Pedestrians
They face unique safety challenges, such as navigating traffic, crossing streets, and sharing public spaces with vehicles.
Pedestrian safety research aims to develop strategies and technologies to enhance the protection and mobility of pedestrians, reducing the risk of accidents and injuries.
This research field encompasses areas like infrastructure design, traffic calming measures, pedestrian-vehicle interaction, and the development of assistive technologies.
By studying pedestrian behavior, risk factors, and effective countermeasures, researchers can help create safer and more accessible environments for all who choose to travel on foot.
Most cited protocols related to «Pedestrians»
Each participant was shown the printed GIS map for their local area. The interviewer helped to orientate them by pointing out the location of their residence, main roads, and local landmarks. Using maps for reference or simply from recall, participants were asked to:
(i) Recall all recent (last seven days) and usual walking destinations from their home. In the event that participants were unable to identify any (more) walking destinations, interviewer prompts were used to ask them to recall any places they had walked from their home without using the map, or used the map to identify possible destinations (e.g., local shopping areas, pubs/bars, family/friends).
(ii) Draw their 'neighbourhood area' on the map. Participants were advised that it could be any size or shape, and that there was no right or wrong answer.
Annotated maps from all participants were scanned back into a GIS for analysis. All recalled destination points and 'neighbourhood area' boundaries were digitised and the annotation from the maps recorded as feature attributes. GIS analysis was used to create a number of Euclidean and network distance buffers around the address location of each participant. A Euclidean buffer is a straight line circular radius around an address, whereas the network buffers were calculated by measuring a defined distance along the pedestrian street network (i.e., roads and pathways used by pedestrians) in all possible directions away from a participant's address. The end points of these routes were joined together to form an enclosed area representing the total area within a defined walking distance of the address.
For each participant we produced five different neighbourhood areas (Figure
Reported walking destinations were placed into eight categories used in the recently developed European ALPHA questionnaire [14 (link)]: retail (e.g., shops, supermarkets, grocers); local services (e.g., banks, libraries); eating and drinking (e.g., pubs, cafes, restaurants); family and friends; work/school; bus stops; green space (e.g., parks and common areas); and physical activities facilities (e.g., leisure centres, private gyms, swimming pools). Each geocoded destination was defined as lying within or outside each of the five different neighbourhood areas. These were examined for the sample as a proportion of total walking destinations.
The study was approved by the Staffordshire University ethics committee.
[15 ], as modified by the Healthy Aging Network
[26 ], and further modified by present investigators (Additional file
There were four sections of the tool: overall route, street segments (defined as the area between crossings), crossings, and cul-de-sacs, as described in Table
The route section included items related to land use and destinations, transit stops, street amenities, traffic calming, hardscape and softscape aesthetics, and the social environment. The segments section assessed sidewalks, street buffers, sidewalk slope, bicycle facilities, shortcuts, visibility from buildings (“eyes on the street”), building aesthetics, trees, setbacks, and building height. The crossings section assessed crosswalks, slopes, width of crossings, crossing signals, and pedestrian protection (e.g., curb extensions, protected refuge islands). The cul-de-sacs section assessed the potential recreational environment within a cul-de-sac and included items about the size and condition of the surface area, slope, surveillance from surrounding homes, and amenities (e.g., basketball hoops).
Most recents protocols related to «Pedestrians»
Example 16
Subjects performing non-driving tasks inside an autonomous car can develop motion sickness. Peripheral information delivered by different sensors, including analyzed variability patterns of the subject are incorporated into the algorithm for generating a type of a drive that which alleviate these symptoms.
A model for the car driver and bicycle cyclist interactions when they are approaching a conflicting zone which is based on comprising variability patterns, can benefit from introducing irregularity parameters into the response of the car. The model can apply randomness of the location of the cars' decision points in a passenger-tailored way.
All patients underwent the usual pathway of trauma patients adopted by the hospital, which included history taking, examination (primary and secondary surveys), trauma laboratory studies, and radiologic studies, which included a FAST and an abdominopelvic CT scan. The FAST was performed for all patients by a well-trained radiology specialist registrar. The presence of hematuria was tested in the urine samples using a dipstick test (Medi-Test Combi 11, MACHEREY-NAGEL GmbH & Co. KG, Düren, Germany).
Patients were subdivided into two groups according to the findings of the CT scan. The workflow of the patients is shown in Figure
Ethical approvals
The study was approved by both the Research Ethics Committee (REC), General Surgery Department, Ain Shams University (IRB: 00006379), and the University of Maryland, Baltimore (UMB) Institutional Review Board (IRB), and it followed the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.
Operational definitions
“Road traffic crashes (RTC)” are all accidents related to moving vehicles, the patient may be the drivers, vehicle passengers, or pedestrians. “Falling from a height” is falling from one or more story heights, i.e., more than three meters. “Falling” is falling from less than one story height, like slips, stumbles, or falling down stairs.
Statistical analysis
The collected data were coded, tabulated, and statistically analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics software version 22.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY).
The descriptive statistics were done for the quantitative data as mean ± SD, and as number and percentage for the qualitative data. The inferential analyses were done for the quantitative variables using the independent t-test; while for the qualitative data, the inferential analyses for the independent variables were done using the chi-square test for differences between proportions and the Fisher’s exact test for the variables with small expected numbers. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant, otherwise, it is non-significant.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Data are presented with figures and percentages for categorical variables and median (interquartile range) for continuous variables. Normality was investigated using graphical methods for continuous variables. Non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare non-normal quantitative variables and ANOVA was used for normally distributed variables. Qualitative variables were compared with the Chi-squared test unless expected counts were less than 10, in which case Fischer’s exact test was used.
We faced an indication bias as the three groups were constituted retrospectively. In order to consider indication bias and potential confounders, covariates that might influence both timings of surgery and clinical outcomes were analyzed using a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG). The first step consisted in the choice of the covariates to analyze (mechanism of trauma (motor vehicle crash, pedestrian/bicycle collision, fall from a height, other), uncontrolled pain as an indication to surgery, SAPS II, ISS, presence of hemothorax, presence and number of non-thoracic lesions, chest deformation as indication to surgery, CTS (less than 5 vs. 5 or more). The hypotheses of association were based on the literature and on pathophysiological knowledge. The second step was to identify covariates whose effect can be mediated by others and, then these new hypotheses were investigated by the monitoring and steering committee. Finally, all the direct associations were used to construct the DAG using the DAGitty software (25 (link)). A multivariable logistic regression model was used to calculate the odds ratio of main outcomes and covariates selected using the DAG. Sensitivity analyses were performed to analyze timing for surgery divided into two groups (within 48 vs. 48 h and more). Analyses were performed on complete data.
Then, an exploratory analysis was conducted to determine factors associated with early pneumonia. A first selection of the variables of interest was carried out with a univariable logistic regression model. Then, the variables of interest with a threshold of P<0.25 were implemented in a multivariable logistic regression model. Then, using a backward stepwise selection of covariates, the covariates were selected until the most appropriate model, defined by the lowest Akaike Information Criterion. A threshold of α= 0.05 was considered for significance for the final model. Analyses were performed with R software version 3.5.1.
Aerial map of Ratchasuda College (RC) at Mahidol University. A route between two on-campus locations is delineated
Top products related to «Pedestrians»
More about "Pedestrians"
They face unique safety challenges, such as navigating traffic, crossing streets, and sharing public spaces with vehicles.
Pedestrian safety research aims to develop strategies and technologies to enhance the protection and mobility of those who choose to travel on foot, reducing the risk of accidents and injuries.
This research field encompasses areas like infrastructure design, traffic calming measures, pedestrian-vehicle interaction, and the development of assistive technologies.
By studying pedestrian behavior, risk factors, and effective countermeasures, researchers can help create safer and more accessible environments for all who travel by foot.
Pedestrian safety is a critical issue, with researchers utilizing tools like Stata, SAS 9.4, and SPSS version 21 to analyze data and develop effective solutions.
Technologies like the G27 racing kit and Promethion metabolic cages may also be employed to simulate and study pedestrian-vehicle interactions.
Experts in the field are continuously working to improve pedestrian safety, leveraging the latest advancements in R version 3.6.1 and Stata 15 to enhance research protocols and ensure reproducibility.
The AI-driven platform PubCompare.ai can be a valuable resource for pedestrian safety researchers, helping them locate the best protocols from literature, pre-prints, and patents, and optimize their research processes.
By incorporating these insights, researchers can further advance the field of pedestrian safety and create safer, more accessible environments for all.