Parental criminality, family economic adversity, and sexual abuse were assessed with short question series developed for the baseline NCS.10 (link) Parental criminality was assessed with questions about whether a parent either engaged in criminal activities like burglary or selling stolen property or was ever arrested for criminal activity. Economic adversity was assessed with questions about whether the family received welfare or other government assistance and whether the family often lacked enough money to pay for basic necessities of living. Sexual abuse was assessed with questions about repeated fondling, attempted rape, or rape. Parental mental illness (major depression, generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, antisocial personality disorder) and substance abuse were assessed with the Family History Research Diagnostic Criteria (FHRDC) Interview27 and its extensions.28 (link) Family violence and physical abuse of the respondent by parents were assessed with a modified version of the Conflict Tactics Scale.29 Neglect was assessed with questions used in studies of child welfare about frequency of not having adequate food, clothing, or medical care, having inadequate supervision, and having to do age-inappropriate chores.30 Life-threatening physical illness, finally, was assessed with a standard chronic conditions checklist.31 (link)
Brassica rapa
This fast-growing, leafy annual is widely cultivated for its edible leaves and stems, which are rich in vitamins, minerals, and fiber.
Brassica rapa plants exhibit a diverse range of morphological characteristics, including head-forming and non-heading types.
This species is an important component of many traditional cuisines, particularly in Asia, and has gained global popularity due to its versatility and nutritional profile.
Reserachers studying Brassica rapa can leverge PubCompare.ai, an AI-powered platform, to locate the best experimental protocols from literature, preprints, and patents, ensuring reproducibility and accuracy in their work.
PubCompare.ai empowers scientists to make informed decisions and advance their Brassica rapa research with confidence.
Most cited protocols related to «Brassica rapa»
After gene prediction, gene functions were assigned according to the best match of the alignments against various protein databases using BLAST v2.2.31 (E-value = 1e-5), including the KEGG33 (link), Swiss-Prot, and TrEMBL databases34 (link). GO terms for each gene were obtained from the corresponding InterPro entries35 (link). Overall, we inferred 44,539 (96.86%) genes that were annotated based on the results from searching the protein databases (Supplementary Table
Intact LTR-RTs were identified using LTR_finder36 (link) and classified the intact LTR-RTs by predicting the RT domains using the Pfam database (version 26.0) and HMMER software37 . Muscle38 (link) was then employed to perform multiple RT sequence alignments, and RAxML39 was adopted to construct maximum likelihood (ML) trees based on the sequence alignments with 500 bootstrap replications. Finally, the interactive tree of life (iTOL)40 (link) was used to plot the ML trees. The analysis of LTR insertion time was performed as previously reported4 (link).
We also performed noncoding RNA annotation for our assembly. tRNA annotation was conducted using tRNAscan-SE (v1.3.1)41 (link) according to its structural characteristics. Homology-based rRNAs were localized by mapping known full-length plant rRNAs to the B. rapa genome v3.0. snRNAs were predicted by Infenal (v1.1)42 (link) using the Rfam database43 . miRNA annotation was performed as previously described44 (link).
The full training of the interviewers took two months. The project objectives and the rationale behind the structure of the survey instrument as well as that of each question in the questionnaire were discussed in detail. Great attention was also paid to issues such as initial contacts, maintaining a professional attitude while in the field, avoiding influencing the respondent, and reducing interviewer and courtesy biases. The importance of collecting information by means of standardized questions so that the same question was asked to all respondents is stressed and questioning and probing skills were developed. Supervisors were instructed separately on data collection guidelines, their roles and their responsibility to ensure data quality. Keeping in mind the sensitive nature of some of the questions regarding violence and trauma and the fact that the team members were from the study population and probably had experiences similar to the respondents, a workshop on sexual and gender-based-violence was conducted by a consultant to the UNICEF office in Kampala, before the survey. The aim of this workshop was to increase awareness and sensitivity of the team towards respondents and their experiences. Another consultant to the project reviewed the team's interviewing skills and the project's data quality control measures just before the start of the survey. Problem areas were identified and remedied.
Data were complete and analyzed for N = 3179 respondents: 2,540 (75 %) of the respondents were women (15–50 years of age) and 831 (25%) were men (20–55 years of age). Details of the sampling, translation and assessment procedures, as well as the socio-demographic characteristics of the populations, have been described elsewhere [15 (link)].
Traumatic events were assessed using a checklist consisting of possible war and non-war related traumatic event types (i.e. witnessing or experiencing injury by a weapon or gun, beatings/torture, harassment by armed personnel, robbery/extortion, imprisonment, poisoning, rape or sexual abuse, beatings, abduction, child marriage, forced prostitution/sexual slavery, forced circumcision, etc.). The checklist was compiled after interviews with key informants (security personnel, doctors, community leaders, women's representatives) and 30 respondents from all three populations about their personal history of stressful events. Following these interviews, the single events obtained in these studies were rated as being potentially traumatic by experts. The following pilot checklist was pre-tested among further 44 Ugandans and Sudanese in areas not selected for the survey and modified according to the suggestions of the respondents. A primary item analysis based on inter-item correlations led to the exclusion of some events that were obviously not directly related to traumatic histories, e.g. the experiencing of witchcraft. Events included 19 experienced events and 12 witnessed events. Respondents were asked for each event type if they had experienced or witnessed such an event ever (i.e., lifetime experience) and if it happened in the past year. PTSD in respondents was assessed using the Posttraumatic Stress Diagnostic Scale (PDS), modified for assessment by trained lay interviewers [16 ]. The PDS is a self-report measure widely-used in industrialized countries as a screening instrument for the diagnosis and severity of PTSD based on DSM-IV Criteria.
Confidentiality was assured and it was explained that researchers were not working for any UN or Ugandan government organization. Informed consent was obtained using a standardized form explaining the potential risks of participation and explaining that no compensation would be provided. Informed consent forms were signed by the respondent and a witness; fingerprints were taken from illiterate respondents. No financial incentives were provided and respondents were informed that no improvements in living conditions were to be expected as a result of participating in the survey. Respondents were provided with referrals to counseling services provided by NGOs where available.
The NISHS was the largest epidemiological study of mental health in NI. A multi-stage, clustered, area probability household sample was drawn based on the structure and information from the 2001 NI census. The sample size was 4,340 and the response rate was 68.4%. Data was cleaned and missing data collected or imputed prior to the analysis. See Bunting et al. for further details of the sampling procedures and quality assurance strategies [9] (link). The NISHS survey instrument was administered in two sections; all participants completed Section 1, section 2 was then administered to respondents who met the criteria for any core disorder, an additional 50% of individuals who were subthreshold core disorder cases, and a 25% sample of all other individuals (n = 1,986). This sampling strategy enabled the computation of weights to adjust for differential selection for Section 2. Weights to minimize the effects of bias included information relating to sample selection, nonresponse, and poststratification factors such as age, sex, and geographical region [14] . The NI population characteristics at the midpoint of the data collection period were used in these weight calculations.
The survey instrument was the WMH Composite International Diagnostic Interview (WMH-CIDI) [13] . This is a comprehensive, fully structured interview for the assessment of mental disorders according to the ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders: Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines (ICD-10) [15] and DSM-IV criteria [16] .
Lifetime suicidal behaviour was assessed using three questions from the suicidality section in part two of the WMH-CIDI: “Have you ever seriously thought about committing suicide?”, “Have you ever made a plan for committing suicide?”, and “Have you ever attempted suicide?”.
Traumatic events were assessed in the PTSD section of part two of the WMH-CIDI. Participants were presented with 28 types of traumatic events and asked whether they had experienced them during their lifetime and if they endorsed a particular event, they were asked the age at which they first experienced this event type. The research team identified events that were presumed to be conflict-related, drawing upon a previous study of conflict in Lebanon [17] (link). Individuals were assigned to a conflict-related category if they experienced any one of the following events from 1968 onwards: combat experience, peacekeeper in a place of war, unarmed civilian in a place of war, civilian in a place of ongoing terror, refugee, kidnapped, man-made disaster, beaten by someone other than parents or partner, mugged or threatened with a weapon, witnessed someone being killed or seriously injured, purposely caused injury or death, or saw atrocities. The event types classified as non-conflict related included rape and sexual violence, death or illness of a loved one or diagnosis with a life threatening condition. It is also likely that a proportion of unexpected deaths and traumatic events involving loved ones could be associated with the NI conflict, however we did not categorise these event types as conflict-related. This is therefore likely to be a conservative estimation of conflict-related trauma. Mental disorders were assessed on the basis of DSM criteria [16] again using the WMH-CIDI.
Chi squared tests were used to assess whether the difference in proportions between categories were statistically significant. The association between traumatic event types and suicidal ideation, plan and attempt, controlling for the effects of any lifetime mental disorder, was examined using logistic regression. The reference category for the logistic regression was not having endorsed suicidal ideation (“seriously considered suicide”). The analysis incorporated weights to adjust for the differential selection for Section 2, sample selection, nonresponse, and poststratification factors, age, sex, and geographical region [14] . All analyses were implemented using STATA version 10.0 [18] .
Most recents protocols related to «Brassica rapa»
Underlining the importance of understanding sofa surfing as a gateway to exclusion many women detailed the inherent danger and vulnerability in needing to rely on others to find a place to stay:
You get to know people the wrong way sometimes. It’s really sad when you need, you know you’re doing a very dangerous thing... it also exposes the anger. Men who hate women. I always forget the word, misogynist. You become a needy woman, you meet a misogynist (Tracy).
I was couch surfing but there was many a night where I’d have to get out of there because they assume that means sex in bed and rock and roll, you know ... Because you owe something. And once you owe something, they can take anything. It’s dirty. It’s a really ugly, you know the word rape is um, is so misunderstood even as a victim of it because if you’re doing it for a place to stay, am I being raped? Or am I f****** him so I can have somewhere to sleep. You know what I mean? Excuse my language. It’s a horrendous place to be.
The questionnaire and methodology for this study were approved by the Jordanian Ministry of Health, and all procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Applied Science Private University. Data were collected between June and December 2019. After full disclosure, the study participants were requested to sign an informed consent form and completed a self-administered written questionnaire. A trained psychotherapist with more than 5 years of experience in working with refugees attended the visits to the participants to clarify any ambiguous item. Most participants were accessed in their homes or work places, upon their request. To have a variety in participants experiences, only one participant, who achieved the inclusion criteria and willing to participate, was recruited from each family. Based on an initial analysis of the completed questionnaires, participants with severe symptoms, needing medical help were referred to psychotherapist or psychologist clinics based on appointments made by the psychotherapist who attended the visit, for further assessment. It was explained to the study participants that the information they provided would help them receive better care and would not have an impact on their lives or treatment plans, and that if any of the questions made them feel uncomfortable or embarrassed, they could choose not to answer, or, if they did, that their responses would be kept confidential. Self-administered surveys were filled out anonymously and de-identified by assigning each participant a code in order to maintain confidentiality. The study was carried out according to the Helsinki Declaration.
A self-administered structured questionnaire comprising 4 sections was used for data collection. Section one included questions related to sociodemographic and personal aspects (such as age, gender, employment, and marital status). Section 2 included 2 components of the Arabic version of the HTQ; part I: trauma event, and part IV: trauma symptoms,21 (link)
which was developed from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Text Revision (DSM-IV TR) published by the American Psychology Association (APA, 1987, 1994).22
The part I (trauma event) consisted of 42 questions that describe various stressors encountered by refugees, such as torture, rape, killing, and shortage of food or water, to explore the type of painful or horrific trauma events that evoked significant distress symptoms. Participants were asked if they had ever experienced, witnessed, or encountered an occurrence that involved real or threatened death, significant harm, or a threat to one’s own or another person’s physical integrity. The participants responded with 2 reaction options (yes or no). The part IV (trauma symptom) included 45 questions exploring the symptoms associated with the trauma felt by refugees. Part IV comprises of 2 parts: participants’ PTSD symptoms (16 items) and their self-perception of functioning (SPFS) (29 items), which includes questions regarding how trauma affects people’s perceptions of their capacity to operate in daily life. Separate PTSD symptoms and SPFS scores may also be computed in addition to the Part IV overall score (45 items).22
The answers to this part were rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). Shoeb et al23 (link)
validated the Arabic version of the questionnaire among Iraqi refugees in the United States in 2007. The prevalence and severity of trauma symptoms were assessed using the mean item scores for the first HTQ-16 and the entire symptom scale (HTQ-45). A standard cutoff score of 2.5, as reported by Mollica et al24
(2004) was adopted to indicate probable PTSD.
The third section of the study questionnaire consisted of 15 questions, each question assesses a physical symptom (such as stomachache, backache, dysmenorrhea [for the female participants]) without identifying specific traumatic experiences, across the previous 4 weeks, using a 3-point scale ranging from “not bothered at all” to “bothered a lot.” These symptoms were selected based on previous literature.25 (link)
An additional question was added to this section to assess the degree to which psychological problems and physical symptoms interfered with social activities. Participants rated their responses using a 5-point Likert-type scale, ranging from 0 (never) to 5 (all the time). The fourth section included 13 questions that assessed refugees’ satisfaction with the lifestyle, medical care, and child healthcare that they received following their settlement in Jordan. Participants’ responses were rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 “bad” to 5 “excellent”. To calculate the sample size, a 2-tailed independent samples t-test with a medium effect size of 0.40, a significant level of 0.05, and a statistical power of 0.80 was utilized. A total sample of 200 participants were needed to achieve a statistical power of 0.80 with a medium effect size using G*power. Another 30 additional participants have been included to account for attrition.
Fiona, a 20-year-old student from the Western Cape, was sexually assaulted and raped by a female cousin. At age 12, her uncle sexually assaulted her, but she narrowly escaped by calling for help. Her experience of sexual trauma was never spoken about in her family. As a young adult, Fiona tended to isolate herself and struggled to function socially or to engage in romantic relationships.
Olga, a 21-year-old student from Gauteng, was raped by a friend from university. Olga did not inform the police about the rape as she did not want her family to know about her trauma. Olga felt confused about the rape because the perpetrator was a friend and she still saw him on campus. As a result, she struggled academically and was avoidant of the perpetrator.
Thando, a 21-year-old student from Gauteng, was stalked by an unfamiliar man in town who had exposed his genitalia to her in public, which led her to seek safety. As a result, she felt afraid to go to town as she believed that the perpetrator would find her and possibly rape her. In addition, Thando reported that her male cousin sexually assaulted her from age 7 to 12. At age nine, she witnessed her father being shot and seriously injured, and at age 14 she was physically attacked with a knife. Thando had difficulty with depression and low self-esteem.
Buyiswa, a 20-year-old student from the Eastern Cape, reported that three unknown men sexually assaulted her. Three months post-trauma, Buyiswa started trauma therapy and reported that she could remember certain parts of the assault and was unsure of the extent of the assault. Buyiswa stated that she did not inform her mother and found difficult to receive support from her family, as she did not want to burden them.
Anna, a 27-year-old student, reported that as a child she witnessed prolonged interpersonal violence between her mother and father, and that her father was emotionally abusive. At age 16, she witnessed her mother being shot and killed during a home break-in. At age 22, she reported that a work colleague raped her, and she believed that he drugged her after having supper with him. Anna found it difficult to trust people and had conflicting feelings toward her estranged father.
Tessa, a 20-year-old student from KwaZulu-Natal, was raped at age 15 and again at age 18. Tessa reported that she struggled with depression and low self-esteem. She described her relationship with her parents as emotionally guarded. According to Tessa, her family did not know about her sexual traumas. Tessa found it difficult to talk about her past and current traumas and avoided emotionally overwhelming experiences.
Top products related to «Brassica rapa»
More about "Brassica rapa"
This fast-growing, leafy annual is widely cultivated around the world for its edible leaves and stems, which are rich in vitamins, minerals, and dietary fiber.
Brassica rapa plants exhibit a diverse range of morphological characteristics, including both head-forming and non-heading varieties.
This species is a staple in many traditional Asian cuisines and has gained global popularity due to its culinary versatility and health benefits.
Researchers studying Brassica rapa can leverage the power of PubCompare.ai, an AI-powered platform that helps locate the best experimental protocols from scientific literature, preprints, and patents.
This ensures reproducibility and accuracy in their work, empowering scientists to make informed decisions and advance their Brassica rapa research with confidence.
When conducting Brassica rapa research, scientists may also utilize techniques and tools such as TRIzol reagent for RNA extraction, the Multiwave 3000 microwave digestion system, the HiSeq 2000 sequencing platform, the MLR-352-PE leaf area meter, the RNeasy Plus Mini Kit for RNA purification, the FL10BLB growth chamber, the ICPE-9000 inductively coupled plasma emission spectrometer, the fungicide Azoxystrobin, and Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) for cell culture.
The RNeasy Mini Kit is another commonly used tool for high-quality RNA isolation and purification.
By leveraging these resources and technologies, researchers can delve deeper into the fascinating world of Brassica rapa, unlocking new insights and advancing our understanding of this important crop species.