Log In Sign up
The largest database of trusted experimental protocols
> Living Beings > Professional or Occupational Group > Anesthetist

Anesthetist

Anesthetists are medical professionals who specialize in administering anesthesia to patients during surgical, obstetric, and other medical procedures.
They are responsible for ensuring patient safety, monitoring vital signs, and adjusting anesthesia levels as needed.
Anesthetists must have a thorough understanding of pharmacology, physiology, and patient care to effectively manage anesthesia and minimize the risk of complications.
They work closely with surgeons, dentists, and other healthcare providers to provide comprehensive perioperative care.
Anesthetists play a vital role in the delivery of safe and effective medical treatment, ensuring patients remain comfortable and stable throughout their procedures.

Most cited protocols related to «Anesthetist»

1
Difficult Airway Society Guidelines Update
The Difficult Airway Society commissioned a working group to update the guidelines in April 2012. An initial literature search was conducted for the period January 2002 to June 2012 using databases (Medline, PubMed, Embase, and Ovid) and a search engine (Google Scholar). The websites of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (http://www.asahq.org), Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists (http://www.anzca.edu.au), European Society of Anesthesiologists' (http://www.esahq.org/euroanaesthesia), Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society (http://www.cas.ca), and the Scandinavian Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (http://ssai.info/guidelines/) were also searched for airway guidelines. English language articles and abstract publications were identified using keywords and filters. The search terms were as follows: ‘Aintree intubating catheter’, ‘Airtraq’, ‘airway device’, ‘airway emergency’, ‘airway management’, ‘Ambu aScope’, ‘backward upward rightward pressure’, ‘Bonfils’, ‘Bullard’, ‘bronchoscopy’, ‘BURP manoeuvre’, ‘can't intubate can't ventilate’, ‘can't intubate can't oxygenate’, ‘C-Mac’, ‘Combitube’, ‘cricoid pressure’, ‘cricothyroidotomy’, ‘cricothyrotomy’, ‘C trach’, ‘difficult airway’, ‘difficult intubation’, ‘difficult laryngoscopy’, ‘difficult mask ventilation’, ‘difficult ventilation’, ‘endotracheal intubation’, ‘esophageal intubation’, ‘Eschmann stylet’, ‘failed intubation’, ‘Fastrach’, ‘fiber-optic scope’, ‘fibreoptic intubation’, ‘fiberoptic scope’, ‘fibreoptic stylet’, ‘fibrescope’ ‘Frova catheter', ‘Glidescope’, ‘gum elastic bougie’, ‘hypoxia’, ‘i-gel’, ‘illuminating stylet’, ‘jet ventilation catheter’, ‘laryngeal mask’, ‘laryngeal mask airway Supreme’, ‘laryngoscopy’, ‘lighted stylet’, ‘light wand’, ‘LMA Supreme’, ‘Manujet’, ‘McCoy’, ‘McGrath’, ‘nasotracheal intubation’, ‘obesity’, ‘oesophageal detector device’, ‘oesophageal intubation’, ‘Pentax airway scope’, ‘Pentax AWS’, ‘ProSeal LMA′, ‘Quicktrach’, ‘ramping’, ‘rapid sequence induction’, ‘Ravussin cannula’, ‘Sanders injector’, ‘Shikani stylet’, ‘sugammadex’, ‘supraglottic airway’, ‘suxamethonium’, ‘tracheal introducer’, ‘tracheal intubation’, ‘Trachview’, ‘Tru view’, ‘tube introducer’, ‘Venner APA’, ‘videolaryngoscope’, and ‘videolaryngoscopy’.
The initial search retrieved 16 590 abstracts. The searches (using the same terms) were repeated every 6 months. In total, 23 039 abstracts were retrieved and assessed for relevance by the working group; 971 full-text articles were reviewed. Additional articles were retrieved by cross-referencing the data and hand-searching. Each of the relevant articles was reviewed by at least two members of the working group. In areas where the evidence was insufficient to recommend particular techniques, expert opinion was sought and reviewed.8 (link) This was most notably the situation when reviewing rescue techniques for the ‘can't intubate can't oxygenate’ (CICO) situation.
Opinions of the DAS membership were sought throughout the process. Presentations were given at the 2013 and 2014 DAS Annual Scientific meetings, updates were posted on the DAS website, and members were invited to complete an online survey about which areas of the existing guidelines needed updating. Following the methodology used for the extubation guidelines,5 (link) a draft version of the guidelines was circulated to selected members of DAS and acknowledged international experts for comment. All correspondence was reviewed by the working group.
Frerk C., Mitchell V.S., McNarry A.F., Mendonca C., Bhagrath R., Patel A., O'Sullivan E.P., Woodall N.M, & Ahmad I. (2015). Difficult Airway Society 2015 guidelines for management of unanticipated difficult intubation in adults. BJA: British Journal of Anaesthesia, 115(6), 827-848.
Publication 2015
Airway Management Anesthesiologist Anesthetist Bronchoscopy Cannula Catheters Dyspnea Emergencies Eructation Esophagus Europeans Frova Hypoxia Intensive Care Intubation Intubation, Intratracheal Laryngoscopy Light Medical Devices Obesity Pharmaceutical Preparations Pressure Rapid Sequence Induction Scandinavians Succinylcholine Sugammadex Trachea Tracheal Extubation
2
ICNARC Case Mix Programme Dataset Protocol
CMP data are recorded prospectively and abstracted onto standard forms by trained data collectors according to precise rules and definitions. Abstraction is usually performed retrospectively by chart review. It is thought to take around 10–20 min to abstract the data for one admission, depending on how much intervention the patient has received. A comprehensive dataset specification (the ICNARC Case Mix Programme Dataset Specification) [9 ] and individual data collection manuals are made available to all data collectors and software developers. Data collectors from each unit are trained prior to commencing data collection at a 2-day training course. One consultant, one nurse and one audit clerk from each new unit are initially trained to ensure a wide knowledge of the data to be collected in the unit. Retraining of existing staff or training of new staff is also available. Training courses are held at least four times per year.
Precise figures on the background of data collectors are not available. However, each unit must register one data collector as a point of contact for ICNARC. Analysis of the job titles of the 187 staff members for which these data are available shows the following split: 117 (62.6%) audit staff (e.g. audit clerk, information officer, data coordinator), 33 (17.6%) nursing staff (e.g. staff nurse, audit nurse), 23 (12.3%) clerical staff (e.g. secretary, administrative coordinator), six (3.2%) joint audit and clerical staff (e.g. audit and administration manager), three (1.6%) consultant anaesthetists and five other staff (audit clerk/nursing auxiliary, clinical effectiveness coordinator, clinical effectiveness facilitator, ICU technician and research assistant).
Data are collected on consecutive admissions to each participating critical care unit and are submitted to ICNARC in cycles of 6 months. Data are validated locally according to the ICNARC Case Mix Programme Dataset Specification and undergo extensive central validation for completeness, illogicalities and inconsistencies, with data validation reports returned to the units for correction or confirmation. The validation process is repeated until all queries have been dealt with, and the data are then incorporated into the CMPD.
Units receive comparative data analysis reports on each cycle (6 months) of data, from which they can identify their own unit's data compared with all other participating units. Clinicians and managers can also interrogate the CMPD directly by submitting requests for analyses to ICNARC. Reports from these ad hoc analyses are published online [10 ].
Harrison D.A., Brady A.R, & Rowan K. (2004). Case mix, outcome and length of stay for admissions to adult, general critical care units in England, Wales and Northern Ireland: the Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre Case Mix Programme Database. Critical Care, 8(2), R99-R111.
Publication 2004
Anesthetist ARID1A protein, human Clergy Consultant Dysplasia, Campomelic Joints Nurses Nurses' Aides Nursing Staff Patients
3
COVID-19 Impact on Maternal and Newborn Care
This is a cross-sectional study of health professionals providing MNH care services. The target population was health professionals directly providing maternal (antenatal, intrapartum and/or postnatal) or newborn care, including midwives, nurses, obstetricians/gynaecologists, neonatologists, paediatricians, anaesthetists, general practitioners, medical officers, clinical officers, community health workers, lactation counsellors, paramedics, health technicians and health professionals in training. Due to the unavailability of a global sampling frame for this study population, sampling was non-random and not intended to generate generalisable nationally representative results of either health professionals or facilities. Rather, our intention was to collect and synthesise the voices and experiences of MNH professionals from various countries, contexts, services and facility types at the early stage of the COVID-19 pandemic. An invitation to complete the survey was distributed using personal networks of the multicountry research team members, maternal/newborn platforms and social media (eg, Facebook, Twitter and WhatsApp). Respondents were encouraged to share the survey with other colleagues in an attempt to snowball the sample population. Respondents provided informed consent online by checking a box affirming that they voluntarily agreed to participate in the survey.
Semaan A., Audet C., Huysmans E., Afolabi B., Assarag B., Banke-Thomas A., Blencowe H., Caluwaerts S., Campbell O.M., Cavallaro F.L., Chavane L., Day L.T., Delamou A., Delvaux T., Graham W.J., Gon G., Kascak P., Matsui M., Moxon S., Nakimuli A., Pembe A., Radovich E., van den Akker T, & Benova L. (2020). Voices from the frontline: findings from a thematic analysis of a rapid online global survey of maternal and newborn health professionals facing the COVID-19 pandemic. BMJ Global Health, 5(6), e002967.
Publication 2020
Anesthetist Breast Feeding Community Health Workers COVID 19 General Practitioners Gynecologist Health Personnel Infant, Newborn Midwife Mothers Neonatologists Nurses Obstetrician Paramedical Personnel Pediatricians Reading Frames Target Population
4
Ethnographic Exploration of Maternity Unit Safety
We adopted an ethnographic approach (Hammersley and Atkinson, 2007 ), involving observations, semi-structured interviews, and focus groups. To offer an in-depth, longitudinal and recursive analysis not tied to specific individuals who happened to be on duty or specific events, data for the study were collected in two phases: between September 2014 and March 2015 and between July and August 2017. This approach allowed analytic depth by enabling exploration and probing of issues identified in early observations and interviews.
Three researchers (JW, EL, CT) conducted approximately 143 h of observations of between one and three days (including a night shift) in the maternity unit. They also observed two PROMPT in-house training events at Southmead and one national PROMPT train-the-trainers event. Observations were open-ended (a predetermined observation checklist was not used), but, consistent with our research aims, particular effort went into capturing how routines, interactions, social norms and structures contributed to or interfered with safety. For observations, oral consent was obtained from participants, who were informed about the researchers’ background as social scientists.
Two researchers (JW and EL) conducted 12 semi-structured interviews with nine clinicians working in the unit (five doctors and four midwives, some of whom were involved in the local PROMPT programme), and with three individuals with a management or risk management role.
Both in our field conversations and in interviews, we adopted a maximum variability strategy to access as many different points of views as possible on the issues of interest. Participants were selected in consultation with the local collaborators to represent a range of different disciplines and seniority levels, and were approached by the researchers during the fieldwork. Our recruitment process was guided by the principle of information power (Malterud et al 2016 ), which shifts the focus from the number of participants included in a sample to the power of information the sample holds.
Interviews focused on participants’ understanding of the mechanisms that contributed to, or hindered, safety in the unit, as well as allowing follow-up on aspects of practice seen in observations. Interviews lasted 60–120 min and were conducted face-to-face or by telephone. JW also conducted two focus groups, one involving midwives and MCAs, and one with consultant obstetricians, anaesthetists, and doctors-in-training. Interview and focus group participants signed a consent form. The study received ethical approval from the London – Harrow Research Ethics Committee.
Liberati E.G., Tarrant C., Willars J., Draycott T., Winter C., Chew S, & Dixon-Woods M. (2019). How to be a very safe maternity unit: An ethnographic study. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 223, 64-72.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2019
Anesthetist Consultant Ethics Committees, Research Face Middle Cerebral Artery Midwife Obstetrician Physicians Risk Management Safety Vision
5
Evidence-Based Ventilatory Support Guidelines for Respiratory Failure
Literature available from MedLine (2003-2013) and the Cochrane Central Register of
Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) was reviewed by specialists with a higher education
(intensivists, anesthetists, pulmonary specialists, physical therapists, and nurses) who
were distributed in pairs for review of each of the 29 selected subtopics related to
non-invasive and invasive ventilatory support for patients with respiratory failure.
After reviewing the articles available in the literature, each pair answered the
questions formulated by the organizing commission (composed by Carmen Silvia Valente
Barbas, President of the Committee of Respiratory Failure and Mechanical Ventilation of
AMIB, Alexandre Marini Isola, National Coordinator of the Course of MV in ICU - VENUTI,
and Augusto Manoel de Carvalho Farias, Coordinator of the Department of Intensive Care
of the SBPT) according to criteria previously suggested by other authors.(1 (link)-4 )Thus, the term recommendation was used when the level of evidence was high, i.e.,
derived from randomized studies conducted with more than 100 participants,
meta-analyses, all-or-nothing effect, or patient safety. The term suggestion was used
when the available evidence was weak, i.e., based on observational or case-control
studies, case series, or on the experience of specialists to provide guidance for
efficient and safe ventilatory support in Brazil. We therefore hoped that these
evidence-based recommendations would help to avoid potential deleterious effects
associated with inadequate ventilatory support in our patients.
The 58 participating specialists were requested to answer the proposed questions during
an eight-hour session conducted at the Brazilian Intensive Care Medicine Association
(Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira - AMIB) on August 3,
2013. The answers were formulated based on the evidence available in the literature and
on the experience of the specialists and were then presented at a plenary session that
included all 58 participating specialists, which was held on August 4, 2013 at AMIB
headquarters. During that session, the answers were discussed, modified when needed,
voted on, and approved in accordance with the suggestions and observations of the
specialists who attended the meeting.
The reports made by all the pairs of specialists were gathered by the project organizing
commission, which revised, formatted and drafted the final document, following the
authors' revisions. The document was then printed in the form of a bedside manual of
recommendations to be distributed to ICUs all across Brazil, and it was also sent for
publication in the Brazilian Journal of Intensive Care (Revista Brasileira de
Terapia Intensiva - RBTI) and the Brazilian Journal of Pneumology
(Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia).
Barbas C.S., Ísola A.M., Farias A.M., Cavalcanti A.B., Gama A.M., Duarte A.C., Vianna A., Serpa A N.e.t.o., Bravim B.D., Pinheiro B.D., Mazza B.F., de Carvalho C.R., Toufen C J.ú.n.i.o.r., David C.M., Taniguchi C., Mazza D.D., Dragosavac D., Toledo D.O., Costa E.L., Caser E.B., Silva E., Amorim F.F., Saddy F., Galas F.R., Silva G.S., de Matos G.F., Emmerich J.C., Valiatti J.L., Teles J.M., Victorino J.A., Ferreira J.C., Prodomo L.P., Hajjar L.A., Martins L.C., Malbouisson L.M., Vargas M.A., Reis M.A., Amato M.B., Holanda M.A., Park M., Jacomelli M., Tavares M., Damasceno M.C., Assunção M.S., Damasceno M.P., Youssef N.C., Teixeira P.J., Caruso P., Duarte P.A., Messeder O., Eid R.C., Rodrigues R.G., de Jesus R.F., Kairalla R.A., Justino S., Nemer S.N., Romero S.B, & Amado V.M. (2014). Brazilian recommendations of mechanical ventilation 2013. Part I. Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva, 26(2), 89-121.
Publication 2014
Anesthetist ARID1A protein, human Debility Intensive Care Lung Mechanical Ventilation Nurses Patients Patient Safety Pharmaceutical Preparations Physical Therapist Respiratory Failure Specialists

Most recents protocols related to «Anesthetist»

1
Hysteroscopy Anesthesia Optimization Protocol
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Weifang People’s Hospital and registered at http://www.chictr.org.cn (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2200057803). The study protocol followed the CONSORT guidelines. The study protocol was performed in the relevant guidelines. Informed consent was signed by the patients and their families who participated in the study.
Patients proposed for hysteroscopy day surgery under total intravenous anesthesia, aged 18 to 65 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I or II were selected. Exclusion criteria were breastfeeding, a history of chronic pain, a history of sedative and analgesic administration or allergy to any of the study drugs, severe hypertension, and diabetes mellitus. Reject criteria were a procedure time of more than 1 hour, discharged the next day, missing follow-up with the electronic questionnaire pushed 24 hours after the procedure. The included patients were randomized into 3 groups: dexamethasone plus saline group (DC group), dexamethasone plus droperidol group (DD group) and dexamethasone plus propofol group (DP group). The DC group was used as the control group and the remaining 2 groups as the intervention group. Random allocation of included patients by an independent researcher using Excel 2016 (Microsoft) with a 1:1:1 allocation. The participating patients, the outcome assessment fellows, were unaware of the group allocation, only the doctor administering the anesthetic was aware of the grouping of patients and all patients were anesthetized by the same anesthetist.
Patients were routinely fasted and no pre operative medication was administered. After the patient entered the operating room, the intravenous channel was established, and the patient’s ECG, SPO2, NIBP, and BIS were monitored. Patients in each group were given dexamethasone 5 mg for anti-inflammatory and antiemetic prophylaxis before induction, and flurbiprofen axetil 50 mg for preemptive analgesia. Induction of anesthesia: remimazolam 6 mg/kg/hours was continuously infused until sleep, and then mivacurium 0.2 mg/kg and alfentanil 20 ug/kg were slowly injected, after 3 minutes of mask ventilation, the laryngeal mask was placed by the anesthesiologist and mechanical ventilation was performed. Anesthesia maintenance: alfentanil 40 ug/kg/hours and remimazolam 1 mg/kg/hour continuous infusion, stop infusion at the end of the operation. BIS value was maintained between 40 and 60, and 0.1 mg/kg of mivacurium was injected intermittently when necessary. After the start of surgery DC group was given 2ml saline, DD group was given droperidol 1 mg, and DP group was given propofol 20 mg. After awakening and extubation, the patient was taken to the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) and assessed for nausea and vomiting. Patients were discharged after meeting discharge criteria as assessed by the Post-anesthetic Discharge Scoring System (PADSS) criteria. An electronic follow-up questionnaire was pushed 24 hours after the operation. Basic information about the patient’s medical history and surgery was obtained through pre operative anesthesia clinic assessment, intraoperative anesthesia monitoring, in the inpatient electronic medical record, and observation notes in the PACU.
Xiao H., Liu M., Man Y., Wei Y, & Ji F. (2023). Effect of low-dose propofol combined with dexamethasone on the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in gynaecological day surgery under remimazolam-based general anesthesia. Medicine, 102(10), e33249.
Publication 2023
Alfentanil Analgesics Anesthesia Anesthesia, Intravenous Anesthesiologist Anesthetics Anesthetist Anti-Inflammatory Agents Antiemetics Chinese Chronic Pain Dexamethasone Diabetes Mellitus Droperidol Drug Allergy Ethics Committees, Clinical flurbiprofen axetil High Blood Pressures Hysteroscopy Inpatient Laryngeal Masks Management, Pain Mechanical Ventilation Mivacurium Nausea Operative Surgical Procedures Patient Discharge Patients Pharmaceutical Preparations Physicians Propofol remimazolam Saline Solution Saturation of Peripheral Oxygen Sedatives Sleep Surgery, Day Tracheal Extubation
2
Cataract Surgery with Surgicube Approach
All patients were examined by their surgeon, with particular attention to the need for sedation according to the patient’s history and psychological profile. The indication for surgery was phacoemulsification with the placement of an implant in the capsular bag. Intracameral cefuroxime antibiotic prophylaxis was administered systematically in both groups. Postoperative treatment included a topical antibiotic (1 week), a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory (1 month), and cortisone antibiotic eye drops (1 month). Patients in the Surgicube® group underwent topical anesthesia with tetracaine or oxybuprocaine, followed by additional intracameral lidocaine. They were prepared by the nurse and installed on a stretcher, with only the head arriving at the level of the sterile operating area by the laminar air flow. There was no anesthetist or peripheral venous line. The control group had topical anesthesia followed by an intracameral lidocaine injection. An anesthetist nurse was always present in the room. Patients had to change into an overall.
Artus A., Fabro F., Cochereau I., Caputo G., Tadayoni R., Vignal C., Galatoire O., Salviat F., Gatinel D, & Panthier C. (2023). Effectiveness and safety of cataract surgery in laminar air flow device versus traditional scrubs: A 1-year non-inferiority pilot study. Frontiers in Medicine, 10, 987505.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2023
Anesthetist Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal Antibiotic Prophylaxis Antibiotics Attention benoxinate Capsule Cefuroxime Cortisone Eye Drops Head Lidocaine Nurses Operative Surgical Procedures Patient Holding Stretchers Patients Phacoemulsification Sedatives Sterility, Reproductive Surgeons Tetracaine Topical Anesthetics Veins
3
Calculating Opioid Dosage Equivalents
A Defined Daily Dose (DDD) for each prescription was calculated using the drug name and administration instructions; MED was calculated using DDD. Calculations for MEDs depended on the type of opioid prescribed and were computed using the equivalence parameters in Table 1, overseen by a Consultant Anaesthetist with extensive experience in opioid prescribing for CNCP (BF). The calculations needed to account for multiple daily opioid prescriptions that patients may take, whether or not they use the prescriptions concurrently. As a result, once MEDs were calculated for every prescription a new variable was created to calculate patients’ combined daily MED (MED sum) which reflects the total MED if they were to use all of their prescribed opioids. The purpose of this variable was to establish one potential total of MED for each patient, specifically for those with more than one prescription that may contribute to their daily morphine intake. However, it is clear that not all prescribed medication will be taken simultaneously, with patients choosing from a range of their prescribed medication according to the current severity of their pain. The new MED sum parameter was used to create an average MED variable, by dividing the MED sum by the total number of prescriptions for that patient, thus accounting for the multiple prescriptions that patients may receive. In summary, MED sum = the total potential MED for a patient based on all currently prescribed opioids and MED average = MED sum/number of currently prescribed opioids.
For example, a patient prescribed co-codamol (30/500; 4 x 2 tablets per day), buprenorphine (10ug/h; 1 patch per week) and morphine sulphate (10mg/5ml; 2.5ml x 6 per day) would have a DDD of 240mg Codeine (30mg morphine) from the co-codamol, 10ug/hour (30mg morphine) from the buprenorphine and 30mg morphine from the morphine sulphate giving a total MED of 90mg (MED sum = 90). A patient may not take all of these medicines concurrently so prescriptions were averaged to give a daily MED average of 90/3 = 30mg MED.
Begley E.K., Poole H.M., Sumnall H.R., Frank B.F, & Montgomery C. (2023). Opioid prescribing and social deprivation: A retrospective analysis of prescribing for CNCP in Liverpool CCG. PLOS ONE, 18(3), e0280958.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2023
acetaminophen - codeine Anesthetist Buprenorphine Codeine Consultant Morphine Opioids Patients Pharmaceutical Preparations Prescriptions Severity, Pain Sulfate, Morphine
4
Identifying Patterns in Opioid Prescribing for Chronic Non-Cancer Pain
Ethical approval for this study was granted by LJMU Research Ethics Committee. A data sharing agreement for the extraction of patient level data was drawn up between LJMU and Liverpool CCG, in accordance with the Data Protection Act 2018. The inclusion criteria for patients were: age over 18 years; CNCP diagnosis; in receipt of any opioid prescription between August 2016 and August 2018. Patients with a history of substance dependence (current read code for dependence or free text entry indicating dependence in patient’s record), and those prescribed opioids to manage cancer pain (current read code for cancer diagnosis; prescribed opioid predominantly used in management of cancer pain not CNCP) were excluded. While we were interested in opioid prescribing for CNCP, the extracted data demonstrated that there was a great deal of heterogeneity in the coding of linked problems (providing reason why an opioid prescription was issued) with over 60,000 distinct reported problems. Categories of CNCP were created by grouping together similar conditions and conferring with a consultant anaesthetist (BF) to develop typologies. The most common linked problem for which opioids were prescribed was for musculoskeletal pain (n = 16,137) specifically back pain (n = 10,974) and arthritis (n = 7,154). For a full list of the 78 categories and frequency of linked prescriptions see S1 File. Upon further investigation of the linked problems, it was evident that there were anomalies in coding of linked problems, with some codes reflecting that a patient may have initially requested an appointment for an alternative reason. See S2 File for full list of linked problems.
Begley E.K., Poole H.M., Sumnall H.R., Frank B.F, & Montgomery C. (2023). Opioid prescribing and social deprivation: A retrospective analysis of prescribing for CNCP in Liverpool CCG. PLOS ONE, 18(3), e0280958.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2023
Anesthetist Arthritis Back Pain Cancer Pain Consultant Diagnosis Ethics Committees, Research Genetic Heterogeneity Malignant Neoplasms Management, Pain Opioids Patients Prescriptions Substance Dependence
5
Multidisciplinary Approach to Surgical Protocol
The invention was developed by a multidisciplinary group consisting of behavioural scientists, a surgeon, anaesthetist, CRC liaison nurse (all members of the research team), and two stomal therapy nurses.
Wyse R., Smith S., Zucca A., Fakes K., Mansfield E., Johnston S.A., Robinson S., Oldmeadow C., Reeves P., Carey M.L., Norton G, & Sanson-Fisher R.W. (2023). Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a digital health intervention to support patients with colorectal cancer prepare for and recover from surgery: study protocol of the RecoverEsupport randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open, 13(3), e067150.
Publication 2023
Anesthetist Nurses Surgeons Surgical Stoma Therapeutics

Top products related to «Anesthetist»

1
Spss version 20 by IBM
Sourced in United States, Japan, United Kingdom, Germany, Belgium, Austria, Spain, France, Denmark, Switzerland, Ireland
SPSS version 20 is a statistical software package developed by IBM. It provides a range of data analysis and management tools. The core function of SPSS version 20 is to assist users in conducting statistical analysis on data.
2
Propofol by Fresenius
Sourced in Germany, Austria, China, United States, United Kingdom, Belgium, Sweden, Israel
Propofol is a pharmaceutical product used as a general anesthetic and sedative. It is a sterile, nonpyrogenic injectable emulsion that contains the active ingredient propofol and other inactive ingredients. Propofol is administered intravenously and is used to induce and maintain general anesthesia, as well as for sedation in intensive care unit (ICU) settings.
3
Sonosite m turbo by Fujifilm
Sourced in United States, Japan
The SonoSite M-Turbo is a compact and portable ultrasound system designed for a variety of medical applications. It features a high-resolution display, intuitive user interface, and advanced imaging capabilities to support clinical decision-making. The SonoSite M-Turbo is a versatile tool that can be used in various healthcare settings.
4
Spss v24 by IBM
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom, Spain, Germany, Austria
SPSS v24 is a software application for statistical analysis. It provides tools for data management, analysis, and visualization. The core function of SPSS v24 is to assist users in processing and analyzing data, including the ability to perform various statistical tests and generate reports.
5
Sas 9 by SAS Institute
Sourced in United States, Austria, Japan, Belgium, United Kingdom, Cameroon, China, Denmark, Canada, Israel, New Caledonia, Germany, Poland, India, France, Ireland, Australia
SAS 9.4 is an integrated software suite for advanced analytics, data management, and business intelligence. It provides a comprehensive platform for data analysis, modeling, and reporting. SAS 9.4 offers a wide range of capabilities, including data manipulation, statistical analysis, predictive modeling, and visual data exploration.
6
Mgpinstruments dmc 2000 by Mirion Technologies
The MGPInstruments DMC 2000 is a compact and portable electronic dosimeter designed for personal radiation monitoring. It measures the cumulative radiation dose received by the user, providing real-time dose and dose rate information. The device is intended for use in environments where ionizing radiation may be present, such as nuclear facilities, research laboratories, or medical settings.
7
Gf uct180 by Olympus
Sourced in Japan, United States, Germany
The GF-UCT180 is an Olympus laboratory microscope designed for high-resolution imaging. It features a 180x magnification capability and utilizes an ultra-compact design.
8
Aplio by Toshiba
Sourced in Japan
The Aplio is a medical imaging device manufactured by Toshiba. It is designed to capture high-quality diagnostic images using ultrasound technology. The core function of the Aplio is to generate and interpret ultrasound waves to create visual representations of internal bodily structures.
9
Ketalar by Pfizer
Sourced in United States, Belgium, Germany, Finland, Sweden, United Kingdom, Norway, Switzerland, Brazil, Ireland, Denmark, Canada, Australia
Ketalar is a general anesthetic medication used to induce and maintain anesthesia. It is a clear, colorless, water-soluble compound that is administered via injection. The active ingredient in Ketalar is the chemical compound ketamine hydrochloride.
10
Spss software version 24 by IBM
Sourced in United States, Japan, United Kingdom, India
SPSS software version 24.0 is a statistical analysis and data management software package developed by IBM. It provides a range of tools for data analysis, including descriptive statistics, bivariate statistics, prediction for numerical outcomes, and prediction for identifying groups. The software is designed to help users analyze and understand complex data sets.

More about "Anesthetist"

Anesthesiologists, Anesthesia Providers, Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists (CRNAs), Anesthesia Specialists, Anesthesia Practitioners, Anesthetic Experts, Anesthesia Professionals.
These medical professionals are responsible for administering anesthesia, monitoring vital signs, and adjusting anesthesia levels during surgical, obstetric, and other medical procedures.
They have a deep understanding of pharmacology, physiology, and patient care to ensure safe and effective anesthesia management, minimizing the risk of complications.
Anesthetists work closely with surgeons, dentists, and other healthcare providers to deliver comprehensive perioperative care.
They play a crucial role in the delivery of safe and effective medical treatment, ensuring patients remain comfortable and stable throughout their procedures.
Anesthetists utilize a variety of medical equipment and software to assist in their duties, such as SPSS version 20, Propofol, SonoSite M-Turbo, SPSS v24, SAS 9.4, MGPInstruments DMC 2000, GF-UCT180, Aplio, Ketalar, and SPSS software version 24.0.
These tools help them monitor patient vitals, administer anesthesia, and analyze data to optimize patient outcomes.
Anesthetists must stay up-to-date with the latest advancements in anesthesia technology and research to provide the best possible care for their patients.