Healthy Volunteers
These participants provide valuable data to help researchers understand normal physiological processes, test new interventions, and advance scientific knowledge.
Healthy volunteers play a crucial role in the development of safe and effective treatments, contributing to the overall progress of biomedical research.
Most cited protocols related to «Healthy Volunteers»
The study consisted of two phases. In the first phase, carried out from June to November 2007, a pool of potential labels for the new levels was identified and provisional labels for the 5-level version were chosen from that pool after a response scaling task carried out in face-to-face interviews with convenience samples of lay respondents. In the second phase, carried out from May to July 2008, face and content validity of two alternative 5-level systems were tested in focus group sessions with healthy participants and those with chronic illness. The second phase was also used to test the face validity of a series of health states based on the 5-level versions. Different groups of respondents were used in the two phases of the study.
Participants in both phases were recruited to ensure a wide range of socio-demographic characteristics. For the response scaling phase, the UK participants were recruited via local newspaper advertisements, local community advertisements, and from an existing participant database. The Spanish participants were recruited from among parents from local schools and from patient associations. Patient focus groups included primarily individuals with arthritis, diabetes, or asthma. In all groups, adequate written and oral fluency in English or Spanish was required.
Written informed consent to participate was obtained from all participants in both phases of the study.
Groups were led by an experienced moderator, and sessions were audio-recorded and transcribed for analysis. A previously prepared script was followed in all groups. All participants in each group first completed either Alternative 1 or Alternative 2 of the EQ-5D-5L (depending on the group they were assigned to), followed by the EQ-VAS. Participants were then asked to review their answers and what they had thought about while they completed the survey. Further questions were used to probe their reactions to the questionnaire in more detail, particularly their reactions to the severity labels used. Participants then provided socio-demographic information before being asked to complete the complementary Alternative 2 or Alternative 1, again on their own, after which there was further group discussion on their reactions. At the end, participants were asked their preferences for the alternative descriptive systems. The order of administration of versions 1 and 2 was alternated between the groups to control for possible ordering effects, and groups were assigned randomly to the different orders.
In the final stage of the focus groups, participants discussed a set of hypothetical health states produced by combining different levels from the 5 dimensions using the alternative 5-level versions. Examples of the health states tested are shown in Table
Examples of two of the health states tested in the phase 2 focus groups
Health state 1 |
Slight (mild) problems in walking about |
No problems washing or dressing myself |
Unable to do my usual activities |
Slight pain or discomfort |
Not anxious or depressed |
Health state 2 |
Severe problems in walking about |
Moderate problems washing or dressing myself |
Slight problems doing my usual activities |
Severe pain or discomfort |
Extremely anxious or depressed |
assuming VAI = 1 in healthy nonobese subjects with normal adipose distribution and normal TG and HDL levels (supplemental Appendix 2).
Most recents protocols related to «Healthy Volunteers»
Example 8
Characterization of Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, and Excretion of Oral [14C]Vorasidenib with Concomitant Intravenous Microdose Administration of [13C315N3]Vorasidenib in Humans
Metabolite profiling and identification of vorasidenib (AG-881) was performed in plasma, urine, and fecal samples collected from five healthy subjects after a single 50-mg (100 μCi) oral dose of [14C]AG-881 and concomitant intravenous microdose of [13C3 15N3]AG-881.
Plasma samples collected at selected time points from 0 through 336 hour postdose were pooled across subjects to generate 0—to 72 and 96-336-hour area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)-representative samples. Urine and feces samples were pooled by subject to generate individual urine and fecal pools. Plasma, urine, and feces samples were extracted, as appropriate, the extracts were profiled using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and metabolites were identified by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS and/or LC-MS/MS) analysis and by comparison of retention time with reference standards, when available.
Due to low radioactivity in samples, plasma metabolite profiling was performed by using accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS). In plasma, AG-881 was accounted for 66.24 and 29.47% of the total radioactivity in the pooled AUC0-72 h and AUC96-336 h plasma, respectively. The most abundant radioactive peak (P7; M458) represented 0.10 and 43.92% of total radioactivity for pooled AUC0-72 and AUC96-336 h plasma, respectively. All other radioactive peaks accounted for less than 6% of the total plasma radioactivity and were not identified.
The majority of the radioactivity recovered in feces was associated with unchanged AG-881 (55.5% of the dose), while no AG-881 was detected in urine. In comparison, metabolites in excreta accounted for approximately 18% of dose in feces and for approximately 4% of dose in urine. M515, M460-1, M499, M516/M460-2, and M472/M476 were the most abundant metabolites in feces, and each accounted for approximately 2 to 5% of the radioactive dose, while M266 was the most abundant metabolite identified in urine and accounted for a mean of 2.54% of the dose. The remaining radioactive components in urine and feces each accounted for <1% of the dose.
Overall, the data presented indicate [14C]AG-881 underwent moderate metabolism after a single oral dose of 50-mg (100 μCi) and was eliminated in humans via a combination of metabolism and excretion of unchanged parent. AG-881 metabolism involved the oxidation and conjugation with glutathione (GSH) by displacement of the chlorine at the chloropyridine moiety. Subsequent biotransformation of GSH intermediates resulted in elimination of both glutamic acid and glycine to form the cysteinyl conjugates (M515 and M499). The cysteinyl conjugates were further converted by a series of biotransformation reactions such as oxidation, S-dealkylation, S-methylation, S-oxidation, S-acetylation and N-dealkylation resulting in the formation multiple metabolites.
A summary of the metabolites observed is included in Table 2
Example 3
Example 2
Comparison in Number of ABA/ACA-Specific Exosomes Between Pancreatic Cancer and Other Cancer Types
It was studied whether there was a difference in the amount of ABA/ACA-specific exosomes between cancer types from healthy subjects' sera and sera from each of pancreatic cancer patients, esophageal cancer patients, and colorectal cancer patients. The quantitative determination of ABA/ACA-specific exosomes was performed through the method described in (Method for Measuring Exosomes Binding to Lectins) described above.
The results are shown in
Example 3
16S rRNA sequencing of ileal biopsies showed that the mucosally-associated bacteria from pediatric CD patients had reduced alpha diversity (Faith's phylogenetic diversity) compared to non-IBD patients (
Example 1
Comparison in Number of ABA/ACA-Specific Exosomes Between Healthy Subject and Pancreatic Cancer Patient
It was studied whether there was a difference in the amount of ABA/ACA-specific exosomes between healthy subjects' sera and preoperative and postoperative sera from pancreatic cancer patients. The quantitative determination of ABA/ACA-specific exosomes was performed through the method described in (Method for Measuring Exosomes Binding to Lectins) described above. The sera were diluted 4 times with PBS-T before use.
The results are shown in
Top products related to «Healthy Volunteers»
More about "Healthy Volunteers"
These individuals participate in research studies and clinical trials without any known medical conditions or diseases.
Healthy volunteers are often recruited to serve as control groups in studies, allowing researchers to compare the effects of new treatments or interventions against a baseline of normal, healthy physiology.
By leveraging the participation of healthy volunteers, researchers can gain important insights into the safety and efficacy of new drugs, medical devices, and other healthcare products.
The recruitment and management of healthy volunteers involves several key considerations, such as the use of appropriate cell isolation and culture media, like Ficoll-Paque PLUS, Histopaque-1077, and RPMI 1640 medium, as well as the administration of necessary supplements, such as Penicillin and Streptomycin.
Careful sample collection and processing, using tools like BD Vacutainer, also play a crucial role in ensuring the quality and integrity of the data collected from healthy volunteer studies.
Optimizing the recruitment and management of healthy volunteers is essential for enhancing the reproducibility and reliability of biomedical research.
Platforms like PubCompare.ai can help researchers identify the best protocols and products for their healthy volunteer studies, leveraging AI-driven comparisons and data-driven decision making to streamline the research process and advance scientific progress.