Lilium
Discover relevant protocols from literature, preprints, and patents, and leverage AI-driven comparisons to identify the best protocols and products for your research needs.
Simplify your workflow and improve your outcomes with Lilium's cutting-edegetools.
Experience the difference today!
Most cited protocols related to «Lilium»
SMRU ultrasound practice has also evolved over time, and is informed by the British Medical Ultrasound Society (BMUS) guidelines and local conditions. All women are encouraged to attend the antenatal clinic as early as possible. At the first visit, ultrasound is used to date pregnancies using CRL biometry between 7+0 and 13+6 weeks gestation (or between 7+0 to 10+6 weeks in the early years of ultrasound practice at SMRU, as CRL estimates between 11+0 and 13+6 weeks gestation were avoided to reduce error associated with a flexed fetus, which requires ultrasonographers to overcome a learning curve). For women presenting between 14+0 and 23+6 weeks gestation, BPD was used until 2007, after which HC became the preferred biometric for dating after 14 weeks [25 ]. The Robinson and Fleming formula is used for estimating GA from CRL biometry [26 (link)], the Altman and Chitty formula for estimating GA from HC biometry [25 ,27 (link)], and the formula of Hadlock et al is used for estimating GA from BPD biometry [16 (link)].
The equipment and quality control of the sonographers at SMRU have been detailed previously [1 (link),7 (link)]. Associate Professor Lily Dubowitz introduced the Dubowitz gestational age assessment in 1994 and a quality control program was established in 1995 [28 (link)]. The staff involved in the Dubowitz assessment of gestational age were initially quality controlled against Associate Professor Dubowitz personally, and later against a series of test cards at six-monthly intervals. Details of SFH measurement at SMRU have also been detailed previously [13 (link)].
Lifeact-mEGFP was amplified out of pTH-Ubi-Lifeact-mEGFP using the sense primer
For the Latrunculin B sensitivity assay in moss, cells were prepared in the same way as for the growth assay (see above). Protoplasts were plated on small cellophane circles on top of agar in 96 well plates; wells were filled to the top with agar to create a flat surface to deposit the protoplasts. Cells were plated in protoplast regeneration medium in the absence of Latrunculin B for 4 days. At day 4 the cellophane discs were transferred to regular PpNH4 medium containing different amounts of Latrunculin B. Two days after transfer images were acquired from chlorophyll autofluorescence at a 30× zoom as 36-bit RGB color images with a CCD camera (Leica DF300FX) on a fluorescence stereo-microscope (Leica MZ16FA). Filter combinations were: excitation 480/40, dichroic 505 long pass, emission 510 long pass. The red channel of the color images, corresponding to chlorophyll fluorescence was digitally separated. The resulting 12-bit image was thresholded and the solidity estimated as mentioned above. Latrunculin treatments were performed in triplicate; a total of 7 to 38 plants was measured in each replicate. Dose response curves were fitted to the data using the sigmoidal fitting function of the program Origin (Microcal), using a logistic equation and a log10 scale for the concentration of Latrunculin B. The half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) was estimated from these fits. To compare the significance of the differences an ANOVA statistical test was used between the means obtained for each replicate. To calculate fractional solidity for each cell line and to plot the data, the following transformation was used: the minimum values obtained from the curve fitting were subtracted from the mean values; the resulting value was divided by the maximum value obtained by curve fitting.
For lily, bombarded pollen was grown on a slide and imaged according to our standard procedure (see above). The growth media was then replaced with fresh media plus 2 nM Latrunculin using a pipette. The procedure was performed twice to ensure that all of the media had been replaced.
Most recents protocols related to «Lilium»
The following viruses were used: Begomovirus (tomato leaf curl New Delhi virus, ToLCNDV), Betacarmovirus (turnip crinkle virus, TCV), Caulimovirus (cauliflower mosaic virus, CaMV), Cucumovirus (CMV), Potexvirus (pepino mosaic virus, PepMV) and Potyvirus (lettuce mosaic virus, LMV; TuMV; watermelon mosaic virus, WMV; and zucchini yellow mosaic virus, ZYMV). Virus stocks were generated by harvesting and homogenizing infected tissue of Arabidopsis (CaMV, TCV and TuMV-DV), Nicotiana benthamiana Domin (CMV, LMV, PepMV, TuMV-AS and WMV) or Chenopodium quinoa Willdenow (ZYMV and ToLCNDV). The two isolates of TuMV used differ in their degree of adaptation to Arabidopsis: DV has an increased virulence and fixed mutations (CI/T1293I and VPg/N2039H) in comparation with AS. The naive AS isolate came from strain YC5 (GenBank, AF53055.2), originally obtained from calla lily (Zantedeschia sp.), which was cloned under the 35S promoter and NOS terminator, resulting in the p35STunos infectious clone [56 (link)]. The Arabidopsis-adapted DV isolate was obtained after experimentally evolving the AS isolate for 12 passages in prebolting Col-0 plants [3 (link)].
For the evolution experiment, 10 plants were inoculated per combination of developmental stage and TuMV strain. Fourteen days post-inoculation (dpi), the symptomatic infected plants were collected, making a pool of infected tissue that was homogenized and used as inoculum to start a five-passages evolution. For each one of the three developmental stages, three independent lineages were established to serve as biological replicates of the evolutionary process (
(a) Experimental evolution design. (b) Box plot representation of rates of phenotypic evolution for lineages evolved from the naive AS (left) and the preadapted DV (right) turnip mosaic virus (TuMV) isolates. Rates are calculated for both AUDPS (area under the disease progression stairs, upper row) and AUSIPS (area under the intensity progression stairs; lower row). (c) Box plot representation of evolved (grey) lineages' infection traits (AUDPSon the left; AUSIPS on the right) compared with their corresponding ancestral (white) viruses. Upper row shows the relative phenotype of viruses evolved from the naive AS isolate, while the lower row represents the values for viruses evolved from the preadapted DV isolate. In the box plot, horizontal lines represent the median, and boxes represent the interquartile range (IQR), and error bars ±1.5 × IQR.
The values of 101~110 s for each measurement using an E-nose were imported into WinMuster software and repeated 3 times to generate a principal component analysis (PCA) figure. PCA employs the idea of dimensionality reduction to simplify problems. A plurality of number indexes interconnected to each other were translated into several comprehensive and unrelated indicators, which are the principal components of the original multiple indexes. The between-group linkage method with a metric of Euclidean distance was performed to apply hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) in this study. The merged data presented as a dendrogram, where the horizontal axis represented the Euclidean distance amongst groups and the vertical axis indicated the lily scale flavor similarity. The data obtained in Winmuster were averaged in excel to calculate the response values of the ten electronic metal sensors for the control and H2 fumigation during the storage period, and radar plots were generated using the data analysis tool.
The browning index (BI), which represents the purity of brown color (Palou et al., 1999), was calculated according to the following equation. Fresh lily scale as reference scale was shown in
Top products related to «Lilium»
More about "Lilium"
Developed by PubCompare.ai, Lilium provides researchers with a comprehensive solution to streamline their workflow and improve research outcomes.
At the heart of Lilium is its ability to help researchers discover relevant protocols from a vast repository of literature, preprints, and patents.
Leveraging advanced AI algorithms, Lilium enables users to perform in-depth comparisons of different protocols, identifying the best options for their specific research needs.
This includes not only the protocols themselves, but also the associated products, such as D-glucose, Dexamethasone, DMEM, FBS, DNeasy Plant Mini Kit, Peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse and anti-rabbit IgG, Penicillin, Rosiglitazone, Penicillin/streptomycin, and TRIzol reagent.
By simplifying the research process and providing researchers with cutting-edge tools, Lilium helps to reduce the time and effort required to set up and execute experiments, ultimately leading to more reliable and reproducible research outcomes.
With its intuitive interface and AI-driven insights, Lilium empowers researchers to make informed decisions, optimize their protocols, and streamline their workflows, all while enhancing the overall quality and impact of their work.
Experience the difference that Lilium can make in your research journey today!