The largest database of trusted experimental protocols
> Living Beings > Professional or Occupational Group > Patient Representatives

Patient Representatives

Patient Representatives are individuals who advocate for the interests and perspectives of patients in various healthcare settings.
They play a crucial role in ensuring that patient needs and preferences are taken into account during decision-making processes, such as the development of research protocols, the design of clinical trials, and the evaluation of healthcare services.
Patient Representatives serve as a vital link between patients and healthcare providers, promoting open communication, shared decision-making, and the incorporation of patient-centered outcomes.
Their involvement helps to enhance the reproducibility and relevance of research, ultimately leading to improved patient care and outcomes.
With the help of AI-driven platforms like PubCompare.ai, Patient Representatives can easily access and compare research protocols, ensuring that the best and most suitable approaches are adopted for the benefit of the patients they represent.

Most cited protocols related to «Patient Representatives»

Protocol full text hidden due to copyright restrictions

Open the protocol to access the free full text link

Publication 2010
Brachytherapy Patient Representatives Prostate Cancer Prostatectomy Radiotherapy

Protocol full text hidden due to copyright restrictions

Open the protocol to access the free full text link

Publication 2017
Childbirth Compulsive Behavior Diagnosis Health Insurance Hospitalization National Health Insurance National Health Programs Outpatients Patient Discharge Patient Representatives Patients

Protocol full text hidden due to copyright restrictions

Open the protocol to access the free full text link

Publication 2013
Acute Disease Adult Antibodies Autonomic Nervous System Disorders Child Cognition Cyclophosphamide Encephalitis Ethics Committees, Research Hypoventilation Immunotherapy Intravenous Immunoglobulins Memory Movement Disorders N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptors Neoplasms Patient Representatives Patients Physicians Plasmapheresis Puberty Relapse Rituximab Seizures Speech Steroids Youth
Enrollment for ACTT-1 began on February 21, 2020, and ended on April 19, 2020. There were 60 trial sites and 13 subsites in the United States (45 sites), Denmark (8), the United Kingdom (5), Greece (4), Germany (3), Korea (2), Mexico (2), Spain (2), Japan (1), and Singapore (1). Eligible patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either remdesivir or placebo. Randomization was stratified by study site and disease severity at enrollment. Patients were considered to have severe disease if they required mechanical ventilation, if they required supplemental oxygen, if the oxygen saturation as measured by pulse oximetry (Spo2) was 94% or lower while they were breathing ambient air, or if they had tachypnea (respiratory rate ≥24 breaths per minute). Remdesivir was administered intravenously as a 200-mg loading dose on day 1, followed by a 100-mg maintenance dose administered daily on days 2 through 10 or until hospital discharge or death. A matching placebo was administered according to the same schedule and in the same volume as the active drug. A normal saline placebo was used at the European sites and at some non-European sites owing to a shortage of matching placebo; for these sites, the remdesivir and placebo infusions were masked with an opaque bag and tubing covers to maintain blinding. All patients received supportive care according to the standard of care for the trial site hospital. If a hospital had a written policy or guideline for use of other treatments for Covid-19, patients could receive those treatments. In the absence of a written policy or guideline, other experimental treatment or off-label use of marketed medications intended as specific treatment for Covid-19 were prohibited from day 1 through day 29 (though such medications could have been used before enrollment in this trial).
The trial protocol was approved by the institutional review board at each site (or by a centralized institutional review board as applicable) and was overseen by an independent data and safety monitoring board. Written informed consent (or consent by other institutional review board-approved process) was obtained from each patient or from the patient’s legally authorized representative if the patient was unable to provide consent. Full details of the trial design, conduct, oversight, and analyses can be found in the protocol and statistical analysis plan (available with the full text of this article at NEJM.org).
Publication 2020
Clinical Trials Data Monitoring Committees COVID 19 Drug Labeling Ethics Committees, Research Europeans Mechanical Ventilation Normal Saline Oximetry, Pulse Oxygen Oxygen Saturation Patient Discharge Patient Representatives Patients Pharmaceutical Preparations Placebos remdesivir Respiratory Rate Saturation of Peripheral Oxygen Therapies, Investigational
Comprised of 33 members from 11 European countries and the USA, this EULAR Task Force included four patient representatives, 24 rheumatologists, an infectious disease specialist, a health economist and three fellows; care was taken to have a good representation of clinicians and experts experienced in RA clinical trials and their analysis from all European regions.
Initially, a Steering Group prioritised research questions and search terms for the three SLRs. These searches expanded and updated the available published information on efficacy of csDMARDs (as monotherapy or combination therapy, with and without glucocorticoids), efficacy of bDMARDs (as monotherapy or combined with csDMARDs) and safety aspects of csDMARDs and bDMARDs; treatment strategies were contained in the present SLRs rather than being separate as in 2010.7 (link) Although the SLRs informing the 2010 EULAR recommendations also included a search on economic evaluations,8 (link) the Steering Group felt that re-evaluation was not necessary because the approval status and price of new agents such as bsDMARDs was unknown.
Subsequently, with the help of their mentors, the three fellows performed the respective SLRs using established databases, including registry data for safety outcomes, and abstracts, especially from recent meetings (American College of Rheumatology 2012, EULAR 2012 and 2013). Details on and results of the SLRs are reported separately.13–15 (link) Levels of evidence and grades of recommendation were determined according to the standards of the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine.16
Publication 2013
Combined Modality Therapy Communicable Diseases Europeans Feelings Glucocorticoids Mentors Patient Representatives Rheumatologist Safety

Most recents protocols related to «Patient Representatives»

A convenience sampling strategy was used with emphasis on recruitment of underrepresented groups such as Black and Indigenous populations as well as participants with a low level of educational attainment to obtain a representative sample of patients and families in the NICU. Participants were contacted while their infants were admitted to the IWK Health NICU, through the IWK Health perinatal follow-up clinic, and through representatives of local and national Canadian Premature Babies Foundation parent partner organizations. Informed consent was obtained from each participant prior to their respective interviews. Participants with limited understanding of English were excluded. The study was conducted virtually using recorded video-conference interviews on the Zoom platform (Zoom Video Communications).
Full text: Click here
Publication 2023
Infant Natives Parent Patient Representatives Premature Birth
This observational, real-life study was conducted at the Bordeaux University Hospital, France. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki principles and approved by the South-West and Overseas Protection Committee (CPP) III. According to the law in force in France, the non-opposition of the patient and/or his legal representatives for patients under 18 years of age was obtained for the use of clinical data and lung function testing results which did not require the patients' informed consent.
The study included patients with confirmed CF (sweat chloride >60 mmol/L and/or CFTR gene mutations) followed at the paediatric or adult CF centres older than 5 years old, able to perform forced spirometry and using home spirometry in routine care between July 2015 and June 2021. Patients were included at the first use of the Spirobank smart® and were followed up for 6 months. At the beginning of the follow-up with the Spirobank smart®, patients were advised to perform at least 3 measurements per week for children (6–12 years) and teenagers (12–18 years), and at least one weekly measurement for adults. The advised number of measurements was chosen to fit with the number of respiratory physiotherapy sessions per week performed by patients (i.e., at least 3 times a week for children and at least once for adults). Children were also advised to be helped by their parents to performed home spirometry. The physiotherapists were encouraged to remind and/or to help patients to use the device during respiratory physiotherapy sessions.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2023
Adolescent Adult CFTR protein, human Child Chlorides Medical Devices Mutation Parent Patient Representatives Patients Physical Therapist Respiratory Rate Spirometry Sweat Therapy, Physical
This study was commissioned by the National Health Care Institute, who, amongst others, encourages good healthcare by helping all parties involved to continually improve healthcare quality. This study is part of a larger study for which a steering committee was established. The ten members of the steering committee were purposively selected based on their expertise in the PCC or primary care field and were primary care practitioners, senior researchers, medical specialists, policy makers, patient’s representatives (specifically concerning patients with limited (health-)literacy and a migrant background) (see Acknowledgements). Several meetings with the steering committee were held during the study (February 2018, December 2018, April 2019, December 2019). These meetings were held with the objective to provide feedback and guidance on the methods, the interpretation of (interim) results, and providing overall advice regarding the research. Stakeholder perspectives were considered when testing and refining the PT derived from the RRR. Members of the steering committee were asked to discuss, and to indicate if the identified items on context, mechanisms and outcomes in the literature match with what they see in Dutch practice.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2023
ARID1A protein, human Committee Members Health Literacy Migrants Patient Representatives Patients Policy Makers Primary Health Care Quality of Health Care
In this qualitative study, four focus group discussions (FGDs) were held with the objective to encourage group interaction between participants and to explore and clarify individual and shared perspectives [29 ]. FGD 3 and 4 were combined with a Delphi-study. The four FGDs were held with different stakeholders to validate the findings from the international RRR for the Dutch setting. A FGD lasted approximately 90 minutes. All FGDs were held at a neutral place that participants already knew (i.e., at a research organisation), and where they felt comfortable. Participants of FGD 1 and 2 were patient representatives and patients with limited health literacy skills. Participants of FGD 3 and 4 were various primary care professionals. Due to the different target groups, a target group-specific approach was used. The different approaches are explained in more detail below.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2023
ARID1A protein, human Feelings Health Literacy Patient Representatives Patients Primary Health Care
A 23 factorial trial design was used, with participants randomised evenly across the eight conditions (that is, minimisation) by the survey platform Qualtrics. All vignettes described a hypothetical scenario where a clinical geneticist recommends that the GP prescribes aspirin to a patient with LS (Supplementary Information S1). Three factors were manipulated to form the eight conditions (Box 1). These factors were selected and designed using the authors’ interview data with UK healthcare providers and people with LS (preregistered: https://osf.io/3efg7), the Theoretical Domains Framework,10 (link) existing evidence,5 (link),7 ,11 (link) and expert opinion from healthcare professionals and a patient representative. The three factors were:

NICE guidance (NG151) recommending aspirin for people with LS4 (versus no information);

results from the CAPP2 trial investigating the effectiveness of aspirin for people with LS3 (link) (versus no information); and

information comparing the risks and benefits of aspirin8 (versus no information).

Participant blinding was not possible, but participants were only informed about the three factors across the vignettes after survey completion.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2023
Aspirin Health Care Professionals Patient Representatives Patients

Top products related to «Patient Representatives»

Sourced in United States, Austria, Japan, Belgium, United Kingdom, Cameroon, China, Denmark, Canada, Israel, New Caledonia, Germany, Poland, India, France, Ireland, Australia
SAS 9.4 is an integrated software suite for advanced analytics, data management, and business intelligence. It provides a comprehensive platform for data analysis, modeling, and reporting. SAS 9.4 offers a wide range of capabilities, including data manipulation, statistical analysis, predictive modeling, and visual data exploration.
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom, Germany, Canada, Japan, Sweden, Austria, Morocco, Switzerland, Australia, Belgium, Italy, Netherlands, China, France, Denmark, Norway, Hungary, Malaysia, Israel, Finland, Spain
MATLAB is a high-performance programming language and numerical computing environment used for scientific and engineering calculations, data analysis, and visualization. It provides a comprehensive set of tools for solving complex mathematical and computational problems.
Sourced in United States, Japan, United Kingdom, Austria, Canada, Germany, Poland, Belgium, Lao People's Democratic Republic, China, Switzerland, Sweden, Finland, Spain, France
GraphPad Prism 7 is a data analysis and graphing software. It provides tools for data organization, curve fitting, statistical analysis, and visualization. Prism 7 supports a variety of data types and file formats, enabling users to create high-quality scientific graphs and publications.
Sourced in Germany, United States, Australia, United Kingdom, Sweden
The Leica Bond Max is an automated slide stainer for immunohistochemistry and in-situ hybridization. It features a modular design and can be customized to meet individual laboratory requirements.
Sourced in Canada
SliceOmatic Software version 5.0 is a lab equipment product designed for image processing and analysis. It provides core functionalities for visualizing, segmenting, and quantifying 2D and 3D images. The software supports a variety of file formats and enables users to perform essential image processing tasks.
Sourced in United States
MySQL is a relational database management system (RDBMS) that provides robust data storage and management capabilities. It enables users to create, modify, and query structured data efficiently. MySQL serves as a core component in a wide range of applications and software solutions, offering a reliable and scalable platform for data-driven initiatives.
Sourced in United States, Japan, Germany, United Kingdom, Belgium, Austria, Spain
SPSS Statistics 24 is a software package used for statistical analysis. It provides a comprehensive set of tools for data management, analysis, and presentation. The software is designed to handle a wide range of data types and offers a user-friendly interface for conducting various statistical procedures.
Sourced in Japan, United States
The DP73 is a digital microscope camera designed for high-performance imaging applications. It features a 12.8-megapixel CMOS sensor and supports a wide range of image capture and processing capabilities.
Sourced in United States, Germany, Canada, China, France, United Kingdom, Japan, Netherlands, Italy, Spain, Australia, Belgium, Denmark, Switzerland, Singapore, Sweden, Ireland, Lithuania, Austria, Poland, Morocco, Hong Kong, India
The Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer is a lab instrument that provides automated analysis of DNA, RNA, and protein samples. It uses microfluidic technology to separate and detect these biomolecules with high sensitivity and resolution.
Sourced in United States, China, United Kingdom, Germany, Australia, Japan, Canada, Italy, France, Switzerland, New Zealand, Brazil, Belgium, India, Spain, Israel, Austria, Poland, Ireland, Sweden, Macao, Netherlands, Denmark, Cameroon, Singapore, Portugal, Argentina, Holy See (Vatican City State), Morocco, Uruguay, Mexico, Thailand, Sao Tome and Principe, Hungary, Panama, Hong Kong, Norway, United Arab Emirates, Czechia, Russian Federation, Chile, Moldova, Republic of, Gabon, Palestine, State of, Saudi Arabia, Senegal
Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) is a cell culture supplement derived from the blood of bovine fetuses. FBS provides a source of proteins, growth factors, and other components that support the growth and maintenance of various cell types in in vitro cell culture applications.

More about "Patient Representatives"

Patient Advocates, Patient Liaisons, Patient Advisors, Patient Navigators, Patient Stakeholders, Patient Engagement Specialists, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Clinical Trial Design, Healthcare Policy, Medical Research, Evidence-Based Medicine, Data-Driven Decision Making, SAS 9.4, MATLAB, GraphPad Prism 7, Leica Bond Max, SliceOmatic Software 5.0, MySQL, SPSS Statistics 24, DP73 Camera, Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer, FBS.
Patient Representatives are crucial intermediaries between patients and healthcare providers, ensuring that patient needs, preferences, and perspectives are fully represented in various decision-making processes.
They advocate for patients, promote open communication, and facilitate shared decision-making, ultimately enhancing the relevance and reproducibility of medical research.
With the help of advanced AI-driven platforms like PubCompare.ai, Patient Representatives can easily access and compare research protocols, enabling them to identify the best and most suitable approaches for the benefit of the patients they represent.
This data-driven approach empowers Patient Representatives to optimize research protocols, leading to improved patient care and outcomes.
By leveraging tools like SAS 9.4, MATLAB, GraphPad Prism 7, and others, Patient Representatives can delve into medical data, analyze trends, and make informed decisions that prioritize patient-centered outcomes.
The involvement of Patient Representatives in the healthcare system helps to ensure that research is conducted in a more reproducible and relevant manner, ultimately contributing to the advancement of evidence-based medicine and the delivery of high-quality, patient-centric care.