Protocol full text hidden due to copyright restrictions
Open the protocol to access the free full text link
Protocol full text hidden due to copyright restrictions
Open the protocol to access the free full text link
Protocol full text hidden due to copyright restrictions
Open the protocol to access the free full text link
(1) Pre-survey stage: Respondents’ basic attitudes (Question 1) toward minors’ organ donation were investigated prior to the main survey.
(2) Survey stage
(1) Respondents’ characteristics and basic knowledge: The survey stage entails the collection of respondents’ demographic data (Questions 2–8) and investigates their basic knowledge of organ transplantation and minors’ organ donation (Questions 9–10). The purpose of questions 25–26 was to examine respondents’ expectations of the minimum age at which individuals can donate their organs after being made aware of the Korean law governing minors’ organ donation, and the severity grade of donors’ and recipients’ complications following transplantation.
(2) Respondents’ perception and attitude toward the donation and reception of minors’ organs was further investigated after basic information and additional explanations were provided: The survey in which respondents were educated using structured material was divided into basic and additional explanations. Adults were informed of the overall outcomes and complications associated with the living donation before being asked if they would accept a liver or kidney graft from a family member or minor (Questions 13, 20). Following that, the same questions (Questions 16, 23) were asked after the lack of data, the uncertainty of outcomes associated with living liver donation in minors despite their long-life expectancy, and long-term complications in living kidney donors associated with living with one kidney had been explained to them. Minors among the respondents were also given the same explanations and asked whether they would be willing to donate their liver or kidney to their parents or siblings (Questions 11–12, Questions 18–19, Questions 14–15, and Questions 21–22). Finally, whether providing additional structured explanations influenced respondents’ attitudes was also determined. Questions from 17 to 24 were included to ascertain why respondents altered their decisions after receiving additional explanations.
(3) Post-survey stage: After the survey stage, Question 27, the same question as Question 1, was asked to investigate whether there was any change in respondents’ attitudes toward minors’ organ transplantation following the questionnaire with additional information.