with iminodiacetate functional groups that can selectively bind to metal cations. The resin is available in a variety of bead sizes and can be used in a range of applications, including sample preparation, water treatment, and metal ion purification.
Sourced in United States, Germany, United Kingdom, Switzerland, Australia
Tetracycline hydrochloride is a chemical compound used as a laboratory reagent. It is a crystalline solid that is soluble in water and various organic solvents. Tetracycline hydrochloride is commonly used in research and analytical applications, but its specific core function is not provided here to maintain an unbiased and factual approach.
Sourced in United States, China, Japan, Germany, United Kingdom, Canada, Italy, France, Switzerland, Singapore, Belgium, Australia, Spain
The CFX96 Real-Time PCR Detection System is a thermal cycler designed for real-time PCR analysis. It is capable of detecting and quantifying nucleic acid sequences in real-time using fluorescent dyes or probes.
Sourced in Switzerland, Germany, United States, China, Japan, United Kingdom, France, Canada, Estonia, Austria, Belgium, Australia, Spain, Netherlands
The LightCycler 480 system is a real-time PCR system designed for high-throughput quantitative and qualitative nucleic acid analysis. It features a flexible multiwell plate format, advanced optical detection, and intuitive software for streamlined data analysis.
Sourced in Germany, United States, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Spain, France, Switzerland, Japan, China, Canada
The DNeasy kit is a laboratory tool used for the purification of DNA from various sample types. It employs a silica-based membrane technology to efficiently extract and purify DNA for downstream applications.
Sourced in United States, China, Japan, Germany, United Kingdom, Canada, France, Italy, Australia, Spain, Switzerland, Netherlands, Belgium, Lithuania, Denmark, Singapore, New Zealand, India, Brazil, Argentina, Sweden, Norway, Austria, Poland, Finland, Israel, Hong Kong, Cameroon, Sao Tome and Principe, Macao, Taiwan, Province of China, Thailand
TRIzol reagent is a monophasic solution of phenol, guanidine isothiocyanate, and other proprietary components designed for the isolation of total RNA, DNA, and proteins from a variety of biological samples. The reagent maintains the integrity of the RNA while disrupting cells and dissolving cell components.
Sourced in United States, Austria, Canada, Belgium, United Kingdom, Germany, China, Japan, Poland, Israel, Switzerland, New Zealand, Australia, Spain, Sweden
Prism 8 is a data analysis and graphing software developed by GraphPad. It is designed for researchers to visualize, analyze, and present scientific data.

More about "Wolbachia"

Wolbachia is a fascinating genus of intracellular bacteria that have captured the attention of researchers worldwide.
These remarkable microbes are known for their ability to manipulate the reproductive biology of their arthropod and nematode hosts, often leading to increased fitness and spread within host populations.
This unique characteristic has made Wolbachia a subject of intense study, with potential applications in areas such as mosquito-borne disease control and the management of parasitic nematode infections.
To facilitate Wolbachia research, researchers often utilize a variety of tools and techniques.
The DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit, for example, is a widely used method for extracting high-quality genomic DNA from a range of sample types, including Wolbachia-infected specimens.
Similarly, the LightCycler 480 system and CFX96 Real-Time PCR Detection System are popular platforms for conducting sensitive and accurate quantitative PCR (qPCR) analysis of Wolbachia gene expression and abundance.
In addition to DNA extraction and quantification, researchers may also employ Chelex 100 resin for rapid DNA preparation, or TRIzol reagent for RNA extraction and purification.
The use of Tetracycline hydrochloride, a broad-spectrum antibiotic, is another common approach in Wolbachia research, as it can be used to selectively eliminate the bacteria from their hosts.
By harnessing the power of these tools and techniques, researchers can gain valuable insights into the biology and ecology of Wolbachia, ultimately enhancing their ability to develop innovative applications and solutions in areas such as disease control and parasitic nematode management.
PubCompare.ai's AI-driven analysis tool can further assist researchers in this endeavor, helping them locate the best protocols and products from literature, preprints, and patents to optimize their Wolbachia research and improve reproducibility and accuracy.