The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Health Educators

Health Educators are professionals who specialize in promoting and improving the health and well-being of individuals, communities, and populations.
They design, implement, and evaluate educational programs and interventions that empower people to make informed decisions about their health.
Health Educators work in a variety of settings, including schools, hospitals, community organizations, and government agencies.
They utilize evidence-based practices, engage with stakeholders, and leverage the power of technology to deliver effective health education and disease prevention strategies.
With a deep understanding of human behavior and the social determinants of health, Health Educators play a crucial role in addressing public health challenges and enhancing the quality of life for all.
PubCompare.ai can assist Health Educators by providing a platform to effortlessly locate and compare research protocols, enabling them to optimize their work and enhance the reproducibility and accuracy of their research.

Most cited protocols related to «Health Educators»

The working definition of patient navigation was provided by the NCI’s CRHCD in their request for applications. 13 In this definition, patient navigation refers to support and guidance offered to persons with abnormal cancer screening or a new cancer diagnosis in accessing the cancer care system, overcoming barriers, and facilitating timely, quality care provided in a culturally sensitive manner. Patient navigation is intended to target those who are most at risk for delays in care, including racial and ethnic minorities and those from low income populations. Furthermore, patient navigation targets specific time points in the cancer care continuum; we operationally define patient navigation as starting at the time of an abnormal screening result and ending at the determination that the screening test was a false positive or, for those individuals with a new cancer diagnosis, continuing through the completion of cancer treatment. The goal of patient navigation is to facilitate timely access to quality cancer care that meets cultural needs and standards of care for all patients.
Examples of navigation services include: arranging various forms of financial support, arranging for transportation to and childcare during scheduled appointments, identifying and scheduling appointments with culturally sensitive caregivers, coordinating care among providers, arranging for interpreter services, ensuring coordination of services among medical personnel, ensuring that medical records are available at each scheduled appointment, and providing other services to overcome access barriers encountered during the cancer care process including linkage to community resources. Navigators work to address health literacy and to train patients to advocate for themselves in the health care system. They are also trained to provide emotional support to patients during this stressful period. Navigators may also identify systems issues that serve as barriers to many patients, and work towards reduce the complexity to the patient of the multidisciplinary approach to care.
The concept of patient navigation is based upon the care management or case management model, which has four components.14 The first is case identification, which is a systematic approach to the identification of those individuals with abnormal cancer screening in need of follow-up care or incident cancers. The second is identifying individual barriers to receiving care. Navigators contact patients and elicit information about the barriers to completion of recommended care. The third is developing an individualized plan to address the barriers that are identified. The fourth is tracking, which is a systematic method of following each case through resolution of the problem. In the case of cancer navigation, this is to resolution of a diagnostic evaluation when a benign condition is diagnosed or follow-up to completion of primary therapy when a cancer or pre-malignant condition is diagnosed.
The navigator will focus on assisting patients and coordinating care of the patients among providers, community, and the patients and their families. Given that patient navigators are working primarily with racial/ethnic minority and low-income patients, cultural competence is a key feature. Cultural and linguistic competence is a set of congruent behaviors, attitudes, and policies that enable effective work in cross-cultural situations.15
PNRP sites vary in the prior training, skill sets, and educational background of navigators and include lay community peers, health educators and advocates, medical assistants, social workers, and nurses. The study has set a minimum requirement of a high school diploma or General Education Diploma. In an effort to achieve a core set of knowledge, skills, and competencies across navigators, a standardized training has been developed. The curriculum focuses on basic information about cancer and its diagnosis and treatment, professionalism, understanding barriers to care, communication skills, cultural competency, ethical conduct of human subjects research, and developing a local network of resources to support patients.16
Publication 2008
Cancer Screening Case Management Continuity of Patient Care Diagnosis Emotions Ethnic Minorities Follow-Up Care Health Educators Health Literacy Health Personnel Homo sapiens Low-Income Population Malignant Neoplasms Nurses Patient Navigation Patient Navigators Patients Quality of Health Care Racial Minorities
UMSP in collaboration with the Uganda National Malaria Control Program (NMCP) established a health facility-based malaria surveillance system at six sentinel sites between September 2006 and January 2007 (Figure 1). All sentinel site facilities are government run level IV health centers that provide care free of charge, including diagnostic testing and medications. Level IV health centers generally have a catchment population of approximately 100,000 people and are staffed by one medical officer, two clinical officers, five nurses, five midwives, four nursing assistants, one dental officer, one lab technician, one lab assistant, one records officer, one health educator and one health assistant. Each site had previously been selected as part of the East African Network for Monitoring Antimalarial Treatment (EANMAT) to represent the diversity of geography and malaria transmission intensity in Uganda [9] (link).
Full text: Click here
Publication 2011
Antimalarials Dental Health Services East African People Health Educators Malaria Midwife Nurses Nursing Assistants Pharmaceutical Preparations Transmission, Communicable Disease
The study was conducted in Al-Wazarat Chronic Diseases Center, a division of the Al-Wazarat Health Care (WHC) Family Medicine Center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The Chronic Diseases Center consists of 12 specialized clinics, primarily for patients with T2DM, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and bronchial asthma, in addition to a procedures room and support services such as pharmacy, laboratory, and radiology. The Chronic Diseases Center is staffed by senior family physicians who are board certified and/or specialized in diabetes care, a board certified clinical pharmacist, dieticians, diabetic educators, health educators, and social workers. The daily clinics are run by six physicians serving approximately 120 patients daily.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2018
Asthma Clinical Pharmacists Diabetes Mellitus Dietitian Disease, Chronic Dyslipidemias Health Educators High Blood Pressures Patients Pharmaceutical Services Physicians Physicians, Family X-Rays, Diagnostic
Data presented in this paper are from a randomised controlled study, the PRO-AGE study (London, U.K.; Hamburg, Germany; and Solothurn, Switzerland). In this study, non-disabled community-dwelling older persons were recruited from primary care and randomised to intervention and control groups [3 (link)]. After randomisation, all subjects allocated to the intervention group were sent the HRA-O questionnaire. This study examined the effects of the HRA-O linked with a site-specific reinforcement (i.e. supplemental counselling by a physician, health educator, or other health professional) on self reported health behaviour and use of preventative care. The ethical approval of the PRO-AGE project was from the Brent Medical Ethics Committee and King's College Hospital Research Ethics Committee (London), the Ethics Committee of the Ärztekammer Hamburg (Hamburg) and the Kantonale Ethikkommission Solothurn (EKO 0023) (Solothurn).
Full text: Click here
Publication 2007
Disabled Persons Ethics Committees Ethics Committees, Clinical Ethics Committees, Research Health Care Professionals Health Educators Physicians Primary Health Care Reinforcement, Psychological
The intervention used theory-based32 (link) and evidence-based33 (link),34 (link) principles to promote weight loss and hypertension self-management for 24 months. The intervention is described in greater detail elsewhere.29 Briefly, we used a behavioral weight loss approach designed for use in resource-constrained settings.29 The intervention approach was designed for delivery in populations with limited literacy and numeracy and impaired access to health-promoting resources. Patients are prescribed 3 tailored goals to modify routine obesogenic lifestyle behaviors.29 ,33 (link) Behavior change goals were modeled on evidence-based recommendations31 ,34 (link) that were tailored to the patient population and phrased so that they could be easily self-monitored. New goals were selected at subsequent 13-week intervals. For the duration of the study, participants maintained a hypertension medication adherence goal (to take their medication as prescribed daily).
Participants chose to self-monitor their progress using either the study website or an interactive voice response system, available in English and Spanish. Both tracking systems provided real-time tailored feedback. Participants could switch their intervention platform at any time.
Trained community health educators delivered counseling calls monthly during the first 12 months of intervention and bimonthly during the second year (18 total scheduled calls). The community health educators were trained by study investigators in principles of motivational interviewing35 (link),36 and conducted 15- to 20-minute calls (in English or Spanish) that covered self-monitoring data, problem solving, and behavioral skills training. The community health educators also led 12 optional monthly group sessions that were held at a community location. The community health educators were trained and certified at baseline, were recertified annually, and received weekly supervision throughout the study.
Primary care providers delivered at least 1 brief, standardized message about the importance of intervention participation. We also provided a personalized behavior change “prescription” that included the primary care provider's electronic signature.37 (link)Finally, we provided tailored behavioral skills training materials, adapted from previous studies.34 (link) We also provided tailored information on community resources (eg, public parks, walking groups, and farmers' markets) and distributed a walking kit that included a pedometer and maps (with step counts) of destinations in the local community.
Publication 2012
ARID1A protein, human Brief Interventions Counseling Farmers Health Educators High Blood Pressures Hispanic or Latino Microtubule-Associated Proteins Motivation Obstetric Delivery Patients Pharmaceutical Preparations Primary Health Care Self-Management Supervision

Most recents protocols related to «Health Educators»

The eligibility criteria used to assess the tweets included: 1. Containing at least one of the keywords that refers to an antidepressant(s) or the term ‘antidepressant’; 2. Written in English; 3. Posted between a 10-day period between 14th June 2022 and 23rd June 2022; 4. Containing original text; 5. Posted by a user who self-identified as a healthcare provider. Several preliminary searches determined a 10-day span would be feasible considering the scale of data and the capability of manual analysis. Posts on Twitter are generally categorised into tweets (including those that quoted another tweet), retweets and replies. For this study, only tweets and replies were included, since retweets are identical reposts and thus were considered duplicate content.
The inclusion/exclusion criteria were applied within Microsoft Excel, by authors manually reviewing the textual data. Microsoft Excel allowed screening and excluding data easily according to our criteria 1–4. For criterion 5, user profiles (names and bios) associated with the identified tweets were assessed for eligibility, whereby tweets posted by healthcare providers were eligible and categorised by their roles byYD. The definition of “healthcare providers” (Table 1) was adapted from the version defined by Lee et al. which was previously used to conduct a Twitter analysis of healthcare providers.42 (link) It was expanded in this study to”relevant healthcare professionals, providers and students”, who were considered people or organisations which the general public may expect to be more knowledgeable about healthcare, such as physicians (including psychiatrists), nurses, pharmacists, psychologists, researchers, medical students, and organisations in medical fields and other allied professionals (e.g, therapists, dietitians). Where there was ambiguity over someone's eligibility due to dubious expression over their role, a second researcher (NW) was consulted. If it was not certain that they were a healthcare provider, i.e., they did not use definitive terminology such as ‘pharmacist’ or ‘medic’, they were not included in the analysis. The content of the tweet text had not been considered in this stage to avoid bias.

Descriptions and Examples of Categories of Healthcare Providers Identified: This table explained the classification of healthcare providers in this study and listed some examples of their presentations. Identifying information was adapted.

Table 1
CategoryDescriptionExample Bio (partially adapted)
PhysiciansPhysicians, psychiatrists, doctors from various clinical subjects, dentists, ophthalmologists“MD […] #physiatrist […]”, “Maternal-Fetal Medicine Physician”, “MBBS (GMC, […])”, “Doctor | Special interest in Long Covid […]”, “Clinician-scientist […]”
NursesNurses, nurse practitioners, registered nurses, retired nurses“Mom, nurse, wife, daughter, and sister. […]”, “STICU Nurse. […]”, “28. Labor & delivery RN. […]”
PharmacistsPharmacists, mental health pharmacists, clinical pharmacists from various clinical subjects“PharmD/writer w/30y exp.Infect Diseases. […]”, “Retail Pharmacist”, “Mental Health Clinical Pharmacist Practitioner […]”
PsychologistsPsychologists, clinical psychologists“Dual national,CPsychol, accidental academic. […]”, “A retired developmental psychologist […]”
Medical StudentsMedical students, MD and PharmD candidates, students of biomedical areas“PGY-1 in rural/full-spectrum family med […]”, “[…] | Med student | […]”, “Internal medicine residency applicant”
OrganisationsHospitals, clinics, healthcare businesses, academic groups, journals, medical information providers, charities“Real vitamins for physical and mental health. […]”, “Original research in physiology with an emphasis on adaptive and integrative mechanisms | An @APSPhysiology journal”, “ACTIV-6 is a research study testing repurposed medications to understand if they can help people with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 feel better faster.”
ResearchersIndividual researchers specified in biomedicine, mental health, public health areas“COVID scientist; Associate Professor of Psychiatry @[…]”, “Training psychiatrist/research fellow @[…]”, “Researcher in Pharmacognosy, Pharmacology & Pharmacy. […]”
Others Allied ProfessionalsTherapists, dieticians, nutritionists, midwives, social workers, hygienists, health care educators, unspecified professionals“Social worker in […]”, “[…] Mental Health Therapist […]”, “Health Care Provider, […]”, “NHS midwife, […]”, “Registered Dietitan, Cannabis practitioner, […]”
Full text: Click here
Publication 2023
Accidents Acclimatization Antidepressive Agents Cannabis Clinical Pharmacists Community Pharmacists COVID 19 Daughter Dentist Dietitian Eligibility Determination Feelings Health Care Professionals Health Educators Health Personnel Hygienist, Dental Medical Residencies Mental Health Midwife Nurses Nutritionist Obstetric Delivery Obstetric Labor Ophthalmologists Pharmaceutical Preparations Physiatrists Physical Examination Physicians physiology Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome Practitioner, Nurse Psychiatrist Psychologist Registered Nurse Student Students, Medical Vitamins Wife Worker, Social
Both authors are facilitators with the Structural Competency Working Group, a network of health care workers, patients, and social scientists who provide workshops and consultation on structural competency to health care workers and trainees, policy makers, and health professions faculty. These roles enhance our ability to interpret the data in relation to structural competency’s core concepts. It also may lead us to overly rely on structural competency as an analytic frame. Our distinct professional backgrounds and shared personal backgrounds also influenced our analysis. In the tradition of critical, post-structuralist ethnographers, we harnessed our social positions as data.26 We are both middle-class white women with experience working in safety-net health care institutions. The first author is a former birth and abortion doula, social worker, and social welfare scholar, while the second author has given birth to two children, has worked as a health educator in the US health care safety net for five years, and is a medical sociologist.
The first author, as the researcher in the field, negotiated several relationships with participants and the research questions. Her identity as a white, middle-class social worker who moved to the region during a wave of gentrification perpetuated by similarly situated professionals may have influenced the way participants spoke about the economic and racial inequities they observe and experience. Her identities may have positioned her as an outsider. On the other hand, her health and social service-related training may have positioned her as an insider, facilitating access within Family Center.
Publication 2023
Child Childbirth Doulas Faculty Health Educators Health Personnel Induced Abortions Patients Policy Makers Reading Frames Safety Women, Working Worker, Social Workshops
The first author spent nine months (three days per week) conducting fieldwork at Family Center, primarily with the Health Team. Her activities included clerical work, escorting clients to appointments, and preparing tea and leading doula demonstrations for weekly prenatal education classes. She attended staff meetings and trainings weekly. She also attended activities outside of the agency, such as colloquia at the local teaching hospital where Family Center staff were invited to brainstorm strategies to address health inequities. Early on in participant observation, she noted that while text on the city’s Department of Public Health website and presentations used the SDH framework to describe Family Center’s work, no frontline workers ever used the framework to describe their work. In the case of the Department of Public Health, the Dahlgren and Whitehead model was cited to describe Family Center. Manuscripts in development from this ethnography report more specifically on findings from participant observation.
Participant observation assisted the researcher in identifying relevant participants for semi-structured interviews, specifically those who worked most closely with clients on health and health care needs. There were 21 interviewees in total, including social work case managers, health counselors, health educators, community health workers, and a member of Family Center’s executive team who supervised all frontline workers. All quotations are from semi-structured interviews. Throughout informal interviews during participant observation, all participants endorsed the relevance of social determinants in creating health and health care inequities, which motivated the interview protocol development. A purposive sampling approach was utilized. Interviews were conducted in person at a mutually agreed-on location within Family Center and averaged 67 minutes in length. Participants received a US$25 gift card. The semi-structured interview guide probed for daily routines and practices concerning client care, collaboration practices, and explanations for health inequities (e.g., “What makes it hard for some clients to be healthy?”). Perspectives on the SDH framework were elicited at the close of interviews, when participants were shown an image of Dahlgren and Whitehead’s model and asked to describe it. This model was chosen because the Department of Public Health uses it to describe Family Center’s work, because it is widely cited in public health literature generally, and because it balances breadth and depth with visual clarity.
Publication 2023
Case Manager Clergy Community Health Workers Counselors Doulas Family Member Health Educators Prenatal Education Training Programs Workers
As part of the formative evaluation [34 (link)], all class nine students, as well as their Health and Physical Education (HPE) teachers and school nurses from the four schools will take part in quantitative and qualitative pre-tests. This phase will assess participants’ HL knowledge, and, needs. This phase [44 (link)] will also inform the implementation strategies [34 (link), 45 ].
The HL Intervention will be developed in three steps. First, the researchers will prepare a preliminary draft of the intervention based on the IM’s four dimensions (accessing, understanding, appraising, and applying health information [40 (link)]), and the HPE curriculum of class nine. Second, the preliminary draft will be refined based on the HL needs of the target group. This will then be further refined by the Delphi study with HPE teachers, school nurse, health education, public health and medical care experts. As part of this process, the 9th -grade HPE curriculum will be integrated into the interventions’ contents, strategies, materials, and practical facilitation of the sessions. Third, to make it more aligned with HL needs, the curriculum, and the HL domains (accessing, understanding, evaluating, and applying), the refined draft will be finalized based on consultation with health educators and health literacy experts (see Fig. 3).

Flow chart of the intervention development process

Full text: Click here
Publication 2023
Health Education Health Educators Health Literacy Nurses Physical Education Physical Examination Student
We will first classify all the arms of all studies according to the definition of HF-MP types and the intervention details collected from all studies. We plan to divide the HF-MP intervention into five categories based on the intensities of content, the frequencies of encounters, and the primary care provider, as follows: high-intensity hybrid disease management (high-HDM), low-intensity hybrid disease management (low-HDM), high-intensity self-care support (high-SCS), low-intensity self-care support (low-SCS), and self-monitoring (SM). Details of the definitions of these HF-MP programs are provided in Table 1.

Interventions models (five HF-MP types) and comparator groups, with descriptions

Intervention model
NicknameTypeProfessional involvement degreeFrequencyEncounter typeDelivery personnelMain content
High-HDMHybrid disease managementHigh ≥ 1/month or ≥ 6 h over the study periodFace-to-face and/or telephoneHealthcare professional team led by HF cardiologist and/or HF nurse, and pharmacyReview patient status and data; medication reconciliation; facilitating access to care
High-SCSSelf-care supportModerate ≥ 1/month or ≥ 6 h over the study periodFace-to-face and/or telephoneHealthcare team coordinated by nurse, physician, psychologist, health educator, or trained volunteerReview patient status, provide Education program and self-care support
Low-HDMHybrid disease managementModerate < 1/monthFace-to-face and/or telephoneHealthcare professional team led by HF cardiologist and/or HF nurse, and pharmacyReview patient status and data; medication reconciliation; facilitating access to care
Low-SCSSelf-care supportLow < 1/monthFace-to-face and/or telephoneHealthcare team coordinated by nurse, physician, psychologist, health educator, or trained volunteerReview patient status, provide Education program and self-care support
SMSelf-monitoringNo scheduled encounters; real time self-monitoringTelemonitoringSelf-managementNo scheduled interactions with healthcare professionals
Comparator group
 EUCConsisted of the patients being given care guided by local practice that may or may not have included scheduled follow-up visits but did not include any structured educational programs
 UCThe necessary support was provided at the discretion of clinicians that may or may not have included scheduled follow-up visits but did not include any structured educational programs
In brief, high-intensity programs were defined as those in which encounters with the patients occurred more than once per month or more than 6 h over the study period. Low intensity was defined as patient encounters occurring less than once per month during the intervention period. Hybrid disease management programs were led by health care professionals (including HF specialists, HF nurses, or pharmacists), including review of patients’ clinic status, medication reconciliation, patient education, and facilitated access to care and/or social and psychological support. Self-care support was primarily delivered by an allied healthcare professional team that included physicians, nurses or psychologists, health educators, and/or trained volunteers who provide support and educational programs to enhance patients’ self-care skills and address potential barriers to self-care. Self-monitoring programs were based on telemonitoring.
To remove the bias caused by the different strength of “usual care” groups in different studies, comparator groups will be characterized as either “usual care” (UC) or “enhanced usual care” (EUC). “Usual care” was defined as care provided at the discretion of clinicians and may or may not have included scheduled follow-up visits but did not include any structured educational programs. “Enhanced usual care” was defined as patients being given a formal plan with scheduled follow-up visits and/or being given structured educational material only before they were discharged from the hospital (i.e., no structured educational program following discharge). We will also present the results of not performing this operation as a sensitivity analysis.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2023
Arm, Upper Cardiologists Disease Management Education of Patients Face Health Care Professionals Health Educators Health Personnel Hybrids Hypersensitivity Intensive Care Medication Reconciliation Nurses Patient Discharge Patients Physicians Primary Health Care Programmed Learning Specialists Voluntary Workers

Top products related to «Health Educators»

The Omron HJ-320 is a single-step automatic hematology analyzer designed for laboratory use. It provides a compact and efficient solution for performing complete blood count (CBC) analysis. The HJ-320 delivers accurate and reliable results, catering to the needs of clinical laboratories and healthcare settings.
The Seca 700 is a physician balance beam scale designed for accurate weight measurement. It features a robust construction and precise balance beam mechanism to deliver reliable results. The scale is suitable for use in medical settings to obtain patient weight measurements.
The ActiGraph GT3X-plus is a wearable activity monitor designed to accurately measure and record physical activity and movement. It is a triaxial accelerometer that can detect movement in three dimensions, providing comprehensive data on an individual's physical activity patterns.
Sourced in Finland
The Polar S610 is a heart rate monitoring device designed for fitness and sports activities. It features a wearable chest strap that measures the user's heart rate and transmits the data to a compatible display or device.
Sourced in Germany
Atlas.ti v8 is a qualitative data analysis software that supports the collection, organization, and analysis of various types of data, including text, audio, video, and images. It provides a platform for researchers, analysts, and professionals to manage and explore their data, code and annotate it, and generate insights.
Sourced in United Kingdom
The Portable Stadiometer is a compact and lightweight device designed for measuring an individual's standing height. It provides accurate and reliable height measurements, making it suitable for use in various settings, such as clinics, schools, or field studies.
Sourced in United States
STATA v10 is a general-purpose statistical software package developed by StataCorp. It provides a comprehensive set of tools for data management, statistical analysis, and visualization. STATA v10 supports a wide range of statistical techniques, including regression analysis, time series analysis, and multivariate methods. The software is designed to be user-friendly and offers a powerful command-line interface as well as a graphical user interface.
Sourced in United States, Japan, Germany, United Kingdom, Belgium, Austria, Spain
SPSS Statistics 24 is a software package used for statistical analysis. It provides a comprehensive set of tools for data management, analysis, and presentation. The software is designed to handle a wide range of data types and offers a user-friendly interface for conducting various statistical procedures.
Sourced in Japan, United Kingdom, Germany
The TRC-NW8 is a non-mydriatic retinal camera manufactured by Topcon. It captures high-quality digital images of the retina without the need for pupil dilation. The device is designed for efficient and comfortable retinal screening.
Sourced in Italy, United States
The Quark CPET is a lab equipment product that provides cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) functionality. It is designed to measure and analyze respiratory and metabolic parameters during physical exercise.

More about "Health Educators"

Health Educators, also known as Public Health Educators or Community Health Educators, are specialized professionals who focus on promoting and improving the health and well-being of individuals, communities, and populations.
They design, implement, and evaluate educational programs and interventions that empower people to make informed decisions about their health.
These dedicated professionals work in a variety of settings, including schools, hospitals, community organizations, and government agencies.
They utilize evidence-based practices, engage with stakeholders, and leverage the power of technology to deliver effective health education and disease prevention strategies.
With a deep understanding of human behavior and the social determinants of health, Health Educators play a crucial role in addressing public health challenges and enhancing the quality of life for all.
They may collaborate with healthcare providers, such as physicians who use equipment like the Seca 700 physician balance beam scale or the ActiGraph GT3X-plus activity monitor, to gather data and develop targeted interventions.
Health Educators also utilize various research tools and software, such as Polar S610 heart rate monitors, Atlas.ti v8 for qualitative data analysis, STATA v10 and SPSS Statistics 24 for statistical analysis, and TRC-NW8 for environmental monitoring.
These tools help them optimize their research protocols and enhance the reproducibility and accuracy of their findings.
PubCompare.ai can assist Health Educators by providing a platform to effortlessly locate and compare research protocols, enabling them to identify the most effective strategies and products for their work.
By leveraging artificial intelligence, the platform allows users to search through literature, pre-prints, and patents, and provides comprehensive comparisons to help Health Educators make informed decisions and improve their research outcomes.