Phoenix dactylifera
It is cultivated for its edible fruit, the date.
The date palm is a major crop in many Middle Eastern and North African countries, where it has been an important source of food, shelter, and economy for thousands of years.
This plant is adapted to hot, dry climates and can grow in oases and desert regions.
PubCompare.ai's AI-driven tools can help researchers optimize their studies on this important crop by easily locating and evaluating the best research methods from literature, preprints, and patents.
Experienec the power of AI-driven protocol comparison today to enhance reproducibility and accuracy in your Phoenix dactylifera research.
Most cited protocols related to «Phoenix dactylifera»
We determined the three types of repeats, dispersed, tandem and palindromic, by first applying the program REPuter and then manually filtering the redundant output of REPuter. Gap size between palindromic repeats was restricted to a maximal length of 3 kb. Overlapping repeats were merged into one repeat motif whenever possible. A given region in the genome was designated as only one repeat type, and tandem repeat was prior to dispersed repeat if one repeat motif could be identified as both tandem and dispersed repeats. For coding, each repeat present in a given genome was ‘1’ and those absent were labeled as ‘0’. We performed MP analyses of this matrix using PAUP*4.0b10 [63] to implement exhaustive tree searches. Non-parametric bootstrap analysis was conducted under 1,000 replicates with TBR branch swapping.
Phylogenomic analysis was conducted on a subset of SNPs separately for nuclear, cpDNA, and mtDNA genomes using a combination of randomized axelerated maximum likelihood (RAxML) (61 (link)) and R packages phangorn (62 (link)) and ape (63 (link)). Model-based clustering of population genomic data was conducted with STRUCTURE (29 (link)). A model of population splits and mixtures was fitted to the data using TreeMix (36 (link)). Admixture tests with and D statistics were conducted with Popstats (64 (link)). Estimates of ancestry proportions were obtained from TreeMix mixture weights and with the -ratio approach as implemented in Popstats. Population and introgression summary statistics were estimated directly from sample alignments with analysis of next generation sequencing data (ANGSD) (65 (link)) or from SNPs with vcftools (66 (link)) and a script from Martin et al. (37 (link)). Statistical analysis was conducted with the R Statistical Programing Language (67 ).
Archaeobotanical records of date palm were gathered from published reports, based on finding monograph chapters based on previous regional reviews (e.g., refs. 68 and 69 ), a database search of “literature on archaeological remains of cultivated plants 1981–2004” (70 ), and a Google scholar search for additional recent journal articles. It includes all reports, most of which are dated based on associated artifactal and archaeological evidence (indicated as “ass.”), in some cases by associated radiocarbon dates (C14) or direct accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) dates on crop remains. Few of these are directly dated Phoenix stones themselves, but those available are indicated as “AMS*.” Calibrated radiocarbon dates have been summed and the 1-sigma range has been taken to represent the phase of the sample, from a which a median has been calculated. In the case of associated dating evidence a standard period age range has been taken from recent archaeological literature (based on the expertise of D.Q.F.) and a median taken from this range. Where there are concerns over the true antiquity of remains, such as uncarbonized Phoenix stones of large size from Takrakori, Libya, attributed to a 8,000-yBP context (38 ), these are flagged in our database (
DNA sequence data new to this study have been deposited in the Sequence Read Archive (71 (link)). SNP data have been deposited in the Dryad Digital Repository (72 ).
The biofilm inhibition potential of Date palm ethanolic extracts was also observed through Phase contrast microscopy. For this, few drops of the overnight culture of Bacillus subtilis and Pasteurella multocida was added on separate glass slides and incubated at 37°C for 14 h. Using phosphate buffer saline, the slides were washed and supplemented with Date palm extracts. Then the slides were rinsed, stained and the biofilms were dissolved using 30% glacial acetic acid. Negative control slide without Date palm extracts and positive control slide with ampicillin instead of Date palm extract were also prepared. All the prepared smears on glass slides were examined microscopically.30
Most recents protocols related to «Phoenix dactylifera»
Example 1
Preparation of AgNPs@CMC, FeNPs@CMC and AgNPs@Fe@CMC Nanocomposites
The AgNPs@CMC, FeNPs@CMC and AgNPs@Fe@CMC were separately prepared via the reduction co-precipitation method. In this method, 100 mL of an aqueous solution of metal salt (0.05M) was prepared and 2 g of CMC extract was added. The system was kept under stirring (500 rpm) at room temperature for 30 min. Thereafter, 0.5M of sodium borohydride was added to the solution containing the metal ion-loaded CMC under continuous stirring for 1 hour. The metal oxide loaded CMC was isolated, washed with distilled water, and dried in an oven at 60° C. for 24 hour. The silver nanoparticle-loaded CMC was labeled as AgNPs@CMC and iron nanoparticle CMC was labeled as FeNPs@CMC.
Example 5
Electrochemical Methods
Cyclic voltammetry responses of all measurements were recorded at −0.2 V to 0.6 V. EIS tests were examined in the frequency range from 105 Hz to 0.1 Hz.
It is to be understood that the composition and methods are not limited to the specific embodiments described above, but encompasses any and all embodiments within the scope of the generic language of the following claims enabled by the embodiments described herein, or otherwise shown in the drawings or described above in terms sufficient to enable one of ordinary skill in the art to make and use the claimed subject matter.